Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

There are less than 72 hours left in this Mid-Year Campaign and our independent journalism needs your help today.
If you value our work, please support Common Dreams. This is our hour of need.

Join the small group of generous readers who donate, keeping Common Dreams free for millions of people each year. Without your help, we won’t survive.

elon musk

SpaceX owner and Tesla CEO Elon Musk poses on the red carpet of the Axel Springer Award 2020 on December 01, 2020 in Berlin, Germany. (Photo: Britta Pedersen-Pool/Getty Images)

Good Riddance! Let Outer Space Have Our Billionaires

Could space become the 'final frontier' in the struggle for a more equal world?

Sam Pizzigati

 by Inequality.org

Three of the richest billionaires on Earth are now busily spending billions to exit our Earth's atmosphere and enter into space. The world is watching—and reflecting.

Some commentators see our billionaire trio—Richard Branson, Jeff Bezos, and Elon Musk—as heroic heirs to the legacies of Charles Lindbergh and Sir Edmund Hillary, the first mere mortals to high jump the Atlantic alone and scale the world's highest mountain.

Our billionaires racing into space, other charmed commentators are adding, aren't just thrilling humankind. They're uplifting us. The technologies that the space operations Branson, Bezos, and Musk "develop could benefit people worldwide far into the future," says Yahoo Finance's Daniel Howley.

"This is what you're going to do with your unprecedented fortunes and influence? Drag race to outer space?"

But most of our commentators seem to be taking a considerably more skeptical perspective. They're dismissing the space antics of Branson, Bezos, and Musk as the ego trips of bored billionaires, "cynical stunts by disgustingly rich businessmen," as one British analyst puts it, "to boost their self-importance at a time when money and resources are desperately needed elsewhere."

"Space travel used to be about 'us,' a collective effort by the country to reach beyond previously unreachable limits," writes author William Rivers Pitt. "That was the Cold War propaganda, anyway, and it had an unavoidable allure. Now, it's about 'them,' the 0.1 percent."

The best of these skeptical commentators can even make us laugh.

"Really, billionaires?" comedian Seth Meyers asked earlier this month. "This is what you're going to do with your unprecedented fortunes and influence? Drag race to outer space?"

Let's enjoy the ridicule. But let's not treat the billionaire space race as a laughing matter. Let's see it as a wake-up call, a reminder that we don't only get billionaires when wealth concentrates. We get a society that revolves around the egos of the most affluent among us and an economy where the needs of average people go unmet and don't particularly matter.

Characters like Elon Musk, notes Paris Max, host of the Tech Won't Save Us podcast, are using "misleading narratives about space to fuel public excitement" and gain tax-dollar support for various projects "designed to work best—if not exclusively—for the elite."

The three corporate space shells for Musk, Bezos, and Branson—SpaceX, Blue Origin, and Virgin Galactic—have "all benefited greatly through partnerships with NASA and the US military," notes CNN Business. Their common corporate goal: to get satellites, people, and cargo "into space cheaper and quicker than has been possible in decades past."

Branson, for his part, is hawking tickets for roundtrips "to the edge of the atmosphere and back," at $250,000 per head. He's planning some 400 such trips a year, observes British journalist Oliver Bullough, about "almost as bad an idea as racing to see who can burn the rainforest quickest."

The annual UN Emissions Gap Report last year concluded that the world's richest 1 percent do more to foul the atmosphere than the entire poorest 50 percent combined. That top 1 percent, the UN report adds, would have to "reduce its footprint by a factor of 30 to stay in line" with the 2015 Paris Agreement targets. Opening space to rich people's joyrides would stomp that footprint even bigger.

Bezos and Musk seem to have grander dreams than mere space tourism. They're looking "to colonize the cosmos," with Bezos pushing "artificial tube-like structures floating close to Earth" and Musk talking up the terraforming of Mars. They essentially see space as a refuge from an increasingly inhospitable planet Earth. They expect tax-dollar support to make their various pipedreams come true.

And how should we respond to all this? We should, of course, be working to create a more hospitable planet for all humanity. In the meantime, several egalitarian wags have been circulating online petitions that urge our terrestrial authorities not to let orbiting billionaires back on Earth.

"Billionaires should not exist…on Earth or in space, but should they decide the latter, they should stay there," reads one petition nearing 200,000 signatures.

Ric Geiger, the 31-year-old automotive supplies account manager behind that effort, is hoping his petition helps the issue of maldistributed wealth "reach a broader platform."

Activists like Geiger are going down the right track. We don't need billionaires out to "conquer space." We need to conquer inequality.


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
Sam Pizzigati

Sam Pizzigati

Sam Pizzigati, veteran labor journalist and Institute for Policy Studies associate fellow, edits Inequality.org. His recent books include: "The Case for a Maximum Wage" (2018) and "The Rich Don't Always Win: The Forgotten Triumph over Plutocracy that Created the American Middle Class, 1900-1970"(2012).

Just a few days left in our crucial Mid-Year Campaign and we might not make it without your help.
Who funds our independent journalism? Readers like you who believe in our mission: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. No corporate advertisers. No billionaire founder. Our non-partisan, nonprofit media model has only one source of revenue: The people who read and value this work and our mission. That's it.
And the model is simple: If everyone just gives whatever amount they can afford and think is reasonable—$3, $9, $29, or more—we can continue. If not enough do, we go dark.

All the small gifts add up to something otherwise impossible. Please join us today. Donate to Common Dreams. This is crunch time. We need you now.

Markey, Bowman Join Climate Coalition in Urging SCOTUS Expansion

"We cannot sit idly by," said Markey, "as extremists on the Supreme Court eviscerate the authorities that the government has had for decades to combat climate change and reduce pollution."

Brett Wilkins ·


Ocasio-Cortez Says US 'Witnessing a Judicial Coup in Process'

"It is our duty to check the Court's gross overreach of power in violating people's inalienable rights and seizing for itself the powers of Congress and the president."

Brett Wilkins ·


Critics Say Biden Drilling Bonanza 'Won't Lower Gas Prices' But 'Will Worsen Climate Crisis'

"President Biden's massive public lands giveaway in the face of utter climate catastrophe is just the latest sign that his climate commitments are mere rhetoric," said one campaigner.

Kenny Stancil ·


Grave Warnings as Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Case That Threatens 'Future of Voting Rights'

"Buckle up," implores one prominent legal scholar. "An extreme decision here could fundamentally alter the balance of power in setting election rules in the states and provide a path for great threats to elections."

Brett Wilkins ·


Biden Urged to Take Emergency Action After 'Disastrous' Climate Ruling by Supreme Court

"The catastrophic impact of this decision cannot be understated," said Rep. Pramila Jayapal, but "we cannot accept defeat."

Kenny Stancil ·

Common Dreams Logo