Agroecology has been lauded as an approach that should guide the transformation of food and agriculture systems. (Photo by Wendy Stone/Corbis via Getty Images)
Finance for Agroecology: More Than Just a Dream?
A profound transformation of food systems is needed and such a shift must happen rapidly to constructively address the multiple crises that are threatening humanity.
Between alarming discourses and action: the math doesn't add up
A recent UN report revealed that the world keeps failing reaching the targets it sets to safeguard biodiversity and the benefits it provides to people. And the bad news keeps pilling up: climate chaos, biodiversity collapse, increasing inequalities, hunger and malnutrition. Every day brings further evidence of a collapsing global civilization. Forest fires, droughts, Covid-19 are further examples. Human-made disasters are no longer future threats. It is widely recognized that 2030 is a key year with respect to addressing the multiple, converging crises and associated challenges: it is the year the UN's Sustainable Development Goals have to be achieved and a key year with respect to the implementation of the Paris Agreement. Yet, according to the FAO-OECD 2020-2029 agriculture outlook, greenhouse gas emissions from the food system will grow another 6%, telling us that something's got to give. According to current estimates, global food systems already contribute a considerable proportion of global GHG - between 21% (according to the FAO), 24% (IPCC) or up to 50% (Grain), if processing, packaging, transport, refrigeration and distribution are taken into account. A large gap remains between transformative discourses and incremental action, which can no longer be justified, nor excused. The math doesn't add up: a paradigm shift is desperately needed.
Agroecology: a paradigm shift
Agroecology is the needed paradigm and has been embraced a wide range of organisations. As an appropriate way of redesigning and managing food systems - "from the farm to the table, with a goal of achieving ecological, economic, and social sustainability" - agroecological principles can be adapted to different contexts all over the world. At least since the important report of IAASTD in 2009, agroecology has been lauded as an approach that should guide the transformation of food and agriculture systems. Its potential to achieve the SDGs and implement the Paris Agreement is now also recognised. But talking about agroecology as a paradigm shift is not enough: action needs to be taken now. Many people around the world, peasants, indigenous people, neo-rural youth, farmers and NGOs are working tirelessly to restore and enhance the ecological health and diversity of the land they cultivate. They are, however, being undermined by policies and finance still feeding the expansion of petrochemical-dependent agribusiness. The needed paradigm shift requires political action in order to direct funds away from an entirely unsustainable agricultural sector and towards more-than-sustainable and regenerative agroecology.
Finance for agroecology: too little, but not too late
While lip service is paid to the urgent need for "food system transformation", the bulk of financial flows still goes towards business-as-usual approaches and efficiency-oriented approaches (conventional and industrial agriculture). We have now reached a critical mass of evidence highlighting this gap. Several reports and studies have critically analysed the financial support for transformative agroecology provided by countries and institutions. The support is either minimal (Belgium, Germany, USA) or inexistent (UK). A recent joint IPES-Food and Biovision study on financial flows highlighted the lack of funding anew, by showing that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation's agricultural research spending on agroecology amounted to a mere 3%. Spending on agroecology research in Kenya was slightly higher at 13%. FAO's own analysis of their 2018-2019 work plan highlighted that only 8% of their expected results were supportive of a transition towards sustainable food systems. The case of Switzerland (where 51% of Swiss-funded agricultural research for development projects had agroecological components) seems to be the exception.
The same political, scientific, and financial will that accompanied the green revolution in its early stage must back agroecology now.
Other reports have shown that development banks, such as the International Finance Corporation (World Bank) and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), are strongly financing industrial livestock farms and meat and dairies industries, having directed $2.6bn to these in the past 10 years. We have also recently learned that "$500bn (PS388bn) of environmentally damaging government subsidies have not been eliminated".
Through the research partnership between CIDSE and the Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience at Coventry University, we identified similar trends in funding for agroecology at European Union (EU) and Green Climate Fund (GCF) level. Projects supporting transformative agroecology aimed at redesigning food and farming systems were only found in the GCF portfolio and represent 10.6% of the total invested in agricultural projects. Only 2.7% of EU funds channelled through FAO, IFAD and the WFP between 2016 and 2018 focus on substituting harmful inputs and practices with less degrading ones - which should be the starting point of a transition towards agroecology. Though the analysis of EU projects only provided a snapshot of one specific part of the overall EU development portfolio (and thus may overlook some EU financial support for agroecology elsewhere), the meager figures reflect the typical gap between discourse and implementation mentioned above. The bottom line is disappointing.
Thinking big, acting fast
A profound transformation of food systems is needed and such a shift must happen rapidly to constructively address the multiple crises that are threatening humanity. We find ourselves at the end of the petrochemical era which ushered in the so called 'green' revolution. What is needed is a new vision to catalyse the next revolution. Agroecology - together with food sovereignty has this potential and where it has been implemented it has delivered. The same political, scientific and financial will that accompanied the green revolution in its early stage must back agroecology now. Fortunately, recent developments at the international level (the uptake of agroecology by all major UN agencies) and at EU level (inclusion of agroecology in its Green Deal) suggests that things might be changing. Now we just need public institutions and governments to put their money where their mouths are.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Between alarming discourses and action: the math doesn't add up
A recent UN report revealed that the world keeps failing reaching the targets it sets to safeguard biodiversity and the benefits it provides to people. And the bad news keeps pilling up: climate chaos, biodiversity collapse, increasing inequalities, hunger and malnutrition. Every day brings further evidence of a collapsing global civilization. Forest fires, droughts, Covid-19 are further examples. Human-made disasters are no longer future threats. It is widely recognized that 2030 is a key year with respect to addressing the multiple, converging crises and associated challenges: it is the year the UN's Sustainable Development Goals have to be achieved and a key year with respect to the implementation of the Paris Agreement. Yet, according to the FAO-OECD 2020-2029 agriculture outlook, greenhouse gas emissions from the food system will grow another 6%, telling us that something's got to give. According to current estimates, global food systems already contribute a considerable proportion of global GHG - between 21% (according to the FAO), 24% (IPCC) or up to 50% (Grain), if processing, packaging, transport, refrigeration and distribution are taken into account. A large gap remains between transformative discourses and incremental action, which can no longer be justified, nor excused. The math doesn't add up: a paradigm shift is desperately needed.
Agroecology: a paradigm shift
Agroecology is the needed paradigm and has been embraced a wide range of organisations. As an appropriate way of redesigning and managing food systems - "from the farm to the table, with a goal of achieving ecological, economic, and social sustainability" - agroecological principles can be adapted to different contexts all over the world. At least since the important report of IAASTD in 2009, agroecology has been lauded as an approach that should guide the transformation of food and agriculture systems. Its potential to achieve the SDGs and implement the Paris Agreement is now also recognised. But talking about agroecology as a paradigm shift is not enough: action needs to be taken now. Many people around the world, peasants, indigenous people, neo-rural youth, farmers and NGOs are working tirelessly to restore and enhance the ecological health and diversity of the land they cultivate. They are, however, being undermined by policies and finance still feeding the expansion of petrochemical-dependent agribusiness. The needed paradigm shift requires political action in order to direct funds away from an entirely unsustainable agricultural sector and towards more-than-sustainable and regenerative agroecology.
Finance for agroecology: too little, but not too late
While lip service is paid to the urgent need for "food system transformation", the bulk of financial flows still goes towards business-as-usual approaches and efficiency-oriented approaches (conventional and industrial agriculture). We have now reached a critical mass of evidence highlighting this gap. Several reports and studies have critically analysed the financial support for transformative agroecology provided by countries and institutions. The support is either minimal (Belgium, Germany, USA) or inexistent (UK). A recent joint IPES-Food and Biovision study on financial flows highlighted the lack of funding anew, by showing that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation's agricultural research spending on agroecology amounted to a mere 3%. Spending on agroecology research in Kenya was slightly higher at 13%. FAO's own analysis of their 2018-2019 work plan highlighted that only 8% of their expected results were supportive of a transition towards sustainable food systems. The case of Switzerland (where 51% of Swiss-funded agricultural research for development projects had agroecological components) seems to be the exception.
The same political, scientific, and financial will that accompanied the green revolution in its early stage must back agroecology now.
Other reports have shown that development banks, such as the International Finance Corporation (World Bank) and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), are strongly financing industrial livestock farms and meat and dairies industries, having directed $2.6bn to these in the past 10 years. We have also recently learned that "$500bn (PS388bn) of environmentally damaging government subsidies have not been eliminated".
Through the research partnership between CIDSE and the Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience at Coventry University, we identified similar trends in funding for agroecology at European Union (EU) and Green Climate Fund (GCF) level. Projects supporting transformative agroecology aimed at redesigning food and farming systems were only found in the GCF portfolio and represent 10.6% of the total invested in agricultural projects. Only 2.7% of EU funds channelled through FAO, IFAD and the WFP between 2016 and 2018 focus on substituting harmful inputs and practices with less degrading ones - which should be the starting point of a transition towards agroecology. Though the analysis of EU projects only provided a snapshot of one specific part of the overall EU development portfolio (and thus may overlook some EU financial support for agroecology elsewhere), the meager figures reflect the typical gap between discourse and implementation mentioned above. The bottom line is disappointing.
Thinking big, acting fast
A profound transformation of food systems is needed and such a shift must happen rapidly to constructively address the multiple crises that are threatening humanity. We find ourselves at the end of the petrochemical era which ushered in the so called 'green' revolution. What is needed is a new vision to catalyse the next revolution. Agroecology - together with food sovereignty has this potential and where it has been implemented it has delivered. The same political, scientific and financial will that accompanied the green revolution in its early stage must back agroecology now. Fortunately, recent developments at the international level (the uptake of agroecology by all major UN agencies) and at EU level (inclusion of agroecology in its Green Deal) suggests that things might be changing. Now we just need public institutions and governments to put their money where their mouths are.
Between alarming discourses and action: the math doesn't add up
A recent UN report revealed that the world keeps failing reaching the targets it sets to safeguard biodiversity and the benefits it provides to people. And the bad news keeps pilling up: climate chaos, biodiversity collapse, increasing inequalities, hunger and malnutrition. Every day brings further evidence of a collapsing global civilization. Forest fires, droughts, Covid-19 are further examples. Human-made disasters are no longer future threats. It is widely recognized that 2030 is a key year with respect to addressing the multiple, converging crises and associated challenges: it is the year the UN's Sustainable Development Goals have to be achieved and a key year with respect to the implementation of the Paris Agreement. Yet, according to the FAO-OECD 2020-2029 agriculture outlook, greenhouse gas emissions from the food system will grow another 6%, telling us that something's got to give. According to current estimates, global food systems already contribute a considerable proportion of global GHG - between 21% (according to the FAO), 24% (IPCC) or up to 50% (Grain), if processing, packaging, transport, refrigeration and distribution are taken into account. A large gap remains between transformative discourses and incremental action, which can no longer be justified, nor excused. The math doesn't add up: a paradigm shift is desperately needed.
Agroecology: a paradigm shift
Agroecology is the needed paradigm and has been embraced a wide range of organisations. As an appropriate way of redesigning and managing food systems - "from the farm to the table, with a goal of achieving ecological, economic, and social sustainability" - agroecological principles can be adapted to different contexts all over the world. At least since the important report of IAASTD in 2009, agroecology has been lauded as an approach that should guide the transformation of food and agriculture systems. Its potential to achieve the SDGs and implement the Paris Agreement is now also recognised. But talking about agroecology as a paradigm shift is not enough: action needs to be taken now. Many people around the world, peasants, indigenous people, neo-rural youth, farmers and NGOs are working tirelessly to restore and enhance the ecological health and diversity of the land they cultivate. They are, however, being undermined by policies and finance still feeding the expansion of petrochemical-dependent agribusiness. The needed paradigm shift requires political action in order to direct funds away from an entirely unsustainable agricultural sector and towards more-than-sustainable and regenerative agroecology.
Finance for agroecology: too little, but not too late
While lip service is paid to the urgent need for "food system transformation", the bulk of financial flows still goes towards business-as-usual approaches and efficiency-oriented approaches (conventional and industrial agriculture). We have now reached a critical mass of evidence highlighting this gap. Several reports and studies have critically analysed the financial support for transformative agroecology provided by countries and institutions. The support is either minimal (Belgium, Germany, USA) or inexistent (UK). A recent joint IPES-Food and Biovision study on financial flows highlighted the lack of funding anew, by showing that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation's agricultural research spending on agroecology amounted to a mere 3%. Spending on agroecology research in Kenya was slightly higher at 13%. FAO's own analysis of their 2018-2019 work plan highlighted that only 8% of their expected results were supportive of a transition towards sustainable food systems. The case of Switzerland (where 51% of Swiss-funded agricultural research for development projects had agroecological components) seems to be the exception.
The same political, scientific, and financial will that accompanied the green revolution in its early stage must back agroecology now.
Other reports have shown that development banks, such as the International Finance Corporation (World Bank) and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), are strongly financing industrial livestock farms and meat and dairies industries, having directed $2.6bn to these in the past 10 years. We have also recently learned that "$500bn (PS388bn) of environmentally damaging government subsidies have not been eliminated".
Through the research partnership between CIDSE and the Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience at Coventry University, we identified similar trends in funding for agroecology at European Union (EU) and Green Climate Fund (GCF) level. Projects supporting transformative agroecology aimed at redesigning food and farming systems were only found in the GCF portfolio and represent 10.6% of the total invested in agricultural projects. Only 2.7% of EU funds channelled through FAO, IFAD and the WFP between 2016 and 2018 focus on substituting harmful inputs and practices with less degrading ones - which should be the starting point of a transition towards agroecology. Though the analysis of EU projects only provided a snapshot of one specific part of the overall EU development portfolio (and thus may overlook some EU financial support for agroecology elsewhere), the meager figures reflect the typical gap between discourse and implementation mentioned above. The bottom line is disappointing.
Thinking big, acting fast
A profound transformation of food systems is needed and such a shift must happen rapidly to constructively address the multiple crises that are threatening humanity. We find ourselves at the end of the petrochemical era which ushered in the so called 'green' revolution. What is needed is a new vision to catalyse the next revolution. Agroecology - together with food sovereignty has this potential and where it has been implemented it has delivered. The same political, scientific and financial will that accompanied the green revolution in its early stage must back agroecology now. Fortunately, recent developments at the international level (the uptake of agroecology by all major UN agencies) and at EU level (inclusion of agroecology in its Green Deal) suggests that things might be changing. Now we just need public institutions and governments to put their money where their mouths are.