The House on Friday voted to allow families of 9/11 victims to sue Saudi Arabia for any role in the attacks. (Photo: Glyn Lowe/cc/flickr)
Sep 09, 2016
The U.S. House of Representatives on Friday overwhelmingly voted to allow families of 9/11 victims to sue nations, including Saudi Arabia, for any role their government may have played in the terrorist attacks.
As the New York Timesexplains,
The bill addresses a 1976 law that gives foreign nations broad immunity from American lawsuits by amending it to allow for nations to be sued in federal courts if they are found to have played any role in terrorist attacks that killed Americans on home soil. It also allows Americans to direct financial damage claims against those who funded the attacks.
The bill, which passed the Senate in May, now heads to President Obama, who has signaled he will veto the legislation.
In April, White House press secretary Josh Earnest said, "It could put the United States and our taxpayers and our service members and our diplomats at significant risk if other countries were to adopt a similar law," adding, "The whole notion of sovereign immunity is at stake."
Obama, for his part, said in April, "If we open up the possibility that individuals and the United States can routinely start suing other governments, then we are also opening up the United States to being continually sued by individuals in other countries." That, according to some observers, reflected the fear that the legislation could make U.S. officials the subject of lawsuits over drone strikes.
As Reutersreports, "If Obama carries out that threat and the required two-thirds of both the Republican-majority House and Senate still support the bill, it would be the first time since Obama's presidency began in 2009 that Congress had overridden a veto."
ThinkProgresswrites that the House vote sets off "a diplomatic nightmare for President Barack Obama," as "[t]he legislation is sure to antagonize a key U.S. ally in the Middle East which already has tense relations with the administration."
Still, as Reutersreported this week, "Obama's administration has offered Saudi Arabia more than $115 billion in weapons, other military equipment and training, the most of any U.S. administration in the 71-year U.S.-Saudi alliance."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The U.S. House of Representatives on Friday overwhelmingly voted to allow families of 9/11 victims to sue nations, including Saudi Arabia, for any role their government may have played in the terrorist attacks.
As the New York Timesexplains,
The bill addresses a 1976 law that gives foreign nations broad immunity from American lawsuits by amending it to allow for nations to be sued in federal courts if they are found to have played any role in terrorist attacks that killed Americans on home soil. It also allows Americans to direct financial damage claims against those who funded the attacks.
The bill, which passed the Senate in May, now heads to President Obama, who has signaled he will veto the legislation.
In April, White House press secretary Josh Earnest said, "It could put the United States and our taxpayers and our service members and our diplomats at significant risk if other countries were to adopt a similar law," adding, "The whole notion of sovereign immunity is at stake."
Obama, for his part, said in April, "If we open up the possibility that individuals and the United States can routinely start suing other governments, then we are also opening up the United States to being continually sued by individuals in other countries." That, according to some observers, reflected the fear that the legislation could make U.S. officials the subject of lawsuits over drone strikes.
As Reutersreports, "If Obama carries out that threat and the required two-thirds of both the Republican-majority House and Senate still support the bill, it would be the first time since Obama's presidency began in 2009 that Congress had overridden a veto."
ThinkProgresswrites that the House vote sets off "a diplomatic nightmare for President Barack Obama," as "[t]he legislation is sure to antagonize a key U.S. ally in the Middle East which already has tense relations with the administration."
Still, as Reutersreported this week, "Obama's administration has offered Saudi Arabia more than $115 billion in weapons, other military equipment and training, the most of any U.S. administration in the 71-year U.S.-Saudi alliance."
The U.S. House of Representatives on Friday overwhelmingly voted to allow families of 9/11 victims to sue nations, including Saudi Arabia, for any role their government may have played in the terrorist attacks.
As the New York Timesexplains,
The bill addresses a 1976 law that gives foreign nations broad immunity from American lawsuits by amending it to allow for nations to be sued in federal courts if they are found to have played any role in terrorist attacks that killed Americans on home soil. It also allows Americans to direct financial damage claims against those who funded the attacks.
The bill, which passed the Senate in May, now heads to President Obama, who has signaled he will veto the legislation.
In April, White House press secretary Josh Earnest said, "It could put the United States and our taxpayers and our service members and our diplomats at significant risk if other countries were to adopt a similar law," adding, "The whole notion of sovereign immunity is at stake."
Obama, for his part, said in April, "If we open up the possibility that individuals and the United States can routinely start suing other governments, then we are also opening up the United States to being continually sued by individuals in other countries." That, according to some observers, reflected the fear that the legislation could make U.S. officials the subject of lawsuits over drone strikes.
As Reutersreports, "If Obama carries out that threat and the required two-thirds of both the Republican-majority House and Senate still support the bill, it would be the first time since Obama's presidency began in 2009 that Congress had overridden a veto."
ThinkProgresswrites that the House vote sets off "a diplomatic nightmare for President Barack Obama," as "[t]he legislation is sure to antagonize a key U.S. ally in the Middle East which already has tense relations with the administration."
Still, as Reutersreported this week, "Obama's administration has offered Saudi Arabia more than $115 billion in weapons, other military equipment and training, the most of any U.S. administration in the 71-year U.S.-Saudi alliance."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.