SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
The last Democratic debate of 2015 was held the Saturday before Christmas. (Photo: Disney-ABC Television/flickr/cc)
Resolution for 2016: More Debate!
The last Democratic presidential debate of 2015 was held on the Saturday night before Christmas. Viewership was roughly one-quarter that of the first Republican debate and dramatically lower than all the Republican debates.
In other words, the Democrats lost the competition for viewers -- and for framing the issues and ideas for the 2016 presidential competition.
Jan 03, 2016
The last Democratic presidential debate of 2015 was held on the Saturday night before Christmas. Viewership was roughly one-quarter that of the first Republican debate and dramatically lower than all the Republican debates.
In other words, the Democrats lost the competition for viewers -- and for framing the issues and ideas for the 2016 presidential competition.
That's bad for the Democratic Party and its candidates. It's also bad for a body politic that requires more than the junk-food diet offered up by Donald Trump and most of his fellow contenders for the Republican presidential nod.
So former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich, one of the most respected independent progressive figures within the Democratic orbit, has decided to do something about the problem.
Working with the activist group Democracy for America, Reich is circulating a petition that urges urges the Democratic National Committee and its chair, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, to schedule additional debates.
More than 100,000 Americans have signed the petition -- which echoes calls from former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders for more debates -- and the number is rising rapidly.
Reich is making an important point as a prominent progressive who served in former President Bill Clinton's Cabinet and who has emerged as a hero of activists aligned with what is frequently referred to as "the Elizabeth Warren wing of the Democratic Party."
"The Democratic National Committee has scheduled fewer than half the debates the Republicans have scheduled, and also put them on weekends when few people are likely to watch (the next one will be on a Sunday during the NFL playoffs, during the three-day MLK Jr. birthday weekend). Again by contrast, the Republicans have made sure their debates are in prime time," he explains. "As a result, Republicans are getting lots of free TV time for their right-wing ideas and brainless policies, while Democrats get little time for ideas and policies that should be front and center. Republican debates are making the headlines, while Democratic debates are buried. Republican lies and misinformation shape the public's understanding of what's at stake in the 2016 election, while real issues and the important facts are sidelined."
The fight for more debates ought not to be limited to the Democratic primary process.
Activists should also be fighting for more debates once the parties have nominated their candidates for president.
The Commission on Presidential Debates, a joint project of Democratic and Republican party insiders, currently has control of the fall presidential debates -- along with the television networks. The commission has a history of narrowing the number of debates, limiting the number of candidates who can participate, and selecting moderators and panelists who constrain rather than expand the range of debate.
Now is the time to start fighting to break the stranglehold of the commission and open up the fall debates. Some groups are already working in this direction. There's even a change.org petition that calls for the commission to "Include All Qualified Candidates in 2016 Presidential Debates."
Debates are an essential feature of democracy, and we should all resolve to fight for more of them in 2016.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 The Capital Times
John Nichols
John Nichols is Washington correspondent for The Nation and associate editor of The Capital Times in Madison, Wisconsin. His books co-authored with Robert W. McChesney are: "Dollarocracy: How the Money and Media Election Complex is Destroying America" (2014), "The Death and Life of American Journalism: The Media Revolution that Will Begin the World Again" (2011), and "Tragedy & Farce: How the American Media Sell Wars, Spin Elections, and Destroy Democracy" (2006). Nichols' other books include: "The "S" Word: A Short History of an American Tradition...Socialism" (2015), "Dick: The Man Who is President (2004) and "The Genius of Impeachment: The Founders' Cure for Royalism" (2006).
bernie sandersdemocracydemocratic partyelection 2016hillary clintonjohn nicholsmartin omalleyrepublican party
The last Democratic presidential debate of 2015 was held on the Saturday night before Christmas. Viewership was roughly one-quarter that of the first Republican debate and dramatically lower than all the Republican debates.
In other words, the Democrats lost the competition for viewers -- and for framing the issues and ideas for the 2016 presidential competition.
That's bad for the Democratic Party and its candidates. It's also bad for a body politic that requires more than the junk-food diet offered up by Donald Trump and most of his fellow contenders for the Republican presidential nod.
So former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich, one of the most respected independent progressive figures within the Democratic orbit, has decided to do something about the problem.
Working with the activist group Democracy for America, Reich is circulating a petition that urges urges the Democratic National Committee and its chair, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, to schedule additional debates.
More than 100,000 Americans have signed the petition -- which echoes calls from former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders for more debates -- and the number is rising rapidly.
Reich is making an important point as a prominent progressive who served in former President Bill Clinton's Cabinet and who has emerged as a hero of activists aligned with what is frequently referred to as "the Elizabeth Warren wing of the Democratic Party."
"The Democratic National Committee has scheduled fewer than half the debates the Republicans have scheduled, and also put them on weekends when few people are likely to watch (the next one will be on a Sunday during the NFL playoffs, during the three-day MLK Jr. birthday weekend). Again by contrast, the Republicans have made sure their debates are in prime time," he explains. "As a result, Republicans are getting lots of free TV time for their right-wing ideas and brainless policies, while Democrats get little time for ideas and policies that should be front and center. Republican debates are making the headlines, while Democratic debates are buried. Republican lies and misinformation shape the public's understanding of what's at stake in the 2016 election, while real issues and the important facts are sidelined."
The fight for more debates ought not to be limited to the Democratic primary process.
Activists should also be fighting for more debates once the parties have nominated their candidates for president.
The Commission on Presidential Debates, a joint project of Democratic and Republican party insiders, currently has control of the fall presidential debates -- along with the television networks. The commission has a history of narrowing the number of debates, limiting the number of candidates who can participate, and selecting moderators and panelists who constrain rather than expand the range of debate.
Now is the time to start fighting to break the stranglehold of the commission and open up the fall debates. Some groups are already working in this direction. There's even a change.org petition that calls for the commission to "Include All Qualified Candidates in 2016 Presidential Debates."
Debates are an essential feature of democracy, and we should all resolve to fight for more of them in 2016.
John Nichols
John Nichols is Washington correspondent for The Nation and associate editor of The Capital Times in Madison, Wisconsin. His books co-authored with Robert W. McChesney are: "Dollarocracy: How the Money and Media Election Complex is Destroying America" (2014), "The Death and Life of American Journalism: The Media Revolution that Will Begin the World Again" (2011), and "Tragedy & Farce: How the American Media Sell Wars, Spin Elections, and Destroy Democracy" (2006). Nichols' other books include: "The "S" Word: A Short History of an American Tradition...Socialism" (2015), "Dick: The Man Who is President (2004) and "The Genius of Impeachment: The Founders' Cure for Royalism" (2006).
The last Democratic presidential debate of 2015 was held on the Saturday night before Christmas. Viewership was roughly one-quarter that of the first Republican debate and dramatically lower than all the Republican debates.
In other words, the Democrats lost the competition for viewers -- and for framing the issues and ideas for the 2016 presidential competition.
That's bad for the Democratic Party and its candidates. It's also bad for a body politic that requires more than the junk-food diet offered up by Donald Trump and most of his fellow contenders for the Republican presidential nod.
So former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich, one of the most respected independent progressive figures within the Democratic orbit, has decided to do something about the problem.
Working with the activist group Democracy for America, Reich is circulating a petition that urges urges the Democratic National Committee and its chair, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, to schedule additional debates.
More than 100,000 Americans have signed the petition -- which echoes calls from former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders for more debates -- and the number is rising rapidly.
Reich is making an important point as a prominent progressive who served in former President Bill Clinton's Cabinet and who has emerged as a hero of activists aligned with what is frequently referred to as "the Elizabeth Warren wing of the Democratic Party."
"The Democratic National Committee has scheduled fewer than half the debates the Republicans have scheduled, and also put them on weekends when few people are likely to watch (the next one will be on a Sunday during the NFL playoffs, during the three-day MLK Jr. birthday weekend). Again by contrast, the Republicans have made sure their debates are in prime time," he explains. "As a result, Republicans are getting lots of free TV time for their right-wing ideas and brainless policies, while Democrats get little time for ideas and policies that should be front and center. Republican debates are making the headlines, while Democratic debates are buried. Republican lies and misinformation shape the public's understanding of what's at stake in the 2016 election, while real issues and the important facts are sidelined."
The fight for more debates ought not to be limited to the Democratic primary process.
Activists should also be fighting for more debates once the parties have nominated their candidates for president.
The Commission on Presidential Debates, a joint project of Democratic and Republican party insiders, currently has control of the fall presidential debates -- along with the television networks. The commission has a history of narrowing the number of debates, limiting the number of candidates who can participate, and selecting moderators and panelists who constrain rather than expand the range of debate.
Now is the time to start fighting to break the stranglehold of the commission and open up the fall debates. Some groups are already working in this direction. There's even a change.org petition that calls for the commission to "Include All Qualified Candidates in 2016 Presidential Debates."
Debates are an essential feature of democracy, and we should all resolve to fight for more of them in 2016.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.