SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Why McDonald's Announcement on Chicken Is Important for Everyone's Health
Fast food chain announces phase-out of antibiotic-treated chicken
Mar 04, 2015
Chicken McNuggets might not be part of your diet, but a new announcement from McDonald's could have an impact on your health.
According to a statement issued Wednesday, the roughly 14,000 farms that supply chicken to U.S. locations of the fast food restaurant have a two-year window to stop the use of antibiotics that are important to human health. Chickens treated with a type of antibiotic not used on humans, ionophores, will continue to be allowed.
The company said the change, which follows similar moves by companies like Panera Bread and Chipotle, was an effort "to better meet the changing preferences and expectations of today's customers."
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization have warned of an alarming rise in antibiotic-resistant bacteria or "superbugs"--a problem fueled by livestock farms, where up to 80 percent of all antibiotics are used.
Given that link, Jonathan Kaplan, director of NRDC's Food and Agriculture program, called the news "a landmark announcement in the fight to keep life-saving antibiotics working for us and our children." Because of the "company's massive purchasing power and iconic brand, we may be at a tipping point for better antibiotic stewardship in the poultry industry," he added.
Kaplan further explained that it's "good news for McDonald's customers and anyone else who might someday need an effective antibiotic."
Kari Hamerschlag, senior program manager at Friends of the Earth, echoed that sentiment, stating, "We also hope this plan will convince the livestock industry to stop its misuse of antibiotics in animal agriculture; which has been a key contributor to antibiotic resistance."
The organizations added their hopes that McDonald's move on poultry was just a first step, and that it would be making the same demands of its beef and pork supplies.
Wenonah Hauter, executive director of Food and Water Watch, also said the phase-out was a good development, but said it pointed to a failing at the federal level.
"It's past time for the FDA to force the meat industry to eliminate its use of harmful antibiotics though enforceable, non-voluntary regulation," Hauter stated.
NRDC's Kaplan also notes how McDonald's new plan falls short. He writes:
Unfortunately, the company also published a disappointing "Global Vision for Antimicrobial Stewardship in Food Animals" that sadly does little to improve the company's 2003 policy. While it looks like McDonald's invested quite a bit effort in developing it, the policy contains a giant loophole: Use of medically important antibiotics is allowed for "disease prevention" with no real limit on how much or how often these drugs can be administered. That's the same loophole that undermines FDA's current voluntary guidelines. McDonald's spokespeople described the "Global Vision" to NRDC as a "framework" for guiding more specific initiatives in different regions. That doesn't bode well for getting all routine uses of antibiotics out of their global supply chains.
The announcement comes the same week as McDonald's ushers in a new chief executive, Steve Easterbrook, who has said he wants to create a "modern, progressive burger company."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
antibioticscenters for disease control (cdc)environmentfdafoodfood & water watchfriends of the earthpublic health
Chicken McNuggets might not be part of your diet, but a new announcement from McDonald's could have an impact on your health.
According to a statement issued Wednesday, the roughly 14,000 farms that supply chicken to U.S. locations of the fast food restaurant have a two-year window to stop the use of antibiotics that are important to human health. Chickens treated with a type of antibiotic not used on humans, ionophores, will continue to be allowed.
The company said the change, which follows similar moves by companies like Panera Bread and Chipotle, was an effort "to better meet the changing preferences and expectations of today's customers."
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization have warned of an alarming rise in antibiotic-resistant bacteria or "superbugs"--a problem fueled by livestock farms, where up to 80 percent of all antibiotics are used.
Given that link, Jonathan Kaplan, director of NRDC's Food and Agriculture program, called the news "a landmark announcement in the fight to keep life-saving antibiotics working for us and our children." Because of the "company's massive purchasing power and iconic brand, we may be at a tipping point for better antibiotic stewardship in the poultry industry," he added.
Kaplan further explained that it's "good news for McDonald's customers and anyone else who might someday need an effective antibiotic."
Kari Hamerschlag, senior program manager at Friends of the Earth, echoed that sentiment, stating, "We also hope this plan will convince the livestock industry to stop its misuse of antibiotics in animal agriculture; which has been a key contributor to antibiotic resistance."
The organizations added their hopes that McDonald's move on poultry was just a first step, and that it would be making the same demands of its beef and pork supplies.
Wenonah Hauter, executive director of Food and Water Watch, also said the phase-out was a good development, but said it pointed to a failing at the federal level.
"It's past time for the FDA to force the meat industry to eliminate its use of harmful antibiotics though enforceable, non-voluntary regulation," Hauter stated.
NRDC's Kaplan also notes how McDonald's new plan falls short. He writes:
Unfortunately, the company also published a disappointing "Global Vision for Antimicrobial Stewardship in Food Animals" that sadly does little to improve the company's 2003 policy. While it looks like McDonald's invested quite a bit effort in developing it, the policy contains a giant loophole: Use of medically important antibiotics is allowed for "disease prevention" with no real limit on how much or how often these drugs can be administered. That's the same loophole that undermines FDA's current voluntary guidelines. McDonald's spokespeople described the "Global Vision" to NRDC as a "framework" for guiding more specific initiatives in different regions. That doesn't bode well for getting all routine uses of antibiotics out of their global supply chains.
The announcement comes the same week as McDonald's ushers in a new chief executive, Steve Easterbrook, who has said he wants to create a "modern, progressive burger company."
Chicken McNuggets might not be part of your diet, but a new announcement from McDonald's could have an impact on your health.
According to a statement issued Wednesday, the roughly 14,000 farms that supply chicken to U.S. locations of the fast food restaurant have a two-year window to stop the use of antibiotics that are important to human health. Chickens treated with a type of antibiotic not used on humans, ionophores, will continue to be allowed.
The company said the change, which follows similar moves by companies like Panera Bread and Chipotle, was an effort "to better meet the changing preferences and expectations of today's customers."
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization have warned of an alarming rise in antibiotic-resistant bacteria or "superbugs"--a problem fueled by livestock farms, where up to 80 percent of all antibiotics are used.
Given that link, Jonathan Kaplan, director of NRDC's Food and Agriculture program, called the news "a landmark announcement in the fight to keep life-saving antibiotics working for us and our children." Because of the "company's massive purchasing power and iconic brand, we may be at a tipping point for better antibiotic stewardship in the poultry industry," he added.
Kaplan further explained that it's "good news for McDonald's customers and anyone else who might someday need an effective antibiotic."
Kari Hamerschlag, senior program manager at Friends of the Earth, echoed that sentiment, stating, "We also hope this plan will convince the livestock industry to stop its misuse of antibiotics in animal agriculture; which has been a key contributor to antibiotic resistance."
The organizations added their hopes that McDonald's move on poultry was just a first step, and that it would be making the same demands of its beef and pork supplies.
Wenonah Hauter, executive director of Food and Water Watch, also said the phase-out was a good development, but said it pointed to a failing at the federal level.
"It's past time for the FDA to force the meat industry to eliminate its use of harmful antibiotics though enforceable, non-voluntary regulation," Hauter stated.
NRDC's Kaplan also notes how McDonald's new plan falls short. He writes:
Unfortunately, the company also published a disappointing "Global Vision for Antimicrobial Stewardship in Food Animals" that sadly does little to improve the company's 2003 policy. While it looks like McDonald's invested quite a bit effort in developing it, the policy contains a giant loophole: Use of medically important antibiotics is allowed for "disease prevention" with no real limit on how much or how often these drugs can be administered. That's the same loophole that undermines FDA's current voluntary guidelines. McDonald's spokespeople described the "Global Vision" to NRDC as a "framework" for guiding more specific initiatives in different regions. That doesn't bode well for getting all routine uses of antibiotics out of their global supply chains.
The announcement comes the same week as McDonald's ushers in a new chief executive, Steve Easterbrook, who has said he wants to create a "modern, progressive burger company."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.