

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Inequality is shaping the 2016 U.S. presidential election, as voters disillusioned by the financial crisis and Wall Street greed increasingly turn to populist candidates like Bernie Sanders, who has made economic inequality a central platform of his campaign, Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz said on Wednesday.
"There are a lot of people that are described as angry and they finally figured out that they're not doing very well," Bloomberg reports Stiglitz as saying during an event at the Resolution Foundation, a London-based research group. "They're not doing as well as their parents; some Americans aren't doing as well as their grandparents."
"Americans have seen lots of injustices--people were thrown out of their houses that didn't owe money, and none of the bankers were held accountable" for their roles in the financial crisis, Stiglitz said. "I think that really has motivated the anger across the spectrum."
Stiglitz, a professor at Columbia University, told Democracy Now! in a December interview that "we're a wealthy-enough economy that we should be able to provide the basic requisites of a middle-class lifestyle for all Americans."
"[T]he question is whether the United States is rich enough to be able to make sure that everyone has a basic right to healthcare, family leave, parental, you know, sick leave--we are exceptional--whether we are a society that can tolerate--that should tolerate the levels of inequality that we have," Stiglitz said at the time. "I think Bernie Sanders is right about that."
On Wednesday, Stiglitz pointed out that 91 percent of economic gains made since the 2008 recession went to the top one percent of earners, while the minimum wage has failed to keep up with the pace of inflation by more than 60 years.
"The American economy is a failed economy," he said. "We have to once again rewrite the rules of the economy for the 21st century."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Inequality is shaping the 2016 U.S. presidential election, as voters disillusioned by the financial crisis and Wall Street greed increasingly turn to populist candidates like Bernie Sanders, who has made economic inequality a central platform of his campaign, Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz said on Wednesday.
"There are a lot of people that are described as angry and they finally figured out that they're not doing very well," Bloomberg reports Stiglitz as saying during an event at the Resolution Foundation, a London-based research group. "They're not doing as well as their parents; some Americans aren't doing as well as their grandparents."
"Americans have seen lots of injustices--people were thrown out of their houses that didn't owe money, and none of the bankers were held accountable" for their roles in the financial crisis, Stiglitz said. "I think that really has motivated the anger across the spectrum."
Stiglitz, a professor at Columbia University, told Democracy Now! in a December interview that "we're a wealthy-enough economy that we should be able to provide the basic requisites of a middle-class lifestyle for all Americans."
"[T]he question is whether the United States is rich enough to be able to make sure that everyone has a basic right to healthcare, family leave, parental, you know, sick leave--we are exceptional--whether we are a society that can tolerate--that should tolerate the levels of inequality that we have," Stiglitz said at the time. "I think Bernie Sanders is right about that."
On Wednesday, Stiglitz pointed out that 91 percent of economic gains made since the 2008 recession went to the top one percent of earners, while the minimum wage has failed to keep up with the pace of inflation by more than 60 years.
"The American economy is a failed economy," he said. "We have to once again rewrite the rules of the economy for the 21st century."
Inequality is shaping the 2016 U.S. presidential election, as voters disillusioned by the financial crisis and Wall Street greed increasingly turn to populist candidates like Bernie Sanders, who has made economic inequality a central platform of his campaign, Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz said on Wednesday.
"There are a lot of people that are described as angry and they finally figured out that they're not doing very well," Bloomberg reports Stiglitz as saying during an event at the Resolution Foundation, a London-based research group. "They're not doing as well as their parents; some Americans aren't doing as well as their grandparents."
"Americans have seen lots of injustices--people were thrown out of their houses that didn't owe money, and none of the bankers were held accountable" for their roles in the financial crisis, Stiglitz said. "I think that really has motivated the anger across the spectrum."
Stiglitz, a professor at Columbia University, told Democracy Now! in a December interview that "we're a wealthy-enough economy that we should be able to provide the basic requisites of a middle-class lifestyle for all Americans."
"[T]he question is whether the United States is rich enough to be able to make sure that everyone has a basic right to healthcare, family leave, parental, you know, sick leave--we are exceptional--whether we are a society that can tolerate--that should tolerate the levels of inequality that we have," Stiglitz said at the time. "I think Bernie Sanders is right about that."
On Wednesday, Stiglitz pointed out that 91 percent of economic gains made since the 2008 recession went to the top one percent of earners, while the minimum wage has failed to keep up with the pace of inflation by more than 60 years.
"The American economy is a failed economy," he said. "We have to once again rewrite the rules of the economy for the 21st century."