January, 19 2011, 11:09am EDT

Firms Plan to Pursue Experimental Nuclear Reactors without Required Licenses
Documents Reveal Reactors Could Be Fueled by Radioactive Fuel from Savannah River Site, Leading to More Importation of Dangerous Radioactive Waste into South Carolina
COLUMBIA, SC
Documents obtained by Friends of the Earth under the Freedom of
Information Act reveal that a private contractor plans to pursue
experimental nuclear reactors without licensing by the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, even though such licensing is required by law.
The revelation that two prototype "small modular reactors" are being
pursued by Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, the private contractor that
manages the Department of Energy's Savannah River Site near Aiken,
South Carolina, "in advance of any design certification and licensing by
the NRC" has drawn the charge from Friends of the Earth that such a
move does not comply with pertinent U.S. regulations and must be
dropped.
"We call on Savannah River Nuclear Solutions and the Department of
Energy to immediately affirm that no experimental nuclear reactors will
be pursued in South Carolina without the required license from the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission," said Tom Clements, Southeastern Nuclear
Campaign Coordinator for Friends of the Earth. "Construction of 'small
modular reactors' that are not licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission would violate U.S. law as well as endanger the public and we
will strongly oppose any attempt to avoid required licensing of such
reactors."
Small modular reactors are being pursued by various companies but at
present only exist as concepts. Although such reactors would be smaller
than those currently operating, modular reactors would still produce
nuclear waste and pose the same safety and proliferation problems of
larger reactors. Licensing discussions between at least one firm and the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission have begun.
On January 7 Friends of the Earth obtained two memoranda of
understanding related to two different small modular reactors. The
memoranda were obtained via a Freedom of Information Act request to the
Savannah River Site. The memoranda, related to the "Hyperion SMR"
(signed August 2010) and the "GE-Hitachi PRISM SMR" (signed September
2010) designs, both state that "[the U.S. Department of Energy] would
assume responsibility for regulating the design, construction, and
operation of a PRISM prototype under DOE's existing authority as
codified in l0 CFR 830, in advance of any design certification and
licensing by the NRC."
The federal Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, which created the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Energy Research and Development
Administration (now DOE), requires NRC licensing of a nuclear reactor
"when operated in any other manner for the purpose of demonstrating the
suitability for commercial application of such a reactor." Thus, unless
the projects are pursued exclusively by the Department of Energy with no
private involvement, Nuclear Regulatory Commission licensing is
mandated.
"In order to avoid required regulation, it appears that the Savannah
River Site is trying to manipulate things so that requirements of the
Energy Reorganization Act are avoided, but that will be impossible to
do," said Clements. "In addition, the private firm that intends to
construct these experimental reactors appears poised to try to force
taxpayers to pick up the cost. Savannah River Nuclear Solutions must pay
for its own activities. Friends of the Earth calls on DOE and Savannah
River Nuclear Solutions and its partners to demonstrate that 100 percent
of the funding for any experimental reactors will come from private
sources and that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission will play the role
required by law."
Friends of the Earth believes that the private companies developing the
experimental reactors, which are only concepts at this point, must
provide 100 percent of the financing, but even partial private financing
or involvement would still trigger the requirement that licensing be
carried out by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
The Hyperion memorandum, signed for the Savannah River National
Laboratory by Garry Flowers, President and CEO of Savannah River Nuclear
Solutions, also states that the fuel for the Hyperion reactor could
come from commercial reprocessing in the H-Canyon reprocessing plant, an
idea that is already stirring controversy and which may be impossible
to pursue as the H-Canyon may be placed on stand-by due to budget
constraints. Clements of Friends of the Earth and many members of the
public spoke out against use of the H-Canyon facility for commercial
reprocessing R&D before a January 7 meeting in Augusta, Georgia of
the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future.
Likewise, the PRISM memorandum states that the Savannah River Site
plutonium fuel (MOX) facility, now under construction, could be used to
fabricate the first fuel for the reactor, which is in direct
contradiction to pledges by the Energy Department that the facility
would not be used for missions beyond fabricating surplus weapons
plutonium into MOX fuel for existing light-water reactors. That program
is in trouble as the Energy Department has failed to identify reactors
to use the MOX fuel and the facility could end up could end up sitting
idle. A multi-year MOX testing program will be required by the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission even if reactors are identified, and the Energy
Department was unable to outline the details of such a testing program
during a public tour of the Savannah River Site on January 6, 2011, in
parallel with a tour by the Blue Ribbon Commission.
Contrary to the approach presented by Savannah River Nuclear Solutions
in the two memoranda, the Tennessee Valley Authority is pursuing an
mPower "small modular reactor" and has recently revealed that it plans
to seek a construction license fr om
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. But like other small modular
reactors, the mPower reactor is but a concept this point and faces a
host of technical and licensing hurdles.
###
Notes:
1. The two five-page memoranda are available at https://foe.org/sites/default/files/MOU_GE-Hitachi_PRISM_9.2010.pdf and https://foe.org/sites/default/files/MOU_Hyperion_SMR_8.2010.pdf.
2. See text of Energy Reorganization Act on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission website at: https://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/governing-laws.html
SeeSec. 202. Licensing and Related Regulatory Functions Respecting
Selected Administration Facilities - "Notwithstanding the exclusions
provided for in section 110 a. or any other provisions of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 USC 2140(a)), the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission shall, except as otherwise specifically provided by section
110 b. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 USC 2140(b)), or
other law, have licensing and related regulatory authority pursuant to
chapters 6, 7, 8, and 10 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended,
as to the following facilities of the Administration: ... (2)Other
demonstration nuclear reactors-except those in existence on the
effective date of this Act-when operated as part of the power generation
facilities of an electric utility system, or when operated in any other
manner for the purpose of demonstrating the suitability for commercial
application of such a reactor."
-----
Contact:Tom Clements, Southeastern Nuclear Campaign Coordinator,
Friends of the Earth, 1112 Florence Street, Columbia, SC 29201, tel.
803-834-3084, cell 803-240-7268
Attachment | Size |
---|
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
MOU_GE-Hitachi_PRISM_9.2010.pdf | 359 KB |
MOU_Hyperion_SMR_8.2010.pdf | 321.1 KB |
Friends of the Earth fights for a more healthy and just world. Together we speak truth to power and expose those who endanger the health of people and the planet for corporate profit. We organize to build long-term political power and campaign to change the rules of our economic and political systems that create injustice and destroy nature.
(202) 783-7400LATEST NEWS
Global Sumud Flotilla Set for Latest Attempt to 'Break Israel's Illegal Siege on Gaza'
"Our boats carry more than aid. They carry a message—the siege must end. The greater danger lies not in confronting Israel at sea, but in allowing genocide to continue with impunity."
Aug 29, 2025
Palestine defenders are preparing for the latest—and largest—Freedom Flotilla Coalition mission to set sail for Gaza in an attempt to break Israel's US-backed genocidal siege on the embattled Palestinian territory.
Dozens of boats carrying hundreds of activists from as many as 44 nations are set to take part in the Global Sumud Flotilla—sumud means "perseverance" in Arabic—as it attempts to run Israel's naval blockade and deliver desperately needed humanitarian aid including food, medicines, and baby formula to the starving people of Gaza.
"We are a coalition of everyday people—organizers, humanitarians, doctors, artists, clergy, lawyers, and seafarers—who believe in human dignity and the power of nonviolent action," Global Sumud Flotilla's website explains.
In addition to "everyday people," flotilla participants include Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg, American actress Susan Sarandon, Irish actor Liam Cunningham, leftist Portuguese parliamentarian Mariana Mortágua, former Barcelona Mayor Ada Colau, and Mandla Mandela, the grandson of former South African President Nelson Mandela.
Israel "is starving and killing the people of Gaza," Mandela—whose grandfather was not only a hero of his country's anti-apartheid struggle but also a staunch supporter of Palestinian liberation—said Friday on behalf of the South African flotilla delegation. "We are a diverse group of international activists calling for urgent global action to compel Israel to open Gaza's borders to aid and end its genocide of the Palestinian people."
"We ask that South Africans of conscience join us," he added. South Africa is leading an ongoing genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague that is officially or informally supported by around two dozen nations.
Colau said earlier this week that "to end the genocide in Gaza is the duty of all of us, so we have to do what is in our power to do it if governments, including the government of Spain, do not do what they can to stop the criminal state of Israel."
Spain has joined the ICJ genocide case against Israel, has formally recognized Palestinian statehood and urged other nations to do so, and has taken significant steps toward an arms embargo on Israel.
"Although Spain has positioned itself more than other governments and recognized the Palestinian state, words are not enough when thousands of children are being killed," Colau said Friday in an interview with RTE.
At least 18,500 children are among the more than 63,000 Palestinians killed by Israeli forces in Gaza since October 2023—although the official Gaza Health Ministry figures are likely a vast undercount, according to peer-reviewed studies.
"This is my third attempt to try to sail with humanitarian aid to break Israel's illegal siege on Gaza and open up a humanitarian corridor," Thunberg, who is a member of the flotilla steering committee, told Middle East Eye Thursday.
"There have been 38 previous attempts just for the Freedom Flotilla Coalition (FFC) and now with the Global Sumud Flotilla," Thunberg continued. "This is unprecedented. We are mobilizing people from all over the world with dozens of boats sailing from Barcelona first, and then more boats joining us from other ports around the Mediterranean Sea."
"We are doing this because we are facing a genocide," she added. "We are seeing people being deliberately deprived of their basic means to sustain life. And this is a continuation of the suffocating oppression that Palestinians have been living under for decades, and we simply have no choice if we have any sense of humanity left, we cannot just sit by and watch this unfolding."
The Gaza Famine—officially declared last week by the authoritative Integrated Food Security Phase Classification—has claimed at least hundreds of Palestinian lives in what experts say is an engineered effort by Israel. The International Criminal Court arrest warrants issued last year for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, who ordered the "complete siege" on Gaza fueling the famine, list forced starvation, along with murder, as alleged crimes against humanity and war crimes committed by the pair.
Earlier this year, the FFC vessels Conscience, Madleen, and Handala each separately tried to break the blockade but were thwarted by Israeli forces in international waters, an apparent violation of maritime law. Flotilla activists were beaten, kidnapped, jailed, interrogated, and deported by Israel.
Fifteen years ago, Israeli forces raided one of the first FFC convoys carrying humanitarian aid to Gaza. The Israeli attackers killed nine volunteers aboard the MV Mavi Marmara, including Turkish-American teenager Furkan Doğan.
The Sumud Flotilla comes as Israeli forces ramp up Operation Gideon's Chariots 2, a campaign of conquest, occupation, and ethnic cleansing of Gaza backed by the administration of US President Donald Trump. On Thursday, Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich proposed the systematic annexation of Gaza over the coming months if Hamas keeps fighting, as well as the implementation of Trump's plan to ethnically cleanse the Palestinian exclave and transform it into the "Riviera of the Middle East."
Israel's siege of Gaza has been in effect in varying degrees of severity since 2006 in response to Hamas' rise to power in the strip.
"The idea is to put the Palestinians on a diet, but not to make them die of hunger," a senior adviser to then-Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said at the time.
Now Palestinians are dying of hunger, and the world has increasingly had enough.
"Our boats carry more than aid," Global Sumud Flotilla said. "They carry a message—the siege must end. The greater danger lies not in confronting Israel at sea, but in allowing genocide to continue with impunity."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Economists Warn Trump Attack on Fed Will Further Jack Prices for Working Families
"Confidence that the Fed will respond wisely to future periods of macroeconomic stress... will evaporate," warned one economist.
Aug 29, 2025
Economists are warning that US President Donald Trump's efforts to meddle with the Federal Reserve are going to wind up raising prices even further on working families.
Michael Madowitz, principal economist at the Roosevelt Institute, said on Wednesday that the president's efforts to strong-arm the US central bank into lowering interest rates by firing Federal Reserve Gov. Lisa Cook would backfire by accelerating inflation.
"The administration's efforts to politicize interest rates—an authoritarian tactic—will ultimately hurt American families by driving up costs," he said. "That helps explain why Fed independence has helped keep inflation under 3%, while, after years of political interference in their central bank, Turkey's inflation rate is over 33%."
Heidi Shierholz, the president of the Economic Policy Institute, said that the president's move to fire Cook "radically undermines what Trump says his own goal is: lowering U.S. interest rates to spur faster economic growth."
She then gave a detailed explanation for why Trump imposing his will on the Federal Reserve would likely bring economic pain.
"Presidential capture of the Fed would signal to decision-makers throughout the economy that interest rates will no longer be set on the basis of sound data or economic conditions—but instead on the whims of the president," she argued. "Confidence that the Fed will respond wisely to future periods of macroeconomic stress—either excess inflation or unemployment—will evaporate."
This lack of confidence, she continued, would manifest in investors in US Treasury bonds demanding higher premiums due to the higher risks they will feel they are taking when buying US debt, which would only further drive up the nation's borrowing costs.
"These higher long-term rates will ripple through the economy—making mortgages, auto loans, and credit card payments higher for working people—and require that rates be held higher for longer to tamp down any future outbreak of inflation," she said. "In the first hours after Trump's announcement, all of these worries seemed to be coming to pass."
Economist Paul Krugman, a former columnist for The New York Times, wrote on his personal Substack page Thursday that Trump's moves to take control of the Federal Reserve were "shocking and terrifying."
"Trump's campaign to take over monetary policy has shifted from a public pressure to personal intimidation of Fed officials: the attack on Cook signals that Trump and his people will try to ruin the life of anyone who stands in his way," he argued. "There is now a substantial chance that the Fed's independence, its ability to manage the nation's monetary policy on an objective, technocratic basis rather than as an instrument of the president's political interests and personal whims, will soon be gone."
The economists' warnings come as economic data released on Friday revealed that core inflation rose to 2.9% in August, which is the highest annual rate recorded since this past February. Earlier this month, the Producer Price Index, which is considered a leading indicator of future inflation, came in at 3.3%, which was significantly higher than economists' consensus estimate of 2.5%.
Data aggregated by polling analyst G. Elliott Morris shows that inflation is far and away Trump's biggest vulnerability, as American voters give him a net approval of -23% on that issue.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Texas House Passes Attack on Mailed Abortion Pills That 'Will Fuel Fear' Nationwide
"Texas: Land of the free! Also Texas: We want you to surveil your neighbor, see if they've missed their period, snoop through their trash and mail, and sue whoever sent them medication abortion."
Aug 29, 2025
Republicans in the Texas House of Representatives on Thursday night advanced another anti-abortion bounty hunter bill, this one taking aim at medications mailed from states that support reproductive freedom so Texans can choose to end pregnancies.
House Bill 7 passed 82-48 along party lines during Texas' second special legislative session of the year. The proposal from state Rep. Jeff Leach (R-67) still needs approval from the Senate—which previously passed similar legislation—before it heads to the desk of Republican Gov. Greg Abbott. He has signed various attacks on reproductive rights, including Senate Bill 8, a 2021 state law that entices vigilantes with $10,000 bounties to enforce a six-week abortion ban.
Like S.B. 8, the new bill relies on lawsuits filed by private citizens. H.B. 7 would empower them to sue out-of-state healthcare providers, medication manufacturers, and anyone who mails or otherwise provides abortion pills to someone in the state for up to $100,000 in damages per violation—even if no abortion occurs. Under pressure from some anti-choice groups, Republicans added language allowing vigilantes to keep only $10,000; the rest would go to a charity they choose.
"It's designed to trap Texans into forced pregnancy," Shellie Hayes-McMahon, executive director of Planned Parenthood Texas Votes, told the Houston Chronicle. "Instead of fixing the crisis they (Texas lawmakers) manufactured, they're doubling down to punish anyone who dares to help a Texan. This bill is not about safety, it's about control."
Republicans in the Texas House have introduced another way to try to harm patients, providers, and manufacturers in the state. HB 7 would allow anyone to sue a manufacturer, distributor, or provider of medication abortion—even without proof of care being provided.
[image or embed]
— Reproductive Freedom for All (@reproductivefreedomforall.org) August 29, 2025 at 10:34 AM
The bill is part of a broader effort to stop the flow of abortion medications—mifepristone and misoprostol—into states that have ramped up restrictions in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's right-wing supermajority reversing Roe v. Wade in 2022.
As GOP lawmakers have worked to further restrict reproductive freedom, Democrat-controlled states have enacted "shield laws" to protect doctors and patients. Laws enabling telehealth abortions are key targets for Republican officials and far-right activists—including "anti-abortion legal terrorist" Jonathan Mitchell, the chief architect of S.B. 8 who's now representing a Texas man in a wrongful death case against a California doctor accused of providing pills that his girlfriend used to end her pregnancy.
The New York Times reported that "supporters hope and opponents fear" H.B. 7 "will serve as a model for other states to limit medication abortion by promoting a rash of lawsuits against medical providers, pharmaceutical companies, and companies such as FedEx or UPS that may ship the drugs."
Supporters and opponents also anticipate court battles over the bill itself. "Texas is sort of the tip of the spear," Marc Hearron, the associate director of litigation at the Center for Reproductive Rights, told the Times. "It's setting up a clash."
H.B. 7 is "pushing up against the limits of how much a state can control," Hearron added. "Each state can have its own laws, but throughout our history, we have been able to travel across the country, send things across the country."
Texas: Land of the free! Also Texas: We want you to surveil your neighbor, see if they've missed their period, snoop through their trash and mail, and sue whoever sent them medication abortion. https://bit.ly/4lM2sXF
[image or embed]
— Center for Reproductive Rights (@reprorights.org) August 28, 2025 at 4:45 PM
After Thursday's vote, Blair Wallace, policy and advocacy strategist on reproductive freedom at the ACLU of Texas, warned in a statement that "H.B. 7 exports Texas' extreme abortion ban far beyond state borders."
"It will fuel fear among manufacturers and providers nationwide, while encouraging neighbors to police one another's reproductive lives, further isolating pregnant Texans, and punishing the people who care for them," she said. "We believe in a Texas where people have the freedom to make decisions about our own bodies and futures."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular