In the first two decades after its release, methane traps over 85 times more heat in our atmosphere than carbon dioxide (CO2). (Photo: Robert Nickelsberg/Getty Images)
The Recent Natural Gas Blowout in South Texas Highlights the Need for Strong Regulation
The proposed rollback of existing methane standards would allow oil and gas wells to release both methane and VOCs with virtually no control.
Last week a natural gas well run by Devon energy experienced a blow-out in Texas near the towns of Yorktown and Nordheim. It lasted 3 days and spewed massive amounts of methane, dangerous Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and other pollutants in Southern Texas, leading authorities to seal off thousands of acres surrounding the site. The blowout did not receive significant coverage. Furthermore, a report by researchers at Colorado State University suggest that leaks of methane and pollutants from natural gas sites occur quite frequently.
Despite the urgent need to cap methane emissions, a potent heat-trapping gas and driver of climate change, the Trump administration favors rolling back existing limits on methane leaks from oil and gas wells. In August, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator announced a proposal to eliminate all methane pollution standards for new sources in the oil and gas sector. The plan is to prevent any future regulation of methane emissions from already-existing oil and gas sources. And he is also proposing to remove federal regulation for methane from pipelines and transmission and storage facilities, claiming that existing regulation of harmful volatile organic compounds (VOCs) already ensures limited methane release.
On November 17, the EPA held a hearing in Dallas where they invited members of the public to testify on this proposal. As a 2nd-year medical student at University of Texas-Southwestern, I felt compelled to speak out. Despite my hectic study schedule, I testified at the hearing because I'm deeply concerned that the proposed changes to the regulation of methane and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) will pose a direct threat to the health and safety of my future patients.
The proposed rollback of existing methane standards would allow oil and gas wells to release both methane and VOCs with virtually no control. That is dangerous because methane is a potent greenhouse gas. In the first two decades after its release, methane traps over 85 times more heat in our atmosphere than carbon dioxide (CO2). As a result, methane is a major contributor to the climate crisis, which has accelerated the spread of certain diseases and intensified natural disasters. And VOCs such as benzene and toluene, which would be emitted with the methane, are dangerous direct pollutants. Benzene is a known human carcinogen; toluene is toxic to the nervous system.
The EPA's core mission is to protect human health and the environment. They must not undermine their core mission by eliminating these critical standards. A nationwide analysis finds that the health impacts attributable to the ozone (smog), which forms due VOCs reacting with nitrogen oxide emissions, from the oil and gas industry include 750,000 asthma attacks for children, 500,000 lost school days, 2,000 asthma-related emergency room visits, and 600 respiratory-related hospital admissions.
I already see plenty of patients with end-stage lung disease, heart problems and cancer. By the time they end up in the hospital, often they are too sick to be cured. In each case, I wonder about the underlying causes, and I know that for some, environmental pollution is a deadly factor.
I am currently conducting research on patients with mysterious restrictive lung diseases, many of which are linked to environmental exposures. I also teach a class on how to quit smoking, because the best thing I can do for my future patients is prevent exposure to toxic substances in the first place. Protecting my patients from harmful environmental exposures in our community must be a top priority to prevent a higher risk of disease and premature death.
We depend on the federal methane standards to limit climate change and control VOCs to keep the air we breathe clean. These standards are especially critical to protect people living near oil and gas facilities, where harmful emissions can worsen respiratory illnesses.
And the issue is not solely local. Our government has a duty to protect public health and maintain environmental quality for everyone - no matter their zip code. Clean air and a livable climate should not be a luxury in America.
That's why we need federal safeguards on oil and gas well emissions: to ensure all American families are equally protected. I join the health professional community in calling on the EPA to strengthen, not undermine, these life-saving methane and VOC standards. I don't want to see more patients whose life-threatening disease I can't cure, because of exposure to pollution.
FINAL DAY! This is urgent.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just hours left in our Spring Campaign, we're still falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Last week a natural gas well run by Devon energy experienced a blow-out in Texas near the towns of Yorktown and Nordheim. It lasted 3 days and spewed massive amounts of methane, dangerous Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and other pollutants in Southern Texas, leading authorities to seal off thousands of acres surrounding the site. The blowout did not receive significant coverage. Furthermore, a report by researchers at Colorado State University suggest that leaks of methane and pollutants from natural gas sites occur quite frequently.
Despite the urgent need to cap methane emissions, a potent heat-trapping gas and driver of climate change, the Trump administration favors rolling back existing limits on methane leaks from oil and gas wells. In August, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator announced a proposal to eliminate all methane pollution standards for new sources in the oil and gas sector. The plan is to prevent any future regulation of methane emissions from already-existing oil and gas sources. And he is also proposing to remove federal regulation for methane from pipelines and transmission and storage facilities, claiming that existing regulation of harmful volatile organic compounds (VOCs) already ensures limited methane release.
On November 17, the EPA held a hearing in Dallas where they invited members of the public to testify on this proposal. As a 2nd-year medical student at University of Texas-Southwestern, I felt compelled to speak out. Despite my hectic study schedule, I testified at the hearing because I'm deeply concerned that the proposed changes to the regulation of methane and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) will pose a direct threat to the health and safety of my future patients.
The proposed rollback of existing methane standards would allow oil and gas wells to release both methane and VOCs with virtually no control. That is dangerous because methane is a potent greenhouse gas. In the first two decades after its release, methane traps over 85 times more heat in our atmosphere than carbon dioxide (CO2). As a result, methane is a major contributor to the climate crisis, which has accelerated the spread of certain diseases and intensified natural disasters. And VOCs such as benzene and toluene, which would be emitted with the methane, are dangerous direct pollutants. Benzene is a known human carcinogen; toluene is toxic to the nervous system.
The EPA's core mission is to protect human health and the environment. They must not undermine their core mission by eliminating these critical standards. A nationwide analysis finds that the health impacts attributable to the ozone (smog), which forms due VOCs reacting with nitrogen oxide emissions, from the oil and gas industry include 750,000 asthma attacks for children, 500,000 lost school days, 2,000 asthma-related emergency room visits, and 600 respiratory-related hospital admissions.
I already see plenty of patients with end-stage lung disease, heart problems and cancer. By the time they end up in the hospital, often they are too sick to be cured. In each case, I wonder about the underlying causes, and I know that for some, environmental pollution is a deadly factor.
I am currently conducting research on patients with mysterious restrictive lung diseases, many of which are linked to environmental exposures. I also teach a class on how to quit smoking, because the best thing I can do for my future patients is prevent exposure to toxic substances in the first place. Protecting my patients from harmful environmental exposures in our community must be a top priority to prevent a higher risk of disease and premature death.
We depend on the federal methane standards to limit climate change and control VOCs to keep the air we breathe clean. These standards are especially critical to protect people living near oil and gas facilities, where harmful emissions can worsen respiratory illnesses.
And the issue is not solely local. Our government has a duty to protect public health and maintain environmental quality for everyone - no matter their zip code. Clean air and a livable climate should not be a luxury in America.
That's why we need federal safeguards on oil and gas well emissions: to ensure all American families are equally protected. I join the health professional community in calling on the EPA to strengthen, not undermine, these life-saving methane and VOC standards. I don't want to see more patients whose life-threatening disease I can't cure, because of exposure to pollution.
Last week a natural gas well run by Devon energy experienced a blow-out in Texas near the towns of Yorktown and Nordheim. It lasted 3 days and spewed massive amounts of methane, dangerous Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and other pollutants in Southern Texas, leading authorities to seal off thousands of acres surrounding the site. The blowout did not receive significant coverage. Furthermore, a report by researchers at Colorado State University suggest that leaks of methane and pollutants from natural gas sites occur quite frequently.
Despite the urgent need to cap methane emissions, a potent heat-trapping gas and driver of climate change, the Trump administration favors rolling back existing limits on methane leaks from oil and gas wells. In August, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator announced a proposal to eliminate all methane pollution standards for new sources in the oil and gas sector. The plan is to prevent any future regulation of methane emissions from already-existing oil and gas sources. And he is also proposing to remove federal regulation for methane from pipelines and transmission and storage facilities, claiming that existing regulation of harmful volatile organic compounds (VOCs) already ensures limited methane release.
On November 17, the EPA held a hearing in Dallas where they invited members of the public to testify on this proposal. As a 2nd-year medical student at University of Texas-Southwestern, I felt compelled to speak out. Despite my hectic study schedule, I testified at the hearing because I'm deeply concerned that the proposed changes to the regulation of methane and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) will pose a direct threat to the health and safety of my future patients.
The proposed rollback of existing methane standards would allow oil and gas wells to release both methane and VOCs with virtually no control. That is dangerous because methane is a potent greenhouse gas. In the first two decades after its release, methane traps over 85 times more heat in our atmosphere than carbon dioxide (CO2). As a result, methane is a major contributor to the climate crisis, which has accelerated the spread of certain diseases and intensified natural disasters. And VOCs such as benzene and toluene, which would be emitted with the methane, are dangerous direct pollutants. Benzene is a known human carcinogen; toluene is toxic to the nervous system.
The EPA's core mission is to protect human health and the environment. They must not undermine their core mission by eliminating these critical standards. A nationwide analysis finds that the health impacts attributable to the ozone (smog), which forms due VOCs reacting with nitrogen oxide emissions, from the oil and gas industry include 750,000 asthma attacks for children, 500,000 lost school days, 2,000 asthma-related emergency room visits, and 600 respiratory-related hospital admissions.
I already see plenty of patients with end-stage lung disease, heart problems and cancer. By the time they end up in the hospital, often they are too sick to be cured. In each case, I wonder about the underlying causes, and I know that for some, environmental pollution is a deadly factor.
I am currently conducting research on patients with mysterious restrictive lung diseases, many of which are linked to environmental exposures. I also teach a class on how to quit smoking, because the best thing I can do for my future patients is prevent exposure to toxic substances in the first place. Protecting my patients from harmful environmental exposures in our community must be a top priority to prevent a higher risk of disease and premature death.
We depend on the federal methane standards to limit climate change and control VOCs to keep the air we breathe clean. These standards are especially critical to protect people living near oil and gas facilities, where harmful emissions can worsen respiratory illnesses.
And the issue is not solely local. Our government has a duty to protect public health and maintain environmental quality for everyone - no matter their zip code. Clean air and a livable climate should not be a luxury in America.
That's why we need federal safeguards on oil and gas well emissions: to ensure all American families are equally protected. I join the health professional community in calling on the EPA to strengthen, not undermine, these life-saving methane and VOC standards. I don't want to see more patients whose life-threatening disease I can't cure, because of exposure to pollution.