SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) questions witnesses during a U.S. House Foreign Affairs' Committee's Africa, Global Health, Global Human Rights, and International Organizations Subcommittee hearing on Capitol Hill May 16, 2019. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Demanding 'Full Accountability,' Lawmakers Call for Probe Into Claims ICE Gave Muslim Detainees a Choice: Spoiled Food or Pork
"This is the latest betrayal of religious liberty by Trump and a reminder of the inhumanity of ICE detention."
Sep 01, 2020
Following multiple reports that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) employees offered Muslim detainees the choice between expired food and pork dishes, lawmakers Monday called on the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees the agency, to investigate.
"It is unconscionable Muslim ICE detainees were reportedly forced to choose between eating pork or rotten halal food," Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) said in a tweet Monday. "This is the latest betrayal of religious liberty by Trump and a reminder of the inhumanity of ICE detention."
In the letter signed by Omar, Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), Rep. Andre Carson (D-Ind.), and 26 other U.S. House members, the lawmakers cite a previous letter from Muslim Advocates and Americans for Immigrant Justice last month that called for an investigation into what the groups called an "unlawful pattern of religious discrimination" at the Krome Service Processing Center in Miami.
The advocacy groups wrote in their letter that "during the pandemic, ICE officers at Krome have repeatedly served pork or pork-based products to Muslim detainees, contrary to the detainees' sincerely held religious belief that they are forbidden from consuming pork."
Citing a history of allegations of detainee rights violations, the coalition of congressional representatives asked DHS to investigate not only the Krome facility, but any facility with "significant numbers of detainees requiring religious accommodations," and to give a list of those facilities "including the numbers of detainees requiring religious accommodations, disaggregated by religion, at each of them."
According to HuffPost, ICE has denied the allegations, telling the news outlet, "Performance-Based National Detention Standards cover all aspects of detention to include reasonable accommodation of religious dietary practices."
In a press release in August, Muslim Advocates--who, in February 2019 sued the Florida ICE facility for violating detainees' religious rights--shared an image of expired food labels obtained from a detainee at the Krome facility, and noted in their letter to officials that detainees who ate the expired food experienced "stomach pain, vomiting, and diarrhea."
Lawmakers pointed to these reports and others in their request Monday:
The allegations that Muslim detainees were given a "choice" to violate their religious tenets by eating pork, or offered spoiled halal food as a substitute, are outlined in detail in a letter sent to your office by Muslim Advocates on August 18, 2020. While ICE has publicly denied the allegations, every aspect of the allegations has documented precedent. Given the history of religious freedom violations across ICE detention facilities, including violations affecting Muslim, Catholic, Jewish, and Hindu detainees we find the allegations of targeted violations of Muslim civil rights to be credible.
Furthermore, given a history of dangerously poor food quality in ICE detention facilities, including those enumerated in a February, 2019 DHS Office of the Inspector General report regarding the detention facility in Essex, New Jersey, we find the allegation that the "reasonable accommodation" provided to detainees at Krome may have included spoiled religiously compliant food alternatives to be credible.
As you are no doubt aware, forcing Muslim detainees to choose between eating pork and eating spoiled halal food would be a clear violation of ICE's 2011 Performance-Based National Detention Standards. They would also be clear violations of the civil rights and civil liberties of Muslim detainees.
Journalist and podcast host Phillip Picardi noted systemic issues surrounding ICE's treatment of detainees is bigger than the latest complaint. Tweeting excerpts of a podcast titled "Why Are Muslims Starving in ICE Detention," Picardi cited Nimra Azimi, an attorney for Muslim Advocates:
Picardi also interviewed immigration reporter Aura Bogado, who said the misinformed notion that ICE detainees are criminals adds to their mistreatment. "There's an automatic notion that people [in ICE custody] are serving hard time," Bogado told Picardi.
"People in immigrant detention are being held on civil matters--there's no alleged crime. You yourself are not a crime for existing," Bogado said.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Following multiple reports that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) employees offered Muslim detainees the choice between expired food and pork dishes, lawmakers Monday called on the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees the agency, to investigate.
"It is unconscionable Muslim ICE detainees were reportedly forced to choose between eating pork or rotten halal food," Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) said in a tweet Monday. "This is the latest betrayal of religious liberty by Trump and a reminder of the inhumanity of ICE detention."
In the letter signed by Omar, Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), Rep. Andre Carson (D-Ind.), and 26 other U.S. House members, the lawmakers cite a previous letter from Muslim Advocates and Americans for Immigrant Justice last month that called for an investigation into what the groups called an "unlawful pattern of religious discrimination" at the Krome Service Processing Center in Miami.
The advocacy groups wrote in their letter that "during the pandemic, ICE officers at Krome have repeatedly served pork or pork-based products to Muslim detainees, contrary to the detainees' sincerely held religious belief that they are forbidden from consuming pork."
Citing a history of allegations of detainee rights violations, the coalition of congressional representatives asked DHS to investigate not only the Krome facility, but any facility with "significant numbers of detainees requiring religious accommodations," and to give a list of those facilities "including the numbers of detainees requiring religious accommodations, disaggregated by religion, at each of them."
According to HuffPost, ICE has denied the allegations, telling the news outlet, "Performance-Based National Detention Standards cover all aspects of detention to include reasonable accommodation of religious dietary practices."
In a press release in August, Muslim Advocates--who, in February 2019 sued the Florida ICE facility for violating detainees' religious rights--shared an image of expired food labels obtained from a detainee at the Krome facility, and noted in their letter to officials that detainees who ate the expired food experienced "stomach pain, vomiting, and diarrhea."
Lawmakers pointed to these reports and others in their request Monday:
The allegations that Muslim detainees were given a "choice" to violate their religious tenets by eating pork, or offered spoiled halal food as a substitute, are outlined in detail in a letter sent to your office by Muslim Advocates on August 18, 2020. While ICE has publicly denied the allegations, every aspect of the allegations has documented precedent. Given the history of religious freedom violations across ICE detention facilities, including violations affecting Muslim, Catholic, Jewish, and Hindu detainees we find the allegations of targeted violations of Muslim civil rights to be credible.
Furthermore, given a history of dangerously poor food quality in ICE detention facilities, including those enumerated in a February, 2019 DHS Office of the Inspector General report regarding the detention facility in Essex, New Jersey, we find the allegation that the "reasonable accommodation" provided to detainees at Krome may have included spoiled religiously compliant food alternatives to be credible.
As you are no doubt aware, forcing Muslim detainees to choose between eating pork and eating spoiled halal food would be a clear violation of ICE's 2011 Performance-Based National Detention Standards. They would also be clear violations of the civil rights and civil liberties of Muslim detainees.
Journalist and podcast host Phillip Picardi noted systemic issues surrounding ICE's treatment of detainees is bigger than the latest complaint. Tweeting excerpts of a podcast titled "Why Are Muslims Starving in ICE Detention," Picardi cited Nimra Azimi, an attorney for Muslim Advocates:
Picardi also interviewed immigration reporter Aura Bogado, who said the misinformed notion that ICE detainees are criminals adds to their mistreatment. "There's an automatic notion that people [in ICE custody] are serving hard time," Bogado told Picardi.
"People in immigrant detention are being held on civil matters--there's no alleged crime. You yourself are not a crime for existing," Bogado said.
Following multiple reports that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) employees offered Muslim detainees the choice between expired food and pork dishes, lawmakers Monday called on the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees the agency, to investigate.
"It is unconscionable Muslim ICE detainees were reportedly forced to choose between eating pork or rotten halal food," Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) said in a tweet Monday. "This is the latest betrayal of religious liberty by Trump and a reminder of the inhumanity of ICE detention."
In the letter signed by Omar, Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), Rep. Andre Carson (D-Ind.), and 26 other U.S. House members, the lawmakers cite a previous letter from Muslim Advocates and Americans for Immigrant Justice last month that called for an investigation into what the groups called an "unlawful pattern of religious discrimination" at the Krome Service Processing Center in Miami.
The advocacy groups wrote in their letter that "during the pandemic, ICE officers at Krome have repeatedly served pork or pork-based products to Muslim detainees, contrary to the detainees' sincerely held religious belief that they are forbidden from consuming pork."
Citing a history of allegations of detainee rights violations, the coalition of congressional representatives asked DHS to investigate not only the Krome facility, but any facility with "significant numbers of detainees requiring religious accommodations," and to give a list of those facilities "including the numbers of detainees requiring religious accommodations, disaggregated by religion, at each of them."
According to HuffPost, ICE has denied the allegations, telling the news outlet, "Performance-Based National Detention Standards cover all aspects of detention to include reasonable accommodation of religious dietary practices."
In a press release in August, Muslim Advocates--who, in February 2019 sued the Florida ICE facility for violating detainees' religious rights--shared an image of expired food labels obtained from a detainee at the Krome facility, and noted in their letter to officials that detainees who ate the expired food experienced "stomach pain, vomiting, and diarrhea."
Lawmakers pointed to these reports and others in their request Monday:
The allegations that Muslim detainees were given a "choice" to violate their religious tenets by eating pork, or offered spoiled halal food as a substitute, are outlined in detail in a letter sent to your office by Muslim Advocates on August 18, 2020. While ICE has publicly denied the allegations, every aspect of the allegations has documented precedent. Given the history of religious freedom violations across ICE detention facilities, including violations affecting Muslim, Catholic, Jewish, and Hindu detainees we find the allegations of targeted violations of Muslim civil rights to be credible.
Furthermore, given a history of dangerously poor food quality in ICE detention facilities, including those enumerated in a February, 2019 DHS Office of the Inspector General report regarding the detention facility in Essex, New Jersey, we find the allegation that the "reasonable accommodation" provided to detainees at Krome may have included spoiled religiously compliant food alternatives to be credible.
As you are no doubt aware, forcing Muslim detainees to choose between eating pork and eating spoiled halal food would be a clear violation of ICE's 2011 Performance-Based National Detention Standards. They would also be clear violations of the civil rights and civil liberties of Muslim detainees.
Journalist and podcast host Phillip Picardi noted systemic issues surrounding ICE's treatment of detainees is bigger than the latest complaint. Tweeting excerpts of a podcast titled "Why Are Muslims Starving in ICE Detention," Picardi cited Nimra Azimi, an attorney for Muslim Advocates:
Picardi also interviewed immigration reporter Aura Bogado, who said the misinformed notion that ICE detainees are criminals adds to their mistreatment. "There's an automatic notion that people [in ICE custody] are serving hard time," Bogado told Picardi.
"People in immigrant detention are being held on civil matters--there's no alleged crime. You yourself are not a crime for existing," Bogado said.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.