Mining Giant Credits Activists for Possibly Saving Great Barrier Reef
Indian mining giant Adani lashes out at environmentalists who sought to block giant coal mine—and succeeded
Fierce environmental activism is being blamed--and credited--with spurring the potential demise of Australia's controversial Carmichael coal mine project.
Indian mining giant Adani lashed out at activists on Tuesday, accusing them of causing delays that prompted financial backers to withdraw their support for the vast Queensland mine and port expansion along the Great Barrier Reef (GBR).
Environmentalists have long warned that the project would irreparably harm the GBR. It has faced significant hurdles, the latest of which was the London-based Standard Chartered Bank's announcement on Monday that it was withdrawing from its advisory role on the project.
Last week, Australia's federal court revoked the government's mine approval. The court sided with conservationists who argued that the license given to the project in 2014 did not account for the significant environmental impacts.
The court's decision was "based on a failure by the minister to have regard to the conservation advice for two federally listed vulnerable species"--the yakka skink and the ornamental snake--according to Sue Higginson, principal solicitor of the Environment Defenders Office NSW. The lawsuit also alleged a failure "to consider global greenhouse emissions from coal burning."
If built, Carmichael would be Australia's largest coal mine and one of the biggest in the world. Construction would require massive seafloor dredging along the GBR, and at maximum production, the mine would produce 121 million tons of carbon dioxide emissions yearly.
On the same day as the court order, the Commonwealth Bank of Australia announced it would not support the mine. This prompted Greenpeace Australia Pacific climate and energy campaigner Nikola Casule to call the Carmichael project "unbankable, unprofitable, and unconscionable."
Reeling from those setbacks, Adani released a statement on Tuesday saying that it had terminated the contract with Standard Chartered "on the basis of Adani's own concerns over ongoing delays to a now five-year-long approvals process in Australia."
The statement then continued, referencing the recent court ruling: "In the event Australia's federal approvals framework is not further undermined by activists seeking to exploit legal loopholes, enabling the project and the thousands of jobs and billions of dollars of investment it would bring to be delivered, Adani would happily work with the bank in the future."
The threat of a new, major coal mine comes amid a pending climate crisis while countries struggle to enact new greenhouse gas regulations. On Tuesday, the government of Australia released a copy of its greenhouse gas reduction goals ahead of the Conference of the Parties 21 (COP21) climate talks in Paris, which critics decried as being "weak" and overly friendly to the "big polluters" including the coal, gas, and oil industries.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Fierce environmental activism is being blamed--and credited--with spurring the potential demise of Australia's controversial Carmichael coal mine project.
Indian mining giant Adani lashed out at activists on Tuesday, accusing them of causing delays that prompted financial backers to withdraw their support for the vast Queensland mine and port expansion along the Great Barrier Reef (GBR).
Environmentalists have long warned that the project would irreparably harm the GBR. It has faced significant hurdles, the latest of which was the London-based Standard Chartered Bank's announcement on Monday that it was withdrawing from its advisory role on the project.
Last week, Australia's federal court revoked the government's mine approval. The court sided with conservationists who argued that the license given to the project in 2014 did not account for the significant environmental impacts.
The court's decision was "based on a failure by the minister to have regard to the conservation advice for two federally listed vulnerable species"--the yakka skink and the ornamental snake--according to Sue Higginson, principal solicitor of the Environment Defenders Office NSW. The lawsuit also alleged a failure "to consider global greenhouse emissions from coal burning."
If built, Carmichael would be Australia's largest coal mine and one of the biggest in the world. Construction would require massive seafloor dredging along the GBR, and at maximum production, the mine would produce 121 million tons of carbon dioxide emissions yearly.
On the same day as the court order, the Commonwealth Bank of Australia announced it would not support the mine. This prompted Greenpeace Australia Pacific climate and energy campaigner Nikola Casule to call the Carmichael project "unbankable, unprofitable, and unconscionable."
Reeling from those setbacks, Adani released a statement on Tuesday saying that it had terminated the contract with Standard Chartered "on the basis of Adani's own concerns over ongoing delays to a now five-year-long approvals process in Australia."
The statement then continued, referencing the recent court ruling: "In the event Australia's federal approvals framework is not further undermined by activists seeking to exploit legal loopholes, enabling the project and the thousands of jobs and billions of dollars of investment it would bring to be delivered, Adani would happily work with the bank in the future."
The threat of a new, major coal mine comes amid a pending climate crisis while countries struggle to enact new greenhouse gas regulations. On Tuesday, the government of Australia released a copy of its greenhouse gas reduction goals ahead of the Conference of the Parties 21 (COP21) climate talks in Paris, which critics decried as being "weak" and overly friendly to the "big polluters" including the coal, gas, and oil industries.
Fierce environmental activism is being blamed--and credited--with spurring the potential demise of Australia's controversial Carmichael coal mine project.
Indian mining giant Adani lashed out at activists on Tuesday, accusing them of causing delays that prompted financial backers to withdraw their support for the vast Queensland mine and port expansion along the Great Barrier Reef (GBR).
Environmentalists have long warned that the project would irreparably harm the GBR. It has faced significant hurdles, the latest of which was the London-based Standard Chartered Bank's announcement on Monday that it was withdrawing from its advisory role on the project.
Last week, Australia's federal court revoked the government's mine approval. The court sided with conservationists who argued that the license given to the project in 2014 did not account for the significant environmental impacts.
The court's decision was "based on a failure by the minister to have regard to the conservation advice for two federally listed vulnerable species"--the yakka skink and the ornamental snake--according to Sue Higginson, principal solicitor of the Environment Defenders Office NSW. The lawsuit also alleged a failure "to consider global greenhouse emissions from coal burning."
If built, Carmichael would be Australia's largest coal mine and one of the biggest in the world. Construction would require massive seafloor dredging along the GBR, and at maximum production, the mine would produce 121 million tons of carbon dioxide emissions yearly.
On the same day as the court order, the Commonwealth Bank of Australia announced it would not support the mine. This prompted Greenpeace Australia Pacific climate and energy campaigner Nikola Casule to call the Carmichael project "unbankable, unprofitable, and unconscionable."
Reeling from those setbacks, Adani released a statement on Tuesday saying that it had terminated the contract with Standard Chartered "on the basis of Adani's own concerns over ongoing delays to a now five-year-long approvals process in Australia."
The statement then continued, referencing the recent court ruling: "In the event Australia's federal approvals framework is not further undermined by activists seeking to exploit legal loopholes, enabling the project and the thousands of jobs and billions of dollars of investment it would bring to be delivered, Adani would happily work with the bank in the future."
The threat of a new, major coal mine comes amid a pending climate crisis while countries struggle to enact new greenhouse gas regulations. On Tuesday, the government of Australia released a copy of its greenhouse gas reduction goals ahead of the Conference of the Parties 21 (COP21) climate talks in Paris, which critics decried as being "weak" and overly friendly to the "big polluters" including the coal, gas, and oil industries.