Trump to Fossil Fuel Execs: 'You Will Like Me So Much'
Republican presidential candidate's comments at industry conference show he "would be a belligerent catalyst of catastrophic climate change if he were elected president."
The same day as a new report highlighted the carbon emissions calamity that would accompany new fossil fuel extraction, Donald Trump promised an audience of fossil fuel executives that is the very agenda he would pursue if elected to the White House.
"Oh, you will like me so much," the Republican presidential candidate said in his address to the Shale Insight conference in Pittsburgh on Thursday.
He promised to lift regulations, open up more federal lands for fossil fuel extraction--including coal and fracking--and ease the way for new fossil fuel infrastructure projects including pipelines.
Trump said he would get rid of "all unnecessary regulations, and [place] a temporary moratorium on new regulations not compelled by Congress or public safety." He also called anti-coal regulations "unfair to our people and our workers."
New fossil fuel projects the executives would like to advance would be no problem under a Trump presidency, he said. "If I'm president, they'll happen quickly. You'll be amazed how quickly," he said.
Reacting on Thursday to Trump's agenda, Rhea Suh, president of Natural Resources Defense Council, called it a "a wish list for big polluters" that "would be a nightmare for our communities and climate."
Trump "would be a belligerent catalyst of catastrophic climate change if he were elected president."Greenpeace USA spokesperson Cassady Sharp offered scathing remarks following the speech, saying that "Trump proved again that he is an unfit leader with no grasp on reality" who sang "the praises of a dangerous energy extraction process that threatens the health and safety of families and communities all over this country, and promis[ed] to slash critical regulations and the EPA [Environmental Protection Agency]."
"This man has no business dealing with America's energy policy, and he would be a belligerent catalyst of catastrophic climate change if he were elected president," Sharp added.
Among those helping to shape that energy policy is fracking billionaire Harold Hamm, whose presence in the audience Trump welcomed.
Mark Floegel, research director with Greenpeace USA, describes Hamm as
a climate-denying serial liar who made his billions at the expense of the Earth and its people. A genuine (as opposed to merely asserted) billionaire, Hamm is the 13th child of a cotton sharecropper who worked his way up through the oil business and whose company--Continental Resources--now controls much of the carbon-rich Bakken Formation in North Dakota.
Trump also boasted in his speech that this energy plan would "make America wealthy again" including boasting GDP by $100 billion and helping to create so many jobs that "All of the workers that are being put to work, they are going to love Donald Trump." CNBC, however, countered his assertions, writing that "the windfalls Trump touts fail to take into account the real reason the coal industry is struggling, and originate from an industry-linked report whose findings rely on a forecasting model that often overstates the economic benefits of drilling, according to economists who study U.S. shale oil and gas."
The White House hopeful last week released his energy agenda, which, as Common Dreams reported, includes "slashing corporate tax rates; scrapping regulations, such as the Waters of the U.S. Rule (pdf) and the Clean Power Plan; lifting restrictions on all sources of American energy, including the dirtiest fossil fuels and offshore deposits; and 'streamlin[ing] the permitting process for all energy infrastructure projects,' like highly-controversial pipelines."
Sierra Club political director Khalid Pitts denounced the policies as amounting to a "dumpster fire," and called the former reality TV star "the worst candidate for our climate and our environment in history."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just hours left in our Spring Campaign, we're still falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The same day as a new report highlighted the carbon emissions calamity that would accompany new fossil fuel extraction, Donald Trump promised an audience of fossil fuel executives that is the very agenda he would pursue if elected to the White House.
"Oh, you will like me so much," the Republican presidential candidate said in his address to the Shale Insight conference in Pittsburgh on Thursday.
He promised to lift regulations, open up more federal lands for fossil fuel extraction--including coal and fracking--and ease the way for new fossil fuel infrastructure projects including pipelines.
Trump said he would get rid of "all unnecessary regulations, and [place] a temporary moratorium on new regulations not compelled by Congress or public safety." He also called anti-coal regulations "unfair to our people and our workers."
New fossil fuel projects the executives would like to advance would be no problem under a Trump presidency, he said. "If I'm president, they'll happen quickly. You'll be amazed how quickly," he said.
Reacting on Thursday to Trump's agenda, Rhea Suh, president of Natural Resources Defense Council, called it a "a wish list for big polluters" that "would be a nightmare for our communities and climate."
Trump "would be a belligerent catalyst of catastrophic climate change if he were elected president."Greenpeace USA spokesperson Cassady Sharp offered scathing remarks following the speech, saying that "Trump proved again that he is an unfit leader with no grasp on reality" who sang "the praises of a dangerous energy extraction process that threatens the health and safety of families and communities all over this country, and promis[ed] to slash critical regulations and the EPA [Environmental Protection Agency]."
"This man has no business dealing with America's energy policy, and he would be a belligerent catalyst of catastrophic climate change if he were elected president," Sharp added.
Among those helping to shape that energy policy is fracking billionaire Harold Hamm, whose presence in the audience Trump welcomed.
Mark Floegel, research director with Greenpeace USA, describes Hamm as
a climate-denying serial liar who made his billions at the expense of the Earth and its people. A genuine (as opposed to merely asserted) billionaire, Hamm is the 13th child of a cotton sharecropper who worked his way up through the oil business and whose company--Continental Resources--now controls much of the carbon-rich Bakken Formation in North Dakota.
Trump also boasted in his speech that this energy plan would "make America wealthy again" including boasting GDP by $100 billion and helping to create so many jobs that "All of the workers that are being put to work, they are going to love Donald Trump." CNBC, however, countered his assertions, writing that "the windfalls Trump touts fail to take into account the real reason the coal industry is struggling, and originate from an industry-linked report whose findings rely on a forecasting model that often overstates the economic benefits of drilling, according to economists who study U.S. shale oil and gas."
The White House hopeful last week released his energy agenda, which, as Common Dreams reported, includes "slashing corporate tax rates; scrapping regulations, such as the Waters of the U.S. Rule (pdf) and the Clean Power Plan; lifting restrictions on all sources of American energy, including the dirtiest fossil fuels and offshore deposits; and 'streamlin[ing] the permitting process for all energy infrastructure projects,' like highly-controversial pipelines."
Sierra Club political director Khalid Pitts denounced the policies as amounting to a "dumpster fire," and called the former reality TV star "the worst candidate for our climate and our environment in history."
The same day as a new report highlighted the carbon emissions calamity that would accompany new fossil fuel extraction, Donald Trump promised an audience of fossil fuel executives that is the very agenda he would pursue if elected to the White House.
"Oh, you will like me so much," the Republican presidential candidate said in his address to the Shale Insight conference in Pittsburgh on Thursday.
He promised to lift regulations, open up more federal lands for fossil fuel extraction--including coal and fracking--and ease the way for new fossil fuel infrastructure projects including pipelines.
Trump said he would get rid of "all unnecessary regulations, and [place] a temporary moratorium on new regulations not compelled by Congress or public safety." He also called anti-coal regulations "unfair to our people and our workers."
New fossil fuel projects the executives would like to advance would be no problem under a Trump presidency, he said. "If I'm president, they'll happen quickly. You'll be amazed how quickly," he said.
Reacting on Thursday to Trump's agenda, Rhea Suh, president of Natural Resources Defense Council, called it a "a wish list for big polluters" that "would be a nightmare for our communities and climate."
Trump "would be a belligerent catalyst of catastrophic climate change if he were elected president."Greenpeace USA spokesperson Cassady Sharp offered scathing remarks following the speech, saying that "Trump proved again that he is an unfit leader with no grasp on reality" who sang "the praises of a dangerous energy extraction process that threatens the health and safety of families and communities all over this country, and promis[ed] to slash critical regulations and the EPA [Environmental Protection Agency]."
"This man has no business dealing with America's energy policy, and he would be a belligerent catalyst of catastrophic climate change if he were elected president," Sharp added.
Among those helping to shape that energy policy is fracking billionaire Harold Hamm, whose presence in the audience Trump welcomed.
Mark Floegel, research director with Greenpeace USA, describes Hamm as
a climate-denying serial liar who made his billions at the expense of the Earth and its people. A genuine (as opposed to merely asserted) billionaire, Hamm is the 13th child of a cotton sharecropper who worked his way up through the oil business and whose company--Continental Resources--now controls much of the carbon-rich Bakken Formation in North Dakota.
Trump also boasted in his speech that this energy plan would "make America wealthy again" including boasting GDP by $100 billion and helping to create so many jobs that "All of the workers that are being put to work, they are going to love Donald Trump." CNBC, however, countered his assertions, writing that "the windfalls Trump touts fail to take into account the real reason the coal industry is struggling, and originate from an industry-linked report whose findings rely on a forecasting model that often overstates the economic benefits of drilling, according to economists who study U.S. shale oil and gas."
The White House hopeful last week released his energy agenda, which, as Common Dreams reported, includes "slashing corporate tax rates; scrapping regulations, such as the Waters of the U.S. Rule (pdf) and the Clean Power Plan; lifting restrictions on all sources of American energy, including the dirtiest fossil fuels and offshore deposits; and 'streamlin[ing] the permitting process for all energy infrastructure projects,' like highly-controversial pipelines."
Sierra Club political director Khalid Pitts denounced the policies as amounting to a "dumpster fire," and called the former reality TV star "the worst candidate for our climate and our environment in history."