April, 27 2010, 08:14am EDT
World Bank Accused of Promoting Land Grabbing
WASHINGTON
Friends of the Earth International warned
today that voluntary principles on land acquisitions announced by
the World Bank and supported by the UN will legitimize and promote
land grabbing in Asia, Africa and Latin America. [1]
The
warning was issued as the World Bank released at an April 26-27
Washington meeting its voluntary principles to protect rights,
livelihoods and resources during large scale land acquisitions by
foreign investors in these continents.
These principles have been
supported by the United Nations Food and Agriculture organization,
the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development and the
International Fund for Agricultural Development .
Millions
of people's livelihoods are being destroyed by land grabbing,
especially those of peasant farmers, indigenous peoples and
fisherfolk. Land
grabbing takes place when states and the private sector buy up
millions of hectares of land in Asia, Africa and Latin America to
produce food and fuel mainly for export.
Land grabbing
is proven to further marginalize small food producers, and local
communities who already make up the largest part of the 1 billion
people suffering most from hunger and poverty. [2]
The
World Bank claims that these acquisitions will promote agricultural
investment. In reality they will further entrench corporate
agriculture for profit and destroy local livelihoods.
Despite
years of declining investment in peasant agriculture and the
promotion of free trade policies that prioritise industrial
agriculture instead, most of the world is still fed by small scale
agriculture. Land grabbing undermines small scale agriculture, which
jeopardizes our ability to feed the world now and in the future. [3]
Friends
of the Earth International Chair Nnimmo Bassey from Nigeria said:
"The
UN has shown that the best way to feed our population is through
existing, peasant based ecological agriculture. Yet the World Bank
and UN agencies support principles which legitimize a new form of
colonialism with grave dangers for millions of local livelihoods and
the environment. If
the UN is serious about ending hunger then it must heed its own
advice, stop the advance of agribusiness in Africa and implement food
sovereignty immediately."
Large
scale corporate agriculture is one of the leading causes of
environmental damage, responsible for about half of all global
greenhouse gas emissions, habitat destruction from land clearance and
huge use of fossil fuels and natural resources.
The
focus of industrial agriculture on producing commodities such as
animal feeds and agrofuels for export to rich countries rather than
food for local populations means it has led to widespread inequality
and malnutrition. [4]
Friends
of the Earth Uruguay Director Karin Nansen said:
"Industrial
production of soy, meat and agrofuels in South America means land
grabbing is already taking place. Local communities are violently
evicted from their land while agribusiness report record profits by
taking control of local resources. More
grabbing of farmland will intensify this violence against people's
sovereignty and also condemn us to ever rising deforestation and
climate emissions."
Friends
of the Earth International is demanding an end to all forms of land
grabbing, which governments and international institutions can
achieve by :
Equitable access to land and natural resources - keeping land
in the hands of local communities and implementing genuine agrarian
reformSupporting agro-ecological peasant, smallholder farming,
fishing and pastoralism, including participatory research and training
programmes so that small-scale food providers can produce ample,
healthy and safe food for everybody.Overhauling farm and trade policies to embrace food
sovereignty and supporting local and regional marketsPromoting community-oriented food and farming systems hinged
on local people's control over land, water and biodiversityEnforce strict mandatory regulations that curb the access of
corporations and other powerful actors (state and private) to
agricultural, coastal and grazing lands, forests, and wetlandsHalting the expansion of industrial corporate led agriculture
and ensure food sovereignty - peoples' right to control their own
seeds, lands, water and food production through just and ecological
systems; which ensures enough, diverse, nutritious, locally produced
and culturally appropriate food for all.
For
more information contact:
In
ENGLISH
Kirtana
Chandrasekaran, FoEI Food Sovereignty Program Co-coordinator in the UK
Tel: +44
(0) 20 7566 1669 and +44 (0) 79619 86956 (UK mobile)
In
SPANISH
Martin
Drago, FoEI Food Sovereignty Program Co-coordinator in Uruguay
Tel: (+ 5982)
9022355 - 9082730 and Mobile: (+ 598 99) 138559
NOTES
[1]
The principles were announced at the World Bank conference detailed
at https://go.worldbank.org/67YHA6L0K0
See
a copy of the principles at https://www.donorplatform.org/
component/option,com_docman/ task,doc_view/gid,1280
[2]
See "Seized: The 2008 land grab for food and financial security"
GRAIN Oct 2008 https://www.grain.org/briefings/?id=212
and
"The
Great Land Grab" Oakland Institute, 2009
www.oaklandinstitute.org/pdfs/LandGrab_final_web.pdf
[3]
Peasant farming feeds at least 70% of the world's population see
"Who feeds us?" ETC group Dec 2009
https://www.etcgroup.org/upload/publication/pdf_file/ETC_Who_Will_Feed_Us.pdf
[4]
According to the FAO 1 billion people mostly in the poorest countries
suffer from hunger while the same number suffer from obesity in the
industrialized world
Friends of the Earth International is the world's largest grassroots environmental network, uniting 74 national member groups and some 5,000 local activist groups on every continent. With over 2 million members and supporters around the world, FOEI campaigns on today's most urgent environmental and social issues.
LATEST NEWS
Warren Bill Would Stop Companies From Placing Shareholder Paydays Over Worker Rights
"Following the most lucrative election in history for special interests," said the senator, "my bill will empower workers to hold corporations to responsible decisions that benefit more than just shareholders."
Dec 11, 2024
Aiming to confront "a root cause of many of America's fundamental economic problems," U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren on Wednesday unveiled a bill to require corporations to balance growth with fair treatment of their employees and consumers.
The Massachusetts Democrat introduced the Accountable Capitalism Act, explaining that for much of U.S. history, corporations reinvested more than half of their profits back into their companies, working in the interest of employees, customers, business partners, and shareholders.
In the 1980s, said Warren corporations began placing the latter group above all, adopting "the belief that their only legitimate and legal purpose was 'maximizing shareholder value.'"
That view was further cemented in 1997 when the Business Roundtable, a lobbying group that represents chief executives across the country, declared that the "principal objective of a business enterprise is to generate economic returns to its owners."
Now, Warren said in a policy document, "around 93% of American-held corporate shares are owned by just 10% of our nation's richest households, while more than 40% of American households hold no shares at all."
"This means that corporate America's commitment to 'maximizing shareholder return' is a commitment to making the rich even richer, while leaving workers and families behind," said Warren in a statement.
The Accountable Capitalism Act would require:
- Corporations with more than $1 billion in annual revenue to obtain a federal charter as a "United States corporation," obligating executives to consider the interests of all stakeholders, not just investors;
- Corporate political spending to be approved by at least 75% of a company's shareholders and 75% of its board of directors; and
- At least 40% of a company's board of directors to be selected by employees.
The bill would also prohibit directors of U.S. corporations from selling company shares within five years of receiving them or within three years of a company stock buyback.
Warren noted that as companies have increasingly poured their profits into stock buybacks to benefit shareholders, worker productivity has steadily increased while real wages have gone up only slightly. The share of national income that goes to workers has also significantly dropped.
"Workers are a major reason corporate profits are surging, but their salaries have barely moved while corporations' shareholders make out like bandits," said Warren told The Guardian. "We need to stand up for working people and hold giant companies responsible for decisions that hurt workers and consumers while lining shareholders' pockets."
The senator highlighted that big business interests invested heavily in November's U.S. presidential election.
"Following the most lucrative election in history for special interests," she said, "my bill will empower workers to hold corporations to responsible decisions that benefit more than just shareholders."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Crushing Blow to the Labor Agenda' as Manchin, Sinema Block Biden NLRB Nominee
"These two senators effectively handed Trump control of the board when his term begins," noted one observer.
Dec 11, 2024
In a move likely fraught with major implications for worker rights during the impending second administration of Republican President-elect Donald Trump, Democratic-turned-Independent U.S. Sens. Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema on Wednesday blocked Democrat Lauren McFerran's bid for a second term on the National Labor Relations Board.
With every Republican senator except Sen. Roger Marshall of Kansas voting against President Joe Biden's nomination of McFerran for a new five-year term, the fate of the woman who has led the agency since 2021 was up to Manchin and Sinema—who, as More Perfect Union founder and executive director Faiz Shakir put it on social media, "consistently spoiled the story of 'what could have been'" by years of fighting to thwart their own former party's agenda.
Sinema struck first, her "no" vote on McFerran grinding the confirmation tally to a 49-49 tie. Manchin, who showed up later, cast the decisive vote, negating speculation that Vice President Kamala Harris, the Senate president who lost the presidential contest to Trump last month, would break the stalemate.
"It is deeply disappointing, a direct attack on working people, and incredibly troubling that this highly qualified nominee—with a proven track record of protecting worker rights—did not have the votes," lamented Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.).
Chris Jackson, a former Democratic Lawrence County, Tennessee commissioner and longtime labor advocate, called Manchin and Sinema's votes "a crushing blow to the labor agenda."
"By casting decisive NO votes against President Biden's NLRB nominee, they've guaranteed Democrats will lose control of the national labor board until at least 2026," Jackson said. "Their votes effectively hand Donald Trump the keys to the board the moment he takes office again. This is a betrayal of working families—and a gift to corporate interests, which is par for the course for these two."
Sara Nelson, president of the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA union, said on social media that while "Manchin and Sinema are responsible for killing voting rights, worker rights, women's rights, LGBTQ rights, childcare, vision, and dental for seniors, and an economy built for the people," the two obstructionist senators "are not the story."
"Don't bury the lede," implored Nelson. "The entire GOP has relentlessly fought against anything good for the vast majority of the people of this country. The GOP shows once again their total disdain for their constituents."
"But they better watch what they do in implementing their plans to make it worse," she warned. "These laws are set up to mostly protect corporations and getting rid of the last pathetic bits of worker rights under the law will simply lead to more disruption and CHAOS."
Trump's first term saw relentless attacks on workers' rights. Critics fear a second Trump administration—whose officials and agenda are steeped in the anti-worker Project 2025—will roll back gains achieved under Biden and work to weaken the right to organize, water down workplace health and safety rules, and strip overtime pay, to name but a handful of GOP wish-list items.
The latest votes by Manchin and Sinema—who are both leaving Congress after this term—sparked widespread outrage among workers' rights defenders on social media, with one account on X, formerly known as Twitter, posting: "Manchin is geriatric and Sinema has a long fruitful career ahead of her in a consulting firm that advocates child slave labor, but at least they kicked the working class in the teeth one last time. Nothing to do now but hope there's a hell."
Keep ReadingShow Less
With Defeat of Megamerger, Sanders Thanks Khan for Taking On 'Corporate Greed'
"The proposed Kroger-Albertsons merger would have led to higher prices at the grocery store and harmed workers," said the Vermont senator.
Dec 11, 2024
Praise for Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan continued to pour in on Wednesday after a pair of judges blocked the merger of grocery chains Kroger and Albertsons following challenges by the FTC and state attorneys general.
"The proposed Kroger-Albertsons merger would have led to higher prices at the grocery store and harmed workers," said U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders. "Let me thank FTC Chair Lina Khan for successfully fighting this merger and standing up to corporate greed."
Congressman Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) also welcomed the rulings and sent "a big thank you to Lina Khan and her team at the FTC."
Their comments on Wednesday followed similar applause from Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Rep. Pramila Jayapal as well as groups including the American Economic Liberties Project (AELP) and Groundwork Collaborative.
Khan addressed the win during a Tuesday stream with political commentator Hasan Piker, noting that "this is the first time that the FTC has ever sought to block a merger not just because it's gonna be bad for consumers, but also because it's gonna be bad for workers."
Khan, an appointee of outgoing Democratic President Joe Biden, has won praise from progressives for taking on not only grocery giants and other companies trying to build monopolies but also Big Pharma and Big Tech.
Sanders recently called her "the best FTC chair in modern history" and AELP earlier this year published a document detailing how, under Khan's leadership, the agency "has entered a new era of more effective, modern, and democratic enforcement to better protect consumers, workers, and independent businesses."
Examples included in the AELP roundup include Khan's "crackdown on deceptive 'junk fees,'" a ban on noncompete clauses that's being challenged in court, a historic lawsuit against Amazon.com, and a "click-to-cancel" rule that requires sellers to "make it as easy for consumers to cancel their enrollment as it was to sign up."
However, the new era of the FTC is set to soon come to an end. Since President-elect Donald Trump's victory last month, speculation has been building that he would replace Khan with someone who would do the bidding of big business. Amid celebrations of the rulings against the Kroger-Albertsons merger on Tuesday, the Republican announced Andrew Ferguson as his pick for chair.
As Common Dreamsreported earlier Wednesday, Basel Musharbash, principal attorney at Antimonopoly Counsel, said that elevating Ferguson, who already sits on the FTC, to chair, "is an affront to the antitrust laws and a gift to the oligarchs and monopolies bleeding this country dry."
Although the agency is expected to be friendlier to mergers under the next Trump administration, Albertsons responded to the Tuesday rulings by bailing on the $24.6 billion deal and suing Kroger for billions of dollars on Wednesday, rather than appealing or moving to in-house FTC hearings.
That move could reflect industry fears of U.S. courts that are willing to block major mergers, as The American Prospect executive editor David Dayen pointed out after the federal court decision on Tuesday.
"The important thing here is not that Biden's enforcers blocked a merger... it's that courts are increasingly comfortable with merger enforcement," he said. "States can sue under the Sherman Act, and they will. The real change to track is in the judiciary. Wall Street, take note."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular