

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Hillary Clinton's potential general election vulnerabilities were on display Tuesday in Michigan, and Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump said as much.
"Hillary's going to be very easy to beat," Trump said at a news conference Tuesday night, flanked by wine and meat after winning the Republican primaries in Michigan and Mississippi. "She's a very flawed candidate. I believe [she's] going to be a very, very easy target."
In fact, polls continue to show that Clinton would triumph over Trump in a head-to-head match-up--though not by the same wide margin as her rival for the Democratic nomination, Bernie Sanders.
The latest NBC News/Washington Post survey, released Wednesday, found that in a general election contest, Sanders would trump Trump by 18 points, 55 to 37 percent. Clinton, meanwhile, would win against Trump by 13 points, 51 percent to 38 percent.

Still, the dynamics at play in Michigan's Democratic primary--which saw Sanders pull an impressive upset after being way behind in polling--further suggest that Clinton's weaknesses on issues like trade and Wall Street reform could be her Achilles heel, both before and after the nominating convention in June.
Much has been made of Sanders' consistent opposition to corporate-friendly trade deals that have devastated the Rust Belt. On the Republican side, however, Trump's bombastic bigotry often eclipses the fact that by some measures, "trade may be his single biggest concern," as Thomas Frank argued in the Guardian this week.
"Ill-considered trade deals and generous bank bailouts and guaranteed profits for insurance companies but no recovery for average people, ever--these policies have taken their toll," across the U.S., Frank said.
"Many of Trump's followers are bigots, no doubt," he continued, "but many more are probably excited by the prospect of a president who seems to mean it when he denounces our trade agreements and promises to bring the hammer down on the CEO that fired you and wrecked your town, unlike Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton."
Indeed, Frank's colleague Lucia Graves pointed out: "A majority of Democrats and Republicans in Michigan have reported that recent trade deals have given people like them the shaft. On the Democratic side, six in 10 Michigan voters thought trade takes away jobs and the majority of those voters supported Sanders; on the Republican side, four in 10 thought trade costs the country jobs, and the majority of them supported Trump."
Lori Wallach, director of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch, added on Wednesday: "Americans' opposition to job-killing trade policies fueled the stunning Bernie Sanders upset victory in Michigan. But it also could be a deciding factor in the general election, especially with Donald Trump being the likely GOP nominee."
"The outcome of the Michigan primary shows the potency of trade issues," she said, "and foreshadows the trouble Hillary Clinton could face winning key Midwestern states in a race against Trump."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Hillary Clinton's potential general election vulnerabilities were on display Tuesday in Michigan, and Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump said as much.
"Hillary's going to be very easy to beat," Trump said at a news conference Tuesday night, flanked by wine and meat after winning the Republican primaries in Michigan and Mississippi. "She's a very flawed candidate. I believe [she's] going to be a very, very easy target."
In fact, polls continue to show that Clinton would triumph over Trump in a head-to-head match-up--though not by the same wide margin as her rival for the Democratic nomination, Bernie Sanders.
The latest NBC News/Washington Post survey, released Wednesday, found that in a general election contest, Sanders would trump Trump by 18 points, 55 to 37 percent. Clinton, meanwhile, would win against Trump by 13 points, 51 percent to 38 percent.

Still, the dynamics at play in Michigan's Democratic primary--which saw Sanders pull an impressive upset after being way behind in polling--further suggest that Clinton's weaknesses on issues like trade and Wall Street reform could be her Achilles heel, both before and after the nominating convention in June.
Much has been made of Sanders' consistent opposition to corporate-friendly trade deals that have devastated the Rust Belt. On the Republican side, however, Trump's bombastic bigotry often eclipses the fact that by some measures, "trade may be his single biggest concern," as Thomas Frank argued in the Guardian this week.
"Ill-considered trade deals and generous bank bailouts and guaranteed profits for insurance companies but no recovery for average people, ever--these policies have taken their toll," across the U.S., Frank said.
"Many of Trump's followers are bigots, no doubt," he continued, "but many more are probably excited by the prospect of a president who seems to mean it when he denounces our trade agreements and promises to bring the hammer down on the CEO that fired you and wrecked your town, unlike Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton."
Indeed, Frank's colleague Lucia Graves pointed out: "A majority of Democrats and Republicans in Michigan have reported that recent trade deals have given people like them the shaft. On the Democratic side, six in 10 Michigan voters thought trade takes away jobs and the majority of those voters supported Sanders; on the Republican side, four in 10 thought trade costs the country jobs, and the majority of them supported Trump."
Lori Wallach, director of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch, added on Wednesday: "Americans' opposition to job-killing trade policies fueled the stunning Bernie Sanders upset victory in Michigan. But it also could be a deciding factor in the general election, especially with Donald Trump being the likely GOP nominee."
"The outcome of the Michigan primary shows the potency of trade issues," she said, "and foreshadows the trouble Hillary Clinton could face winning key Midwestern states in a race against Trump."
Hillary Clinton's potential general election vulnerabilities were on display Tuesday in Michigan, and Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump said as much.
"Hillary's going to be very easy to beat," Trump said at a news conference Tuesday night, flanked by wine and meat after winning the Republican primaries in Michigan and Mississippi. "She's a very flawed candidate. I believe [she's] going to be a very, very easy target."
In fact, polls continue to show that Clinton would triumph over Trump in a head-to-head match-up--though not by the same wide margin as her rival for the Democratic nomination, Bernie Sanders.
The latest NBC News/Washington Post survey, released Wednesday, found that in a general election contest, Sanders would trump Trump by 18 points, 55 to 37 percent. Clinton, meanwhile, would win against Trump by 13 points, 51 percent to 38 percent.

Still, the dynamics at play in Michigan's Democratic primary--which saw Sanders pull an impressive upset after being way behind in polling--further suggest that Clinton's weaknesses on issues like trade and Wall Street reform could be her Achilles heel, both before and after the nominating convention in June.
Much has been made of Sanders' consistent opposition to corporate-friendly trade deals that have devastated the Rust Belt. On the Republican side, however, Trump's bombastic bigotry often eclipses the fact that by some measures, "trade may be his single biggest concern," as Thomas Frank argued in the Guardian this week.
"Ill-considered trade deals and generous bank bailouts and guaranteed profits for insurance companies but no recovery for average people, ever--these policies have taken their toll," across the U.S., Frank said.
"Many of Trump's followers are bigots, no doubt," he continued, "but many more are probably excited by the prospect of a president who seems to mean it when he denounces our trade agreements and promises to bring the hammer down on the CEO that fired you and wrecked your town, unlike Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton."
Indeed, Frank's colleague Lucia Graves pointed out: "A majority of Democrats and Republicans in Michigan have reported that recent trade deals have given people like them the shaft. On the Democratic side, six in 10 Michigan voters thought trade takes away jobs and the majority of those voters supported Sanders; on the Republican side, four in 10 thought trade costs the country jobs, and the majority of them supported Trump."
Lori Wallach, director of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch, added on Wednesday: "Americans' opposition to job-killing trade policies fueled the stunning Bernie Sanders upset victory in Michigan. But it also could be a deciding factor in the general election, especially with Donald Trump being the likely GOP nominee."
"The outcome of the Michigan primary shows the potency of trade issues," she said, "and foreshadows the trouble Hillary Clinton could face winning key Midwestern states in a race against Trump."