Skip to main content

Why are the billionaires always laughing?

Because they know the corporate media will never call bullshit on their bullshit.

Why are the billionaires laughing?

It’s easy to laugh when the corporate press treats you as a glorious success instead of the epitome of a broken social order. Billionaires laugh because they know the corporate media prefers to fawn over them rather than hold them to account.

Today, we ask you to support our nonprofit, independent journalism because we are not impressed by billionaires flying into space, their corporations despoiling our health and planet, or their vast fortunes safely concealed in tax havens across the globe. We are not laughing.

We are hard at work producing journalism for the common good. With our Fall Campaign underway, please support this mission today. We cannot do it without you.

Support Our Work -- Join the small group of generous readers who donate, keeping Common Dreams free for millions of people each year. Every donation—large or small—helps us bring you the news that matters.

When looking at this enormous disparity in the U.S., it’s clear that the ultra-wealthy are the beneficiaries of this system. (Photo: Yuri Keegstra/flickr/cc)

When looking at this enormous disparity in the U.S., it’s clear that the ultra-wealthy are the beneficiaries of this system. (Photo:  Yuri Keegstra/flickr/cc)

Corporations Need to Pay More

As we talk about taxing the ultra-wealthy, let’s not forget the source of their wealth: transnational corporations

Patti Lynn

For all that some might grumble about paying our taxes when this time of year rolls around, we do it. And most of us do it not just because it’s the law, but because we understand and agree with the one of the basic underlying concept behind taxes: We all pay some portion of what we have into a shared pool of resources. And that money goes to fund the services we all need, collectively, like water infrastructure, schools, and transportation.

For decades, corporations and the ultra-wealthy have been rigging it in their favor—creating vast income inequality and widening the economic racial divide.

But this system, like much of our current democracy, is very broken right now. For decades, corporations and the ultra-wealthy have been rigging it in their favor—creating vast income inequality and widening the economic racial divide.

As this tax season comes to a close, and as evidence grows of how the 2017 tax cuts passed by Congress were yet another step toward making the ultra-wealthy and corporations wealthier and more powerful, the call to fix the system is growing louder.  But as politicians begin to heed this call, we must make sure they hold all entities responsible: the ultra wealthy and transnational corporations.

Abandoning the common good

It’s becoming more and more clear how our current economic and political system is failing to provide, take care of, and manage the resources and services we all need. Our aging water infrastructure is in dire need of public reinvestment. Public schools struggle mightily around the country. And in most places in the U.S. public transportation is not equitable, in need of major reinvestment, or doesn’t even exist.

Who bears the brunt of these failures? Well, certainly not super wealthy corporate and mostly white CEOs being driven in limos stocked with bottled water. Or celebrities and hedge fund managers bribing college coaches to get their children into Ivy League and other prestige-bestowing schools.

It’s the mostly Black folks in Flint and Detroit whose water is poisoned or shut off who are experiencing these systemic failures to the greatest degree. It’s people who rely on public transportation to get them to their hourly wage jobs—and who get docked pay or fired if they come in late because of a broken-down subway. It’s low-income families who do the best they can by their kids in resource-starved public K-12 schools.

The source of the wealth divide

When looking at this enormous disparity in the U.S., it’s clear that the ultra-wealthy are the beneficiaries of this system. But it’s also important to follow this wealth disparity to the source: transnational corporations.

U.S.-based transnational corporations are generating—and protecting—enormous profits that are adding to the fortunes of the wealthy. One way they do so is by avoiding paying taxes. Less money paid into our common pool of resources means more money going into already wealthy shareholders’ pockets.

From offshoring money to demanding subsidies and tax incentives from cities (think Amazon ), to exploiting loopholes in tax law to the fullest extent possible (think General Electric)—corporations have found every way possible to hold on to and grow their profits.

So, from offshoring money to demanding subsidies and tax incentives from cities (think Amazon ), to exploiting loopholes in tax law to the fullest extent possible (think General Electric)—corporations have found every way possible to hold on to and grow their profits.

And the 2017 tax cuts made that even easier.

Corporations, flush with cash from the new tax cuts, bought back stock—which often raises stock prices and enriches shareholders. Goldman Sachs analysts estimated corporations spent $1.3 trillion in buybacks in 2018, to the alarm of politicians across the political spectrum. The research group Just Capital estimated that for the 1000 corporations it tracks, 56 percent of their tax-cut related spending went to shareholders.

(As a point of comparison: the same corporations spent just 6 percent of their tax savings on workers in the form of raises or one-time bonuses—mostly one-time bonuses—at an average of $225 per worker.)

Unleash the dams

Even though economists call the U.S. economy “healthy,” only a tiny percentage of people are prospering. There is no rising tide lifting all boats. It’s more like a river dammed up to create a small, deep, exclusive reservoir—while the rest of us are making do with a tiny trickle in a dried out riverbed.

That’s why, as politicians like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Elizabeth Warren are driving forward a call to tax the ultra-wealthy, they are seeing great interest in and support of their plans. Even a Fox News poll shows that 70 percent of voters in the U.S. favor taxing the wealthy.

But taxing the ultra-wealthy is only addressing half the solution. We must also apply the same scrutiny to corporations and enact policies that ensure corporations pay what they owe in taxes (not to mention what they owe in externalized costs). Sen. Warren’s new proposal is a welcome policy proposal in that direction.

The argument against doing so is that the U.S. already has too high of a corporate tax rate, and if we actually make corporations pay their fair share, more of them will move their headquarters somewhere else with lenient tax laws, offshore their profits, and/or take jobs elsewhere.

But the truth is, without effective regulation and enforcement, transnational corporations will keep gaming the system, no matter what. Today, few corporations pay the actual tax rate, which is now at 21 percent, down from 35 thanks to the 2017 law.

In fact, this year, Amazon (the corporation owned by the richest man in the world today) filed for a $129 million refund.

That’s why we need to take the system back. We need transformative, deep-seated changes where corporations do not get to write the rules and where people and our government hold them accountable.

This is the right time for this vision and demand for change. People across the political spectrum are outraged at our rigged system that is leaving them behind. To unrig the system we need to not only tax the ultra-wealthy. We also need to tax and hold accountable the driving force behind their wealth and our nation’s overall income inequality: transnational corporations.


Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Patti Lynn

Patti Lynn

Patti Lynn is the executive director of Corporate Accountability, which stops transnational corporations from devastating democracy, trampling human rights, and destroying our planet. Alongside governmental and NGO allies, Corporate Accountability helped to rein in Big Tobacco by ensuring the adoption of the 2003 UN Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, the first legally binding treaty of the WHO. Patti has been with the organization for over 20 years.

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.

New Whistleblower Sparks Calls to 'Crack Down on Facebook and All Big Tech Companies'

Hours after another ex-employee filed a formal complaint, reporting broke on internal documents that show the tech giant's failure to address concerns about content related to the 2020 U.S. election.

Jessica Corbett ·


'Catastrophic and Irreparable Harm' to Wolves Averted as Wisconsin Judge Cancels Hunt

"We are heartened by this rare instance of reason and democracy prevailing in state wolf policy," said one conservation expert.

Brett Wilkins ·


West Virginia Constituents Decry 'Immorality' of Joe Manchin

"West Virginia has been locked into an economy that forces workers into low-wage jobs with no hope for advancement, and after decades of this our hope is dwindling," said one West Virginian. "The cuts that Sen. Manchin has negotiated into the agenda hurt our state."

Julia Conley ·


'Texans Deserved Better Than This': Supreme Court Leaves Abortion Ban in Place

The nation's high court set a date to hear a pair of legal challenges to the "horrific" restrictions.

Jessica Corbett ·


'Like It Never Happened': Federal Judge Tosses Trump Attack on Clean Water Rule

Denying a Biden administration request to temporarily retain the rule, the judge reestablished "the careful balance of state and federal power to protect clean water that Congress intended when it wrote the Clean Water Act."

Brett Wilkins ·

Support our work.

We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100% reader supported.

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values.
Direct to your inbox.

Subscribe to our Newsletter.


Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit | Privacy Policy
Common Dreams Logo