

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Jeff Bezos, Founder and CEO of Amazon, and his ex-wife MacKenzie Bezos arrive on the red carpet at the Amazon Studios after-party celebrating the 67th Annual Primetime Emmy Awards. (Photo by Paul Mounce/Corbis via Getty Images)
In her second move as a billionaire philanthropist, MacKenzie Scott (formerly Bezos) has announced $4.2 billion in gifts to 384 organizations, mostly unrestricted grants to front-line charities addressing the needs of low-income people during the pandemic.
Writing in a post on Medium, Scott described her motivation. "The pandemic has been a wrecking ball in the lives of Americans already struggling. Economic losses and health outcomes alike have been worse for women, people of color, and for people living in poverty. Meanwhile, it was substantially increased the wealth of billionaires."
Scott is shaming these mega-foundations that worry more about perpetuity than the suffering of their neighbors during an unprecedented crisis.
The bulk of these gifts are to the works of mercy during this pandemic -food banks, direct social service organizations, emergency funds, and support services for the most vulnerable.
Scott's current net worth, according to Forbes is $59 billion, making her the 19th wealthiest billionaire in the U.S. She still has a long way to go in her stated intention of giving away all the wealth. But she's now made two bold moves, putting to shame the other 650 U.S. billionaires who haven't figure out comparable ways to boldly share.
During a pandemic when US billionaire wealth has increased $1 trillion since March, other billionaires should draw inspiration from her approach to move funds to urgent needs, to historically marginalized groups, to share decision-making with non-wealthy people, and to avoid warehousing funds in private legacy foundations.
Many private foundations are still guarding their perpetual endowments and giving the minimum 5 percent required, including overhead. By example, Scott is shaming these mega-foundations that worry more about perpetuity than the suffering of their neighbors during an unprecedented crisis.
Private foundations are sitting on over $1.1 trillion in assets while donor-advised funds (DAFs) hold an estimated $120 billion. Wealthy donors have already taken their tax breaks for these donations, but need a push to move their money. A movement of charities has been pressing Congress to include an Emergency Charity Stimulus as part of the next Covid-relief passage. This would mandate that private foundations increase their minimum payout from 5 percent to 10 percent--and that DAFs have a payout. This would move $200 billion to front line charities over the next three years, without adding to national borrowing.
Of particular note is not just the size of her gifts, but the approach she has taken to giving. Scott, a newcomer on the billionaire wealth scene, has surrounded herself with advisors that come from under-resourced communities, not the folks that typically sit on foundation boards.
Scott writes, "Though I'm far from completing my pledge, this year of giving began with exposure to leaders from historically marginalized groups fighting inequities, and ended with exposure to thousands of organizations working to alleviate suffering for those hardest hit by the pandemic."
She invites others to give whatever they can: "If you're craving a way to use your time, voice, or money to help others at the end of this difficult year, I highly recommend a gift to one of the thousands of organizations doing remarkable work all across the country. Every one of them could benefit from more resources to share with the communities they're serving. And the hope you feed with your gift is likely to feed your own."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
In her second move as a billionaire philanthropist, MacKenzie Scott (formerly Bezos) has announced $4.2 billion in gifts to 384 organizations, mostly unrestricted grants to front-line charities addressing the needs of low-income people during the pandemic.
Writing in a post on Medium, Scott described her motivation. "The pandemic has been a wrecking ball in the lives of Americans already struggling. Economic losses and health outcomes alike have been worse for women, people of color, and for people living in poverty. Meanwhile, it was substantially increased the wealth of billionaires."
Scott is shaming these mega-foundations that worry more about perpetuity than the suffering of their neighbors during an unprecedented crisis.
The bulk of these gifts are to the works of mercy during this pandemic -food banks, direct social service organizations, emergency funds, and support services for the most vulnerable.
Scott's current net worth, according to Forbes is $59 billion, making her the 19th wealthiest billionaire in the U.S. She still has a long way to go in her stated intention of giving away all the wealth. But she's now made two bold moves, putting to shame the other 650 U.S. billionaires who haven't figure out comparable ways to boldly share.
During a pandemic when US billionaire wealth has increased $1 trillion since March, other billionaires should draw inspiration from her approach to move funds to urgent needs, to historically marginalized groups, to share decision-making with non-wealthy people, and to avoid warehousing funds in private legacy foundations.
Many private foundations are still guarding their perpetual endowments and giving the minimum 5 percent required, including overhead. By example, Scott is shaming these mega-foundations that worry more about perpetuity than the suffering of their neighbors during an unprecedented crisis.
Private foundations are sitting on over $1.1 trillion in assets while donor-advised funds (DAFs) hold an estimated $120 billion. Wealthy donors have already taken their tax breaks for these donations, but need a push to move their money. A movement of charities has been pressing Congress to include an Emergency Charity Stimulus as part of the next Covid-relief passage. This would mandate that private foundations increase their minimum payout from 5 percent to 10 percent--and that DAFs have a payout. This would move $200 billion to front line charities over the next three years, without adding to national borrowing.
Of particular note is not just the size of her gifts, but the approach she has taken to giving. Scott, a newcomer on the billionaire wealth scene, has surrounded herself with advisors that come from under-resourced communities, not the folks that typically sit on foundation boards.
Scott writes, "Though I'm far from completing my pledge, this year of giving began with exposure to leaders from historically marginalized groups fighting inequities, and ended with exposure to thousands of organizations working to alleviate suffering for those hardest hit by the pandemic."
She invites others to give whatever they can: "If you're craving a way to use your time, voice, or money to help others at the end of this difficult year, I highly recommend a gift to one of the thousands of organizations doing remarkable work all across the country. Every one of them could benefit from more resources to share with the communities they're serving. And the hope you feed with your gift is likely to feed your own."
In her second move as a billionaire philanthropist, MacKenzie Scott (formerly Bezos) has announced $4.2 billion in gifts to 384 organizations, mostly unrestricted grants to front-line charities addressing the needs of low-income people during the pandemic.
Writing in a post on Medium, Scott described her motivation. "The pandemic has been a wrecking ball in the lives of Americans already struggling. Economic losses and health outcomes alike have been worse for women, people of color, and for people living in poverty. Meanwhile, it was substantially increased the wealth of billionaires."
Scott is shaming these mega-foundations that worry more about perpetuity than the suffering of their neighbors during an unprecedented crisis.
The bulk of these gifts are to the works of mercy during this pandemic -food banks, direct social service organizations, emergency funds, and support services for the most vulnerable.
Scott's current net worth, according to Forbes is $59 billion, making her the 19th wealthiest billionaire in the U.S. She still has a long way to go in her stated intention of giving away all the wealth. But she's now made two bold moves, putting to shame the other 650 U.S. billionaires who haven't figure out comparable ways to boldly share.
During a pandemic when US billionaire wealth has increased $1 trillion since March, other billionaires should draw inspiration from her approach to move funds to urgent needs, to historically marginalized groups, to share decision-making with non-wealthy people, and to avoid warehousing funds in private legacy foundations.
Many private foundations are still guarding their perpetual endowments and giving the minimum 5 percent required, including overhead. By example, Scott is shaming these mega-foundations that worry more about perpetuity than the suffering of their neighbors during an unprecedented crisis.
Private foundations are sitting on over $1.1 trillion in assets while donor-advised funds (DAFs) hold an estimated $120 billion. Wealthy donors have already taken their tax breaks for these donations, but need a push to move their money. A movement of charities has been pressing Congress to include an Emergency Charity Stimulus as part of the next Covid-relief passage. This would mandate that private foundations increase their minimum payout from 5 percent to 10 percent--and that DAFs have a payout. This would move $200 billion to front line charities over the next three years, without adding to national borrowing.
Of particular note is not just the size of her gifts, but the approach she has taken to giving. Scott, a newcomer on the billionaire wealth scene, has surrounded herself with advisors that come from under-resourced communities, not the folks that typically sit on foundation boards.
Scott writes, "Though I'm far from completing my pledge, this year of giving began with exposure to leaders from historically marginalized groups fighting inequities, and ended with exposure to thousands of organizations working to alleviate suffering for those hardest hit by the pandemic."
She invites others to give whatever they can: "If you're craving a way to use your time, voice, or money to help others at the end of this difficult year, I highly recommend a gift to one of the thousands of organizations doing remarkable work all across the country. Every one of them could benefit from more resources to share with the communities they're serving. And the hope you feed with your gift is likely to feed your own."