

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Emphasizing COVID-19's Asian origins during a pandemic undermines the obligations we have towards our fellow citizens. (Photo: Marco Cantile/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Early March my family and I travelled for spring break to Orlando. COVID-19 had not yet morphed into the crisis it has now become for Canada. At the time of booking, my concerns were not so much about catching the virus but more about getting into the United States. Since 9/11, I had not travelled to the United States as I had been placed on the US No Fly List in 2004. I decided to try this year as I had obtained a "Redress Number" from Homeland Security with the help of Prime Minister Trudeau's communication director, Cameron Ahmad and ex-Solicitor General/Liberal MP Wayne Easter. This "Redress Number" did not remove me from the "No Fly List" but allowed some pre-screening to occur from the time the airline ticket is purchased. As a back-up, I also sent emails to my old lawyer, an investigative journalist friend, and Arif Virani my Liberal Minister of Parliament informing them of my travel plans should anything unfortunate happen.
Nothing did happen. The check-ins, passing through security gates and luggage counters were uneventful. No extra questions, no being pulled aside for additional questions. Not a trace of racial profiling. This was strange as after sixteen years I was used to the "building blame into my name" attitudes at international airports. Instead, what was apparent was the awkward social distancing that was occurring between non-Asians and anyone looking remotely Asian. Any passenger now who looked Asian was being questioned if they had traveled to China. Meanwhile, in the waiting lounge, President Trump was every CNN and MSNBN news-loop linking anti-Chinese rhetoric with COVID-19 - legitimizing for many acts of discrimination. The hashtag #JeNeSuisPasUnVirus ("I am not a virus") had already been created by the Asian communities living in France - responding to an escalation of racially motivated violence against them.
Emphasizing COVID-19's Asian origins during a pandemic undermines the obligations we have towards our fellow citizens. There can be no "building blame into a name" in times like this. COVID-19 is affecting everyone, irrespective of race - placing restrictions on what we took for granted only a couple of months ago. Toronto, as with many other cities, has invoked emergency plans. These plans detail how the City will mobilize resources during this current crisis - ensuring everyone is aware of their responsibilities and obligations to all our communities.
Humans notoriously showcase discrimination when threatened. I have been spat on, harassed, and lost my job in the aftermath of 9/11. Is this any different? Comedian Ken Cheng recently said, "Less than 0.001% of Chinese people have coronavirus, yet more than 99.999% have already experienced coronaracism." I, myself, have heard people claim the latest COVID-19 outbreak was caused by Chinese "big-pharma" with their Government deliberately sending virus carriers to Europe. I have watched fake videos of Chinese women eating bat-soup promoting the narrative that Chinese people "deserve-what-they-get". I have seen in Toronto non-Asian streetcar riders leaving their seats when an Asian rider approaches them on the streetcar. This will get worse, I suspect, once more people lose their jobs or loved ones.
Governments are considering issuing immunity certificates to monitor their populations. People making a recovery from COVID-19, with these certificates, would be allowed to get their unrestricted lives back. This gives rise to some unsettling questions. Will these immunity passports create a two-tier society? In our capitalistic world who determines the value of these immunity certificates? Will "certified individuals" broker a higher premium in the employment market for certain jobs? Will there be restrictions on travel for those with no immunity? In my mind, all this does is highlight latent possibilities for stereotyping and prejudice - not unlike what I experience with my current Homeland Security Redress Number. There must be a better and more equitable way.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Early March my family and I travelled for spring break to Orlando. COVID-19 had not yet morphed into the crisis it has now become for Canada. At the time of booking, my concerns were not so much about catching the virus but more about getting into the United States. Since 9/11, I had not travelled to the United States as I had been placed on the US No Fly List in 2004. I decided to try this year as I had obtained a "Redress Number" from Homeland Security with the help of Prime Minister Trudeau's communication director, Cameron Ahmad and ex-Solicitor General/Liberal MP Wayne Easter. This "Redress Number" did not remove me from the "No Fly List" but allowed some pre-screening to occur from the time the airline ticket is purchased. As a back-up, I also sent emails to my old lawyer, an investigative journalist friend, and Arif Virani my Liberal Minister of Parliament informing them of my travel plans should anything unfortunate happen.
Nothing did happen. The check-ins, passing through security gates and luggage counters were uneventful. No extra questions, no being pulled aside for additional questions. Not a trace of racial profiling. This was strange as after sixteen years I was used to the "building blame into my name" attitudes at international airports. Instead, what was apparent was the awkward social distancing that was occurring between non-Asians and anyone looking remotely Asian. Any passenger now who looked Asian was being questioned if they had traveled to China. Meanwhile, in the waiting lounge, President Trump was every CNN and MSNBN news-loop linking anti-Chinese rhetoric with COVID-19 - legitimizing for many acts of discrimination. The hashtag #JeNeSuisPasUnVirus ("I am not a virus") had already been created by the Asian communities living in France - responding to an escalation of racially motivated violence against them.
Emphasizing COVID-19's Asian origins during a pandemic undermines the obligations we have towards our fellow citizens. There can be no "building blame into a name" in times like this. COVID-19 is affecting everyone, irrespective of race - placing restrictions on what we took for granted only a couple of months ago. Toronto, as with many other cities, has invoked emergency plans. These plans detail how the City will mobilize resources during this current crisis - ensuring everyone is aware of their responsibilities and obligations to all our communities.
Humans notoriously showcase discrimination when threatened. I have been spat on, harassed, and lost my job in the aftermath of 9/11. Is this any different? Comedian Ken Cheng recently said, "Less than 0.001% of Chinese people have coronavirus, yet more than 99.999% have already experienced coronaracism." I, myself, have heard people claim the latest COVID-19 outbreak was caused by Chinese "big-pharma" with their Government deliberately sending virus carriers to Europe. I have watched fake videos of Chinese women eating bat-soup promoting the narrative that Chinese people "deserve-what-they-get". I have seen in Toronto non-Asian streetcar riders leaving their seats when an Asian rider approaches them on the streetcar. This will get worse, I suspect, once more people lose their jobs or loved ones.
Governments are considering issuing immunity certificates to monitor their populations. People making a recovery from COVID-19, with these certificates, would be allowed to get their unrestricted lives back. This gives rise to some unsettling questions. Will these immunity passports create a two-tier society? In our capitalistic world who determines the value of these immunity certificates? Will "certified individuals" broker a higher premium in the employment market for certain jobs? Will there be restrictions on travel for those with no immunity? In my mind, all this does is highlight latent possibilities for stereotyping and prejudice - not unlike what I experience with my current Homeland Security Redress Number. There must be a better and more equitable way.
Early March my family and I travelled for spring break to Orlando. COVID-19 had not yet morphed into the crisis it has now become for Canada. At the time of booking, my concerns were not so much about catching the virus but more about getting into the United States. Since 9/11, I had not travelled to the United States as I had been placed on the US No Fly List in 2004. I decided to try this year as I had obtained a "Redress Number" from Homeland Security with the help of Prime Minister Trudeau's communication director, Cameron Ahmad and ex-Solicitor General/Liberal MP Wayne Easter. This "Redress Number" did not remove me from the "No Fly List" but allowed some pre-screening to occur from the time the airline ticket is purchased. As a back-up, I also sent emails to my old lawyer, an investigative journalist friend, and Arif Virani my Liberal Minister of Parliament informing them of my travel plans should anything unfortunate happen.
Nothing did happen. The check-ins, passing through security gates and luggage counters were uneventful. No extra questions, no being pulled aside for additional questions. Not a trace of racial profiling. This was strange as after sixteen years I was used to the "building blame into my name" attitudes at international airports. Instead, what was apparent was the awkward social distancing that was occurring between non-Asians and anyone looking remotely Asian. Any passenger now who looked Asian was being questioned if they had traveled to China. Meanwhile, in the waiting lounge, President Trump was every CNN and MSNBN news-loop linking anti-Chinese rhetoric with COVID-19 - legitimizing for many acts of discrimination. The hashtag #JeNeSuisPasUnVirus ("I am not a virus") had already been created by the Asian communities living in France - responding to an escalation of racially motivated violence against them.
Emphasizing COVID-19's Asian origins during a pandemic undermines the obligations we have towards our fellow citizens. There can be no "building blame into a name" in times like this. COVID-19 is affecting everyone, irrespective of race - placing restrictions on what we took for granted only a couple of months ago. Toronto, as with many other cities, has invoked emergency plans. These plans detail how the City will mobilize resources during this current crisis - ensuring everyone is aware of their responsibilities and obligations to all our communities.
Humans notoriously showcase discrimination when threatened. I have been spat on, harassed, and lost my job in the aftermath of 9/11. Is this any different? Comedian Ken Cheng recently said, "Less than 0.001% of Chinese people have coronavirus, yet more than 99.999% have already experienced coronaracism." I, myself, have heard people claim the latest COVID-19 outbreak was caused by Chinese "big-pharma" with their Government deliberately sending virus carriers to Europe. I have watched fake videos of Chinese women eating bat-soup promoting the narrative that Chinese people "deserve-what-they-get". I have seen in Toronto non-Asian streetcar riders leaving their seats when an Asian rider approaches them on the streetcar. This will get worse, I suspect, once more people lose their jobs or loved ones.
Governments are considering issuing immunity certificates to monitor their populations. People making a recovery from COVID-19, with these certificates, would be allowed to get their unrestricted lives back. This gives rise to some unsettling questions. Will these immunity passports create a two-tier society? In our capitalistic world who determines the value of these immunity certificates? Will "certified individuals" broker a higher premium in the employment market for certain jobs? Will there be restrictions on travel for those with no immunity? In my mind, all this does is highlight latent possibilities for stereotyping and prejudice - not unlike what I experience with my current Homeland Security Redress Number. There must be a better and more equitable way.