SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Burn Them at the Stake? Trump Wants 'Punishment' for Women Who Have Abortions
Proving GOP bona fides, Trump endorses federal ban on abortion
Mar 30, 2016
In a televised interview with MSNBC on Wednesday, Republican frontrunner Donald Trump said that for women who would ignore a theoretical ban on abortion there would have to be "some form of punishment, yeah."
"Perhaps burning at the stake?" --Rewire
Speaking with Chris Matthews, who pressed the candidate on how he would enforce a nationwide ban on abortion, Trump said, "I'm pro-life, yes" and "[abortion] is a big problem." Asked by Matthews to explain how it would be done, Trump continued, "You could go back to a position like they had where people will, perhaps, go to illegal places -- but you have to ban it."
The full town-hall style forum will air Wednesday evening on MSNBC.
Watch:
Though reports indicated his chief Republican rival Ted Cruz responded by questioning Trump's claim that he is an authentic "pro-life" candidate, both Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton slammed Trump's remarks.
Though perhaps not surprised, given his record of misogyny and hateful rhetoric, reproductive and women's rights advocates were not about to let Trump's latest comments go without response:
If Trump's words about women--calling us "disgusting", "slobs" and "fat pigs"--didn't scare us, this should. https://t.co/TCL0DybDGY
-- Kate Black (@KateBlackDC) March 30, 2016
In a statement to Politico, Marge Baker, executive director of the People for the American Way, described Trump's comment about women as an "absolutely abhorrent" position to take.
"Criminalizing abortion would endanger the lives of women -- it's ... unthinkable, and shows just how much is at stake in the November elections," Baker stated. "The fact of the matter, though, is that all of the Republican presidential candidates would like to criminalize abortion -- Trump is no outlier on this."
Following the fierce backlash against what he said during his interview with Matthews, the Trump campaign attempted a (rare) walk-back of the comments by releasing a clarifying statement about his position on abortion.
"If Congress were to pass legislation making abortion illegal and the federal courts upheld this legislation, or any state were permitted to ban abortion under state and federal law," Trump stated, "the doctor or any other person performing this illegal act upon a woman would be held legally responsible, not the woman. The woman is a victim in this case as is the life in her womb. My position has not changed - like Ronald Reagan, I am pro-life with exceptions."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In a televised interview with MSNBC on Wednesday, Republican frontrunner Donald Trump said that for women who would ignore a theoretical ban on abortion there would have to be "some form of punishment, yeah."
"Perhaps burning at the stake?" --Rewire
Speaking with Chris Matthews, who pressed the candidate on how he would enforce a nationwide ban on abortion, Trump said, "I'm pro-life, yes" and "[abortion] is a big problem." Asked by Matthews to explain how it would be done, Trump continued, "You could go back to a position like they had where people will, perhaps, go to illegal places -- but you have to ban it."
The full town-hall style forum will air Wednesday evening on MSNBC.
Watch:
Though reports indicated his chief Republican rival Ted Cruz responded by questioning Trump's claim that he is an authentic "pro-life" candidate, both Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton slammed Trump's remarks.
Though perhaps not surprised, given his record of misogyny and hateful rhetoric, reproductive and women's rights advocates were not about to let Trump's latest comments go without response:
If Trump's words about women--calling us "disgusting", "slobs" and "fat pigs"--didn't scare us, this should. https://t.co/TCL0DybDGY
-- Kate Black (@KateBlackDC) March 30, 2016
In a statement to Politico, Marge Baker, executive director of the People for the American Way, described Trump's comment about women as an "absolutely abhorrent" position to take.
"Criminalizing abortion would endanger the lives of women -- it's ... unthinkable, and shows just how much is at stake in the November elections," Baker stated. "The fact of the matter, though, is that all of the Republican presidential candidates would like to criminalize abortion -- Trump is no outlier on this."
Following the fierce backlash against what he said during his interview with Matthews, the Trump campaign attempted a (rare) walk-back of the comments by releasing a clarifying statement about his position on abortion.
"If Congress were to pass legislation making abortion illegal and the federal courts upheld this legislation, or any state were permitted to ban abortion under state and federal law," Trump stated, "the doctor or any other person performing this illegal act upon a woman would be held legally responsible, not the woman. The woman is a victim in this case as is the life in her womb. My position has not changed - like Ronald Reagan, I am pro-life with exceptions."
In a televised interview with MSNBC on Wednesday, Republican frontrunner Donald Trump said that for women who would ignore a theoretical ban on abortion there would have to be "some form of punishment, yeah."
"Perhaps burning at the stake?" --Rewire
Speaking with Chris Matthews, who pressed the candidate on how he would enforce a nationwide ban on abortion, Trump said, "I'm pro-life, yes" and "[abortion] is a big problem." Asked by Matthews to explain how it would be done, Trump continued, "You could go back to a position like they had where people will, perhaps, go to illegal places -- but you have to ban it."
The full town-hall style forum will air Wednesday evening on MSNBC.
Watch:
Though reports indicated his chief Republican rival Ted Cruz responded by questioning Trump's claim that he is an authentic "pro-life" candidate, both Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton slammed Trump's remarks.
Though perhaps not surprised, given his record of misogyny and hateful rhetoric, reproductive and women's rights advocates were not about to let Trump's latest comments go without response:
If Trump's words about women--calling us "disgusting", "slobs" and "fat pigs"--didn't scare us, this should. https://t.co/TCL0DybDGY
-- Kate Black (@KateBlackDC) March 30, 2016
In a statement to Politico, Marge Baker, executive director of the People for the American Way, described Trump's comment about women as an "absolutely abhorrent" position to take.
"Criminalizing abortion would endanger the lives of women -- it's ... unthinkable, and shows just how much is at stake in the November elections," Baker stated. "The fact of the matter, though, is that all of the Republican presidential candidates would like to criminalize abortion -- Trump is no outlier on this."
Following the fierce backlash against what he said during his interview with Matthews, the Trump campaign attempted a (rare) walk-back of the comments by releasing a clarifying statement about his position on abortion.
"If Congress were to pass legislation making abortion illegal and the federal courts upheld this legislation, or any state were permitted to ban abortion under state and federal law," Trump stated, "the doctor or any other person performing this illegal act upon a woman would be held legally responsible, not the woman. The woman is a victim in this case as is the life in her womb. My position has not changed - like Ronald Reagan, I am pro-life with exceptions."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.