It’s not enough to be outraged. We must fight back.
To keep reporting during these dark and dangerous days, please help us reach our must-hit Spring Campaign goal. Our journalism is committed to cataloging Trump’s outrages and connecting the dots to show people how everything fits together and what they can do to fight back.
Everything we care about is in danger, and Common Dreams is fighting back by exposing their lies and corruption and lifting up the voices of those working to stop them. If you believe in our work, we need you now more than ever. Your gift of any amount helps support our independent and fiercely unafraid journalism.
It’s not enough to be outraged. We must fight back.
G7 Support for Pharma Monopolies Is Putting Millions of Lives at Risk
The self-interest of G7 countries is the biggest obstacle to ending the Covid-19 pandemic, a group of campaigning organizations said today. Ahead of the G7 Leaders' Summit, the People's Vaccine Alliance warned that G7 promises to vaccinate the world by 2022 will be impossible to fulfill, if governments continue blocking proposals to waive patents and share life-saving technology.
WASHINGTON
The self-interest of G7 countries is the biggest obstacle to ending the Covid-19 pandemic, a group of campaigning organizations said today. Ahead of the G7 Leaders' Summit, the People's Vaccine Alliance warned that G7 promises to vaccinate the world by 2022 will be impossible to fulfill, if governments continue blocking proposals to waive patents and share life-saving technology.
Last year South Africa and India - also invited to this week's summit in the UK - proposed waiving intellectual property rules to allow other countries to manufacture Covid-19 tests, treatments and vaccines. The proposal is supported by more than 100 states.
The English county of Cornwall, where the G7 Summit takes place, has administered more vaccinations than 22 African countries combined.
Of the G7 nations, only the US has explicitly supported waiving patents for vaccines - though not for treatments or diagnostics - and Japan has said it will not oppose the moves if they are agreed. Germany and the UK continue to vehemently oppose the plan, despite its potential to massively increase vaccine production and save millions of lives, while Canada, Italy and France remain on the fence.
"The English county of Cornwall, where the G7 Summit takes place, has administered more vaccinations than 22 African countries combined. This is just one example of how the failure to fight pharma monopolies has created staggering inequalities in vaccine access. This unconscionable failure of global leadership must be rectified immediately," said Steve Cockburn, Amnesty International's Head of Economic and Social Justice.
"The path we are currently on does not benefit anybody. There is no way life can return to normal, anywhere, if people in just a handful of countries are vaccinated. There will be no end in sight until rich countries stop hoarding vaccines, stop supporting pharma monopolies, and start facing up to their international obligations."
Anna Marriott, Oxfam's Health Policy lead, said:
"This week G7 leaders will talk about a global goal to vaccinate the whole world by the end of 2022. But without commitments to waive intellectual property rules and share vaccine technology, this will simply not be possible.
"The G7 have a choice this week. They can continue to defend the indefensible monopolies of pharmaceutical giants - or they can change course, and save millions of lives."
The People's Vaccine Alliance - a coalition of organizations including Amnesty International, Health Justice Initiative, Oxfam, Stop AIDS Campaign and UNAIDS - has calculated that if current trends continue, it will take the world's poorest countries until 2078 to vaccinate their populations. Meanwhile G7 countries are on track to vaccinate their populations by January 2022. By the end of May 2021, 42% of people in G7 countries had received at least one vaccine dose, compared to less than 1% in low-income countries.
The G7 have a choice this week. They can continue to defend the indefensible monopolies of pharma giants - or they can change course, and save millions of lives.
28% of the Covid-19 vaccines that had been delivered by the end of May were in G7 countries, which represent just 10% of the world's population. The UK alone has administered nearly twice as many jabs than the entire African continent, despite its population being twenty times smaller.
Increased vaccine production blocked by richest nations
At the summit, G7 leaders are expected to announce plans to share some surplus doses with poorer countries, but this falls far short of what is needed.
Crucially, G7 countries - home to many of the largest vaccine manufacturers - have stood in the way of proposals to waive intellectual property rules on Covid-19 vaccines, tests and treatments. Following a groundbreaking announcement by President Joe Biden in May, the US is currently the only G7 member which supports a waiver on vaccines. Germany and the UK remain fiercely opposed - as does the European Union as a bloc - while Canada, Italy and France are undecided. Japan will not oppose the measures if they are agreed.
The vaccine is not even on the horizon for many at-risk groups in developing countries, including doctors and nurses who continue to risk their lives every day.
There is also an urgent need for pharmaceutical companies to share their vaccine technology and know-how, in order to support a massive increase in vaccine production. Vaccine developers have received over $100 billion in public funding. To date, not a single vaccine developer has agreed to participate in the World Health Organization's Covid-19 Technology Access Pool (C-TAP), which was set up over a year ago to facilitate the sharing of intellectual property and technology.
Instead, firms including Moderna and Pfizer are reaping huge profits, and nine new vaccine billionaires have been created.
Dinah Fuentesfina, Asia and Campaign Manager at ActionAid, said:
"G7 leaders are currently making plans to start vaccinating teenagers. Meanwhile, the vaccine is not even on the horizon for many of the most at-risk groups in developing countries, including doctors and nurses who continue to risk their lives every day.
"G7 leaders have an opportunity to be on the side of the millions of people who desperately need vaccines. We're calling on the world's richest countries to put everyone's health above Big Pharma's bottom line."
COVAX in crisis
Meanwhile, the much-heralded COVAX initiative is in crisis. COVAX had distributed 77 million doses by the end of May, just a third of its target by that date. At its current rate of distribution, COVAX is on track to deliver just 250 million doses by the end of this year, equivalent to just 10% of the populations of poorer countries taking part. As a result, countries which relied on COVAX are rapidly running out of vaccines, and many people who received a first dose have no idea when or if they will receive a second one.
Any indication that the G7 will continue to rely on the 'voluntary' agreement of pharmaceutical corporations to do the right thing, should be judged as naive deference to corporations.
This supply crisis is partly due to COVAX's failure to use its huge leverage to challenge pharmaceutical monopolies, and partly because of its overreliance on supply of AstraZeneca vaccines from India, which are now being prioritized for domestic use. COVAX's largest supplier recently announced it would not be able to deliver more vaccines until later in the year.
Donations from rich countries are urgently needed to help save COVAX, but they will not be enough on their own. The need for donations is a symptom of a broken system, where vaccines have been made artificially scarce and hugely expensive.
Fatima Hassan, Founder and Director of Health Justice Initiative in South Africa, said:
"Any indication that the G7 will continue to rely on the 'voluntary' agreement of pharmaceutical corporations to do the right thing, should be judged as naive deference to corporations that are unelected, and who do not prioritize human rights and lives over profits.
"We have the power to end this pandemic - we have multiple, highly successful vaccines, and global mechanisms in place to deliver them. All that stands between us and ending Covid-19 are politics, vested interested and profits based on patents."
A real solution
The People's Vaccine Alliance is calling for the immediate waiving of intellectual property, sharing of technology, and financing for manufacturing worldwide. Alliance members have done the detailed technical analysis that shows that 8 billion doses could be produced in a year, for as little as $25 billion dollars.
G7 leaders must:
Agree a global goal to vaccinate 60% of the world by the end of 2021, with everyone reached in the next 12 months;
Support the immediate suspension of intellectual property rules and enforce the transfer of vaccine technology to all qualified vaccine manufacturers in the world;
Pay their fair share of the money needed to manufacture billions of doses as fast as possible, and support health systems and especially health workers, to ensure they get to every person, free of charge.
The path we are currently on does not benefit anybody. There is no way life can return to normal, anywhere, if people in just a handful of countries are vaccinated.
Background
The People's Vaccine Alliance is a worldwide movement of global and national organizations and activists united under a common aim of campaigning for a 'People's Vaccine' that is available to all, everywhere, free of charge.
The Peoples Vaccine is supported by a host of world leaders, Nobel Laureates, scientists, and religious leaders including the Pope and the Dalai Lama. 2.7 million people have given their support to the aims of the campaign, and opinion polls have shown that 70% of the public in rich nations support the ending of Big Pharma monopolies.
Amnesty International is a worldwide movement of people who campaign for internationally recognized human rights for all. Our supporters are outraged by human rights abuses but inspired by hope for a better world - so we work to improve human rights through campaigning and international solidarity. We have more than 2.2 million members and subscribers in more than 150 countries and regions and we coordinate this support to act for justice on a wide range of issues.
Two weeks after millions of people attended "Hands Off" protests across the United States, expressing outrage over President Donald Trump's unlawful deportation operation, abandonment of due process for hundreds of migrants, and spending cuts in the interest of enriching the wealthiest Americans, organizers with the "50501" movement called for 11 million people to take to the streets again on Saturday—and early reports suggested the public remains mobilized against the administration.
With Trump intensifying his attacks on federal workers, the environment, freedom of speech, and migrants in recent weeks, organizers said hundreds of events were planned on Saturday—and the protests reflected the wide array of policies that have left Americans angry and fearful about who could be victimized next by the administration.
Signs at a rally outside the Ohio Statehouse in Columbus read, "Ban the fascists, not the books" and "Trump and Vance are traitors," referring to Vice President JD Vance.
Karen Kasler of the Statehouse News Bureau reported the Columbus protest drew the "largest crowd I've seen here since the protest following the U.S. Supreme Court's Dobbs decision overturning the right to abortion in 2022."
Major gatherings also took place in Chicago, New York, and Washington, D.C.
Hunter Dunn, a spokesperson for the 50501 movement—which grew out of a post on Reddit with a call for "50 protests in 50 states on one day"—toldThe Washington Post that the demonstrations are the actions of a "pro-democracy, pro-Constitution, anti-executive overreach, nonviolent grassroots movement."
In addition to protests, organizers called for participants to take part in actions to serve their communities, such as food banks and neighborhood cleanups.
"It's all about actions that support your community against the Trump administration—strengthening your community so that they can weather these assaults on democracy," Dunn toldNPR.
The expulsion of Maryland resident Kilmar Abrego Garcia—a migrant sent by the administration to a super-max prison in El Salvador under a deal with President Nayib Bukele—was a focus for many protesters, following a week of news about his situation. Administration officials have repeatedly claimed Abrego Garcia is a "convicted gang member" and have refused to return him to the U.S. despite a Supreme Court order.
"We are not angry people, we are loving people, but that situation is enraging to us," North Carolina resident Chris Gilbert told The Washington Post at a rally in the nation's capital. "We felt called to come up here to put pressure on the Trump administration. He runs for law and order but then his actions are the opposite."
HAPPENING NOW: Protesters march through Washington, D.C. chanting “Due process!” in support of Kilmar Abrego Garcia and against Donald Trumppic.twitter.com/tzNdEq6p3H — Marco Foster (@MarcoFoster_) April 19, 2025
Organizers say that as Trump has broadened his attacks—overseeing a deportation campaign in which international students have been abducted by plainclothes immigration agents, some wearing masks, in unmarked vehicles—the 50501 movement has grown considerably since its first call to action in early February.
The movement's first day of protests on February 5 included about 80 events in 88 cities, and Dunn said organizers were expecting close to 1,000 events Saturday.
"Anyone who cares about our national security, or receives Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid... has a vested interest in protecting our merit-based federal workforce."
The largest federal labor union in the U.S. said Friday that tens of thousands of federal workers could soon "have their jobs politicized" and be swiftly fired under a new rule proposed by the Office of Personnel Management.
Under the rule, an estimated 50,000 career civil servants would be reclassified as "at-will" employees, removing civil service protections and making it easier for the federal government to dismiss them.
President Donald Trump and his billionaire ally, tech mogul Elon Musk, have long claimed the federal workforce is rife with "rogue bureaucrats" and is part of the "deep state," pledging to dismantle the civil service.
Trump said on his social media platform, Truth Social, that reclassifying workers "will allow the federal government to finally be 'run like a business.'"
"If these government workers refuse to advance the policy interests of the president, or are engaging in corrupt behavior, they should no longer have a job," he said.
"President Trump's action to politicize the work of tens of thousands of career federal employees will erode the government's merit-based hiring system and undermine the professional civil service that Americans rely on."
Everett Kelley, national president of the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), said Friday's announcement was the latest "in a series of deliberate moves by this administration to corrupt the federal government and replace qualified public servants with political cronies."
"President Trump's action to politicize the work of tens of thousands of career federal employees will erode the government's merit-based hiring system and undermine the professional civil service that Americans rely on," said Kelley. "Politicizing the career civil service is a threat to our democracy and to the integrity of all the programs and services Americans rely on."
The new category for civil servants was originally called Schedule F, but the White House said it was changing the classification to "Schedule Policy/Career."
U.S. Sens. Tim Kaine and Mark Warner and Rep. Gerry Connolly, all Democrats from Virginia whose constituents include many federal employees, said Saturday that Trump's proposal to "hire and fire these workers based on their politics, not their qualifications... makes us all less safe."
The lawmakers have all backed legislation to protect the federal civil service from being reclassified outside of merit system principles without the approval of Congress, and issued a warning to congressional Republicans who have heard from angry constituents in recent weeks about the administration's spending cuts through the so-called Department of Government Efficiency.
"Anyone who cares about our national security, or receives Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, or any other critical service administered by the federal government, has a vested interest in protecting our merit-based federal workforce," said the lawmakers. "We have long fought for legislation to protect the federal workforce from this kind of attack. To our colleagues who will hear from their constituents if government services continue to decline because of this decision: You were warned."
"The government cannot undermine the justice system and attempt to manipulate a case's jurisdiction by secretly transporting and imprisoning someone over a thousand miles from home."
"Nobody should be shipped to a detention facility halfway across the country for writing an op-ed," said the ACLU Friday evening after a federal judge ordered the Trump administration to transfer Tufts University student Rumeysa Ozturk to a facility in Vermont, where she was forced to board an airplane bound for Louisiana last month after immigration agents detained her.
Judge William K. Sessions III of the U.S. District Court for the District of Vermont found that Ozturk "raised significant constitutional concerns with her arrest and detention which merit full and fair consideration in this forum."
Ozturk was arrested by plainclothes immigration agents, some of whom wore masks, outside her apartment in Somerville, Massachusetts late last month—days after her student visa was revoked without her knowledge.
She is one of hundreds of international students who have been targeted by the U.S. State Department's "catch and revoke" program aimed at revoking visas and green cards of students who have been involved in pro-Palestinian protests.
Ozturk wrote an op-ed for her university newspaper last year calling on administrators to "acknowledge the Palestinian genocide" being committed by Israel with U.S. backing and to divest from companies with ties to Israel. The Tufts Community Union Senate had made the same demand.
In court documents the Trump administration has said Ozturk has been "involved in associations that 'may undermine U.S. foreign policy by creating a hostile environment for Jewish students and indicating support for a designated terrorist organization,'" suggesting support for Hamas—but officials have presented no evidence of such support.
Numerous Jewish scholars and organizers have spoken out against the administration's "weaponization" of concerns about antisemitism to oppress groups and individuals who have spoken out against Israel's U.S.-backed assault on Gaza.
Ahead of the ruling on Friday, Massachusetts Democratic Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey and Rep. Ayanna Pressley demanded that Secretary of State Marco Rubio release an internal memo on Ozturk's arrest and any other documentation about the administration's case against her.
"Ms. Ozturk's case demands transparency," wrote the lawmakers. "The circumstances of her arrest and detention raise serious concerns about civil liberties, academic freedom, and free speech, as well as the Trump administration's truthfulness. Congress, universities, legal experts, and other members of the public have a strong and compelling interest in the matter.
"Nobody should be shipped to a detention facility halfway across the country for writing an op-ed."
Ozturk filed a lawsuit challenging her detention in Massachusetts, where a U.S. district judge transferred the case to Vermont and denied a government request to transfer it to Louisiana.
Due to the "significant constitutional concerns" raised by Ozturk, Sessions said the court "denies the government's request to dismiss the petition and orders that Ms. Ozturk be transferred to custody within the District of Vermont pending further hearings on this matter."
He said Ozturk should be transferred by May 1 and stayed the order to four days to allow for an appeal.
Ozturk was denied bond this week by an immigration judge, as her lawyers filed their request for her transfer. They said the transfer would allow her better communication with her legal team and a doctor. Ozturk has suffered five asthma attacks in the Louisiana detention center where she is being held, they said.
Lia Ernst of the ACLU of Vermont said Friday's ruling correctly affirmed "that the government cannot undermine the justice system and attempt to manipulate a case's jurisdiction by secretly transporting and imprisoning someone over a thousand miles from home."