SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
US Sending More Arms to Lebanon to Fight Militants
Struggle on Syrian border has led to hundreds of casualties and displacements
Aug 15, 2014
The U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon announced Thursday that the United States will soon supply the Lebanese military with additional weaponry to help "secure Lebanon's borders, protect Lebanon's people, and fight these violent extremist groups."
The assistance comes after Lebanon requested emergency aid following deadly clashes earlier this month with Sunni militants in the eastern Arsal region of the country, on the Syrian border. In five days of fighting in early August, 19 Lebanese soldiers and more than 50 civilians were killed, with many more wounded; seven soldiers are still being held hostage by Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), and nine more are being held by Al-Nusra Front, a branch of Al Qaeda operating in Syria and Lebanon.
In addition, the battle forced thousands of women and children to flee, including Lebanese civilians and Syrian refugees seeking shelter from their own country's civil war. The UN estimates that by the end of this year, there could be close to 1.5 million Syrian refugees in Lebanon, which has long been the site of proxy wars in the Middle East.
Since 2006, the U.S. has provided more than $1 billion in military training and assistance to Lebanon's armed forces, $120 million of that since October 2013.
Those numbers pale in comparison to what Saudi Arabia has pledged since December: $3 billion for weaponry as long as it's purchased from France, plus an additional $1 billion in direct aid.
The ambassador's announcement indicates willingness on the part of the U.S. to work with the Lebanese government despite the sizable influence, in both the military and political spheres, of Hezbollah, the Shiite Islamist militant group that the U.S. describes as a terrorist organization.
An Inter Press Service article last week quoted Yezid Sayigh, senior associate at the Carnegie Middle East Center in Beirut, saying that in relation to the U.S. and its financial support for Lebanon, "there seems to have been a strategic decision to continue to cooperate with the Lebanese government, the Lebanese army, and other agencies even when Hezbollah is in a coalition government."
Some speculate that Saudi Arabia's motives for funding the Lebanese Armed Forces may be even more directly related to Hezbollah. In a column written last week, Al Arabiya journalist Abdulrahman al-Rashed offered context for Saudi Arabia's gift, describing it as a "political act" meant to lend legitimacy to the Lebanese army in the face of Hezbollah's stronger forces:
Saudi Arabia could have offered this financial aid to build up a Lebanese Sunni militia and would have had many reasons for doing so, from fighting the Sunni Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) to deterring the Shiite Hezbollah and Bashar al-Assad's intelligence forces.
Instead, Saudi Arabia chose to support the army in Lebanon -- a country full of Christian, Druze and Shiite militias...It's not in Saudi Arabia's interest for Lebanon to turn into an arena for sectarian militias fighting each other on behalf of the region's countries.
Strengthening the Lebanese army means weakening Hezbollah's scheme to dominate Lebanon and turn it into an Iranian emirate. It will enable the Lebanese to confront Sunni terrorist organizations which came running behind Hezbollah from Syria into Lebanon in this cat and mouse chase. The events in Arsal have proven the importance of having a strong army that stops the meddling of Hezbollah which sought to clash with Syrian groups under the Lebanese army's flag. Military challenges at state level, from the events in Nahr al-Bared refugee camp to the recent events in Arsal, have proven that it's not possible to trust Hezbollah and that the Lebanese people will not accept that any party besides the army defends their security.
According to the U.S. Embassy in Lebanon, "U.S. military assistance will begin arriving in the next few weeks and continue in the months to follow."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
The U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon announced Thursday that the United States will soon supply the Lebanese military with additional weaponry to help "secure Lebanon's borders, protect Lebanon's people, and fight these violent extremist groups."
The assistance comes after Lebanon requested emergency aid following deadly clashes earlier this month with Sunni militants in the eastern Arsal region of the country, on the Syrian border. In five days of fighting in early August, 19 Lebanese soldiers and more than 50 civilians were killed, with many more wounded; seven soldiers are still being held hostage by Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), and nine more are being held by Al-Nusra Front, a branch of Al Qaeda operating in Syria and Lebanon.
In addition, the battle forced thousands of women and children to flee, including Lebanese civilians and Syrian refugees seeking shelter from their own country's civil war. The UN estimates that by the end of this year, there could be close to 1.5 million Syrian refugees in Lebanon, which has long been the site of proxy wars in the Middle East.
Since 2006, the U.S. has provided more than $1 billion in military training and assistance to Lebanon's armed forces, $120 million of that since October 2013.
Those numbers pale in comparison to what Saudi Arabia has pledged since December: $3 billion for weaponry as long as it's purchased from France, plus an additional $1 billion in direct aid.
The ambassador's announcement indicates willingness on the part of the U.S. to work with the Lebanese government despite the sizable influence, in both the military and political spheres, of Hezbollah, the Shiite Islamist militant group that the U.S. describes as a terrorist organization.
An Inter Press Service article last week quoted Yezid Sayigh, senior associate at the Carnegie Middle East Center in Beirut, saying that in relation to the U.S. and its financial support for Lebanon, "there seems to have been a strategic decision to continue to cooperate with the Lebanese government, the Lebanese army, and other agencies even when Hezbollah is in a coalition government."
Some speculate that Saudi Arabia's motives for funding the Lebanese Armed Forces may be even more directly related to Hezbollah. In a column written last week, Al Arabiya journalist Abdulrahman al-Rashed offered context for Saudi Arabia's gift, describing it as a "political act" meant to lend legitimacy to the Lebanese army in the face of Hezbollah's stronger forces:
Saudi Arabia could have offered this financial aid to build up a Lebanese Sunni militia and would have had many reasons for doing so, from fighting the Sunni Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) to deterring the Shiite Hezbollah and Bashar al-Assad's intelligence forces.
Instead, Saudi Arabia chose to support the army in Lebanon -- a country full of Christian, Druze and Shiite militias...It's not in Saudi Arabia's interest for Lebanon to turn into an arena for sectarian militias fighting each other on behalf of the region's countries.
Strengthening the Lebanese army means weakening Hezbollah's scheme to dominate Lebanon and turn it into an Iranian emirate. It will enable the Lebanese to confront Sunni terrorist organizations which came running behind Hezbollah from Syria into Lebanon in this cat and mouse chase. The events in Arsal have proven the importance of having a strong army that stops the meddling of Hezbollah which sought to clash with Syrian groups under the Lebanese army's flag. Military challenges at state level, from the events in Nahr al-Bared refugee camp to the recent events in Arsal, have proven that it's not possible to trust Hezbollah and that the Lebanese people will not accept that any party besides the army defends their security.
According to the U.S. Embassy in Lebanon, "U.S. military assistance will begin arriving in the next few weeks and continue in the months to follow."
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
The U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon announced Thursday that the United States will soon supply the Lebanese military with additional weaponry to help "secure Lebanon's borders, protect Lebanon's people, and fight these violent extremist groups."
The assistance comes after Lebanon requested emergency aid following deadly clashes earlier this month with Sunni militants in the eastern Arsal region of the country, on the Syrian border. In five days of fighting in early August, 19 Lebanese soldiers and more than 50 civilians were killed, with many more wounded; seven soldiers are still being held hostage by Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), and nine more are being held by Al-Nusra Front, a branch of Al Qaeda operating in Syria and Lebanon.
In addition, the battle forced thousands of women and children to flee, including Lebanese civilians and Syrian refugees seeking shelter from their own country's civil war. The UN estimates that by the end of this year, there could be close to 1.5 million Syrian refugees in Lebanon, which has long been the site of proxy wars in the Middle East.
Since 2006, the U.S. has provided more than $1 billion in military training and assistance to Lebanon's armed forces, $120 million of that since October 2013.
Those numbers pale in comparison to what Saudi Arabia has pledged since December: $3 billion for weaponry as long as it's purchased from France, plus an additional $1 billion in direct aid.
The ambassador's announcement indicates willingness on the part of the U.S. to work with the Lebanese government despite the sizable influence, in both the military and political spheres, of Hezbollah, the Shiite Islamist militant group that the U.S. describes as a terrorist organization.
An Inter Press Service article last week quoted Yezid Sayigh, senior associate at the Carnegie Middle East Center in Beirut, saying that in relation to the U.S. and its financial support for Lebanon, "there seems to have been a strategic decision to continue to cooperate with the Lebanese government, the Lebanese army, and other agencies even when Hezbollah is in a coalition government."
Some speculate that Saudi Arabia's motives for funding the Lebanese Armed Forces may be even more directly related to Hezbollah. In a column written last week, Al Arabiya journalist Abdulrahman al-Rashed offered context for Saudi Arabia's gift, describing it as a "political act" meant to lend legitimacy to the Lebanese army in the face of Hezbollah's stronger forces:
Saudi Arabia could have offered this financial aid to build up a Lebanese Sunni militia and would have had many reasons for doing so, from fighting the Sunni Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) to deterring the Shiite Hezbollah and Bashar al-Assad's intelligence forces.
Instead, Saudi Arabia chose to support the army in Lebanon -- a country full of Christian, Druze and Shiite militias...It's not in Saudi Arabia's interest for Lebanon to turn into an arena for sectarian militias fighting each other on behalf of the region's countries.
Strengthening the Lebanese army means weakening Hezbollah's scheme to dominate Lebanon and turn it into an Iranian emirate. It will enable the Lebanese to confront Sunni terrorist organizations which came running behind Hezbollah from Syria into Lebanon in this cat and mouse chase. The events in Arsal have proven the importance of having a strong army that stops the meddling of Hezbollah which sought to clash with Syrian groups under the Lebanese army's flag. Military challenges at state level, from the events in Nahr al-Bared refugee camp to the recent events in Arsal, have proven that it's not possible to trust Hezbollah and that the Lebanese people will not accept that any party besides the army defends their security.
According to the U.S. Embassy in Lebanon, "U.S. military assistance will begin arriving in the next few weeks and continue in the months to follow."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.