

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Kurt Walters, Campaign Director, Demand Progress, kurt@demandprogress.org, 202-630-0299
Today, a coalition of grassroots online advocacy groups announced they have gathered more than 200,000 petition signatures calling on Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and COO Sheryl Sandberg to immediately alert all Facebook users whose personal data was compromised by Cambridge Analytica.
The announcement amid new revelations from Facebook that raised the estimate of users whose data had been taken to 87 million, up from an earlier count of 50 million.
The groups, Demand Progress, CREDO Action, and Daily Kos, noted that nearly three weeks into the media firestorm surrounding Facebook and Cambridge Analytica - and three years after Facebook learned of the situation - no users have been notified if their personal data was affected.
"This is a crisis of trust. Mark Zuckerberg needs to demonstrate that Facebook users' wellbeing - not Facebook's profit line - is the company's number one priority." said Kurt Walters, campaign director at Demand Progress. "Facebook must stop the foot-dragging and immediately alert everyone whose personal data was compromised by Cambridge Analytica or other third parties."
A whistleblower account in the Guardian and New York Times on March 17 revealed 50 million Facebook users' personal information had been taken by a company linked to Cambridge Analytica and employed in campaigns such as Donald Trump's presidential campaign and pro-Brexit efforts in the United Kingdom. The firm's CEO claimed this Facebook data was its "secret sauce" helping both campaigns win.
Additionally, the groups note that Zuckerberg's on-record statements imply that Facebook does not plan to actively notify affected users. Instead, Zuckerberg suggested Facebook may merely create a lookup tool that users would have to learn about, find, and use on their own. In that case, dramatically fewer users would be informed.
"We are outraged that Steve Bannon's company got to improperly use the Facebook data for 87 million users and that no one found out about this until three years later," said Paul Hogarth, Campaign Director of Daily Kos. "What Facebook has done so far is too little, too late. Daily Kos demands that Facebook directly and specifically notify the users whose privacy was compromised."
Given the lengthy period without transparency, the groups called on Facebook to publicly respond to the following questions:
1) Will you actively notify the 87 million users whose personal data was secretly taken by Cambridge Analytica, using a clear alert such as an email, push notification, item in the Notifications tab, or notice at the top of the News Feed?
2) Will you actively notify all users whose personal data was secretly taken by other third parties, using a clear alert such as an email, push notification, item in the Notifications tab, or notice at the top of the News Feed?
3) Will these notifications contain or link to a clear explanation of what personal data was compromised for these users?
4) By what date will you send these notifications?
A full copy of the letter sent earlier today to Facebook from Demand Progress Executive Director David Segal containing these questions is available here.
"It's unacceptable that Facebook knew for as many as three years that Cambridge Analytica had used its platform to steal data from tens of millions of users," said Kaili Lambe, Organizing Director at CREDO. "Facebook should have done the right thing then and warned users about the data breach before the 2016 election," Lambe continued. "As the number of affected users keeps growing, it is far past time for Facebook to come clean about the breach and notify everyone affected."
Late today, Facebook posted an update that the number of users whose data was compromised by Cambridge Analytica was substantially larger than estimated earlier, 87 million. They also included a statement that Facebook would provide users with a link to information about apps they had shared data with, although it was not immediately clear whether these would be fully responsive to the groups' questions.
The coalition groups are frequently engaged on issues essential to upholding the open internet and protecting digital rights, from saving net neutrality to reining in warrantless wiretapping. Their petitions are available here:
Demand Progress - https://act.demandprogress.org/sign/tell-facebook-notify-50-million-users-whose-personal-info-was-secretly-taken-trump-consultants-cambridge-analytica/
CREDO Action - https://act.credoaction.com/sign/facebook_cambridge_analytica
Daily Kos - https://www.dailykos.com/campaigns/petitions/sign-the-petition-facebook-must-come-clean-to-its-users-whose-data-was-stolen
One of the participating groups, Demand Progress, is also helping coordinate a campaign urging technology companies including Facebook, Google, and Microsoft to adopt the Security Pledge, a five-step plan to strengthen protections of user privacy. More information about the Security Pledge is available at https://securitypledge.com/
Demand Progress amplifies the voice of the people -- and wields it to make government accountable and contest concentrated corporate power. Our mission is to protect the democratic character of the internet -- and wield it to contest concentrated corporate power and hold government accountable.
A new poll from Politico found that only 5% of respondents disagree that there is too much money in politics, and 61% think billionaires have too much influence on elections.
A significant majority of Americans agree that there is too much money in the US political system and that the super rich have more influence over election outcomes than ordinary citizens, a poll published by Politico on Saturday found.
The poll comes after outside spending in the 2024 election broke records, with richest-man-alive Elon Musk pouring over $250 million into President Donald Trump's campaign.
"In 2024, the maximum individual donation per candidate was $3,300. Elon Musk donated $277 million to elect Trump because of the loopholes Citizens United created for billionaires to buy elections," Campaign for New York Health executive director Melanie D'Arrigo wrote on social media Sunday in response to the results.
"Elon has increased his wealth by $235 billion during Trump’s second term, and was allowed to gut the federal agencies overseeing and investigating him," she continued. "Big money in politics is a direct threat to democracy and the working class."
“This type of astronomical spending corrodes people’s faith in our system of government."
According to the poll, 72% of Americans agree that there is too much money in politics, while only 5% disagree. There is broad partisan consensus on this issue, with 80% of 2024 Kamala Harris voters and 77% of 2024 Trump voters also agreeing.
At the same time, 61% think that billionaires have too much influence on US politics. There was a larger partisan gap on this issue, with 75% of Harris voters and 55% of Trump voters agreeing
A total of 67% of respondents think that there is too much special interest money specifically in elections, and 53% see it as a form of corruption that should be restricted. There is also bipartisan support for the idea that special interest money is corruption, with 61% of Harris voters and 56% of Trump voters backing this position.
There is slightly more concern about money in politics from Democratic voters, with 49% of 2024 Harris voters stating it could outright buy elections compared with 33% of Trump voters.
In response to the results, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) argued that the Democratic Party should do more to take advantage of this concern.
"Dems shy away from the issue, despite voting 100% to get rid of dark money when given the chance. (Republicans 100% defend dark money.)," he wrote on social media.
The Democratic National Committee passed a resolution condemning dark money election spending last month, but some lawmakers including Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) have called for it to go further by banning dark money contributions to Democratic primaries all together.
Election spending skyrocketed in the US following the Supreme Court's controversial decision Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission in 2010. Dark money spending increased dramatically, reaching $1.9 billion in 2024.
“This type of astronomical spending corrodes people’s faith in our system of government, and I think people are really looking for changes to take some of this outrageous amount of spending and rein it in,” Michael Beckel, the Money in Politics reform director at Issue One, told Politico.
The pair were among the at least 24 people killed by Israeli strikes on Lebanon on Saturday despite a nominal ceasefire.
An Israeli drone killed a Syrian laborer and his 12-year-old daughter in a double-tap attack in southern Lebanon on Saturday, in what the Lebanon Health Ministry described as part of a continuing pattern “of grave violations of International Humanitarian Law.”
The man was riding with his daughter on a motorcycle in Nabatiyeh when the pair were targeted by three drone strikes, according to the ministry.
The Associated Press reported:
The ministry said that after the initial strike, the man and his daughter managed to move away from the site only to be attacked again by the drone instantly killing the man. The girl then moved about 100 meters (yards) away and was hit again by the drone after she had been already wounded.
The girl was taken to the hospital, but did not survive her injuries, according to Lebanon's National News Agency.
"What does terrorism mean to you? If it’s [not] double-tap killings of paramedics, journalists, and today a 12 year old girl, then what is it?"
“The Ministry of Public Health denounces this barbaric targeting and the deliberate violence against civilians and children in Lebanon,” the ministry said, as AP reported.
The father and daughter were among a total of at least 24 people in Lebanon who were killed by Israeli strikes on Saturday, according to Al Jazeera.
One strike on the town of al-Saksakieh killed seven, among them a child. The strike also wounded 15 people including three children.
The bombings continue despite a nominal ceasefire between Lebanon and Hezbollah that went into effect April 17. However, Israel has killed almost 500 people in Lebanon since April 16, raising the death toll since its March 2 invasion to over 2,750.
War correspondent Courtney Schellekens shared the story of the 12-year-old girl and her father in a video on social media on Saturday.
What does terrorism mean to you? If it’s no double-tap killings of paramedics, journalists, and today a 12 year old girl, then what is it?
Westerners, where is your humanity?
Cameraman: @aliezzedine7 pic.twitter.com/ntXIwz4s6H
— courtneybonneauimages (@cbonneauimages) May 9, 2026
"What does terrorism mean to you? If it’s [not] double-tap killings of paramedics, journalists, and today a 12 year old girl, then what is it?" she wrote above the video.
At the conclusion of the video itself, she continued the same line of questioning.
"To my Western followers, I really want you to think critically about the definition of terrorism, to whom it gets applied and who does it benefit," she said. "Because where I've been sitting for the last 18 months, this mass murder and mass, you know, look at this," she gestured to the ruble behind her, "this mass destruction, this ethnic cleansing of south Lebanon, this looks a lot like terrorism to me."
"Drug suspects should be arrested and prosecuted, not summarily executed," a human rights expert said.
The Trump administration continued its illegal bombing of small boats in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific on Friday, killing two and leaving one survivor in its third such strike in five days.
US Southern Command announced the attack on social media, claiming that "intelligence confirmed the vessel was transiting along known narco-trafficking routes in the Eastern Pacific and was engaged in narco-trafficking operations."
"Under [President Donald] Trump's illegal orders, the US military conducted its third boat strike in five days against supposed drug smugglers, killing at least two. Each of these is a murder. Drug suspects should be arrested and prosecuted, not summarily executed," former Human Rights Watch executive director Kenneth Roth wrote on social media Saturday in response to the news.
Friday's strike marks the 57th by the Trump administration and raises the death toll from the boat-strike campaign, which experts say is illegal even if every boat targeted is ferrying drugs, to 192.
"Really absurdly, there’s been no impact on flows of drugs toward the United States."
"What do you call a US citizen who smuggles drugs, SOUTHCOM? A 'narco-terrorist'?" social media user Andrew Marinelli said in response to the Southern Command announcement. "If a US citizen [allegedly] drove drugs into Canada and they blew him away with a drone strike, would you accept it?"
The administration has also not provided evidence for its claims that the boats belong to drug traffickers, and relatives of the victims say at least some of those killed were simply on the water to fish.
Friday's strike was notable in that it left behind a survivor and that US Southern Command said it had activated the US Coast Guard to conduct a search and rescue operation.
The announcement may reflect a response to backlash after news broke last year that, in the administration's first such strike, commanders had ordered a vessel bombed twice when it became clear there were survivors, in keeping with Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth's directive to "kill everybody."
Despite scrutiny, the campaign has continued and even escalated in the past few weeks. There have been three such bombings since the beginning of May, according to The Intercept: One on May 4 in the Caribbean that killed two, one on May 5 in the Pacific that killed three, and the Pacific strike on May 8 that killed two. The reported survivor remains missing.
While the Trump administration claims the strikes have dramatically reduced the flow of illegal drugs into the US, evidence reveals this is not the case, according to an Intercept analysis published May 4.
For example, Trump claimed that drugs entering the US by sea had decreased by 97%, but the administration's own data contradicts this claim, retired Rear Adm. William Baumgartner told The Intercept.
Adam Isacson, the director for defense oversight at human rights group Washington Office on Latin America, said, "Really absurdly, there’s been no impact on flows of drugs toward the United States,” noting that Customs and Border Protection seized 6,000 pounds more cocaine at all US borders in the seven months following the strikes than in the seven months before.
As Sanho Tree, who directs the Institute for Policy Studies' Drug Policy Project, put it, "It wouldn’t be the first time this administration just made up something out of whole cloth."