July, 07 2010, 03:39pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Diana Duarte, Media Coordinator,Phone: +1 212 627 0444,Email:,media@madre.org
Using International Law to Wage Peace in Colombia
In recent decades, human rights advocates have won
passage of a system of international human rights treaties, helping to
address a wide range of social justice concerns. More and
more, local activists are devising ways to use these international
standards to make real change at home.
WASHINGTON
In recent decades, human rights advocates have won
passage of a system of international human rights treaties, helping to
address a wide range of social justice concerns. More and
more, local activists are devising ways to use these international
standards to make real change at home.
Each
major international human rights treaty has a corresponding "treaty
body" or committee responsible for monitoring whether its members are
fulfilling their obligations. One of these important
treaties is the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
(ICCPR), which guarantees such rights as the right to life, the right to
be free from torture and the right to protection from unlawful
imprisonment. The treaty body for the ICCPR is the Human
Rights Committee, and as a member state, Colombia must regularly defend
its record before that committee.
In July
2010, women human rights advocates will have the opportunity to
participate in that international review of Colombia's record. The
people of Colombia have faced decades of armed conflict and rampant
human rights violations. MADRE has joined with our partner
organizations in Colombia to submit a report to the Human Rights
Committee that gives voice to those lived experiences.
The sections below outline the evidence that we have
gathered to challenge any attempt to diminish the severity of the human
rights crises in Colombia. We call on the Human Rights
Committee to respect the calls of Colombian women human rights advocates
and to demand concrete action from the Colombian government.
The Contours of Colombia's Conflict
- For
over 40 years, Colombians have endured an armed conflict over their
country's highly concentrated sources of natural wealth, especially
land.
- In the mid-1960s, the Revolutionary Armed Forces
of Colombia (FARC) arose as a peasant movement demanding land
redistribution and social reform from the government.
- Since
the 1990s, the conflict has been a three-way war: the FARC is
battling the government; the government is fighting to eliminate
the FARC; and brutal paramilitary groups function symbiotically
with the government and Army to protect the interests of powerful
elites.
- Instead of battling one another directly,
Colombia's armed groups usually attack civilians suspected of
siding with their enemy. The main victims of the conflict are women
and families, hundreds of thousands of whom have been assaulted,
displaced from their homes or killed.
For
more information, read MADRE
Talking Points: The Role of the US in Colombia's Conflict.
Forced Displacement and the Right
to Land of Indigenous Peoples and Afro-Colombians
- Under
Colombia's Constitution, Indigenous Peoples and Afro-Colombians have
been granted recognition of their collective rights to their land.
About 28%
of the Colombian territory has been recognized as belonging to
Indigenous Peoples.
- However, these communities have
long suffered sizable losses of lands from forced displacement
caused by the internal armed conflict and by projects relating to
infrastructure and natural resource exploitation.
- Armed groups in Colombia have long sought control over the
lands of Afro-Colombians and Indigenous Peoples for military and economic reasons, forcing them to either
collaborate with the armed groups or abandon their lands.
- In
2009, the Colombian Constitutional
Court warned that at least 34 Indigenous
Peoples "are in danger of cultural or physical extermination due
to the internal armed conflict."
- A
Snapshot of the Reality: Indigenous Peoples and
Afro-Colombians have been denied their right to land, guaranteed in
Colombian and international law, and the Colombian government has
taken no measures to redress this. The Indigenous Embera
Katio People have been displaced from their lands by the
construction of the Urra dam, losing their connection to their
traditional ways of life. The Afro-Colombian communities
of the Curvarado and Jiguamiando river basins have struggled
against the installment of palm plantations in their territories
since the 1990s, and as a result, they have been targeted by
paramilitaries.
Forced Displacement of Women
- Almost 60% of
displaced women have no job or income. In
2008, studies reported that in larger cities, 60% of
all displaced households are experiencing or are at risk of food
insecurity, and in
smaller cities the rate rises to about 71%.
- Difficulty finding work, together with lack of access to
food, housing, health care and education, entrenches poverty and
social exclusion among both displaced Indigenous and Afro-Colombian
women.
- Indigenous
and Afro-Colombian women face racism, as well as low levels of
education and poverty which perpetuates displacement, threatens their access to work, pursuit of cultural practices,
participation in community life and safety from gender violence.
- Furthermore, displacement cuts off access to traditional
foods and medicines for Indigenous women. Traditional
organizational processes, languages, practices and teachings are
weakened and in some cases lost.
Reproductive
Health
- In May 2006, the Colombian Constitutional Court
partially decriminalized abortion, making exceptions for cases of
documented rape, danger to the physical or mental health of the
woman and fetal abnormality.
- However,
since that decision, medical personnel and health care institutions
have misused the principle of "conscientious objection," which
allows for a medical provider to cite their conscience in denying a
woman an abortion. This has led to mistreatment
of and discrimination against women seeking reproductive health
services. Some clinics have made their doctors sign
blanket declarations of "conscientious objection" to refuse to
provide abortion services altogether.
- Alejandro Ordonez, the
Colombian official responsible for supervising compliance with the
Constitution and for protecting human rights, is also responsible for
prosecuting and punishing health care providers who violate a
woman's right to access safe and legal abortions. Yet,
he has refused to investigate the human rights violation
constituted by the misuse of the "conscientious objection"
exception.
- In a number of cases, judges have refused to rule
on cases relating to the misuse of "conscientious objection" to
deny a woman's access to abortion. Moreover, Ordonez
has ordered public officials to ignore Colombian laws that
decriminalize abortion.
- Individual doctors who object to
performing abortions have the legal duty to refer the woman to a
doctor who will carry out the procedure.
- Women in
Colombia experience both physical and mental suffering as a result of
the denial of the right to therapeutic abortion, including in cases
in which pregnancy endangers the life of the woman. Women
experiencing complications of pregnancy and needing therapeutic
abortion are forced to suffer from painful, frightening and
life-threatening conditions, often for many months.
- Women
experiencing unsafe abortions or other obstetric emergencies and who are
often in extreme pain and require immediate treatment also fear
the consequence of prosecution for seeking out an illegal abortion.
Added to the fear of being prosecuted is the fear that needed
treatment will be denied by doctors citing "conscientious
objection."
- A Snapshot of the Reality: Blanca,
a 13-year old girl who was raped and as a result became pregnant,
was sent to seven different health care providers, all of whom
refused to provide an abortion, arguing conscientious objection and
willfully ignoring their obligation to immediately refer her to an
adequate provider. The girl was ultimately forced to carry out a
high-risk pregnancy and give the baby up for adoption. She suffered
permanent health consequences including scoliosis and lung damage.
Sexual Violence
- In
2006, the Committee on the Rights of Children stated that the
widespread discrimination against women in Colombia puts them at
greater risk of recruitment by armed forces as well as sexual
exploitation, internal displacement and continued violation of
their rights.
- In 2006,
the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights Rapporteur stated, "The
violence and discrimination against women is not solely the
product of the armed conflict-they are fixtures in
the lives of women during times of peace that worsen and degenerate
during the internal strife."
- Sexualized
violence is one of the primary causes of the forced displacement
of women in Colombia. It is estimated that two out of
every ten women are forced
to leave their homes because of gender violence.
- An
analysis by two Colombian women's organizations established that acts
of sexual violence have occurred in a range of conflict-related
situations, such as during active attacks, as a result of
forced displacement, or targeting women within armed groups as a
means of control.
- Girl members of illegal armed
groups are particularly vulnerable to grave sexual violence. They
are forced to use inadequate and often harmful methods of
contraception and forced
to have an abortion if they become pregnant.
- A
Snapshot of the Reality: One former girl child
soldier told the story that her commanding officer one day
announced that he would separate the virgins from the other girls.
They were forced to have sex with the commanding officers.
Many girls later testified that they knew their lives were
at stake and that their choices were either to be raped or killed.
Threats
against Women Human Rights Defenders
- Patterns
of threats and harassment against human rights defenders, and
often their families, continue to worsen in Colombia. Journalists,
trade unionists, magistrates, lawyers, student and youth activists,
women defenders, Indigenous and Afro-Colombian leaders suffer
physical violence and threats because of their legitimate efforts
to uphold human rights and fundamental freedoms.
- When community members are
perceived to sympathize with adversary groups, often simply for not
showing enough resistance, they are punished by paramilitaries and
guerrilla groups. In testimonies gathered by MADRE
and our sister organization Taller de Vida, community leaders
shared stories of harassment and threats made against their life,
forcing them to flee their homes on little or no notice, leaving
all they own behind.
- Extrajudicial executions have
been a widely documented practice committed by military units
across the country. Following a
fact-finding mission to Colombia in June 2009, Phillip Alston, the
Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions, stated
that extrajudicial killings of women activists are used
"especially in order to control and instill fear in rural
populations, to intimidate elected officials, to punish those
alleged to be collaborating with the government, or to promote
criminal objectives." - Instead
of protecting the honor and reputation of its citizens, the Government
of Colombia is actively complicit in stigmatizing those who defend human
rights. Women human rights defenders have been accused
by high-level officials of being linked to guerrillas or terrorists. Government
officials are making public accusations to sully the reputations of
independent women's rights activists.
- Other women human rights
defenders have faced death threats, lost family
members to arbitrary killings, or have been jailed without just
cause because of their work defending against and exposing human
rights violations in Colombia.
- A
Snapshot of the Reality: On June 14th, 2010, Aida
Quilcue, an Indigenous women's human rights defender received a
message threatening the lives of members of various Colombian human
rights organizations. The message was sent after activists organized a
public hearing to denounce human rights violations committed
against Indigenous Peoples by the government security forces,
paramilitaries and the FARC.
The Use of
Child Soldiers
- In 1999, Colombia
outlawed the use of child soldiers in its army. This means that
conscripts must be at least 18 years of age.
- Researchers
from MADRE conducted over 30 interviews with former child solders
from the capital city of Bogota and the city of Pereira. The age of
recruitment ranged from 10 to 17 years of age and participation
varied through most of the identified armed groups in Colombia.
- Recruitment
stories ranged from joining armed groups voluntarily due to
abandonment, being orphaned, or fleeing domestic or sexual violence
or other issues at home. Some children were lured into joining
armed groups with promises of a better life only to find the
promises were false and that they faced the punishment of death if
they tried to escape.
- Since
2006, the Attorney-General's Office has found
109 bodies of children - mainly victims of armed groups - in
clandestine graves. According to testimonies of former child soldiers,
children recruited by armed groups were frequently killed for
"insubordination" ranging from stealing food from the group's reserves
to trying to escape.
- A Snapshot of the
Reality: One former child soldier reported
that a friend who in desperation stole sugar from the food supplies was
made to face a "War Council." Members of the
armed group were directed to vote on whether or not his punishment
should be death. The next day, they dug a hole in the
ground and shot and killed him.
What
Needs to Change
The
Colombian Government must:
- Restore communities to their
lands and respect the collective land ownership of Afro-Colombians
and Indigenous Peoples. Communities must be
guaranteed the right to prior consultation and consent with regard
to massive infrastructure and natural resource exploitation
projects. The government must guarantee that policies
to ensure the safe return of displaced peoples are implemented
promptly and with care.
- Protect
a woman's right to access safe and legal abortion.
This means that health care providers may not illegally
claim "conscientious objection," and judges may not refuse judgment
on cases where women have been denied abortions. Furthermore,
women must be guaranteed effective access to sexual and
reproductive healthcare information and services - especially young
women and rural women.
- Address
the root causes of sexual violence against women and ensure their
access to health, education and other necessary social services.
The state must prioritize its responsibility to
investigate, prosecute and punish perpetrators of sexual violence
and to fund special support services for survivors of such
violence.
- End stigma against human
rights defenders and initiate investigations to seek justice for
those who have been attacked and killed. Human
rights defenders deserve not only physical protection, but the
freedom to participate in politics at the local and national
levels.
- Stop the use of child
soldiers. Government policies must address risk
factors that make children vulnerable to recruitment and institute
programs that support children facing abuse at home, that address
the basic needs of displaced families and that provide training to
teachers to recognize warning signs.
MADRE is an international women's human rights organization that partners with community-based women's groups to advance women's human rights, challenge injustice and create social change in contexts of war, conflict, disaster and their aftermath. MADRE advocates for a world in which all people enjoy individual and collective human rights; natural resources are shared equitably and sustainably; women participate effectively in all aspects of society; and all people have a meaningful say in policies that affect their lives. For more information about MADRE, visit www.madre.org.
LATEST NEWS
'Tragic Outcome' for Gig Workers as California Supreme Court Hands Win to Uber, DoorDash
"Today's ruling only strengthens our demand for the right to join together in a union so that we can begin improving the gig economy for workers and our customers," the case plaintiff said.
Jul 25, 2024
Labor advocates on Thursday decried a ruling by the California Supreme Court upholding a lower court's affirmation of a state ballot measure allowing app-based ride and delivery companies to classify their drivers as independent contractors, limiting their worker rights.
The court's seven justices ruled unanimously in Castellanos v. State of California that Proposition 22, which was approved by 58% of California voters in 2020, complies with the state constitution. Prop 22—which was overturned in 2021 by an Alameda County Superior Court judge in 2021—was upheld in March 2023 by the state's 1st District Court of Appeals.
The business models of app-based companies including DoorDash, Instacart, Lyft, and Uber rely upon minimizing frontline worker compensation by categorizing drivers as independent contractors instead of employees. Independent contractors are not entitled to unemployment insurance, health insurance, or compensation for business expenses.
There are approximately 1.4 million app-based gig workers in California, according to industry estimates.
While DoorDash hailed Thursday's ruling as "not only a victory for Dashers, but also for democracy itself," gig worker advocates condemned the decision.
"Over the last three years, gig workers across California have experienced firsthand that Prop 22 is nothing more than a bait-and-switch meant to enrich global corporations at the expense of the Black, brown, and immigrant workers who power their earnings," plaintiff Hector Castellanos, who drives for Uber and Lyft, said in a statement.
"Prop 22 has allowed gig companies like Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash to deprive us of a living wage, access to workers compensation, paid sick leave, and meaningful healthcare coverage," Castellanos added. "Today's ruling only strengthens our demand for the right to join together in a union so that we can begin improving the gig economy for workers and our customers."
Lorena Gonzalez, president of the California Federation of Labor Unions, AFL-CIO, said that "we are deeply disappointed that the state Supreme Court has allowed tech corporations to buy their way out of basic labor laws despite Proposition 22's inconsistencies with our state constitution."
"These companies have upended our social contract, forcing workers and the public to take on the inherent risk created by this work, while they profit," she continued. "A.B. 5 granted virtually all California workers the right to be paid for all hours worked, health and safety standards, unemployment insurance, workers compensation, and the right to organize."
"Rideshare and delivery drivers deserve those rights as well," Gonzalez stressed.
The Gig Workers Rising campaign said on social media that "Uber and other app corporations spent $220 million to buy this law, and they did it by tricking Californians."
Prop 22's passage in November 2020 with nearly 59% of the vote was the culmination of what was by far the most expensive ballot measure in California history. App-based companies and their backers outspent labor and progressive groups by more than 10 to 1, with proponents pouring a staggering $204.5 million into the "yes" campaign's coffers against just $19 million for the "no" side.
"Voters were told the initiative would provide us with 'historic new benefits' and guaranteed earnings," said Gig Workers Rising. "But since it went into effect, drivers have seen our pay go down, learned the benefits are a sham, and have to accept unsafe rides because of the constant threat of being 'deactivated,' kicked off the app with little explanation or warning."
"If Uber really cared about good benefits and fair wages, it could make that happen tomorrow," the campaign added. "Instead, it has shown it would rather slash pay, bamboozle voters, and put drivers' lives and livelihoods in danger—all while promising $7 billion in stock buybacks to banks and billionaires."
Veena Dubal, a law professor at the University of California, Irvine who focuses on labor and inequality, toldCalMatters that Thursday's ruling was "a really tragic outcome," but "it's not the end of the road."
Dubal's sentiment was echoed by some California state legislators, who said the ruling presents an opportunity to act.
"While this decision is frustrating, it must also be motivating," said state Senate Labor Committee Chair Lola Smallwood-Cuevas (D-28). "I'm more determined than ever to ensure that all workers—including our diverse and Black, Indigenous, and people of color-led gig workforce—have the basic protections of workers compensation, paid sick leave, family leave, disability insurance, and the right to form a union."
Prop 22 has served as a template for lawmakers in other states seeking to deny or limit basic worker rights, benefits, and protections.
In Massachusetts, app-based companies have been fighting for years to get a measure to classify drivers as contractors on the state ballot. In 2022, Lyft made the largest political donation in state history—$14.4 million—to a coalition funding one such proposal.
Last month, Uber and Lyft reached an agreement with the office of Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell, a Democrat, to pay $175 million to settle a lawsuit filed in 2020. As part of the deal, the companies also agreed to increase driver pay and provide paid sick leave, accident insurance, and some health benefits. The agreement does not address how app-based gig workers should be classified.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Young Voters Tell Kamala Harris to 'Fight for Our Future'
"This is your chance to energize young people and our communities to vote, mount one of the greatest political comebacks in decades, and deliver a resounding defeat to the far-right agenda of Trump and Vance."
Jul 25, 2024
Four youth-led groups on Thursday urged Vice President Kamala Harris, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, to "fight for our future" by pursuing a policy agenda the coalition unveiled in a March letter to U.S. President Joe Biden.
It's been less than a week since Biden left the race and endorsed Harris, who is expected to face former Republican Donald Trump and his running mate, U.S. Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio), in the November election. Since then, she's racked up endorsements from Democratic members of Congress and progressive groups focused on issues including climate, labor, and reproductive rights.
March for Our Lives, which was launched after the 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, honored Harris with the group's first-ever endorsement on Wednesday, calling her "the right person to stand up for us and fight for the country we deserve."
"To defeat Trump, you must rebuild support and enthusiasm among young voters."
The gun violence prevention organization is part of the youth-led coalition behind the new letter, which also includes the climate-focused Sunrise Movement; Gen-Z for Change, which advocates on a range of issues; and the national immigrant network United We Dream Action.
"You have an urgent and important task. To defeat Trump, you must rebuild support and enthusiasm among young voters," the coalition told Harris on Thursday, noting that she sought the Democratic nomination during the last cycle. "You should build on your 2020 campaign platform where you put forward a strong vision to make the economy work for everyday people and ensure a livable future for us all."
The groups urged Harris to support the Green New Deal, Medicare for All, and the Reverse Mass Incarceration Act. They pushed her to expand pathways to citizenship, keep families together, end fossil fuel subsidies, and create good, union jobs. They also called on her to prioritize gun violence prevention and investments in public health solutions and green, affordable housing.
"Democrats are at a critical crossroads with young people," the coalition wrote to Harris on Thursday. "Polls showed Biden and Trump neck-and-neck among young voters."
ANew York Times/Siena College poll conducted July 22-24 shows Trump leading Harris 48% to 47% among likely voters and 48% to 46% among registered voters—differences that fall within the margin of error.
Forbesnoted Thursday that "Democrats are far more enthusiastic about Harris than they were Biden, the Times/Siena survey found, with nearly 80% of voters who lean Democrat saying they would like Harris to be the nominee, compared to 48% of Democrats who said the same about Biden three weeks ago."
The outlet also pointed to two other polls conducted by Morning Consult and Reuters/Ipsos since Biden dropped out, which both show Harris with a narrow lead over Trump.
"You have an opportunity to win the youth vote by turning the page and differentiating yourself from Biden policies that are deeply unpopular with us, such as approving new oil and gas projects, denying people their right to seek refuge and asylum, and funding the Israeli government's killing of civilians in Gaza," the youth coalition highlighted Thursday. "You must speak to the economic pain young people are facing from crushing student debt and skyrocketing housing and food prices."
Looking beyond November, the groups told Harris—who could be the first Black woman and person of Asian descent elected to the country's highest office—that "you could be a historic president. Not just because of who you are, but what you can accomplish."
"Young people are energized and ready to organize against fascism and for the future we deserve," they concluded. "This is your chance to energize young people and our communities to vote, mount one of the greatest political comebacks in decades, and deliver a resounding defeat to the far-right agenda of Trump and Vance."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Video Game Actors Strike for AI Protections
"The video game industry generates billions of dollars in profit annually," said one union leader. "The driving force behind that success is the creative people who design and create those games."
Jul 25, 2024
After nearly two years of negotiations with video game giants and no deal that would protect performers from artificial intelligence, unionized voice and motion capture actors who work in video game development announced Thursday that they will go on strike starting at 12:01 am on Friday, July 26.
The performers are represented by Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA), which last year won a contract for TV and film actors that included "unprecedented provisions for consent and compensation that will protect members from the threat of AI," after the union went on strike for four months.
The union has been negotiating on behalf of video game actors with major production companies including Disney Character Voices Inc., Activision Productions Inc., and WB Games Inc., and has won concessions over wages and job safety—but "AI protections remain the sticking point," said SAG-AFTRA on Thursday as the impending strike was announced.
Unionized actors want protections that would stop video game companies from training AI to replicate actors' voices or likeness without their consent and without compensating them.
"The video game industry generates billions of dollars in profit annually," said Duncan Crabtree-Ireland, national executive director and chief negotiator for SAG-AFTRA. "The driving force behind that success is the creative people who design and create those games. That includes the SAG-AFTRA members who bring memorable and beloved game characters to life, and they deserve and demand the same fundamental protections as performers in film, television, streaming, and music: fair compensation and the right of informed consent for the AI use of their faces, voices, and bodies."
"Frankly, it's stunning that these video game studios haven't learned anything from the lessons of last year—that our members can and will stand up and demand fair and equitable treatment with respect to AI, and the public supports us in that," he added.
Sarah Elmaleh, negotiating committee chair for the union's interactive media agreement, said the negotiations have shown the companies "are not interested in fair, reasonable AI protections, but rather flagrant exploitation."
"We look forward to collaborating with teams on our interim and independent contracts, which provide AI transparency, consent, and compensation to all performers, and to continuing to negotiate in good faith with this bargaining group when they are ready to join us in the world we all deserve," said Elmaleh.
The unionized actors voted in favor of the strike authorization with a 98.32% yes vote, said SAG-AFTRA.
The strike was announced as more than 500 workers who help develop the popular World of Warcraft video game franchise voted to join the Communications Workers of America (CWA), with the games publisher, Blizzard Entertainment, recognizing the bargaining unit.
CWA noted that the workers' journey to union representation began with a walkout in 2021 at Activision Blizzard, which was later bought by Microsoft, over sexual harassment and discrimination.
"What we've accomplished at World of Warcraft is just the beginning," Eric Lanham, a World of Warcraft test analyst, said in a statement. "We know that when workers have a protected voice, it's a win-win for employee standards, the studio, and World of Warcraft fans looking for the best gaming experience."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular