(Photo by Kimberly White/Getty Images for Accountable Tech)
Trump's Return to Facebook Is About More Than Just Trump
Trumpism online exploited what was already there: the profit-over-people business model of our digital spaces.
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Trumpism online exploited what was already there: the profit-over-people business model of our digital spaces.
Start my morning with me in May 2020: I've just fed my dog. I'm brushing my teeth. I'm mentally making my to-do list and trying to decide if I should stay in sweatpants for the third day in a row. And suddenly none of my plans matter, because Trump just posted an insinuation that Black Lives Matter activists should be shot. Facebook declines to remove the post while Mark Zuckerberg fixes his fingers to defend his decision. And my day is toast.
Now that Meta has decided to let Trump back on Facebook and Instagram, I can't help but have flashbacks to recent years, when bracing myself for whatever fresh hell I would have to experience on the internet became a part of my morning routine.
As a campaigner working on issues related to disinformation and hate speech online, it was a daily struggle to contain harassment, patch up digital security gaps, and accurately distinguish between legitimate political discourse and incitement or even personal threats that could easily derail my life.
Fast forward to 2023. I was quietly enjoying the past two years of a Trump-free social media feed, until Elon Musk nearly burns down Twitter and then unbans Trump via poll results, while Facebook unleashes that man back into my feeds as well.
There's no doubt about it. Trumpism has made the U.S. an even more dangerous place, and Trump should absolutely not be allowed back on Facebook because he is a threat to not only democracy, but also public safety.
Trump is merely one part of a bigger issue. Trumpism online exploited what was already there: the profit-over-people business model of our digital spaces. As long as hate and disinformation can be monetized, social media companies will give platforms to Trump, mini-Trumps, disinformation bots, and other aspiring fascists.
It's not like the remedies are mysteries. In 2021, Kairos ran a campaign called The Facebook Logout, where we organized thousands of Facebook and Instagram users to temporarily log out of their accounts in a show of user power. The campaign's demands were simple: real data privacy, transparency, better content moderation, and an end to the free flow of hate speech and disinformation on the platforms. This campaign sparked a conversation about what users wanted Meta to do to make the platform safe for them. Our demands are still relevant today.
As is the activism: Accountable Tech and Media Matters has relaunched a campaign, bringing together other groups, communities, and individuals to put pressure on Meta to keep Trump off Facebook. And the return of Trump to Facebook is on Congress’s radar as well.
There has to be a world where social media companies spend less energy trying to keep a good public image and more time fixing the harms happening on their platform. This is the vision that campaigners, organizers, and users continue to work towards.
From 2016 until now, I've seen an increase in the number of people talking about the offline consequences of allowing bad actors to be online without moderation. And though it's important to continue that conversation, we cannot assume that if social media executives de-platformed bad actors the world would be a better place.
I remember Pizzagate, Covid-19 "miracle cures," "Stop the Steal," and that attempted coup, but I don't blame Trump alone. We can't simply point to one or some bad guys as the root of all our problems. The internet adds fuel to the fires individuals set—and the platforms profit by handing out matches. So, yes, let's extinguish what we can, but let's also dream and plan what our online spaces could look like if user safety and agency were acknowledged and respected. What would life be like if we users were involved in governing the online spaces that we live in?
My morning routines would probably go more like: feeding my dog, brushing my teeth, and opening my phone without fear. My accounts would already be opted out of targeted advertising by default. My feed would be full of people I choose to follow. My community's online organizing efforts wouldn't be subject to harassment. And by the time my aunt calls me to ask "did you see what's happening on the Facebook?" whatever outright lie she saw will have been removed.
I have moments of uncertainty but I always come back to what I am fighting for: a world where tech works for all. I still believe it is possible if we work towards it together.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Start my morning with me in May 2020: I've just fed my dog. I'm brushing my teeth. I'm mentally making my to-do list and trying to decide if I should stay in sweatpants for the third day in a row. And suddenly none of my plans matter, because Trump just posted an insinuation that Black Lives Matter activists should be shot. Facebook declines to remove the post while Mark Zuckerberg fixes his fingers to defend his decision. And my day is toast.
Now that Meta has decided to let Trump back on Facebook and Instagram, I can't help but have flashbacks to recent years, when bracing myself for whatever fresh hell I would have to experience on the internet became a part of my morning routine.
As a campaigner working on issues related to disinformation and hate speech online, it was a daily struggle to contain harassment, patch up digital security gaps, and accurately distinguish between legitimate political discourse and incitement or even personal threats that could easily derail my life.
Fast forward to 2023. I was quietly enjoying the past two years of a Trump-free social media feed, until Elon Musk nearly burns down Twitter and then unbans Trump via poll results, while Facebook unleashes that man back into my feeds as well.
There's no doubt about it. Trumpism has made the U.S. an even more dangerous place, and Trump should absolutely not be allowed back on Facebook because he is a threat to not only democracy, but also public safety.
Trump is merely one part of a bigger issue. Trumpism online exploited what was already there: the profit-over-people business model of our digital spaces. As long as hate and disinformation can be monetized, social media companies will give platforms to Trump, mini-Trumps, disinformation bots, and other aspiring fascists.
It's not like the remedies are mysteries. In 2021, Kairos ran a campaign called The Facebook Logout, where we organized thousands of Facebook and Instagram users to temporarily log out of their accounts in a show of user power. The campaign's demands were simple: real data privacy, transparency, better content moderation, and an end to the free flow of hate speech and disinformation on the platforms. This campaign sparked a conversation about what users wanted Meta to do to make the platform safe for them. Our demands are still relevant today.
As is the activism: Accountable Tech and Media Matters has relaunched a campaign, bringing together other groups, communities, and individuals to put pressure on Meta to keep Trump off Facebook. And the return of Trump to Facebook is on Congress’s radar as well.
There has to be a world where social media companies spend less energy trying to keep a good public image and more time fixing the harms happening on their platform. This is the vision that campaigners, organizers, and users continue to work towards.
From 2016 until now, I've seen an increase in the number of people talking about the offline consequences of allowing bad actors to be online without moderation. And though it's important to continue that conversation, we cannot assume that if social media executives de-platformed bad actors the world would be a better place.
I remember Pizzagate, Covid-19 "miracle cures," "Stop the Steal," and that attempted coup, but I don't blame Trump alone. We can't simply point to one or some bad guys as the root of all our problems. The internet adds fuel to the fires individuals set—and the platforms profit by handing out matches. So, yes, let's extinguish what we can, but let's also dream and plan what our online spaces could look like if user safety and agency were acknowledged and respected. What would life be like if we users were involved in governing the online spaces that we live in?
My morning routines would probably go more like: feeding my dog, brushing my teeth, and opening my phone without fear. My accounts would already be opted out of targeted advertising by default. My feed would be full of people I choose to follow. My community's online organizing efforts wouldn't be subject to harassment. And by the time my aunt calls me to ask "did you see what's happening on the Facebook?" whatever outright lie she saw will have been removed.
I have moments of uncertainty but I always come back to what I am fighting for: a world where tech works for all. I still believe it is possible if we work towards it together.
Start my morning with me in May 2020: I've just fed my dog. I'm brushing my teeth. I'm mentally making my to-do list and trying to decide if I should stay in sweatpants for the third day in a row. And suddenly none of my plans matter, because Trump just posted an insinuation that Black Lives Matter activists should be shot. Facebook declines to remove the post while Mark Zuckerberg fixes his fingers to defend his decision. And my day is toast.
Now that Meta has decided to let Trump back on Facebook and Instagram, I can't help but have flashbacks to recent years, when bracing myself for whatever fresh hell I would have to experience on the internet became a part of my morning routine.
As a campaigner working on issues related to disinformation and hate speech online, it was a daily struggle to contain harassment, patch up digital security gaps, and accurately distinguish between legitimate political discourse and incitement or even personal threats that could easily derail my life.
Fast forward to 2023. I was quietly enjoying the past two years of a Trump-free social media feed, until Elon Musk nearly burns down Twitter and then unbans Trump via poll results, while Facebook unleashes that man back into my feeds as well.
There's no doubt about it. Trumpism has made the U.S. an even more dangerous place, and Trump should absolutely not be allowed back on Facebook because he is a threat to not only democracy, but also public safety.
Trump is merely one part of a bigger issue. Trumpism online exploited what was already there: the profit-over-people business model of our digital spaces. As long as hate and disinformation can be monetized, social media companies will give platforms to Trump, mini-Trumps, disinformation bots, and other aspiring fascists.
It's not like the remedies are mysteries. In 2021, Kairos ran a campaign called The Facebook Logout, where we organized thousands of Facebook and Instagram users to temporarily log out of their accounts in a show of user power. The campaign's demands were simple: real data privacy, transparency, better content moderation, and an end to the free flow of hate speech and disinformation on the platforms. This campaign sparked a conversation about what users wanted Meta to do to make the platform safe for them. Our demands are still relevant today.
As is the activism: Accountable Tech and Media Matters has relaunched a campaign, bringing together other groups, communities, and individuals to put pressure on Meta to keep Trump off Facebook. And the return of Trump to Facebook is on Congress’s radar as well.
There has to be a world where social media companies spend less energy trying to keep a good public image and more time fixing the harms happening on their platform. This is the vision that campaigners, organizers, and users continue to work towards.
From 2016 until now, I've seen an increase in the number of people talking about the offline consequences of allowing bad actors to be online without moderation. And though it's important to continue that conversation, we cannot assume that if social media executives de-platformed bad actors the world would be a better place.
I remember Pizzagate, Covid-19 "miracle cures," "Stop the Steal," and that attempted coup, but I don't blame Trump alone. We can't simply point to one or some bad guys as the root of all our problems. The internet adds fuel to the fires individuals set—and the platforms profit by handing out matches. So, yes, let's extinguish what we can, but let's also dream and plan what our online spaces could look like if user safety and agency were acknowledged and respected. What would life be like if we users were involved in governing the online spaces that we live in?
My morning routines would probably go more like: feeding my dog, brushing my teeth, and opening my phone without fear. My accounts would already be opted out of targeted advertising by default. My feed would be full of people I choose to follow. My community's online organizing efforts wouldn't be subject to harassment. And by the time my aunt calls me to ask "did you see what's happening on the Facebook?" whatever outright lie she saw will have been removed.
I have moments of uncertainty but I always come back to what I am fighting for: a world where tech works for all. I still believe it is possible if we work towards it together.