New Study Offers More Evidence Dems Need to Fight for Medicare-for-All
'Our findings dramatize the urgent need for national health insurance—a single-payer reform with first-dollar coverage—that would assure that all Americans can get the care they need'
Buoying single-payer advocates' call for system that covers everyone and underscoring the nation's inequality, a new study finds that the wealthiest Americans are the ones receiving the most healthcare.
Published Thursday in health policy journal Health Affairs, the findings show a reversal of a decades-long trend of more equality in healthcare that follwed the 1965 passage of Medicare and Medicaid.
The researchers used data from 22 national surveys conducted between 1963 and 2012, and divided the population into income quintiles. The wealthiest group contained those with an income of $101,094 for a family of three, and the poorest quintile had family incomes below $22,689.
Though medical spending overall slowed between 2004 and 2012, the different income groups showed vastly different spending. The results suggest "that a redistribution of care toward wealthier Americans accompanied the health spending slowdown," the study's abstract states.
Beginning in 2004, the study found, health spending fell for the poorest quintile, but rose for the wealthiest group. In fact, from 2004-2012, expenditures for the wealthiest--a group that already tends to be healthier--rose nearly 20 percent. That's 57 percent more than the growth of the middle-income groups. The poorest, meanwhile, had a 3.7 percent drop in health spending.
The authors note that the disparity was not reflected in the elderly, a group widely covered by Medicare.
A contributing factor to the healthcare inequality, the authors say, were rising costs of co-payments and higher deductibles.
"In recent years," lead author Dr. Samuel Dickman, who conducted his research at Harvard Medical School, said in a statement, "economists have celebrated a slowdown in healthcare cost growth. But the slowdown seems to have been achieved by forcing poor and middle-class Americans to choose between paying rent, buying groceries, or going to the doctor when they're sick."
"Our overall life expectancy is falling further and further behind nations that distribute care based on need, not wealth."
--Dr. David HimmelsteinFor senior author Dr. David Himmelstein, a professor at the City University of New York at Hunter College and lecturer at Harvard Medical School, the study offers yet more evidence of the need for a single-payer system.
"While poor and middle-class patients are skipping vital care, the wealthy are getting unnecessary and even harmful care," he said in a press statement. "And the widening inequalities in healthcare are reflected in rising inequality in death rates. Meanwhile, our overall life expectancy is falling further and further behind nations that distribute care based on need, not wealth."
"Our findings dramatize the urgent need for national health insurance--a single-payer reform with first-dollar coverage--that would assure that all Americans can get the care they need," Himmelstein continued.
Such reform has the backing of the National Nurses United.
The union is holding a press conference Friday in Orlando, Florida, where the full Democratic Platform Committee will be meeting to finalize the language it will present at the convention later this month in Philadelphia.
The drafting committee's decision last month to reject a proposal to place a commitment to "figh for Medicare-for-all" in the party's platform was a mistake, the nurses union said, and it's urging the committee to put such a promise in the platform thereby fulfilling its obligation to fight for coverage for all.
"While the Affordable Care Act has implemented some important improvements, the law has still left for too many behind," NNU Executive Director RoseAnn DeMoro writes in a commentary in the Orlando Sentinel. "Guaranteed healthcare" through an improved Medicare- for-all/single-payer system "must be a uniform, national obligation that the Democratic Party makes a priority."
FINAL DAY! This is urgent.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just hours left in our Spring Campaign, we're still falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Buoying single-payer advocates' call for system that covers everyone and underscoring the nation's inequality, a new study finds that the wealthiest Americans are the ones receiving the most healthcare.
Published Thursday in health policy journal Health Affairs, the findings show a reversal of a decades-long trend of more equality in healthcare that follwed the 1965 passage of Medicare and Medicaid.
The researchers used data from 22 national surveys conducted between 1963 and 2012, and divided the population into income quintiles. The wealthiest group contained those with an income of $101,094 for a family of three, and the poorest quintile had family incomes below $22,689.
Though medical spending overall slowed between 2004 and 2012, the different income groups showed vastly different spending. The results suggest "that a redistribution of care toward wealthier Americans accompanied the health spending slowdown," the study's abstract states.
Beginning in 2004, the study found, health spending fell for the poorest quintile, but rose for the wealthiest group. In fact, from 2004-2012, expenditures for the wealthiest--a group that already tends to be healthier--rose nearly 20 percent. That's 57 percent more than the growth of the middle-income groups. The poorest, meanwhile, had a 3.7 percent drop in health spending.
The authors note that the disparity was not reflected in the elderly, a group widely covered by Medicare.
A contributing factor to the healthcare inequality, the authors say, were rising costs of co-payments and higher deductibles.
"In recent years," lead author Dr. Samuel Dickman, who conducted his research at Harvard Medical School, said in a statement, "economists have celebrated a slowdown in healthcare cost growth. But the slowdown seems to have been achieved by forcing poor and middle-class Americans to choose between paying rent, buying groceries, or going to the doctor when they're sick."
"Our overall life expectancy is falling further and further behind nations that distribute care based on need, not wealth."
--Dr. David HimmelsteinFor senior author Dr. David Himmelstein, a professor at the City University of New York at Hunter College and lecturer at Harvard Medical School, the study offers yet more evidence of the need for a single-payer system.
"While poor and middle-class patients are skipping vital care, the wealthy are getting unnecessary and even harmful care," he said in a press statement. "And the widening inequalities in healthcare are reflected in rising inequality in death rates. Meanwhile, our overall life expectancy is falling further and further behind nations that distribute care based on need, not wealth."
"Our findings dramatize the urgent need for national health insurance--a single-payer reform with first-dollar coverage--that would assure that all Americans can get the care they need," Himmelstein continued.
Such reform has the backing of the National Nurses United.
The union is holding a press conference Friday in Orlando, Florida, where the full Democratic Platform Committee will be meeting to finalize the language it will present at the convention later this month in Philadelphia.
The drafting committee's decision last month to reject a proposal to place a commitment to "figh for Medicare-for-all" in the party's platform was a mistake, the nurses union said, and it's urging the committee to put such a promise in the platform thereby fulfilling its obligation to fight for coverage for all.
"While the Affordable Care Act has implemented some important improvements, the law has still left for too many behind," NNU Executive Director RoseAnn DeMoro writes in a commentary in the Orlando Sentinel. "Guaranteed healthcare" through an improved Medicare- for-all/single-payer system "must be a uniform, national obligation that the Democratic Party makes a priority."
Buoying single-payer advocates' call for system that covers everyone and underscoring the nation's inequality, a new study finds that the wealthiest Americans are the ones receiving the most healthcare.
Published Thursday in health policy journal Health Affairs, the findings show a reversal of a decades-long trend of more equality in healthcare that follwed the 1965 passage of Medicare and Medicaid.
The researchers used data from 22 national surveys conducted between 1963 and 2012, and divided the population into income quintiles. The wealthiest group contained those with an income of $101,094 for a family of three, and the poorest quintile had family incomes below $22,689.
Though medical spending overall slowed between 2004 and 2012, the different income groups showed vastly different spending. The results suggest "that a redistribution of care toward wealthier Americans accompanied the health spending slowdown," the study's abstract states.
Beginning in 2004, the study found, health spending fell for the poorest quintile, but rose for the wealthiest group. In fact, from 2004-2012, expenditures for the wealthiest--a group that already tends to be healthier--rose nearly 20 percent. That's 57 percent more than the growth of the middle-income groups. The poorest, meanwhile, had a 3.7 percent drop in health spending.
The authors note that the disparity was not reflected in the elderly, a group widely covered by Medicare.
A contributing factor to the healthcare inequality, the authors say, were rising costs of co-payments and higher deductibles.
"In recent years," lead author Dr. Samuel Dickman, who conducted his research at Harvard Medical School, said in a statement, "economists have celebrated a slowdown in healthcare cost growth. But the slowdown seems to have been achieved by forcing poor and middle-class Americans to choose between paying rent, buying groceries, or going to the doctor when they're sick."
"Our overall life expectancy is falling further and further behind nations that distribute care based on need, not wealth."
--Dr. David HimmelsteinFor senior author Dr. David Himmelstein, a professor at the City University of New York at Hunter College and lecturer at Harvard Medical School, the study offers yet more evidence of the need for a single-payer system.
"While poor and middle-class patients are skipping vital care, the wealthy are getting unnecessary and even harmful care," he said in a press statement. "And the widening inequalities in healthcare are reflected in rising inequality in death rates. Meanwhile, our overall life expectancy is falling further and further behind nations that distribute care based on need, not wealth."
"Our findings dramatize the urgent need for national health insurance--a single-payer reform with first-dollar coverage--that would assure that all Americans can get the care they need," Himmelstein continued.
Such reform has the backing of the National Nurses United.
The union is holding a press conference Friday in Orlando, Florida, where the full Democratic Platform Committee will be meeting to finalize the language it will present at the convention later this month in Philadelphia.
The drafting committee's decision last month to reject a proposal to place a commitment to "figh for Medicare-for-all" in the party's platform was a mistake, the nurses union said, and it's urging the committee to put such a promise in the platform thereby fulfilling its obligation to fight for coverage for all.
"While the Affordable Care Act has implemented some important improvements, the law has still left for too many behind," NNU Executive Director RoseAnn DeMoro writes in a commentary in the Orlando Sentinel. "Guaranteed healthcare" through an improved Medicare- for-all/single-payer system "must be a uniform, national obligation that the Democratic Party makes a priority."