SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Sanders, Brown Speak Out On Gunboat Diplomacy For Corporations
Members of Congress are weighing in against the U.S. government's use of "gunboat diplomacy"-style intimidation of Colombia against that country allowing a generic version of an ultraexpensive cancer drug named Gleevec in order to protect the public's health.
May 30, 2016
Members of Congress are weighing in against the U.S. government's use of "gunboat diplomacy"-style intimidation of Colombia against that country allowing a generic version of an ultraexpensive cancer drug named Gleevec in order to protect the public's health.
Meanwhile, a coalition of nonprofit groups sent a letter to President Obama on Friday expressing "great alarm" that the U.S. is considering withholding aid to Colombia because of its plan to allow the use of a generic competitor to Gleevec.
"Gunboat Diplomacy"
Last week's post "Is This The Return Of U.S. 'Gunboat Diplomacy' Serving Corporations?" explained how the U.S. government was threatening Colombia in non-trade-related ways because Colombia was objecting to the outrageous pricing of a cancer drug and was legally going to allow companies to make generic versions. The kicker: The drug in question isn't even made by an American company.
Colombia is allowing local production of a generic form of a cancer drug that is ultraexpensive because of a government-granted monopoly handed to a giant, multinational pharmaceutical corporation. The U.S. government is stepping in on the corporation's side with a modern form of "gunboat diplomacy" -- even though the giant corporation isn't even "American."
[. . .] There are indications that right after Colombia enabled local production of a generic version of Gleevec, the U.S. government stepped in to protect pharmaceutical industry profits by threatening to withdraw funding for a peace initiative between the Colombian government and the rebel group, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) and threatening the country's involvement in theTrans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).
"Thankfully, now there exists the greatest opportunity for a lasting peace in Colombia in a generation, and U.S. assistance through the Paz Colombia aid package will play an integral role in consolidating such a peace through support and monitoring," said the nonprofit coalition letter to Obama, endorsed by groups that included the AFL-CIO, Institute for Policy Studies, Public Citizen and the Presbyterian and United Church of Christ denominations. "it is wholly inappropriate, reprehensible, and intolerable for anyone from your administration or the U.S. Congress to ask Colombia to choose between peace and its people's health."
Congress Members Weigh In
Earlier this week, 15 members of Congress sent a letter to U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) Michael Froman expressing their concern about the pressure. The letter says, "There are growing concerns about the very high and increasing costs of pharmaceuticals in the United States and in other nations. And the annual cost of this medicine in Colombia is almost twice as high as the average annual income per person in Colombia. As policymakers struggle to address this issue, we should not seek to limit the existing, agreed upon flexibilities public health authorities have to address these concerns."
On Thursday, senators Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) sent a letter of their own to USTR Froman. The letter says, "We object to any efforts to intimidate and discourage Colombia's government from taking measures to protect the public health of Colombians in a way that is appropriate, effective and consistent with the country's trade and public health obligations. We also find it unconscionable that any representatives of the U.S. Government would threaten to rescind funding for Colombia's peace initiative if a compulsory license for Gleevec were issued."
This situation is not getting much attention in the "corporate media."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
Dave Johnson
Dave Johnson is a former Senior Fellow for the Campaign for America's Future & Renew California.
Members of Congress are weighing in against the U.S. government's use of "gunboat diplomacy"-style intimidation of Colombia against that country allowing a generic version of an ultraexpensive cancer drug named Gleevec in order to protect the public's health.
Meanwhile, a coalition of nonprofit groups sent a letter to President Obama on Friday expressing "great alarm" that the U.S. is considering withholding aid to Colombia because of its plan to allow the use of a generic competitor to Gleevec.
"Gunboat Diplomacy"
Last week's post "Is This The Return Of U.S. 'Gunboat Diplomacy' Serving Corporations?" explained how the U.S. government was threatening Colombia in non-trade-related ways because Colombia was objecting to the outrageous pricing of a cancer drug and was legally going to allow companies to make generic versions. The kicker: The drug in question isn't even made by an American company.
Colombia is allowing local production of a generic form of a cancer drug that is ultraexpensive because of a government-granted monopoly handed to a giant, multinational pharmaceutical corporation. The U.S. government is stepping in on the corporation's side with a modern form of "gunboat diplomacy" -- even though the giant corporation isn't even "American."
[. . .] There are indications that right after Colombia enabled local production of a generic version of Gleevec, the U.S. government stepped in to protect pharmaceutical industry profits by threatening to withdraw funding for a peace initiative between the Colombian government and the rebel group, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) and threatening the country's involvement in theTrans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).
"Thankfully, now there exists the greatest opportunity for a lasting peace in Colombia in a generation, and U.S. assistance through the Paz Colombia aid package will play an integral role in consolidating such a peace through support and monitoring," said the nonprofit coalition letter to Obama, endorsed by groups that included the AFL-CIO, Institute for Policy Studies, Public Citizen and the Presbyterian and United Church of Christ denominations. "it is wholly inappropriate, reprehensible, and intolerable for anyone from your administration or the U.S. Congress to ask Colombia to choose between peace and its people's health."
Congress Members Weigh In
Earlier this week, 15 members of Congress sent a letter to U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) Michael Froman expressing their concern about the pressure. The letter says, "There are growing concerns about the very high and increasing costs of pharmaceuticals in the United States and in other nations. And the annual cost of this medicine in Colombia is almost twice as high as the average annual income per person in Colombia. As policymakers struggle to address this issue, we should not seek to limit the existing, agreed upon flexibilities public health authorities have to address these concerns."
On Thursday, senators Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) sent a letter of their own to USTR Froman. The letter says, "We object to any efforts to intimidate and discourage Colombia's government from taking measures to protect the public health of Colombians in a way that is appropriate, effective and consistent with the country's trade and public health obligations. We also find it unconscionable that any representatives of the U.S. Government would threaten to rescind funding for Colombia's peace initiative if a compulsory license for Gleevec were issued."
This situation is not getting much attention in the "corporate media."
Dave Johnson
Dave Johnson is a former Senior Fellow for the Campaign for America's Future & Renew California.
Members of Congress are weighing in against the U.S. government's use of "gunboat diplomacy"-style intimidation of Colombia against that country allowing a generic version of an ultraexpensive cancer drug named Gleevec in order to protect the public's health.
Meanwhile, a coalition of nonprofit groups sent a letter to President Obama on Friday expressing "great alarm" that the U.S. is considering withholding aid to Colombia because of its plan to allow the use of a generic competitor to Gleevec.
"Gunboat Diplomacy"
Last week's post "Is This The Return Of U.S. 'Gunboat Diplomacy' Serving Corporations?" explained how the U.S. government was threatening Colombia in non-trade-related ways because Colombia was objecting to the outrageous pricing of a cancer drug and was legally going to allow companies to make generic versions. The kicker: The drug in question isn't even made by an American company.
Colombia is allowing local production of a generic form of a cancer drug that is ultraexpensive because of a government-granted monopoly handed to a giant, multinational pharmaceutical corporation. The U.S. government is stepping in on the corporation's side with a modern form of "gunboat diplomacy" -- even though the giant corporation isn't even "American."
[. . .] There are indications that right after Colombia enabled local production of a generic version of Gleevec, the U.S. government stepped in to protect pharmaceutical industry profits by threatening to withdraw funding for a peace initiative between the Colombian government and the rebel group, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) and threatening the country's involvement in theTrans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).
"Thankfully, now there exists the greatest opportunity for a lasting peace in Colombia in a generation, and U.S. assistance through the Paz Colombia aid package will play an integral role in consolidating such a peace through support and monitoring," said the nonprofit coalition letter to Obama, endorsed by groups that included the AFL-CIO, Institute for Policy Studies, Public Citizen and the Presbyterian and United Church of Christ denominations. "it is wholly inappropriate, reprehensible, and intolerable for anyone from your administration or the U.S. Congress to ask Colombia to choose between peace and its people's health."
Congress Members Weigh In
Earlier this week, 15 members of Congress sent a letter to U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) Michael Froman expressing their concern about the pressure. The letter says, "There are growing concerns about the very high and increasing costs of pharmaceuticals in the United States and in other nations. And the annual cost of this medicine in Colombia is almost twice as high as the average annual income per person in Colombia. As policymakers struggle to address this issue, we should not seek to limit the existing, agreed upon flexibilities public health authorities have to address these concerns."
On Thursday, senators Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) sent a letter of their own to USTR Froman. The letter says, "We object to any efforts to intimidate and discourage Colombia's government from taking measures to protect the public health of Colombians in a way that is appropriate, effective and consistent with the country's trade and public health obligations. We also find it unconscionable that any representatives of the U.S. Government would threaten to rescind funding for Colombia's peace initiative if a compulsory license for Gleevec were issued."
This situation is not getting much attention in the "corporate media."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.