

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
In a strong departure from
Bush-era policy, the USDA's National Organic Program released a memo
today
banning synthetic "accessory nutrients" - ending a scandal that
brought down its former organic leadership.
At issue were some of the nation's leading
manufacturers of infant
formula that had been illegally adding synthetic forms of omega-3 and
omega-6
oils to their organic products after a sweetheart deal between a
powerful
industry lobbyist and Dr. Barbara Robinson, the former head of the
USDA's
organic program-exposed by a 2009 investigative report in the Washington Post.
Documents obtained through the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA), by
The Cornucopia Institute and shared with the Washington
Post, indicated that Robinson, after meeting with Jay
Friedman, a
lawyer and lobbyist with the powerful Washington law firm of Covington
Burling,
rescinded a ruling made by USDA career civil servants who found the
inclusion
of synthetic oils in organic infant formula to be illegal.
"Justice prevailed in this matter but it took a
change in the
administration in Washington
to make this happen," said Mark A. Kastel, Codirector of The Cornucopia
Institute.
Problems and improprieties at the National
Organic Program, during the
Bush administration, were also profiled in a recently released audit
from the
USDA's Inspector General's office.
Cornucopia, an organic industry watchdog, first
investigated the use of
these "novel" nutritional oils, derived from soil fungus and algae,
in infant formula, because they are extracted using a neurotoxic
chemical,
hexane, which is explicitly banned in organic production. "We
couldn't understand why the USDA was allowing this to happen," Kastel
said.
Congress passed the Organic Foods Production
Act, as part of the 1990
farm bill, charging the USDA with defending the interests of ethical
industry
participants and protecting organic consumers against fraud.
Cornucopia researchers were shocked when they
started investigating the
DHA/ARA oils, manufactured by Martek Biosciences Corporation, Columbia,
MD,
and found they were implicated by parents and healthcare professionals
in
severe and chronic health problems in infants around the country.
"Organics should be the last bastion of pure,
natural and
unadulterated food for consumers," said Charlotte Vallaeys, lead author
of
Cornucopia's report, Replacing
Mother --
Imitating Human Breast Milk in the Laboratory: www.cornucopia.org
Through a separate FOIA request to the FDA,
Cornucopia learned that
there was an apparent correlation between the use of Martek's
nutritional oils
and severe gastrointestinal problems sometimes resulting in
highly-invasive
testing procedures and hospitalizations.
"Based on FDA adverse reaction reports, we
discovered that many
parents, physicians and healthcare practitioners found that chronic
problems
with infants, often resulting in 'failure to thrive,' acute
dehydration (caused by dangerous diarrhea/vomiting) and severe emotional
stress
on the babies and their families, were often immediately resolved when
switching to formula without DHA/ARA supplementation," stated Vallaeys.
After learning about the health problems,
Cornucopia immediately
stepped up its legal efforts at the USDA to remove Martek's oils not
only
from organic infant formula, but also from organic baby food and organic
milk
manufactured by the nation's leading brand, Horizon, owned by the dairy
giant
Dean Foods.
"It's concerning enough that these Martek oils
are being
widely introduced in the marketplace, in both organic and conventional
products, but there is no authoritative research that suggests they
actually
benefit children's development, as is claimed by the industry," said
Marsha Walker, RN, IBCLC, Executive Director of the National Alliance
for
Breastfeeding Advocacy.
Infant formula manufacturers like Enfamil (Mead
Johnson) promote their
products as being "our closest formula to breast milk," and
research indicates such advertisements might have discouraged some women
from
breastfeeding, which is universally recognized as being superior to
formula in
numerous ways, including for the health and development of babies.
"This seems to be a crass marketing gimmick,
using our children as
guinea pigs to enhance the bottom line at the major pharmaceutical
companies
that manufacture infant formula," lamented Kastel. "The fact
that this material is being illegally added to certified organic formula
is
highly repugnant and left mothers, who could not breastfeed for whatever
reason, with few alternatives in the marketplace."
Over the past few years, infant formula
manufacturers have raised their
prices after adding Martek oils to their products. With the exception
of
some prescription formulas, available with approval from pediatricians,
only
one over-the-counter formula is available without synthetic DHA/ARA, Baby's Only, an organic product
manufactured by Nature's One in Columbus,
Ohio.
"After today's official announcement by the
USDA, all other
organic formula manufacturers will need to remove Martek's oils from
their products," Cornucopia's Vallaeys stated.
In the meantime, The Cornucopia Institute also
has filed petitions with
the FDA requesting that their Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS)
designation
for the Martek oils be revoked.
"When Martek's additives were originally
granted GRAS
status, it was with extreme reservations on the part of the FDA review
panel
because of adverse reactions to these oils" said Valleys.
"When we reviewed FOIA documents, we were astonished to find that none
of the
infant formula manufacturers had complied with the FDA's request to
monitor adverse reactions and perform post-market surveillance of these
materials."
Like baking soda or any other synthetic
ingredient that manufacturers
would like to use in organic products, Martek and the infant formula
manufacturers who would like to use synthetic DHA/ARA oils will now be
allowed
to petition the National Organic Standards Board for a safety review.
Cornucopia projects an aggressive lobbying fight with public interest
groups
and powerful manufacturers once again squaring off.
"We have to say we are continuing to be
impressed by the ethical
turnaround at the USDA, in their oversight of the organic industry,
since the
new administration took control in Washington and Secretary Vilsack
promised
members of the organic community that he would appoint leadership who
'shares our values," Kastel affirmed.
According to The Cornucopia Institute, widely
recognized as one of the
industry's most aggressive independent watchdogs, organic consumers have
every
reason to feel more confident every day in the integrity of the USDA
organic
label.
The Cornucopia Institute, a Wisconsin-based nonprofit farm policy research group, is dedicated to the fight for economic justice for the family-scale farming community. Their Organic Integrity Project acts as a corporate and governmental watchdog assuring that no compromises to the credibility of organic farming methods and the food it produces are made in the pursuit of profit.
"If any Iranians are killed pursuant to this threat," said one expert, "President Trump will be guilty of genocide, as will those assisting him."
Just hours ahead of his self-imposed deadline for a deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, US President Donald Trump threatened on Tuesday to permanently wipe out the "whole civilization" of Iran—remarks seen as a straightforward expression of genocidal intent.
"A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again," Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. "I don’t want that to happen, but it probably will. However, now that we have Complete and Total Regime Change, where different, smarter, and less radicalized minds prevail, maybe something revolutionarily wonderful can happen, WHO KNOWS? We will find out tonight, one of the most important moments in the long and complex history of the World."
Brian Finucane, senior adviser to the US Program at the International Crisis Group, responded to Trump's threat by pointing to 18 US Code § 1091, which prohibits American nationals from committing genocide within the United States and abroad.
Dylan Williams, vice president for government affairs at the US-based Center for International Policy, wrote that "this meets the threshold for intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national group as set forth in 18 US Code § 1091 prohibiting the crime of genocide."
"If any Iranians are killed pursuant to this threat," Williams added, "President Trump will be guilty of genocide, as will those assisting him."
One expert, former Human Rights Watch executive director Kenneth Roth, noted that Trump's genocidal threat is itself unlawful.
"Trump is openly threatening collective punishment, targeting not the Iranian military but the Iranian people," Roth told NBC News, pointing to the Fourth Geneva Convention. "Attacking civilians is a war crime. So is making threats with the aim of terrorizing the civilian population."
"Soldiers must refuse unlawful orders. Members of Congress must call for impeachment and removal."
Trump published his comments as the US unleashed a wave of attacks on Kharg Island, Iran's key oil export hub. The US and Israel also reportedly targeted bridges across Iran overnight as part of a broader assault that has killed thousands of people since late February.
The US president set a deadline of 8 pm ET for Iran to reach a deal that fully reopens the Strait of Hormuz. Trump has threatened to order the obliteration of Iranian bridges and energy infrastructure if there's no agreement by his arbitrary deadline.
Adil Haque, a professor of law at Rutgers University, wrote Tuesday that the international community must intervene immediately to prevent Trump from launching a catastrophic and criminal assault on a country of more than 90 million people.
"Soldiers must refuse unlawful orders," Haque added. "Members of Congress must call for impeachment and removal. Every American who loves their country must speak out. Enough is enough."
"If your political views are practically anything other than MAGA, you’re on notice, courtesy of the FBI," said journalist Ken Klippenstein.
Along with cutting environmental, housing, and health programs and proposing an increase of nearly $500 billion in military spending, President Donald Trump's new budget proposal shows how the White House "wants to use taxpayer dollars to spy on those who oppose its extremist agenda," one Democratic congresswoman said Monday evening.
Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon (D-Penn.) was referring to the budget's description of a new FBI center that is already working to root out what the White House broadly defined as "domestic terrorism" in a federal memo last year.
As independent journalist Ken Klippenstein wrote this week, buried in Trump's budget request—which includes $12.5 billion for the FBI to invest in counterterrorism efforts and other spending—is the White House's latest assertion that "domestic terrorists... pose an elevated threat to the Homeland."
"In recent years, heinous assassinations and other acts of political violence in the United States have dramatically increased," reads the budget's section on domestic terrorism. "Commonly, this violent conduct relates to views associated with anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, and anti-Christianity; support for the overthrow of the US government; extremism on migration, race, and gender; and hostility to those who hold traditional American views on family, religion, and mortality."
The views described echo National Security Presidential Memorandum 7 (NSPM-7), the memo signed last September that directed federal agencies to develop a national strategy to "investigate and disrupt networks, entities, and organizations that foment political violence" in order to stop violent attacks before they happen.
But despite the administration's singular focus on groups and individuals who hold left-wing, anti-capitalism views and subscribe to belief systems other than Christianity, the National Institute of Justice found that since 1990, 227 attacks motivated by right-wing views killed 520 people, while far-left groups carried out 42 attacks that killed 78 people. The NIJ study was removed from the US Department of Justice website shortly after the assassination of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk—an event that Trump explicitly blamed on left-wing groups without evidence, and which came weeks before the signing of NSPM-7.
The budget proposal explains that as a result of NSPM-7, the FBI recently created the NSPM-7 Joint Mission Center (JMC), which is run by personnel from 10 federal agencies.
"The JMC is working to counter domestic terrorism and organized political violence by integrating intelligence operational support, and financial analysis to proactively identify networks and prosecute domestic terrorist and related criminal actors," reads the proposal.
Scanlon is one of a small number of elected Democrats who have spoken out about NSPM-7 in congressional hearings and media interviews.
"If anyone can be labeled a domestic terrorist for speech opposing this administration, our First Amendment rights are under grave threat," said Scanlon recently.
Klippenstein noted that the budget document describes social media platforms and encrypted communications apps as being used by "domestic terrorists" to "recruit new adherents, plan and rally support for in-person actions, and disseminate materials encouraging radicalization and mobilization to violence.”
FBI Director Kash Patel told Congress that anyone who used the Discord channels used by Tyler Robinson, who was accused of killing Kirk, would be investigated by the agency.
Klippenstein noted that the FBI's domestic terrorism watchlist, which as of last September listed about 5,000 US citizens, reportedly "is growing."
"If your political views are practically anything other than MAGA, you’re on notice, courtesy of the FBI," Klippenstein wrote.
Democratic Rep. Yassamin Ansari called the Pentagon secretary "a chief enabler of this illegal war" and accused him of repeatedly violating his oath of office.
US Rep. Yassamin Ansari, the lone Iranian American Democrat in Congress, said on Monday that she will soon introduce articles of impeachment against Pentagon Secretary Pete Hegseth, the most prominent cheerleader of President Donald Trump's illegal war on Iran.
In a statement, Ansari (Ariz.) said that Hegseth has "repeatedly" violated his oath of office and his duty to the Constitution. The Democratic lawmaker, who said she would formally introduce the impeachment articles next week, pointed to Hegseth's "reckless endangerment of US servicemembers and repeated war crimes, including bombing a girls’ school in Minab, Iran."
Ansari, who was born in Seattle to parents who fled Iran following the 1979 revolution, warned that Trump's "deranged statements" and "apocalyptic" threats to obliterate Iranian bridges and power plants as soon as Tuesday night "are further entrenching our country and our world in another devastating, never-ending war."
"He’s threatening war crimes that violate US law and the Geneva Convention, on top of illegal actions and atrocities already committed at his direction–including violence that has destroyed schools, hospitals, and critical civilian infrastructure," said Ansari. "Republicans must join us in calling on the president to end this suicidal war before it is too late. So much is at stake, and those who continue to follow him blindly will have blood on their hands as well."
"As the daughter of Iranian immigrants who fled this regime, and as an American congresswoman who swore an oath to the United States Constitution, I know that this cannot go on," Ansari continued. "The 25th Amendment exists for a reason; his Cabinet should use it. The fate of US troops, the Iranian people, and the very foundation of our global system are at stake."
In a video posted to social media, Ansari said that "as a chief enabler of this illegal war, Pete Hegseth is responsible for directing this insane military action against Iran."
I’m introducing Articles of Impeachment against Pete Hegseth. Here’s why. pic.twitter.com/mMblG7tA7s
— Congresswoman Yassamin Ansari (@RepYassAnsari) April 7, 2026
Hegseth has been the foremost public advocate of Trump's war, praising the "lethality" of the American military and the "death and destruction" it is raining down on Iran, where US-Israeli attacks have killed around 2,000 people—including hundreds of children—and destroyed tens of thousands of civilian structures, from residential buildings to universities to medical facilities.
The Pentagon secretary has also derided what he's called "stupid rules of engagement" that constrain US servicemembers, gutted offices tasked with working to limit civilian casualties in war, and fired uniformed lawyers he's dismissed as "roadblocks" in the way of "maximum lethality."
Experts say those moves have made atrocities such as the one the US military committed on the first day of the war—the bombing of an elementary school in southern Iran—more likely. Human rights organizations and international legal scholars have said the attack should be investigated as a war crime.
Hegseth also said last month that "no quarter" would be given to "our enemies" in Iran, a statement indicating that surrendering combatants would be executed rather than taken prisoner. The declaration itself was seen as a clear violation of international law.
"Hegseth is making people less safe—and it’s time for him to go," the advocacy group Win Without War said last month in its own call for the Pentagon secretary's impeachment and removal.