It isn't quite fair to call Barack Obama a liar. During the campaign he carefully avoided committing to much of anything important that he might have to take back later. For now, I won’t quibble with The St. Petersburg Times’s Obamameter, which so far has the president keeping 30 promises and breaking only six.
And yet, broadly speaking, Obama has been lying on a pretty impressive scale. You just have to get past his grandiloquent rhetoric — usually empty of substance — to get a handle on it. I offer a short, incomplete list, which I’m sure others could easily enlarge.
- Obama portrayed himself as the peace
candidate, or at least the anti-war candidate. He is not a peace
president, nor is he stopping any wars. True, he promised military
escalation in Afghanistan (to blunt John McCain’s accusations of
wimpishness), but well-meaning folks believed their new hero would
genuinely move to end the occupation of Iraq and seriously try to
negotiate with the Taliban. Instead, he has not only increased the
number of troops and attacks against the Afghan insurgency, he has also
expanded on George Bush’s cross-border raids into Pakistan, which have
killed many civilians. The way things are going, Pakistan could become
the new Cambodia and Obama the new Nixon.
In Iraq, Obama has promised to withdraw all the troops . . . unless, which means that we’re not leaving. Whether it’s 50,000 troops remaining at the “invitation” of the so-called government of Iraq, or just enough to man the 14 permanent military bases, or some combination of U.S. military personnel and private mercenaries that exceeds 50,000 soldiers, our army will almost certainly stay in Iraq past the stated deadline of Jan. 1, 2012.
- Obama said he wanted to reform Washington and
“fix” its “broken” system of corrupt lobbying. But Obama is neither a
reformer nor a skilled legislative mechanic. Hatched from the Daley
Machine in one-party Chicago, Obama wouldn’t be president today if he
rocked boats. Witness the appointment of Roland Burris by the corrupt
former Gov. Rod Blagojevich to fill Obama’s Senate seat: not a word of
public protest from the new administration because Burris is a made man
in the Chicago Democratic organization. So what if “Tombstone Roland”
can be heard on the U.S. attorney’s wiretaps of Blagojevich, dancing
around the delicate question of how to raise money for Blago without
appearing to be buying his seat.
As for pork-barrel politics, Obama named one of its greatest champions, Chicago’s own Rahm Emanuel, as his chief of staff, and the new budget (as well as the “stimulus” package) is loaded with pork. Meanwhile, have you heard anything serious about campaign-finance reform from Obama? Not very likely from someone who refused public financing and still has about $10 million left over from record receipts of $745.7 million. It’s just a detail, I know, but Obama’s naming of former Raytheon lobbyist William Lynn III as deputy secretary of defense seems to be at odds with the president’s alleged crusade against special interests and the “revolving door” between private business and government. He has also “sold” ambassadorships to campaign donors. The biggest plum, London, is slated for Lou Susman, a Chicagoan and former Citigroup executive who bundled $239,000. Paris has been reserved for Charles Rivkin, who raised about $500,000 for Obama.
- Obama, with his Arabic middle name and
his big Cairo speech, wants people to think that he is the Muslim
world’s new best friend. Well, the photograph of a cheery Obama with
Saudi King Abdullah and a smiling Emanuel with Saudi Foreign Minister
Saud al-Faisal, proves the contrary. The Saudi royal family hates the
idea of representative government for ordinary Muslims and is cruelly
indifferent to the fate of the Palestinians. A democratic, independent,
partly secular Palestine could only make the Saudi oligarchy look bad.
Thus, the House of Saud is perfectly happy with the status quo, and so,
evidently, is Obama.
Without Saudi pressure, there will be no resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, since Saudi oil is the only lever that would cause America to press Israel into making real concessions. Indeed, the president doesn’t mean for one minute to force Israel into anything more than symbolic withdrawals of its illegal settlements on the West Bank. Meanwhile, the Saudi elite continues to play its double game, paying protection money to extremist Islam and granting pensions to the relatives of suicide bombers. It’s just politics, say Barack and Rahm, grinning ear-to-ear with their sleazy new friends from Riyahd. Just keep the oil pumping around election time and all will be well.
- Obama makes like he’s a friend of
organized labor, at least he did during the Ohio primary when he needed
to beat Hillary Clinton. At the time, he put out a flier headlined
“Only Barack Obama fought NAFTA and other bad trade deals” and charged
that “a little more than a year ago, Hillary Clinton thought NAFTA was
a ‘boon’ to the economy.” In a debate with Clinton on Feb. 26, 2008, he
said, “I will make sure that we renegotiate [NAFTA] in the same way
that Senator Clinton talked about” and “use the hammer of a potential
opt-out as leverage” to get “labor and environmental standards that are
But two months ago, U.S. Trade Rep. Ron Kirk said such a blunt instrument was no longer necessary and that the leaders of Canada, the U.S. and Mexico were now “of the mind that we should be looking for opportunities to strengthen [the North American Free Trade Agreement].” And, of course, there is no discussion at all about renegotiating Permanent Normal Trade Relations with China, a “bad trade deal” that has done even greater harm to American workers and unions than has NAFTA.
Meanwhile, as I noted in my April 15 column, “Wall Street sharks circle the UAW,” Obama and his banker friend Steven Rattner are liquidating the United Auto Workers even as they liquidate the American auto industry. Robert Reich, Bill Clinton’s pseudo-secretary of labor, said as much. “The only practical purpose I can imagine for the bailout is to slow the decline of GM to create enough time for its workers, suppliers, dealers and communities to adjust to its eventual demise,” he wrote last month in the Financial Times — no surprise, considering that Obama’s chief economic adviser remains Lawrence Summers, a champion of deregulation and “free-market” economics in the Clinton administration and very much the enemy of labor unions.
Yes, of course it’s nice to have a president who speaks in complete sentences. But that they’re coherent doesn’t make them honest.