In Gutting California Climate Bill, Big Oil Won Skirmish -- But Not War
"It's a sad day when oil industry lies stand in the way of clean air, but if the industry thinks they have won a victory, it will be short-lived."
Big Oil has succeeded in dismantling a key component of California's sweeping climate change bill, with legislative leaders announcing Wednesday afternoon that in the wake of an intense lobbying campaign, they would drop a measure calling for a 50 percent cut in petroleum use by 2030.
The fossil fuel industry had poured money into advertising and lobbying campaigns against Senate Bill 350 (SB350), calling the legislation the "California Gas Restriction Act of 2015" and warning that it could lead to gas-rationing, bans on SUVs, and the demise of oil companies.
Supporters had a different take, saying that SB 350 represented "an opportunity for our state to go in a new direction, allowing us all to avoid toiling away to stop yet another toxic power plant in our backyard, and it can also reverse our destructive reliance on fossil fuels," as one young activist, Evelyn Garcia, wrote in the lead up to this week's showdown.
Among climate leaders like 350.org's Jamie Henn, there was little doubt that the fossil fuel industry's "bottomless war chest" was to blame for the defeat.
At a press conference Wednesday, Senate President pro Tempore Kevin De Leon noted that the bill's remaining sections--which call for the state to boost energy efficiency in buildings by 50 percent and to get half of its electricity from renewable sources by 2030--"are in and of themselves landmark achievements."
"But in the end--with two days left," he said, "we could not cut through the million-dollar smokescreen created by a single special-interest with a singular motive and a bottomless war chest."
De Leon didn't stop there. "[T]he fact that, despite overwhelming scientific opinion and statewide public support, we still weren't able to overcome the silly-season scare tactics of an outside industry which has repeatedly opposed environmental progress and energy innovation--means that there's a temporary disconnect in our politics which needs to be overcome," he declared.
Gov. Jerry Brown, a Democrat, echoed those charges while expressing optimism about the road ahead. "Oil has won a skirmish," Brown said at the press conference. "But they lost a bigger battle, because I am more determined than ever to make our regulatory regime work for the people of California."
According to KQED News:
[Gov. Brown and Sen. De Leon] said the oil industry's main goal was actually to include provisions in SB 350 that would strip power from the California Air Resources Board, the regulatory agency that has overseen the state's ambitious push toward reducinggreenhouse gas emissions. The board has been a frequent target of Republicans and business groups opposed to the state's already-ambitious climate change laws.
"Look, we had a long discussion. It's very simple -- if we said turn every rule that the ARB makes over to the Legislature, then we get the bill, if we don't do that, then (they) kill it," Brown said of negotiations with oil companies in recent days.
But he added, "California is not going to miss a beat, be very clear about that, we don't have a declaration in statute, but we have absolutely the same authority we had going forward. The only difference is my zeal has been intensified to a maximum degree, and nothing is going to stop the state from pushing forward."
"It's a sad day when oil industry lies stand in the way of clean air, but if the industry thinks they have won a victory, it will be short-lived," the Natural Resources Defense Council said in a statement. However, it continued, "California's leadership and communities across the state are more determined than ever to reduce petroleum dependence."
Henn, of 350.org, agreed, pointing to a specific step that Brown could take to strike back against fossil fuels.
"Big Oil succeeded in gutting one of the most important provisions of this bill," Henn said in a statement. "Let's face it: Governor Brown got his hat handed to him. Now, the clearest way he can fight back against the industry is by banning fracking in California--and that's something he can do on his own, without the State Legislature."
Added Oil Change International's David Turnbull on Twitter:
The newly gutted bill is expected to be voted on this week.
Meanwhile, elsewhere in California, environmentalists rejoiced as the University of California's chief investment officer on Wednesday said it has sold off about $200 million of direct holdings in coal and tar sands companies, which he said were no longer good investments for the university's $98.2 billion fund.
FINAL DAY! This is urgent.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just hours left in our Spring Campaign, we're still falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Big Oil has succeeded in dismantling a key component of California's sweeping climate change bill, with legislative leaders announcing Wednesday afternoon that in the wake of an intense lobbying campaign, they would drop a measure calling for a 50 percent cut in petroleum use by 2030.
The fossil fuel industry had poured money into advertising and lobbying campaigns against Senate Bill 350 (SB350), calling the legislation the "California Gas Restriction Act of 2015" and warning that it could lead to gas-rationing, bans on SUVs, and the demise of oil companies.
Supporters had a different take, saying that SB 350 represented "an opportunity for our state to go in a new direction, allowing us all to avoid toiling away to stop yet another toxic power plant in our backyard, and it can also reverse our destructive reliance on fossil fuels," as one young activist, Evelyn Garcia, wrote in the lead up to this week's showdown.
Among climate leaders like 350.org's Jamie Henn, there was little doubt that the fossil fuel industry's "bottomless war chest" was to blame for the defeat.
At a press conference Wednesday, Senate President pro Tempore Kevin De Leon noted that the bill's remaining sections--which call for the state to boost energy efficiency in buildings by 50 percent and to get half of its electricity from renewable sources by 2030--"are in and of themselves landmark achievements."
"But in the end--with two days left," he said, "we could not cut through the million-dollar smokescreen created by a single special-interest with a singular motive and a bottomless war chest."
De Leon didn't stop there. "[T]he fact that, despite overwhelming scientific opinion and statewide public support, we still weren't able to overcome the silly-season scare tactics of an outside industry which has repeatedly opposed environmental progress and energy innovation--means that there's a temporary disconnect in our politics which needs to be overcome," he declared.
Gov. Jerry Brown, a Democrat, echoed those charges while expressing optimism about the road ahead. "Oil has won a skirmish," Brown said at the press conference. "But they lost a bigger battle, because I am more determined than ever to make our regulatory regime work for the people of California."
According to KQED News:
[Gov. Brown and Sen. De Leon] said the oil industry's main goal was actually to include provisions in SB 350 that would strip power from the California Air Resources Board, the regulatory agency that has overseen the state's ambitious push toward reducinggreenhouse gas emissions. The board has been a frequent target of Republicans and business groups opposed to the state's already-ambitious climate change laws.
"Look, we had a long discussion. It's very simple -- if we said turn every rule that the ARB makes over to the Legislature, then we get the bill, if we don't do that, then (they) kill it," Brown said of negotiations with oil companies in recent days.
But he added, "California is not going to miss a beat, be very clear about that, we don't have a declaration in statute, but we have absolutely the same authority we had going forward. The only difference is my zeal has been intensified to a maximum degree, and nothing is going to stop the state from pushing forward."
"It's a sad day when oil industry lies stand in the way of clean air, but if the industry thinks they have won a victory, it will be short-lived," the Natural Resources Defense Council said in a statement. However, it continued, "California's leadership and communities across the state are more determined than ever to reduce petroleum dependence."
Henn, of 350.org, agreed, pointing to a specific step that Brown could take to strike back against fossil fuels.
"Big Oil succeeded in gutting one of the most important provisions of this bill," Henn said in a statement. "Let's face it: Governor Brown got his hat handed to him. Now, the clearest way he can fight back against the industry is by banning fracking in California--and that's something he can do on his own, without the State Legislature."
Added Oil Change International's David Turnbull on Twitter:
The newly gutted bill is expected to be voted on this week.
Meanwhile, elsewhere in California, environmentalists rejoiced as the University of California's chief investment officer on Wednesday said it has sold off about $200 million of direct holdings in coal and tar sands companies, which he said were no longer good investments for the university's $98.2 billion fund.
Big Oil has succeeded in dismantling a key component of California's sweeping climate change bill, with legislative leaders announcing Wednesday afternoon that in the wake of an intense lobbying campaign, they would drop a measure calling for a 50 percent cut in petroleum use by 2030.
The fossil fuel industry had poured money into advertising and lobbying campaigns against Senate Bill 350 (SB350), calling the legislation the "California Gas Restriction Act of 2015" and warning that it could lead to gas-rationing, bans on SUVs, and the demise of oil companies.
Supporters had a different take, saying that SB 350 represented "an opportunity for our state to go in a new direction, allowing us all to avoid toiling away to stop yet another toxic power plant in our backyard, and it can also reverse our destructive reliance on fossil fuels," as one young activist, Evelyn Garcia, wrote in the lead up to this week's showdown.
Among climate leaders like 350.org's Jamie Henn, there was little doubt that the fossil fuel industry's "bottomless war chest" was to blame for the defeat.
At a press conference Wednesday, Senate President pro Tempore Kevin De Leon noted that the bill's remaining sections--which call for the state to boost energy efficiency in buildings by 50 percent and to get half of its electricity from renewable sources by 2030--"are in and of themselves landmark achievements."
"But in the end--with two days left," he said, "we could not cut through the million-dollar smokescreen created by a single special-interest with a singular motive and a bottomless war chest."
De Leon didn't stop there. "[T]he fact that, despite overwhelming scientific opinion and statewide public support, we still weren't able to overcome the silly-season scare tactics of an outside industry which has repeatedly opposed environmental progress and energy innovation--means that there's a temporary disconnect in our politics which needs to be overcome," he declared.
Gov. Jerry Brown, a Democrat, echoed those charges while expressing optimism about the road ahead. "Oil has won a skirmish," Brown said at the press conference. "But they lost a bigger battle, because I am more determined than ever to make our regulatory regime work for the people of California."
According to KQED News:
[Gov. Brown and Sen. De Leon] said the oil industry's main goal was actually to include provisions in SB 350 that would strip power from the California Air Resources Board, the regulatory agency that has overseen the state's ambitious push toward reducinggreenhouse gas emissions. The board has been a frequent target of Republicans and business groups opposed to the state's already-ambitious climate change laws.
"Look, we had a long discussion. It's very simple -- if we said turn every rule that the ARB makes over to the Legislature, then we get the bill, if we don't do that, then (they) kill it," Brown said of negotiations with oil companies in recent days.
But he added, "California is not going to miss a beat, be very clear about that, we don't have a declaration in statute, but we have absolutely the same authority we had going forward. The only difference is my zeal has been intensified to a maximum degree, and nothing is going to stop the state from pushing forward."
"It's a sad day when oil industry lies stand in the way of clean air, but if the industry thinks they have won a victory, it will be short-lived," the Natural Resources Defense Council said in a statement. However, it continued, "California's leadership and communities across the state are more determined than ever to reduce petroleum dependence."
Henn, of 350.org, agreed, pointing to a specific step that Brown could take to strike back against fossil fuels.
"Big Oil succeeded in gutting one of the most important provisions of this bill," Henn said in a statement. "Let's face it: Governor Brown got his hat handed to him. Now, the clearest way he can fight back against the industry is by banning fracking in California--and that's something he can do on his own, without the State Legislature."
Added Oil Change International's David Turnbull on Twitter:
The newly gutted bill is expected to be voted on this week.
Meanwhile, elsewhere in California, environmentalists rejoiced as the University of California's chief investment officer on Wednesday said it has sold off about $200 million of direct holdings in coal and tar sands companies, which he said were no longer good investments for the university's $98.2 billion fund.