

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
In what climate activists are celebrating as a "landmark" win, the Portland (Oregon) City Council on Thursday unanimously voted to pass a resolution opposing the expansion of fossil fuel infrastructure in the city and its adjacent waterways.
"This is a huge victory for the movement and for climate stability," stated Mia Reback, climate organizer for 350PDX, which joined groups including Rising Tide, Columbia Riverkeeper, and Portland Audubon Society in supporting the resolution.
Brett VandenHeuvel, Executive Director of Columbia Riverkeeper, writes (pdf) that the Oregon city's resolution "takes a strong stand against this fossil fuel infrastructure and has the teeth to succeed." Explaining the specifics, he adds:
Due to federal preemption, Portland cannot block all fossil fuel transport. Federal law, for example, limits city regulations of trains and interstate pipelines. Portland is taking a smart approach by asking city planners to do everything they can, within the law, to stop fossil fuel transport and infrastructure. Example: While Portland cannot block all oil trains, Portland does have the authority to deny an oil shipping terminal if the project violates land use zoning or fire codes. This would have the effect of preventing all the oil trains needed to serve the terminal. The resolution, therefore, is not just symbolic.
Portland Mayor Charlie Hales, as well as climate campaigners, said the city's stand showed it taking exactly the kind of approach needed in this moment of climate crisis.
Following the vote, Hales wrote on his social media accounts: "I'm proud #PDX City Council passed the toughest fossil fuel export policy in the U.S. If we take action and lead on climate, we can shape our future--that's the hope that we heard in students today. I am proud to be a Portlander!"
350.org co-founder Bill McKibben said in a previous statement that "'no new fossil fuel infrastructure' is the right rallying cry for this moment in history, a stand that would galvanize the rest of the planet and demonstrate where the future lies." Vanden Huevel adds that the city "is taking action as a climate leader now" and that "[t]he significance of Portland's action will be magnified as more cities take action."
Campaigners also see the resolution as another indication that the extractivist economy is on its way out the door.
"The tides are clearly turning: from the global movement to divest from fossil fuel companies to the tune of $2.6 trillion, to major victories at the national level, such as getting a U.S. president to stop a major fossil fuel infrastructure project for the first time in pulling the plug on Keystone XL, to the local level such as this landmark victory today," said Adriana Voss-Andreae of 350PDX.
"It's a powerful sign that the the fossil fuel era is beginning to come to an end and that we are the change we've been looking for," she said.
Activists took to Twitter to celebrate the resolution as well:
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
In what climate activists are celebrating as a "landmark" win, the Portland (Oregon) City Council on Thursday unanimously voted to pass a resolution opposing the expansion of fossil fuel infrastructure in the city and its adjacent waterways.
"This is a huge victory for the movement and for climate stability," stated Mia Reback, climate organizer for 350PDX, which joined groups including Rising Tide, Columbia Riverkeeper, and Portland Audubon Society in supporting the resolution.
Brett VandenHeuvel, Executive Director of Columbia Riverkeeper, writes (pdf) that the Oregon city's resolution "takes a strong stand against this fossil fuel infrastructure and has the teeth to succeed." Explaining the specifics, he adds:
Due to federal preemption, Portland cannot block all fossil fuel transport. Federal law, for example, limits city regulations of trains and interstate pipelines. Portland is taking a smart approach by asking city planners to do everything they can, within the law, to stop fossil fuel transport and infrastructure. Example: While Portland cannot block all oil trains, Portland does have the authority to deny an oil shipping terminal if the project violates land use zoning or fire codes. This would have the effect of preventing all the oil trains needed to serve the terminal. The resolution, therefore, is not just symbolic.
Portland Mayor Charlie Hales, as well as climate campaigners, said the city's stand showed it taking exactly the kind of approach needed in this moment of climate crisis.
Following the vote, Hales wrote on his social media accounts: "I'm proud #PDX City Council passed the toughest fossil fuel export policy in the U.S. If we take action and lead on climate, we can shape our future--that's the hope that we heard in students today. I am proud to be a Portlander!"
350.org co-founder Bill McKibben said in a previous statement that "'no new fossil fuel infrastructure' is the right rallying cry for this moment in history, a stand that would galvanize the rest of the planet and demonstrate where the future lies." Vanden Huevel adds that the city "is taking action as a climate leader now" and that "[t]he significance of Portland's action will be magnified as more cities take action."
Campaigners also see the resolution as another indication that the extractivist economy is on its way out the door.
"The tides are clearly turning: from the global movement to divest from fossil fuel companies to the tune of $2.6 trillion, to major victories at the national level, such as getting a U.S. president to stop a major fossil fuel infrastructure project for the first time in pulling the plug on Keystone XL, to the local level such as this landmark victory today," said Adriana Voss-Andreae of 350PDX.
"It's a powerful sign that the the fossil fuel era is beginning to come to an end and that we are the change we've been looking for," she said.
Activists took to Twitter to celebrate the resolution as well:
In what climate activists are celebrating as a "landmark" win, the Portland (Oregon) City Council on Thursday unanimously voted to pass a resolution opposing the expansion of fossil fuel infrastructure in the city and its adjacent waterways.
"This is a huge victory for the movement and for climate stability," stated Mia Reback, climate organizer for 350PDX, which joined groups including Rising Tide, Columbia Riverkeeper, and Portland Audubon Society in supporting the resolution.
Brett VandenHeuvel, Executive Director of Columbia Riverkeeper, writes (pdf) that the Oregon city's resolution "takes a strong stand against this fossil fuel infrastructure and has the teeth to succeed." Explaining the specifics, he adds:
Due to federal preemption, Portland cannot block all fossil fuel transport. Federal law, for example, limits city regulations of trains and interstate pipelines. Portland is taking a smart approach by asking city planners to do everything they can, within the law, to stop fossil fuel transport and infrastructure. Example: While Portland cannot block all oil trains, Portland does have the authority to deny an oil shipping terminal if the project violates land use zoning or fire codes. This would have the effect of preventing all the oil trains needed to serve the terminal. The resolution, therefore, is not just symbolic.
Portland Mayor Charlie Hales, as well as climate campaigners, said the city's stand showed it taking exactly the kind of approach needed in this moment of climate crisis.
Following the vote, Hales wrote on his social media accounts: "I'm proud #PDX City Council passed the toughest fossil fuel export policy in the U.S. If we take action and lead on climate, we can shape our future--that's the hope that we heard in students today. I am proud to be a Portlander!"
350.org co-founder Bill McKibben said in a previous statement that "'no new fossil fuel infrastructure' is the right rallying cry for this moment in history, a stand that would galvanize the rest of the planet and demonstrate where the future lies." Vanden Huevel adds that the city "is taking action as a climate leader now" and that "[t]he significance of Portland's action will be magnified as more cities take action."
Campaigners also see the resolution as another indication that the extractivist economy is on its way out the door.
"The tides are clearly turning: from the global movement to divest from fossil fuel companies to the tune of $2.6 trillion, to major victories at the national level, such as getting a U.S. president to stop a major fossil fuel infrastructure project for the first time in pulling the plug on Keystone XL, to the local level such as this landmark victory today," said Adriana Voss-Andreae of 350PDX.
"It's a powerful sign that the the fossil fuel era is beginning to come to an end and that we are the change we've been looking for," she said.
Activists took to Twitter to celebrate the resolution as well: