SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
'Distressing': New Racial Profiling Rules Won't Apply to Airports, Borders
'Focusing on an entire class of people instead of on actual conduct is unfair and harms our national security,' says ACLU's Laura Murphy
Dec 06, 2014
Soon to be released federal guidelines on racial profiling will allow Department of Homeland Security officials to continue engaging in the pratice at airports and border checks, news agencies are reporting.
The new policy will revise guidance issued by 2003 by Attorney General John Ashcroft.
Earlier this week, Attorney General Eric Holder said the new guidance "will institute rigorous new standards--and robust safeguards--to help end racial profiling, once and for all," but the new reporting indicates that the practice will not be fully stopped.
The New York Times reports:
The new rules expand the definition of racial profiling to include religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation and gender identity. Under the rules, law enforcement officials cannot consider any of those factors, along with race, during criminal investigations, or during routine immigration cases away from the border. Agencies whose officers make traffic stops, such as the United States Park Police, may not use them as a reason to pull someone over. The rules will apply to local police assigned to federal task forces, but not local police agencies.
The rules also eliminate the broad exemption for taking into account those factors in cases involving national security, but F.B.I. agents will still be allowed to map neighborhoods and use that data to recruit informants from specific ethnic groups.
But it exempts Transportation Security Administration (TSA) officials at airport screenings and parts of U.S. Customs and Border Protection--exemptions, the Washington Post reports, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) pushed for:
DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson made the case in a series of high-level meetings, arguing that while his department did not condone profiling, immigration and customs agents and airport screeners needed to consider a variety of factors to keep the nation safe, according to officials familiar with his personal efforts. TSA officials, meanwhile, argued that they should not be covered by the new limits on the grounds that the TSA is not a law enforcement agency.
"We tend to have a very specific clientele that we look for,'' said one federal official involved in immigration enforcement, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. "If you look at numbers, the vast majority of people we deal with are Hispanic. Is that profiling, or just the fact that most of the people who come into the country happen to be Hispanic?''
ACLU issued a statement in response, saying that though the revised guidance eliminates some existing loopholes, the "TSA and CBP exemptions are distressing."
"We are pleased that the national security loophole, the source of many egregious constitutional violations is narrowed. But it's difficult to celebrate knowing federal authorities will still be advised and permitted to target individuals at airports and in the vast 100-mile border zone not because they've done anything wrong, but because of their skin color or First Amendment-protected beliefs," stated ACLU Washington Legislative Office Director Laura W. Murphy.
"Let's be clear: DHS wants to racially profile at the border because, as an anonymous immigration enforcement official said today, 'There's a very specific clientele that we look for.' That's code for Latinos and other people of color who look to DHS police like they don't 'belong.' Focusing on an entire class of people instead of on actual conduct is unfair and harms our national security by wasting scarce government resources and eroding minority communities' trust in government. The White House must insist that these DHS components do not engage in unconstitutional behavior," she continued.
The news of the forthcoming rules comes the same day as a group of United Nations human rights experts said the recent grand jury decisions not to indict the police officers who killed Michael Brown and Eric Garner underscored "legitimate concerns" regarding the fairness of the justice system.
"There are numerous complaints stating that African-Americans are disproportionally affected by such practices of racial profiling and the use of disproportionate and often lethal force," stated UN Special Rapporteur on racism, Mutuma Ruteere.
"African-Americans are 10 times more likely to be pulled over by police officers for minor traffic offenses than white persons. Such practices must be eradicated," Ruteere stated.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Soon to be released federal guidelines on racial profiling will allow Department of Homeland Security officials to continue engaging in the pratice at airports and border checks, news agencies are reporting.
The new policy will revise guidance issued by 2003 by Attorney General John Ashcroft.
Earlier this week, Attorney General Eric Holder said the new guidance "will institute rigorous new standards--and robust safeguards--to help end racial profiling, once and for all," but the new reporting indicates that the practice will not be fully stopped.
The New York Times reports:
The new rules expand the definition of racial profiling to include religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation and gender identity. Under the rules, law enforcement officials cannot consider any of those factors, along with race, during criminal investigations, or during routine immigration cases away from the border. Agencies whose officers make traffic stops, such as the United States Park Police, may not use them as a reason to pull someone over. The rules will apply to local police assigned to federal task forces, but not local police agencies.
The rules also eliminate the broad exemption for taking into account those factors in cases involving national security, but F.B.I. agents will still be allowed to map neighborhoods and use that data to recruit informants from specific ethnic groups.
But it exempts Transportation Security Administration (TSA) officials at airport screenings and parts of U.S. Customs and Border Protection--exemptions, the Washington Post reports, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) pushed for:
DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson made the case in a series of high-level meetings, arguing that while his department did not condone profiling, immigration and customs agents and airport screeners needed to consider a variety of factors to keep the nation safe, according to officials familiar with his personal efforts. TSA officials, meanwhile, argued that they should not be covered by the new limits on the grounds that the TSA is not a law enforcement agency.
"We tend to have a very specific clientele that we look for,'' said one federal official involved in immigration enforcement, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. "If you look at numbers, the vast majority of people we deal with are Hispanic. Is that profiling, or just the fact that most of the people who come into the country happen to be Hispanic?''
ACLU issued a statement in response, saying that though the revised guidance eliminates some existing loopholes, the "TSA and CBP exemptions are distressing."
"We are pleased that the national security loophole, the source of many egregious constitutional violations is narrowed. But it's difficult to celebrate knowing federal authorities will still be advised and permitted to target individuals at airports and in the vast 100-mile border zone not because they've done anything wrong, but because of their skin color or First Amendment-protected beliefs," stated ACLU Washington Legislative Office Director Laura W. Murphy.
"Let's be clear: DHS wants to racially profile at the border because, as an anonymous immigration enforcement official said today, 'There's a very specific clientele that we look for.' That's code for Latinos and other people of color who look to DHS police like they don't 'belong.' Focusing on an entire class of people instead of on actual conduct is unfair and harms our national security by wasting scarce government resources and eroding minority communities' trust in government. The White House must insist that these DHS components do not engage in unconstitutional behavior," she continued.
The news of the forthcoming rules comes the same day as a group of United Nations human rights experts said the recent grand jury decisions not to indict the police officers who killed Michael Brown and Eric Garner underscored "legitimate concerns" regarding the fairness of the justice system.
"There are numerous complaints stating that African-Americans are disproportionally affected by such practices of racial profiling and the use of disproportionate and often lethal force," stated UN Special Rapporteur on racism, Mutuma Ruteere.
"African-Americans are 10 times more likely to be pulled over by police officers for minor traffic offenses than white persons. Such practices must be eradicated," Ruteere stated.
Soon to be released federal guidelines on racial profiling will allow Department of Homeland Security officials to continue engaging in the pratice at airports and border checks, news agencies are reporting.
The new policy will revise guidance issued by 2003 by Attorney General John Ashcroft.
Earlier this week, Attorney General Eric Holder said the new guidance "will institute rigorous new standards--and robust safeguards--to help end racial profiling, once and for all," but the new reporting indicates that the practice will not be fully stopped.
The New York Times reports:
The new rules expand the definition of racial profiling to include religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation and gender identity. Under the rules, law enforcement officials cannot consider any of those factors, along with race, during criminal investigations, or during routine immigration cases away from the border. Agencies whose officers make traffic stops, such as the United States Park Police, may not use them as a reason to pull someone over. The rules will apply to local police assigned to federal task forces, but not local police agencies.
The rules also eliminate the broad exemption for taking into account those factors in cases involving national security, but F.B.I. agents will still be allowed to map neighborhoods and use that data to recruit informants from specific ethnic groups.
But it exempts Transportation Security Administration (TSA) officials at airport screenings and parts of U.S. Customs and Border Protection--exemptions, the Washington Post reports, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) pushed for:
DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson made the case in a series of high-level meetings, arguing that while his department did not condone profiling, immigration and customs agents and airport screeners needed to consider a variety of factors to keep the nation safe, according to officials familiar with his personal efforts. TSA officials, meanwhile, argued that they should not be covered by the new limits on the grounds that the TSA is not a law enforcement agency.
"We tend to have a very specific clientele that we look for,'' said one federal official involved in immigration enforcement, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. "If you look at numbers, the vast majority of people we deal with are Hispanic. Is that profiling, or just the fact that most of the people who come into the country happen to be Hispanic?''
ACLU issued a statement in response, saying that though the revised guidance eliminates some existing loopholes, the "TSA and CBP exemptions are distressing."
"We are pleased that the national security loophole, the source of many egregious constitutional violations is narrowed. But it's difficult to celebrate knowing federal authorities will still be advised and permitted to target individuals at airports and in the vast 100-mile border zone not because they've done anything wrong, but because of their skin color or First Amendment-protected beliefs," stated ACLU Washington Legislative Office Director Laura W. Murphy.
"Let's be clear: DHS wants to racially profile at the border because, as an anonymous immigration enforcement official said today, 'There's a very specific clientele that we look for.' That's code for Latinos and other people of color who look to DHS police like they don't 'belong.' Focusing on an entire class of people instead of on actual conduct is unfair and harms our national security by wasting scarce government resources and eroding minority communities' trust in government. The White House must insist that these DHS components do not engage in unconstitutional behavior," she continued.
The news of the forthcoming rules comes the same day as a group of United Nations human rights experts said the recent grand jury decisions not to indict the police officers who killed Michael Brown and Eric Garner underscored "legitimate concerns" regarding the fairness of the justice system.
"There are numerous complaints stating that African-Americans are disproportionally affected by such practices of racial profiling and the use of disproportionate and often lethal force," stated UN Special Rapporteur on racism, Mutuma Ruteere.
"African-Americans are 10 times more likely to be pulled over by police officers for minor traffic offenses than white persons. Such practices must be eradicated," Ruteere stated.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.