April, 27 2010, 02:57pm EDT
New Administration at USDA Steps Up to End Organic Corruption
Industry Watchdog / Washington Post Investigation Brings Down Old Leadership
CORNUCOPIA, WI
In a strong departure from
Bush-era policy, the USDA's National Organic Program released a memo
today
banning synthetic "accessory nutrients" - ending a scandal that
brought down its former organic leadership.
At issue were some of the nation's leading
manufacturers of infant
formula that had been illegally adding synthetic forms of omega-3 and
omega-6
oils to their organic products after a sweetheart deal between a
powerful
industry lobbyist and Dr. Barbara Robinson, the former head of the
USDA's
organic program-exposed by a 2009 investigative report in the Washington Post.
Documents obtained through the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA), by
The Cornucopia Institute and shared with the Washington
Post, indicated that Robinson, after meeting with Jay
Friedman, a
lawyer and lobbyist with the powerful Washington law firm of Covington
Burling,
rescinded a ruling made by USDA career civil servants who found the
inclusion
of synthetic oils in organic infant formula to be illegal.
"Justice prevailed in this matter but it took a
change in the
administration in Washington
to make this happen," said Mark A. Kastel, Codirector of The Cornucopia
Institute.
Problems and improprieties at the National
Organic Program, during the
Bush administration, were also profiled in a recently released audit
from the
USDA's Inspector General's office.
Cornucopia, an organic industry watchdog, first
investigated the use of
these "novel" nutritional oils, derived from soil fungus and algae,
in infant formula, because they are extracted using a neurotoxic
chemical,
hexane, which is explicitly banned in organic production. "We
couldn't understand why the USDA was allowing this to happen," Kastel
said.
Congress passed the Organic Foods Production
Act, as part of the 1990
farm bill, charging the USDA with defending the interests of ethical
industry
participants and protecting organic consumers against fraud.
Cornucopia researchers were shocked when they
started investigating the
DHA/ARA oils, manufactured by Martek Biosciences Corporation, Columbia,
MD,
and found they were implicated by parents and healthcare professionals
in
severe and chronic health problems in infants around the country.
"Organics should be the last bastion of pure,
natural and
unadulterated food for consumers," said Charlotte Vallaeys, lead author
of
Cornucopia's report, Replacing
Mother --
Imitating Human Breast Milk in the Laboratory: www.cornucopia.org
Through a separate FOIA request to the FDA,
Cornucopia learned that
there was an apparent correlation between the use of Martek's
nutritional oils
and severe gastrointestinal problems sometimes resulting in
highly-invasive
testing procedures and hospitalizations.
"Based on FDA adverse reaction reports, we
discovered that many
parents, physicians and healthcare practitioners found that chronic
problems
with infants, often resulting in 'failure to thrive,' acute
dehydration (caused by dangerous diarrhea/vomiting) and severe emotional
stress
on the babies and their families, were often immediately resolved when
switching to formula without DHA/ARA supplementation," stated Vallaeys.
After learning about the health problems,
Cornucopia immediately
stepped up its legal efforts at the USDA to remove Martek's oils not
only
from organic infant formula, but also from organic baby food and organic
milk
manufactured by the nation's leading brand, Horizon, owned by the dairy
giant
Dean Foods.
"It's concerning enough that these Martek oils
are being
widely introduced in the marketplace, in both organic and conventional
products, but there is no authoritative research that suggests they
actually
benefit children's development, as is claimed by the industry," said
Marsha Walker, RN, IBCLC, Executive Director of the National Alliance
for
Breastfeeding Advocacy.
Infant formula manufacturers like Enfamil (Mead
Johnson) promote their
products as being "our closest formula to breast milk," and
research indicates such advertisements might have discouraged some women
from
breastfeeding, which is universally recognized as being superior to
formula in
numerous ways, including for the health and development of babies.
"This seems to be a crass marketing gimmick,
using our children as
guinea pigs to enhance the bottom line at the major pharmaceutical
companies
that manufacture infant formula," lamented Kastel. "The fact
that this material is being illegally added to certified organic formula
is
highly repugnant and left mothers, who could not breastfeed for whatever
reason, with few alternatives in the marketplace."
Over the past few years, infant formula
manufacturers have raised their
prices after adding Martek oils to their products. With the exception
of
some prescription formulas, available with approval from pediatricians,
only
one over-the-counter formula is available without synthetic DHA/ARA, Baby's Only, an organic product
manufactured by Nature's One in Columbus,
Ohio.
"After today's official announcement by the
USDA, all other
organic formula manufacturers will need to remove Martek's oils from
their products," Cornucopia's Vallaeys stated.
In the meantime, The Cornucopia Institute also
has filed petitions with
the FDA requesting that their Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS)
designation
for the Martek oils be revoked.
"When Martek's additives were originally
granted GRAS
status, it was with extreme reservations on the part of the FDA review
panel
because of adverse reactions to these oils" said Valleys.
"When we reviewed FOIA documents, we were astonished to find that none
of the
infant formula manufacturers had complied with the FDA's request to
monitor adverse reactions and perform post-market surveillance of these
materials."
Like baking soda or any other synthetic
ingredient that manufacturers
would like to use in organic products, Martek and the infant formula
manufacturers who would like to use synthetic DHA/ARA oils will now be
allowed
to petition the National Organic Standards Board for a safety review.
Cornucopia projects an aggressive lobbying fight with public interest
groups
and powerful manufacturers once again squaring off.
"We have to say we are continuing to be
impressed by the ethical
turnaround at the USDA, in their oversight of the organic industry,
since the
new administration took control in Washington and Secretary Vilsack
promised
members of the organic community that he would appoint leadership who
'shares our values," Kastel affirmed.
According to The Cornucopia Institute, widely
recognized as one of the
industry's most aggressive independent watchdogs, organic consumers have
every
reason to feel more confident every day in the integrity of the USDA
organic
label.
The Cornucopia Institute, a Wisconsin-based nonprofit farm policy research group, is dedicated to the fight for economic justice for the family-scale farming community. Their Organic Integrity Project acts as a corporate and governmental watchdog assuring that no compromises to the credibility of organic farming methods and the food it produces are made in the pursuit of profit.
LATEST NEWS
Listen Live: US Supreme Court Hears Outrageous Argument That Trump Is Above the Law
"The American people deserve a Supreme Court that does not hesitate to declare that no one is above the law, including a former president," said one campaigner.
Apr 25, 2024
After months of delay, the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday will hear oral arguments in a closely watched case on whether former President Donald Trump should be immune from criminal charges stemming from his efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss—an argument that legal experts say is both absurd and dangerous.
Listen live to the oral arguments, which are set to begin at 10:00 am ET:
Thursday's proceedings mark the high court's final argument of its current term, and pro-democracy campaigners are calling on the justices to quickly reject the former president's sweeping immunity claim so he can face trial on federal election subversion charges before his November rematch with President Joe Biden.
As Bloomberg's Greg Stohr noted earlier this week, Thursday's oral arguments give "Special Counsel Jack Smith only a narrow window to put the former president in front of a Washington jury before voters go to the polls on November 5."
"With the trial on hold until the high court rules," Stohr added, "Smith needs a clear-cut victory, and he needs it quickly."
Sean Eldridge, founder and president of the progressive advocacy group Stand Up America, said in a statement Thursday that "the Supreme Court's right-wing majority has already handed Trump a temporary victory by stalling this case for months, allowing him to delay accountability for his criminal attempts to cling to power."
"With so much at stake for our democracy, the Supreme Court should rule swiftly and decisively in this case," said Eldridge. "Accountability delayed could mean accountability denied."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Grand Jury Indicts Top Trump Aides, 11 Arizona Republicans Over 'Fake Electors' Scheme
Had it succeeded, said the state's attorney general, the scheme would have "deprived Arizona's voters of their right to have their votes counted for their chosen president."
Apr 25, 2024
A grand jury in Arizona on Wednesday charged seven aides to Donald Trump and nearly a dozen Republican officials over a "fake electors" scheme in the state that aimed to keep the former president in power after his 2020 loss to President Joe Biden.
Trump, who is currently facing nearly 90 charges across four criminal cases as he runs for another White House term, was described as "unindicted co-conspirator 1" in the 58-page indictment, which was announced by Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes.
"The people of Arizona elected President Biden," Mayes, a Democrat, said Wednesday. "Unwilling to accept this fact, the defendants charged by the state grand jury allegedly schemed to prevent the lawful transfer of the presidency. Whatever their reasoning was, the plot to violate the law must be answered for."
The indictment names former Arizona Republican Party Chair Kelli Ward, sitting state Republican Sens. Jake Hoffman and Anthony Kern, former U.S. Senate candidate Jim Lamon, and seven others as the "fake electors" who sought to declare Trump the rightful winner of the state's presidential contest.
The names of other individuals indicted by the state grand jury are redacted, but the document's descriptions make clear that former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, former Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, and top Trump legal strategist Boris Epshteyn are among those facing felony charges—including fraud, forgery, and conspiracy.
"In Arizona, defendants, unindicted coconspirators, and others pressured the three groups of election officials responsible for certifying election results to encourage them to change the election results," the document reads. "Discussions about using the Republican electors to change the outcome of the election began as early as November 4, 2020. Those plans evolved during November based on memos drafted by [an attorney for the Trump campaign, Kenneth Chesebro]."
Mayes said Wednesday that had the fake elector scheme succeeded, it would have "deprived Arizona's voters of their right to have their votes counted for their chosen president."
"It effectively would have made their right to vote meaningless," said Mayes.
A state grand jury, made up of everyday, regular Arizonans, has handed down felony indictments in the ongoing investigation into the fake elector scheme in Arizona. pic.twitter.com/Nu8GcD4ZqJ
— AZ Attorney General Kris Mayes (@AZAGMayes) April 24, 2024
Alex Gulotta, state director of All Voting Is Local Action Arizona, said Wednesday that "the indictment of the eleven fake electors is one of the first steps required in holding these election deniers accountable for their alleged attempts to take power away from voters by disrupting our free and fair elections."
"Arizonans deserve to trust the election officials responsible for administering our elections and preserving our democracy," said Gulotta, "and this is a positive step forward as we continue to strengthen the foundations of our democracy and restore faith in our elections."
The Arizona Republicreported Wednesday that "several of the Arizona electors have previously claimed they were merely offering Congress a backup plan, though nothing in the documents they sent to Congress and the National Archives backs up that assertion."
"The indictment includes several statements the false electors made on social media that contradict those claims," the newspaper observed.
Jenny Guzman, director of Common Cause's Arizona program, said the indictment "marks the start of a new chapter for the fake elector scheme that has plagued Arizona."
"Arizonans are still dealing with the fallout from the false electors and the Big Lie about the 2020 elections," said Guzman. "We are relieved that the investigation by Attorney General Mayes has concluded and Arizonans can now know that what comes next is accountability. These efforts by these fake electors to undermine the will of Arizona’s voters have had implications far beyond their failed attempt to overthrow the 2020 election."
"This indictment can reassure all Arizonans that if anyone, regardless of their political affiliation, attempts to undermine their vote, consequences will follow," Guzman added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Watchdog Urges FEC to Investigate Trump Campaign Over Scheme for Legal Fees
"By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much."
Apr 24, 2024
A campaign finance watchdog on Wednesday filed a Federal Election Commission complaint accusing former President Donald Trump's 2024 campaign, affiliated political groups, and an accounting firm of violating U.S. law in a scheme "seemingly designed to obscure the true recipients of a noteworthy portion of Trump's legal bills."
The Washington, D.C.-based Campaign Legal Center (CLC) said that "evidence appears to show an illegal arrangement between several Trump-affiliated committees and a compliance firm named Red Curve Solutions that is designed to obscure the identities of those providing legal services and how much they are being paid."
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money."
CLC alleges that the Trump campaign, Trump's political action committee (PAC) Save America, and three affiliated organizations "violated federal reporting requirements based on a scheme in which the committees reportedly paid over $7.2 million—described as 'reimbursement for legal' costs or expenses"—to Red Curve.
The watchdog also said that Red Curve appears to be "making or facilitating illegal contributions that violate either federal contribution limits or the prohibition on corporate contributions."
According to CLC:
Red Curve is a domestic limited liability company that offers compliance and FEC reporting services but does not appear to offer any legal services. It is managed by Bradley Crate, who also serves as the treasurer for each of the five Trump-affiliated committees concerned in this complaint, as well as over 200 other federal committees.
According to filings with the FEC, Red Curve appears to have been fronting legal costs for Trump since at least December 2022, with Trump-affiliated committees repaying the company later. This arrangement appears to violate FEC rules that require campaigns to disclose not only the entity being reimbursed (here, Red Curve) but also the underlying vendor. By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much they are being paid—through this arrangement.
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money," CLC senior director of campaign finance Erin Chlopak said in a statement. "When campaigns and committees obscure that information from the public, not only do they make it difficult to determine if the law has been violated, but they deny voters the ability to make an informed choice when casting a ballot."
"The steps taken by the Trump campaign, its affiliated committees, and Red Curve Solutions concealed information about how campaign funds were used to pay former President Trump's legal expenditures, including the amounts and ultimate recipients of these expenditures—and the FEC must investigate immediately," Chlopak added.
Trump—who is the presumptive 2024 GOP presidential nominee—faces 91 federal and state felony charges related to his role in the January 6 insurrection and his organization's business practices. He is currently on trial in New York for allegedly falsifying business records related to hush money payments to cover up sex scandals during the 2016 election cycle. The twice-impeached former president has been open about his use of campaign donations to pay his legal costs.
The new CLC filing comes a day after the watchdog filed separate FEC complaints urging investigations into a pair of Trump-affiliated "scam PACs," which "pretend to fundraise for major candidates or issues while secretly diverting almost all of their donors' money back into fundraising or the fraudsters' own pockets."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular