April, 06 2012, 08:52am EDT
Yemen: Transition Needs Accountability, Security Reform
Human Rights Watch Delegation Completes Official Visit in Sanaa
SANAA
Yemen's transition to a democracy that respects human rights and the rule of law is at risk unless the new government moves swiftly on security reform and accountability for past crimes, Human Rights Watch said today.
The transition government of President Abd Rabu Mansur Hadi also should ensure that security forces on all sides release unlawfully detained prisoners and decommission child soldiers, Human Rights Watch said. The government should repeal provisions of an array of laws that restrict free expression, association, and assembly, and that discriminate or fail to protect women and girls. Human Rights Watch met in Sanaa with Yemeni government officials, political party leaders, and civil society members during a trip to Yemen from March 15 to April 3, 2012.
"While Yemen's new government has taken several promising steps, the repressive security apparatus of former President Ali Abdullah Saleh remains largely intact," said Sarah Leah Whitson, Middle East and North Africa director at Human Rights Watch. "Civilian leaders reiterated that they cannot move forward on accountability and reform of the security services so long as Saleh continues to play a hand in directing various security forces there."
The Human Rights Watch delegation, led by Whitson, met with members of the Yemeni cabinet and judiciary, including Prime Minister Mohammed Salim Basindwa; Foreign Minister Abu Bakr al-Qirbi; Interior Minister Abdul-Qader Qahtan; Human Rights Minister Huryah Mashhoor; Legal Affairs Minister Mohammed Ahmed al-Mikhlafi; the Supreme Judicial Council chairman, Esam Abdulwahab al-Samawi; Justice Minister Murshed Ali al-Arashani; and Prosecutor General Ali Ahmed al-Awash.
The delegation also met with intelligence and security chiefs, including Ali Mohamed al-Anisi, chairman of the National Security Bureau; Gen. Ahmed Ali Saleh, commander of the Republican Guard; Brig.-Gen. Yayha Saleh, chief of Central Security Forces; and Gen. Ali Mohsen al-Ahmar, commander of the First Armored Division, which defected to the political opposition in March 2011. It also met with Hamid al-Ahmar, the head of a powerful clan whose fighters clashed with Saleh's forces during the uprising.
Hadi, who was inaugurated in February after a yearlong uprising against Saleh, and the caretaker cabinet that took office in December have made progress in a number of areas, Human Rights Watch said. Positive steps include partially demilitarizing major cities and making a small number of leadership changes within the security units and the Supreme Judiciary Council, Yemen's top judicial authority. The government also has pledged to draft a new constitution, commence a national dialogue, and reform electoral laws in advance of parliamentary elections in 2014.
The government is drafting a transitional justice law that would empower a truth commission to investigate past violations, including deadly attacks on largely peaceful protesters by government forces and gangs in 2011, and compensate victims. In addition, it is working on measures to increase participation of women in public life and has permitted the United Nations Office for the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) to open an office in Yemen.
However, Human Rights Watch found that Sanaa and other cities remain divided into zones controlled by an array of military, paramilitary, and tribal forces, and that Hadi's efforts to reorganize them under a central command have stalled. Moreover, with few exceptions, the leadership and membership of these units remain unchanged, despite documentation by Human Rights Watch and other human rights groups of serious violations by their forces, including the Central Security Services, the Republican Guard, and the Political Security and National Security agencies during the 2011 uprising and in previous years.
In addition, the country has yet to complete any investigations into the abuses committed by these forces, including their role in attacks on peaceful protests that killed at least 270 demonstrators and bystanders, the excessive use of force to police demonstrations, and indiscriminate shelling of civilian areas, and to hold those responsible to account.
Saleh's relatives and other loyalists of the former president head security forces including the Republican Guard and Central Security, and the civilian leadership in the country has stated that it has no control over these forces.
The US Pentagon has stated that it plans to spend $75 million this year in military training and donations of equipment to Yemen to fight al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula and affiliated armed Islamist groups, provided the new government shows sufficient progress toward reform. The US suspended $150 million in such assistance during the uprising last year. In the past, US security assistance has gone to individual units of the Yemeni security services, including the Yemeni Air Force and Central Security's Counterterrorism Unit.
Human Rights Watch called for the United States and other donors to ensure that they do not provide military aid to individual units of the security services that have been implicated in serious abuses and where there have been no clear steps to ensure accountability for these abuses.
"The US government has no business resuming aid, overt or covert, to security forces that are implicated in murdering Yemen's citizens and refuse to accept accountability for these abuses," Whitson said. "Direct military aid to these forces could undermine the government's ability to ensure accountability and bring peace and security to the country."
In addition, Human Rights Watch asked regional and international bodies including the
US, EU, Gulf states, and the UN Security Council, to ban travel and freeze foreign assets of current and former officials considered most responsible for human rights crimes in Yemen until these abuses are halted, genuine steps are taken to investigate them, those responsible are held to account, and security forces are vetted.
Accountability
Investigations into the violations of the past year appear to be stalled, and it remains uncertain whether there will be any meaningful accountability for those responsible. For example, not one person has been convicted for the March 18, 2011 attack by pro-government snipers on a peaceful protest in Sanaa that killed 45 people. Several witnesses told Human Rights Watch that Central Security forces deployed nearby had failed to stop the killing spree. The key suspect - a governor's son who was a colonel in the Criminal Investigation Department - remains a fugitive. General Prosecutor al-Awash said he did not know how many other suspects were security force members.
While the draft transitional justice law is a positive step, .Human Rights Watch opposes provisions that bar prosecution of government officials for human rights crimes. These provisions are based on a law passed by Yemen's parliament in January 2012 that grants blanket immunity to Saleh and immunity from all political crimes except terrorism to all those who served with him during his 33-year rule - language that could cover any major human rights violations committed by the government during the course of official duties. Such immunity violates Yemen's international obligations to prosecute serious human rights crimes.
In addition, the law does not define or specify how it distinguishes "political" crimes from "terrorist" crimes. The UN special rapporteur on human rights and counterterrorism's definition of terrorism includes acts committed with the intent of causing death or serious injury, for the purpose of "provoking a state of terror, intimidating a population, or compelling a government or international organization to do or abstain from doing any act.
Moreover, the panel to be formed to investigate past abuses may not be able to compel witnesses to testify or government officials or agencies to provide information they hold. This amounts to an open invitation for those responsible for abuses, or witnesses thereto, to resist revealing the chain of command or other details of human rights violations.
"Redress is an essential component of justice, but a truth commission without the judicial power to learn the truth is an affront to victims," Whitson said. "Burying the mistakes of the past is a sure path toward reinforcing impunity."
Arbitrary Detention
Human Rights Watch pressed the leaders of armed forces on all sides to immediately free anyone who has been arbitrarily detained or to promptly transfer them to judicial authorities. Human Rights Watch in February, March, and April interviewed 22 people, including opposition protesters and fighters, who described their incommunicado detention by government security and intelligence forces in 2011 and in the first quarter of 2012, as well as a relative of another recently released detainee. The former detainees said they were held for periods of a few days to seven months by forces including the Republican Guards and National Security. All 22 and the relative of the additional former detainee made credible allegations of physical or psychological torture and other ill-treatment in detention.
Human Rights Watch also interviewed family members who gave credible evidence that security or intelligence agencies had forcibly disappeared seven people, including protesters and Republican Guards, in separate incidents in December 2011 and February 2012 who were still being held. Some relatives said they or other witnesses saw the men taken to or being held in the detention centers of entities including the Political Security Organization, Central Security, and the Republican Guards.
In meetings with Human Rights Watch, General Saleh of the Republican Guard, General al-Ahmar of the renegade First Armored Division, and Hamid al-Ahmar, a leader of the al-Ahmar clan and a member of the supreme committee of the Yemeni Congregation for Reform (Islah), the largest opposition party and a key Islamic force in Yemen, denied that forces under their command were unlawfully holding detainees. But both General al-Ahmar and Hamid al-Ahmar accused the Republican Guard of holding several dozen of their fighters, while General Saleh in turn accused the First Armored Division of holding seven dozen Republican Guards.
Child Soldiers and School Occupations
It also appears that government and other armed forces are using child soldiers in their units. Human Rights Watch interviewed 12 children who said they were deployed or being trained as soldiers. The children named their various units as the Republican Guard, the First Armored Division, Central Security, or the al-Ahmar militia. Deployment of children in armed groups is a clear violation of international law.
Human Rights Watch also visited 19 schools in Sanaa, of which six were occupied by troops from the First Armored Division, while another was closed due to the presence of First Armored Division troops surrounding it. Gen. Ali Mohsen told Human Rights Watch that the division was only in one school at present and had only entered schools pursuant to an agreement with the Ministry of Education. He further promised to ensure that First Armored Division soldiers would clear out of any remaining schools.
Judicial Reform
Reform of the judiciary is another critical task. Notwithstanding Hadi's appointment of three new members to the Supreme Judiciary Council, the nine-member body remains under the direct control of the executive and should be restructured to ensure an independent and impartial judiciary. The Specialized Criminal Court and specialized Media Court, which fail to guarantee defendants' basic rights to due process, should be immediately abolished or at a minimum suspended until they have been reformed so as to guarantee the basic rights to a fair trial.
Sultan al-Barakani, head of the General People's Congress (GPC) bloc in Parliament, promised Human Rights Watch he would support any legislation the cabinet sends him seeking suspension of the specialized courts or abusive laws. The GPC is Saleh's party and holds a parliamentary majority.
Law Reform
Legal provisions that Human Rights Watch called on the new government to repeal or suspend immediately include portions of Yemen's Press and Publication Law of 1990 that prohibit criticism of the head of state and require journalists to uphold "the goals of the Yemeni Revolution" and "national unity."
The government also should tighten language in the Law on Organizing Demonstrations and Marches of 2003 that requires organizers to notify the authorities three days in advance of large protests and rallies so that it is not used arbitrarily to suppress freedom of assembly, and strike the law's provision that forbids demonstrators to question the "unity of the lands." The former government used both laws to justify widespread crackdowns on media, protesters, and civil society both during the 2011 uprising and in previous years.
Another law the government should suspend or reform is the Law on Associations and Foundations of 2001, which requires nongovernmental organizations to have one million Yemeni reals (about $4,600 - a large sum in Yemen) in seed money, and grants the Social Affairs Ministry extensive supervision over their affairs. The ministry should immediately end the longstanding practice of obstructing civil society groups by denying them licenses for years at a time.
The government also should revoke the death penalty. As an immediate first step, President Hadi should commute the death sentences of three men - Muhammad Tahir Sumum, Walid Husain Haikal, and Muhammad Abd al-Qasim al-Tawil - who allege that they committed their crimes when they were juveniles and retry them in courts that meet international due-process standards. The three men have exhausted all appeals, and their execution warrants were signed by former president Saleh.
All sides, including Islamic conservatives in Parliament, should promote gender equality. Human Rights Watch called on Abdul Wahab al-Anisi, the general secretary of Islah, and Hamid al-Ahmar to support enactment of a minimum marital age to prevent the widespread practice of child marriage. Human Rights Watch has documented how child marriage jeopardizes Yemeni girls' access to education, harms their health, and keeps them second-class citizens. Hamid al-Ahmar told Human Rights Watch he would support a minimum marital age. The government also should end discriminatory practices in the Personal Status Law, such as the provision that a female virgin's silence signifies consent to marry.
National Unity Dialogue
To address allegations of exclusion or discrimination of groups including youth protesters, residents of the southern provinces, followers of the Zaidi strand of Shia Islam, and the minority so-called "al-Akhdam" community, the government should ensure that the national dialogue conference mandated in Saleh's exit deal develops effective measures to ensure equality and non-discrimination.
"Events in Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya show that removing an authoritarian leader is only the first of many difficult steps," Whitson said. "The best way for Hadi to gain the support of all Yemenis is to ensure their grievances are addressed."
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
Privacy Defenders Decry 'Spy Draft' in Section 702 Renewal Advanced by Senate
"It's not about who RISAA allows the government to spy on, it's about who RISAA allows the government to force to spy," explained one critic.
Apr 18, 2024
Civil liberties defenders on Thursday decried the U.S. Senate's advancement of the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, which critics say lawmakers are trying to ram through without protection against warrantless surveillance and with a provision that would effectively make every American a spy whether they like it or not.
Senators voted 67-32 in favor of a cloture motion to begin voting on RISAA, a bill to reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which expires on Friday. FISA—a highly controversial law that has been abused hundreds of thousands of times—allows warrantless surveillance of non-U.S. citizens but also often sweeps up Americans' communication data in the process.
In a 273-147 vote last week, House lawmakers passed RISAA, including an amendment critics say dramatically expands the government's unchecked surveillance authority by compelling a wide range of individuals and organizations—including businesses and the media—to cooperate in government spying operations.
This so-called "Make Everyone a Spy" clause would allow the attorney general or director of national intelligence to force electronic communication service providers to "immediately provide... all information, facilities, or assistance" the government deems necessary.
"This bill would basically allow the government to institute a spy draft," Seth Stern, director of advocacy at Freedom of the Press Foundation, warned Thursday. "It will lead to significant distrust between journalists and sources, not to mention everyone else."
"It's not about who RISAA allows the government to spy on, it's about who RISAA allows the government to force to spy," he added. "Regardless of whether the end target of the surveillance is a foreigner, it's indisputable that the people the government can enlist to conduct the surveillance are Americans. And what's more, these civilians ordered to spy would be gagged and sworn to secrecy under the law."
In addition to the "Make Everyone a Spy" provision, civil libertarians have sounded the alarm over the House lawmakers' rejection of an amendment that would have added a warrant requirement to the legislation.
Critics accuse Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and colleagues including Senate Intelligence Committee Chair Mark Warner (D-Va.) of trying to rush a vote on RISAA while disingenuously claiming Section 702's powers will expire with the law on Friday. That's a misleading claim, as a national security court earlier this month approved the government's request to continue a disputed surveillance program even if Section 702 lapses.
"There is simply no defense of Majority Leader Schumer and Sen. Warner's duplicity," Sean Vitka, policy director at the progressive advocacy group Demand Progress, said in a statement. "House Intelligence Committee leaders poisoned this bill with one of the most repugnant surveillance expansions in history, and apparently the administration was too busy attacking commonsense privacy protections to notice. They know it, we know it, and now the American people know it."
"There can be no mistake: Sens. Schumer and Warner just helped hand the next president an unspeakably dangerous weapon that will be used against their own constituents," Vitka added. "And there is only one vote left to stop it."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.)—who
said earlier this week that the bill would dragoon the American people into becoming "an agent for Big Brother"—on Thursday argued that "this issue demands a debate about meaningful reforms, not a rushed vote to rubber-stamp more warrantless government surveillance powers."
In an attempt to tackle the warrantless surveillance issue, Senate Judiciary Chair Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.) on Thursday proposed a RISAA amendment that would require the government to obtain a warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court before accessing Americans' private communications.
However, the amendment contains exceptions to the warrant requirement in the event of unspecified emergencies and cyberattacks.
"If the government wants to spy on the private communications of Americans, they should be required to get approval from a judge—just as our Founders intended," Durbin said in a statement. "Congress has a responsibility to the American people to get this right."
The Biden administration and U.S. intelligence agencies vehemently oppose the Durbin-Cramer amendment. The White House called the measure "a reckless policy choice contrary to the key lessons of 9/11 and not grounded in any constitutional requirement or statute."
"The amendment outright bars the government from gaining access to lawfully collected information using terms associated with U.S. persons," the administration added. "Exceptions to that prohibition are narrow and unworkable. They are insufficient to protect our national security."
On Wednesday, the House also passed the Fourth Amendment Is Not for Sale Act, which would prohibit the government from buying Americans' information from data brokers if it would otherwise need a warrant to obtain the data, which includes location and internet records. The Senate will now take up FANFSA.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'The Opposite of Leadership': US Vetoes Palestine's UN Membership
Palestine's permanent observer at the United Nations said the resolution's failure "will not break our will, and it will not defeat our determination."
Apr 18, 2024
U.S. President Joe Biden's administration on Thursday used the country's veto power at the United Nations Security Council to block Palestine's bid to become a full member of the U.N.
While 12 nations voted in favor of Palestinian membership and two abstained, the United States is one of five countries—along with China, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom—who have veto authority at the Security Council.
Since Israel launched what the International Court of Justice has said is a "plausibly" genocidal assault of the Gaza Strip in response to a Hamas-led October attack, the Biden administration has blocked three cease-fire resolutions at the Security Council. Under mounting global pressure, the U.S. finally abstained last month, allowing a cease-fire measure to pass.
In the lead-up to Thursday's vote, the Biden administration was pressuring other countries to oppose the Palestinian Authority's renewed membership effort so it could possibly avoid a veto, according to leaked cables obtained by The Intercept.
"Take a moment to ponder how isolated Biden has made the U.S.," said Trita Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, after the veto. "Biden lobbied Japan, South Korea, and Ecuador HARD to oppose the Palestine resolution so that the U.S. wouldn't have to veto. They refused. So Biden cast his fourth veto in seven months (!!) This is the opposite of leadership."
In addition to the nations Parsi highlighted, Algeria, China, France, Guyana, Malta, Mozambique, Russia, Sierra Leone, and Slovenia voted for giving Palestine full U.N. membership while Switzerland and the United Kingdom abstained.
After the vote, U.N. Newsreported on remarks from Riyad Mansour, a U.N. permanent observer for the state of Palestine:
"We came to the Security Council today as an important historic moment, regionally and internationally, so that we could salvage what can be saved. We place you before a historic responsibility to establish the foundations of a just and comprehensive peace in our region."
Council members were given the opportunity "to revive the hope that has been lost among our people" and to translate their commitment towards a two-state solution into firm action "that cannot be maneuvered or retracted," and the majority of council members "have risen to the level of this historic moment, and they have stood on the side of justice and freedom and hope, in line with the ethical and humanitarian and legal principles that must govern our world and in line with simple logic."
"The fact that this resolution did not pass will not break our will, and it will not defeat our determination," Mansour added. "We will not stop in our effort. The state of Palestine is inevitable. It is real. Perhaps they see it as far away, but we see it as near, and we are the faithful."
Parsi said that "a Western-friendly senior Global South diplomat" told him of Biden's veto: "Whatever agonizing claim the U.S. had to lead a self-appointed free world has died a very loud public death on the Security Council horseshoe tonight. YOU CAN'T LEAD IF YOU CAN'T LISTEN."
Biden, a Democrat seeking reelection in November, has faced fierce criticism in the United States and around the world for U.S. complicity in Israel's war on Gaza—which Hamas, not the Palestinian Authority, has controlled for nearly two decades. In under seven months, Israeli forces have killed 33,970 Palestinians, injured another 76,770, displaced most of the besieged enclave's 2.3 million population, devastated civilian infrastructure, and severely limited the flow of lifesaving humanitarian assistance.
Israel—which already got $3.8 billion in annual U.S. military aid before October 7—continues to receive weapons support from the Biden administration, even as a growing chorus of critics, including some Democrats in Congress, argues that the arms transfers violate U.S. and international law.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Shameful': Columbia Greenlights Police Crackdown on Anti-War Encampment
Even after dozens of students were arrested, hundreds "rushed to take the place of their classmates" and continued the protest.
Apr 18, 2024
The arrests of dozens of Columbia University and Barnard College students on Thursday "galvanized" other supporters of Palestinian rights on the campuses, as hundreds of students occupied the school's western lawn after New York City police filled at least two buses with protesters who had been detained for setting up an encampment.
"Disclose, divest, we will not stop, we will not rest," chanted hundreds of students as they marched around the area where organizers had set up a tent encampment early Wednesday morning.
Columbia President Minouche Shafik informed the campus community on Thursday that she had authorized the police to clear the encampment.
As it has been in the past, the school has become a center of anti-war protests—and crackdowns by school officials and the police—since Israel began its bombardment of Gaza in October.
Pro-Palestinian students and alumni have demanded that Columbia divest from companies that profit from Israel's apartheid policies in the occupied Palestinian territories and cancel its dual degree program with Tel Aviv University.
In response to pro-Palestinian demonstrations, Columbia in November suspended the campus chapters of Jewish Voice for Peace and Students for Justice in Palestine—an action that pushed the New York Civil Liberties Union and Palestine Legal to file a lawsuit on behalf of the students last month.
On Thursday, police and Columbia employees took down about 50 tents that had been up for more than a day and disposed of them in trash cans and alleyways—but The New York Times reported later that "demonstrators repitched a couple of tents, and ... recovered the main signage from the encampment as well," while hundreds of students were "still gathered and chanting on the south side of the grass."
The arrests came a day after Shafik testified before the U.S. House Committee on Education and the Workforce about antisemitism on campus.
U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), whose daughter, Isra Hirsi, was among the Barnard students who were suspended on Thursday for participating in the encampment protest, questioned Shafik about whether antisemitic protests have actually taken place at Columbia, prompting the president to say there have not.
"There has been a rise in targeting and harassment against anti-war protesters, because it's been pro-war and anti-war protesters is what it seems, like, correct?" asked Omar.
"Correct," replied Shafik.
On Thursday, Omar posted on social media two images of protesters at Columbia: one from the encampment this week, and one from 1968, when students protested the U.S. war in Vietnam.
New York City Council member Tiffany Cabán was among those who condemned the university's crackdown on the protests on Thursday.
"Suspending and arresting Columbia/Barnard student activists and disbanding student organizations—including Jewish students and organizations—doesn't combat antisemitism or increase safety," said Cabán. "All it does is punish and intimidate those who believe in human rights for Palestinians. Shameful."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular