August, 03 2010, 09:21am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Robert Johns, American Bird Conservancy, (202) 234-7181 x 210
Jeff Miller, Center for Biological Diversity, (510) 499-9185
National Ban on Lead-based Ammunition, Fishing Tackle Sought to End Wildlife Poisoning
Lead Still a Potent Killer of Millions of Wild Birds, Health Risk for Humans
WASHINGTON
A coalition of conservation, hunting and
veterinary groups today filed a formal petition with the
Environmental Protection Agency requesting a ban on the use of toxic lead in
hunting ammunition and fishing tackle. Major efforts to reduce lead exposure to
people have greatly reduced the amount of lead in the environment, but toxic
lead is still a widespread killer in the wild, harming bald eagles, trumpeter
swans, endangered California condors and other wildlife.
"It's long past time do something about this deadly -
and preventable - epidemic of lead poisoning in the wild," said Jeff Miller of
the Center for Biological Diversity. "Over
the past several decades we've wisely taken steps to get lead out of our
gasoline, paint, water pipes and other sources that are dangerous to people. Now
it's time to get the lead out of hunting and fishing sports to save wildlife
from needless poisoning."
An estimated 10 million to 20 million birds and other
animals die each year from lead poisoning in the United States. This occurs when
animals scavenge on carcasses shot and contaminated with lead bullet fragments,
or pick up and eat spent lead-shot pellets or lost fishing weights, mistaking
them for food or grit. Some animals die a painful death from lead poisoning
while others suffer for years from its debilitating effects.
"The science on this issue is massive in breadth and
unimpeachable in its integrity," said George Fenwick, president of American Bird
Conservancy. "Hundreds of peer-reviewed studies show continued lead poisoning of
large numbers of birds and other animals, and this petition is a prudent step to
safeguard wildlife and reduce unacceptable human health risks."
American Bird Conservancy, Center for Biological
Diversity, Association of Avian Veterinarians, Public Employees for
Environmental Responsibility, and the hunters' group Project Gutpile are asking
for the ban under the Toxic Substances Control Act, which regulates dangerous
chemicals in the United States.
"As a hunter in California, compliance with the
recent state nonlead ammunition regulation has been simple," said Anthony
Prieto, a hunter and co-founder of Project Gutpile, a hunter's group that
provides educational resources for lead-free hunters and anglers. "I still get
to hunt, there is no toxic impact on wildlife or my health, and copper bullets
shoot better."
The petition references nearly 500 peer-reviewed
scientific studies that starkly illustrate the widespread dangers from lead
ammunition and fishing tackle. Lead is an extremely toxic substance that is
dangerous to people and wildlife even at low levels. Exposure can cause a range
of health effects, from acute poisoning and death to long-term problems such as
reduced reproduction, inhibition of growth and damage to neurological
development. In the United States, 3,000 tons of lead are shot into the
environment by hunting every year, another 80,000 tons are released at shooting
ranges, and 4,000 tons are lost in ponds and streams as fishing lures and
sinkers. At least 75 wild bird species are poisoned by spent lead ammunition,
including bald eagles, golden eagles, ravens and endangered California condors.
Despite being banned in 1992 for hunting waterfowl, spent lead shotgun pellets
continue to be frequently ingested by swans, cranes, ducks, geese, loons and
other waterfowl. These birds also consume lead-based fishing tackle lost in
lakes and rivers, often with deadly consequences.
Lead ammunition also poses health risks to people.
Lead bullets explode and fragment into minute particles in shot game and can
spread throughout meat that humans eat. Studies using radiographs show that
numerous, imperceptible, dust-sized particles of lead can infect meat up to a
foot and a half away from the bullet wound, causing a greater health risk to
humans who consume lead-shot game than previously thought. A recent study found
that up to 87 percent of cooked game killed by lead ammunition can contain
unsafe levels of lead. State health agencies have had to recall venison donated
to feed the hungry because of lead contamination from lead bullet fragments.
Nearly 10 million hunters, their families and low-income beneficiaries of
venison donations may be at risk.
For more information, read about the Center's
Get the Lead Out campaign
and the ABC web page on lead threats to birds.
Read the petition to EPAÂ
Frequently Asked Questions
Timeline of lead hazard reduction for wildlife and
people
Recent scientific studies on lead exposure for wildlife and
humans
Photos and video of lead poisoning
Background
Lead has been known to be highly toxic for more than
2,000 years. Its use in water pipes, cosmetics, pottery and food is suspected as
a major contributing factor in the collapse of the Roman Empire. Lead causes
numerous pathological effects on living organisms, from acute, paralytic
poisoning and seizures to subtle, long-term mental impairment, miscarriage,
neurological damage, and impotence. Even low levels of lead can impair
biological functions. There may be no safe level of lead in the body tissues of
fetuses and young. Despite knowledge of how dangerous lead is, it continues to
be used in hunting and fishing products that expose wildlife and humans to lead.
In recent decades the federal government has implemented regulations to reduce
human lead exposure in drinking water, batteries, paint, gasoline, toys, toxic
dumps, wheel balancing weights, and shooting ranges.
The California condor, so near extinction in the
mid-1980s that the last nine wild birds were captured for an expensive
captive-breeding program, had a healthy enough captive population to begin
reintroduction into the wild in the mid-1990s. Yet reintroduced condors are far
from safe since they feed on carcasses often containing lead bullet fragments.
At least 30 condors in California and Arizona have died from lead poisoning
since reintroductions began, and chronic, sub-lethal lead poisoning is rampant
throughout the four reintroduced condor flocks in the United States. In 2008
California passed the Ridley-Tree Condor Preservation Act requiring use of
non-lead bullets for hunting in the condor range. This law has reduced lead
exposure, but lead bullets are still available in California and condors,
eagles, and other wildlife continue to be poisoned.
Because there are now numerous, commercially
available, non-toxic alternatives, the petitioning groups are urging the EPA to
develop regulations to require non-lead rifle bullets, shotgun pellets, and
fishing weights and lures throughout the nation. Non-toxic steel, copper, and
alloy bullets and non-lead fishing tackle are readily available in all 50
states. Hunters and anglers in states and areas that have restrictions or have
already banned lead have made successful transitions to hunting with non-toxic
bullets and fishing with non-toxic tackle. Over a dozen manufacturers of bullets
have designed and now market many varieties of non-lead, nontoxic bullets and
shot with satisfactory to superior ballistic characteristics - fully replacing
the old lead projectiles. The Toxic Substances Control Act gives the EPA broad
authority to regulate chemical substances that present an unreasonable risk of
injury to health or the environment, such as lead. The EPA can prohibit the
manufacture, processing, and distribution in commerce of lead for shot, bullets,
and fishing sinkers.
LATEST NEWS
Watchdog Urges FEC to Investigate Trump Campaign Over Scheme for Legal Fees
"By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much."
Apr 24, 2024
A campaign finance watchdog on Wednesday filed a Federal Election Commission complaint accusing former President Donald Trump's 2024 campaign, affiliated political groups, and an accounting firm of violating U.S. law in a scheme "seemingly designed to obscure the true recipients of a noteworthy portion of Trump's legal bills."
The Washington, D.C.-based Campaign Legal Center (CLC) said that "evidence appears to show an illegal arrangement between several Trump-affiliated committees and a compliance firm named Red Curve Solutions that is designed to obscure the identities of those providing legal services and how much they are being paid."
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money."
CLC alleges that the Trump campaign, Trump's political action committee (PAC) Save America, and three affiliated organizations "violated federal reporting requirements based on a scheme in which the committees reportedly paid over $7.2 million—described as 'reimbursement for legal' costs or expenses"—to Red Curve.
The watchdog also said that Red Curve appears to be "making or facilitating illegal contributions that violate either federal contribution limits or the prohibition on corporate contributions."
According to CLC:
Red Curve is a domestic limited liability company that offers compliance and FEC reporting services but does not appear to offer any legal services. It is managed by Bradley Crate, who also serves as the treasurer for each of the five Trump-affiliated committees concerned in this complaint, as well as over 200 other federal committees.
According to filings with the FEC, Red Curve appears to have been fronting legal costs for Trump since at least December 2022, with Trump-affiliated committees repaying the company later. This arrangement appears to violate FEC rules that require campaigns to disclose not only the entity being reimbursed (here, Red Curve) but also the underlying vendor. By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much they are being paid—through this arrangement.
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money," CLC senior director of campaign finance Erin Chlopak said in a statement. "When campaigns and committees obscure that information from the public, not only do they make it difficult to determine if the law has been violated, but they deny voters the ability to make an informed choice when casting a ballot."
"The steps taken by the Trump campaign, its affiliated committees, and Red Curve Solutions concealed information about how campaign funds were used to pay former President Trump's legal expenditures, including the amounts and ultimate recipients of these expenditures—and the FEC must investigate immediately," Chlopak added.
Trump—who is the presumptive 2024 GOP presidential nominee—faces 91 federal and state felony charges related to his role in the January 6 insurrection and his organization's business practices. He is currently on trial in New York for allegedly falsifying business records related to hush money payments to cover up sex scandals during the 2016 election cycle. The twice-impeached former president has been open about his use of campaign donations to pay his legal costs.
The new CLC filing comes a day after the watchdog filed separate FEC complaints urging investigations into a pair of Trump-affiliated "scam PACs," which "pretend to fundraise for major candidates or issues while secretly diverting almost all of their donors' money back into fundraising or the fraudsters' own pockets."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'One Step Closer': Arizona House Votes to Repeal 1864 Abortion Ban
"With a total ban still set to take effect June 8, the Arizona Abortion Access Act is needed now more than ever," one state campaigner said of a November ballot measure.
Apr 24, 2024
Three Republicans in the Arizona House of Representatives on Wednesday joined with Democrats to advance legislation that would repeal an 1864 ban on abortion—a development rights advocates welcomed while stressing that the fight is far from over.
The 32-28 vote on House Bill 2677—with GOP Reps. Tim Dunn (25), Matt Gress (4), and Justin Wilmeth (2) voting in favor—was the third attempt in as many weeks to pass repeal legislation since the Arizona Supreme Court upheld the ban.
"The state Senate could vote on the repeal as early as next Wednesday, after the bill comes on the floor for a 'third reading,' as is required under chamber rules," according toNBC News. Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs on Wednesday toldThe Washington Post that "I am hopeful the Senate does the right thing and sends it to my desk so I can sign it."
Applauding the House passage of H.B. 2677, Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona president and CEO Angela Florez said that "today, Arizona is one step closer to repealing the state's Civil War-era total abortion ban. While the repeal still must pass the Senate, this is a major win for reproductive freedom."
"We must celebrate today's vote in support of abortion rights and harness our enthusiasm to spread the word and urge lawmakers in the Senate to support this necessary repeal bill," she continued. "Despite this step forward, Arizonans cannot stop fighting."
Florez noted that "even with the repeal of the Civil War-era ban, the state will still have a ban on abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy that denies people access to critical care. And lawmakers continue to attack Arizonans' ability to access reproductive healthcare. Our right to control our bodies and lives is hanging on by a thread."
"Thankfully, voters will have the opportunity to take back control if the Arizona Abortion Access Act is on the ballot this November," she added. "Abortion bans are out-of-step with the will of Arizonans and will force pregnant people to leave their communities for essential healthcare. Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona will continue fighting to ensure everyone has the right to make decisions about their health and futures."
The Arizona Abortion Access Act is a proposed state constitutional amendment that would prevent many limits on abortions before fetal viability and safeguard access to care after viability to protect the life or physical or mental health of the patient.
The coalition supporting the amendment, Arizona for Abortion Access, highlighted on social media that the House-approved bill "did not include the emergency clause required to stop the 1864 ban from taking effect on June 8," meaning H.B. 2677 wouldn't apply until 90 days after the end of the legislative session.
Coalition campaign manager Cheryl Bruce said that "with a total ban still set to take effect June 8, the Arizona Abortion Access Act is needed now more than ever. We remain committed to taking these decisions out of the hands of extremist politicians."
Arizona is one of multiple states where rights advocates are promoting abortion rights ballot measures this cycle. Reproductive freedom is also dominating political races at all levels, including the presidential contest. Democratic President Joe Biden is set to face former Republican President Donald Trump in November.
"Donald Trump is responsible for Arizona's abortion ban. Women in the state are still living under a ban with no exceptions for rape or incest and have been stripped of the freedom to make their own healthcare decisions," said Julie Chávez Rodriguez, Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris' reelection campaign manager.
While the presumptive GOP nominee has tried to distance himself from the Arizona Supreme Court's reinstatement of a 160-year-old abortion ban, he has also campaigned on his three appointees to the U.S. Supreme Court who helped reverse Roe v. Wade.
"Trump brags that he is 'proudly' the person responsible for these bans and if he retakes power, the chaos and cruelty he has created will only get worse in all 50 states," Chávez Rodriguez said. "President Biden and Vice President Harris are the only candidates who will stop him."
Keep ReadingShow Less
US Dodges Growing Calls for Probe of Mass Graves at Gaza Hospitals
"Somehow I don't think the U.S. State Department would defer to Russia as a credible source to investigate itself if a mass grave were discovered in Ukrainian territory it had occupied," said one legal expert.
Apr 24, 2024
While continuing to give Israel billions of dollars in support to wage war on the Gaza Strip, the Biden administration this week has declined to join the growing global demands for an international probe into mass graves discovered at hospitals in the besieged Palestinian enclave.
Two journalists on Tuesday questioned Vedant Patel, a spokesperson for the U.S. State Department, about the administration's response to the hundreds of bodies found at Gaza City's al-Shifa Hospital and Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis as well as United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk's call for an independent investigation.
"Would you support such an independent investigation?" Said Arikat asked during a press briefing. Patel responded, "Right now, Said, we are asking for more information... That is squarely where we are leaving the conversation."
Patel added that "I don't have any details to match, confirm, or offer as it relates to that. We're aware of those reports, and we have asked the government of Israel for additional clarity and information. And that's where I'm at."
When Said asked a follow-up about potential U.S. support for a probe, Patel reiterated that the administration is awaiting information from the Israeli government.
Later, Niall Stanage asked Patel to explain U.S. "resistance" to supporting a probe, the spokesperson insisted that "it's not about resistance to this particular situation, it is me not wanting to speak in detail about something which Said posed as a hypothetical question when, from the United States' perspective, I don't have any additional information on this aside from the public reporting."
After Patel again stressed that the administration has asked Israel for more information, Stanage inquired, "And do you believe the government of Israel is a credible source in enlightening you?"
The spokesperson interrupted Stanage to say, "We do."
While supporting the six-month Israeli assault on Gaza that the International Court of Justice has found to be plausibly genocidal, the Biden administration is also arming Ukrainians' resistance to a Russian invasion. Brian Finucane, a senior adviser for the Crisis Group's U.S. program and a former legal adviser at the State Department, pointed to the latter.
"Somehow I don't think the U.S. State Department would defer to Russia as a credible source to investigate itself if a mass grave were discovered in Ukrainian territory it had occupied," Finucane said on social media in response to Stanage's questioning.
Meanwhile, European Union spokesperson Peter Stano made clear Tuesday that the E.U. supports an independent probe.
"This is something that forces us to call for an independent investigation of all the suspicions and all the circumstances, because indeed it creates the impression that there might have been violations of international human rights committed," Stano said. "That's why it's important to have independent investigation and to ensure accountability."
Human rights groups around the world joined the call for an independent investigation on Wednesday, as the official death toll in Gaza hit 34,262 with 77,229 people injured and thousands more missing and presumed dead beneath the rubble.
In an Arabic statement translated by Al Jazeera, the Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor said that the number of bodies found in the mass graves is "alarming, and requires urgent international action, including the formation of an independent international investigation committee."
The group added that some of those killed were subjected to "premeditated murder as well as arbitrary and extrajudicial executions while they were detained and handcuffed."
Amnesty International senior director of research, advocacy, policy, and campaigns Erika Guevara Rosas said in a statement that "the harrowing discovery of these mass graves underscores the urgency of ensuring immediate access for human rights investigators, including forensic experts, to the occupied Gaza Strip to ensure that evidence is preserved and to carry out independent and transparent investigations with the aim of guaranteeing accountability for any violations of international law."
"Lack of access for human rights investigators to Gaza has hampered effective investigations into the full scale of the human rights violations and crimes under international law committed over the past six months, allowing for the documentation of just a tiny fraction of these abuses," she noted. "Without proper investigations to determine how these deaths took place or what violations may have been committed, we may never find out the truth of the horrors behind these mass graves."
Guevara Rosas continued:
Mass grave sites are potential crime scenes offering vital and time-sensitive forensic evidence; they must be protected until professional forensic experts with the necessary skills and resources can safely carry out adequate exhumations and accurate identification of remains.
The absence of forensic experts and the decimation of Gaza's medical sector as a result of the war and Israel's cruel blockade, along with the lack of availability of the necessary resources for the identification of bodies such as DNA testing, are huge obstacles to the identifications of remains. This denies those killed the opportunity to have a dignified burial and deprives families with relatives missing or forcibly disappeared the right to know and to justice—leaving them in a limbo of uncertainty and anguish.
Noting that the International Court of Justice directed Israel to preserve evidence in its initial genocide case order, Guevara Rosas said that "amid a total vacuum of accountability and mounting evidence of war crimes in Gaza, Israeli authorities must ensure they comply with the ICJ ruling by granting immediate access to independent human rights investigators and ensuring that all evidence of violations is preserved."
"Third states must pressure Israel to comply with the ICJ orders by allowing the immediate entry into the Gaza Strip of independent human rights investigators and forensic experts, including the U.N.-appointed Commission of Inquiry and investigators of the International Criminal Court," she added. "There can be no truth and justice without proper, transparent independent investigations into these deaths."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular