June, 11 2010, 11:10am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Mike Senatore, Defenders, attorney, (202) 772-3221, msenatore@defenders.org
Caitlin Leutwiler, Defenders, communications, (202) 772-3226, cleutwiler@defenders.org
Derb Carter, SELC, senior attorney, (919) 967-1450
Catherine Wannamaker, SELC, senior attorney, (404) 521-9900, cwannamaker@selcga.org
Kathleen Sullivan, SELC, communications, (919) 945-7106, ksullivan@selcnc.org
MMS Deepwater Lease Sales to BP and Other Companies Continue Lax Oversight, say Groups
Leases financially obligate U.S. government, creating incentive to allow drilling
WASHINGTON
The Minerals Management Service (MMS) continues to approve new
leases after the Deepwater Horizon explosion that give British
Petroleum and other companies the right to drill even more deepwater
wells in the Gulf of Mexico under the same inadequate oversight that
led to the current oil spill, according to a new legal challenge filed
by the Southern Environmental Law Center and Defenders of Wildlife. The
groups say current policies create an incentive to allow drilling even
in the face of evident risks because once a lease is issued by MMS, the
U.S. government is obligated to pay the lessee either the fair market
value of the lease or the amount spent to obtain the bid plus costs and
interest if the government cancels the lease or refuses to allow
drilling. MMS approved new leases for deepwater tracts as recently as
June 10 under the same lax oversight complicit in the current Gulf
spill.
"MMS quietly granted oil companies the right to drill 198 more
deepwater wells as if the spill wasn't devastating the Gulf," said Derb
Carter, senior attorney and director, Carolinas Office, Southern
Environmental Law Center. "If it's too deep to stop a spill, it's too
deep to drill. BP is under criminal investigation for its explosion and
dumping millions of gallons of oil into the Gulf, yet MMS approved 13
new leases for BP to drill in deepwater without any better oversight."
The groups' lawsuit challenges MMS approval of leases, including 198
deepwater leases, in the Central Gulf of Mexico after the Deepwater
Horizon explosion on April 20 and ongoing spill. In a legal claim added
on June 10 to an ongoing lawsuit in federal court, the groups allege
that MMS failed its legal responsibility after the explosion and spill
to reconsider its 2008 conclusions that the sale of the deepwater
leases and future oil drilling would have no potential significant
impact to the environment and no detailed environmental review was
required.
"Clueless and inept is really the only way to describe the ongoing
situation at MMS," said Mike Senatore, vice president for Conservation
Law at Defenders of Wildlife. "This agency is at the epicenter of the
worst environmental disaster in our nation's history and yet it's still
going about business as usual. How else do you explain MMS's approval
of the right to drill hundreds of new wells in the Gulf, including 13
for BP, based on the same fundamentally flawed and patently illegal
environmental documents used to green-light the Deepwater Horizon
operation?"
Despite President Obama's moratorium on new deepwater wells, MMS
approved the leases as it did the Deepwater Horizon rig--under the same
inadequate environmental review, requiring no failsafe spill
preventions, and with insufficient spill response plans--all of which
led to the ongoing Gulf oil spill. Now news reports say the President
is considering cutting short his moratorium on new deepwater wells due
to increasing pressure from oil companies.
"The public needs to understand that we are subsidizing the oil
companies for risky deepwater drilling," added Catherine Wannamaker,
senior attorney, Southern Environmental Law Center. "It's the public
that pays the cost of lax oversight. It's clear BP was in over its head
drilling in deep waters and now the Gulf is mired in oil."
Although oil companies must obtain approved exploration plans and a
permit before drilling a well, MMS routinely grants these
authorizations through a "categorical exclusion" or waiver of
additional environmental review. Thirteen new leases for BP--including
four leases in the Mississippi Canyon near the site of the uncontrolled
well--are among 198 new deepwater (over 200 meters or about 656 feet
deep) oil drilling leases approved by MMS as past of Lease Sale Number
213 in the Central Gulf of Mexico. At least 92 lease tracts are at
deeper depths than the Deepwater Horizon well, with the deepest ones
nearly two miles deep or almost twice the depth of the Deepwater
Horizon well.
One hundred forty-nine leases in Lease Sale Number 213 are over 400
meters deep. If wells over 400 meters (about a quarter mile) deep from
this sale produce oil, the federal government will also subsidize those
wells through the "royalty relief" program under which oil companies
are relieved from paying the normal 18.5 percent royalty on the volume
of the oil produced from risky deep water wells. The deeper the
drilling, the more oil the company can recover royalty free.
Four of the tracts MMS approved for BP to lease are over a mile deep
(between 1600 and 2000 meters) and will receive a royalty suspension of
12 million barrels of oil; six tracts MMS approved for BP are over a
mile and a quarter (2000 meters) deep and will receive a royalty
suspension for 16 million barrels. At $71 a barrel of oil, the royalty
relief program would provide what amounts to a public subsidy up to
$210 million for deepwater leases at that depth (2000 meters).
The Southern Environmental Law Center and Defenders of Wildlife
filed suit in federal court in Alabama on May 17 challenging MMS's
approval of oil drilling exploration plans, including BP's Deepwater
Horizon, with categorical exclusions or waivers of environmental review.
Defenders of Wildlife is the premier U.S.-based national conservation organization dedicated to the protection and restoration of imperiled species and their habitats in North America.
(202) 682-9400LATEST NEWS
UN Chief Warns of Israel's Syria Invasion and Land Seizures
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres stressed the "urgent need" for Israel to "de-escalate violence on all fronts."
Dec 12, 2024
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres said Thursday that he is "deeply concerned" by Israel's "recent and extensive violations of Syria's sovereignty and territorial integrity," including a ground invasion and airstrikes carried out by the Israel Defense Forces in the war-torn Mideastern nation.
Guterres "is particularly concerned over the hundreds of Israeli airstrikes on several locations in Syria" and has stressed the "urgent need to de-escalate violence on all fronts throughout the country," said U.N. spokesperson Stephane Dujarric.
Israel claims its invasion and bombardment of Syria—which come as the United States and Turkey have also violated Syrian sovereignty with air and ground attacks—are meant to create a security buffer along the countries' shared border in the wake of last week's fall of former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and amid the IDF's ongoing assault on Gaza, which has killed or wounded more than 162,000 Palestinians and is the subject of an International Court of Justice genocide case.
While Israel argues that its invasion of Syria does not violate a 1974 armistice agreement between the two countries because the Assad dynasty no longer rules the neighboring nation, Dujarric said Guterres maintains that Israel must uphold its obligations under the deal, "including by ending all unauthorized presence in the area of separation and refraining from any action that would undermine the cease-fire and stability in Golan."
Israel conquered the western two-thirds of the Golan Heights in 1967 and has illegally occupied it ever since, annexing the seized lands in 1981.
Other countries including France, Russia, and Saudi Arabia have criticized Israel's invasion, while the United States defended the move.
"The Syrian army abandoned its positions in the area... which potentially creates a vacuum that could have been filled by terrorist organizations," U.S. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said at a press briefing earlier this week. "Israel has said that these actions are temporary to defend its borders. These are not permanent actions... We support all sides upholding the 1974 disengagement agreement."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Sanders Says 'Political Movement,' Not Murder, Is the Path to Medicare for All
"Killing people is not the way we're going to reform our healthcare system," he said. "The way we're going to reform our healthcare system is having people come together."
Dec 12, 2024
Addressing the assassination of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson and conversations it has sparked about the country's for-profit system, longtime Medicare for All advocate Sen. Bernie Sanders on Wednesday condemned the murder and stressed that getting to universal coverage will require a movement challenging corporate money in politics.
"Look, when we talk about the healthcare crisis, in my view, and I think the view of a majority of Americans, the current system is broken, it is dysfunctional, it is cruel, and it is wildly inefficient—far too expensive," said Sanders (I-Vt.), whose position is backed up by various polls.
"The reason we have not joined virtually every other major country on Earth in guaranteeing healthcare to all people as a human right is the political power and financial power of the insurance industry and drug companies," he told Jacobin. "It will take a political revolution in this country to get Congress to say, 'You know what, we're here to represent ordinary people, to provide quality care to ordinary people as a human right,' and not to worry about the profits of insurance and drug companies."
Asked about Thompson's alleged killer—26-year-old Luigi Mangione, whose reported manifesto railed against the nation's expensive healthcare system and low life expectancy—Sanders said: "You don't kill people. It's abhorrent. I condemn it wholeheartedly. It was a terrible act. But what it did show online is that many, many people are furious at the health insurance companies who make huge profits denying them and their families the healthcare that they desperately need."
"What you're seeing, the outpouring of anger at the insurance companies, is a reflection of how people feel about the current healthcare system."
"What you're seeing, the outpouring of anger at the insurance companies, is a reflection of how people feel about the current healthcare system," he continued, noting the tens of thousands of Americans who die each year because they can't get to a doctor.
"Killing people is not the way we're going to reform our healthcare system," Sanders added. "The way we're going to reform our healthcare system is having people come together and understanding that it is the right of every American to be able to walk into a doctor's office when they need to and not have to take out their wallet."
"The way we're going to bring about the kind of fundamental changes we need in healthcare is, in fact, by a political movement which understands the government has got to represent all of us, not just the 1%," the senator told Jacobin.
The 83-year-old Vermonter, who was just reelected to what he says is likely his last six-year term, is an Independent but caucuses with Democrats and sought their presidential nomination in 2016 and 2020. He has urged the Democratic Party to recognize why some working-class voters have abandoned it since Republicans won the White House and both chambers of Congress last month. A refusal to take on insurance and drug companies and overhaul the healthcare system, he argues, is one reason.
Sanders—one of the few members of Congress who regularly talks about Medicare for All—isn't alone in suggesting that unsympathetic responses to Thompson's murder can be explained by a privatized healthcare system that fails so many people.
In addition to highlighting Sanders' interview on social media, Congressman Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) pointed out to Business Insider on Wednesday that "you've got thousands of people that are sharing their stories of frustration" in the wake of Thompson's death.
Khanna—a co-sponsor of the Medicare for All Act, led in the House of Representatives by Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.)—made the case that you can recognize those stories without accepting the assassination.
"You condemn the murder of an insurance executive who was a father of two kids," he said. "At the same time, you say there's obviously an outpouring behavior of people whose claims are being denied, and we need to reform the system."
Two other Medicare for All advocates, Reps. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), also made clear to Business Insider that they oppose Thompson's murder but understand some of the responses to it.
"Of course, we don't want to see the chaos that vigilantism presents," said Ocasio-Cortez. "We also don't want to see the extreme suffering that millions of Americans confront when your life changes overnight from a horrific diagnosis, and people are led to just some of the worst, not just health events, but the worst financial events of their and their family's lives."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)—a co-sponsor of Sanders' Medicare for All Act—similarly toldHuffPost in a Tuesday interview, "The visceral response from people across this country who feel cheated, ripped off, and threatened by the vile practices of their insurance companies should be a warning to everyone in the healthcare system."
"Violence is never the answer, but people can be pushed only so far," she continued. "This is a warning that if you push people hard enough, they lose faith in the ability of their government to make change, lose faith in the ability of the people who are providing the healthcare to make change, and start to take matters into their own hands in ways that will ultimately be a threat to everyone."
After facing some criticism for those comments, Warren added Wednesday: "Violence is never the answer. Period... I should have been much clearer that there is never a justification for murder."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Reports Target Israeli Army for 'Unprecedented Massacre' of Gaza Journalists
"In Gaza, the scale of the tragedy is incomprehensible," wrote Thibaut Bruttin, director general of Reporters Without Borders.
Dec 12, 2024
Reports released this week from two organizations that advocate for journalists underscore just how deadly Gaza has become for media workers.
Reporters Without Borders' (RSF) 2024 roundup, which was published Thursday, found that at least 54 journalists were killed on the job or in connection with their work this year, and 18 of them were killed by Israeli armed forces (16 in Palestine, and two in Lebanon).
The organization has also filed four complaints with the International Criminal Court "for war crimes committed by the Israeli army against journalists," according to the roundup, which includes stats from January 1 through December 1.
"In Gaza, the scale of the tragedy is incomprehensible," wrote Thibaut Bruttin, director general of RSF, in the introduction to the report. Since October 2023, 145 journalists have been killed in Gaza, "including at least 35 who were very likely targeted or killed while working."
Bruttin added that "many of these reporters were clearly identifiable as journalists and protected by this status, yet they were shot or killed in Israeli strikes that blatantly disregarded international law. This was compounded by a deliberate media blackout and a block on foreign journalists entering the strip."
When counting the number of journalists killed by the Israeli army since October 2023 in both Gaza and Lebanon, the tally comes to 155—"an unprecedented massacre," according to the roundup.
Multiple journalists were also killed in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Mexico, Sudan, Myanmar, Colombia, and Ukraine, according to the report, and hundreds more were detained and are now behind bars in countries including Israel, China, and Russia.
Meanwhile, in a statement released Thursday, the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) announced that at least 139 Palestinian journalists and media workers have been killed since the war in Gaza began in 2023, and in a statement released Wednesday, IFJ announced that 104 journalists had perished worldwide this year (which includes deaths from January 1 through December 10). IFJ's number for all of 2024 appears to be higher than RSF because RSF is only counting deaths that occurred "on the job or in connection with their work."
IFJ lists out each of the slain journalists in its 139 count, which includes the journalist Hamza Al-Dahdouh, the son of Al Jazeera's Gaza bureau chief, Wael Al-Dahdouh, who was killed with journalist Mustafa Thuraya when Israeli forces targeted their car while they were in northern Rafah in January 2024.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular