April, 27 2010, 02:57pm EDT
New Administration at USDA Steps Up to End Organic Corruption
Industry Watchdog / Washington Post Investigation Brings Down Old Leadership
CORNUCOPIA, WI
In a strong departure from
Bush-era policy, the USDA's National Organic Program released a memo
today
banning synthetic "accessory nutrients" - ending a scandal that
brought down its former organic leadership.
At issue were some of the nation's leading
manufacturers of infant
formula that had been illegally adding synthetic forms of omega-3 and
omega-6
oils to their organic products after a sweetheart deal between a
powerful
industry lobbyist and Dr. Barbara Robinson, the former head of the
USDA's
organic program-exposed by a 2009 investigative report in the Washington Post.
Documents obtained through the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA), by
The Cornucopia Institute and shared with the Washington
Post, indicated that Robinson, after meeting with Jay
Friedman, a
lawyer and lobbyist with the powerful Washington law firm of Covington
Burling,
rescinded a ruling made by USDA career civil servants who found the
inclusion
of synthetic oils in organic infant formula to be illegal.
"Justice prevailed in this matter but it took a
change in the
administration in Washington
to make this happen," said Mark A. Kastel, Codirector of The Cornucopia
Institute.
Problems and improprieties at the National
Organic Program, during the
Bush administration, were also profiled in a recently released audit
from the
USDA's Inspector General's office.
Cornucopia, an organic industry watchdog, first
investigated the use of
these "novel" nutritional oils, derived from soil fungus and algae,
in infant formula, because they are extracted using a neurotoxic
chemical,
hexane, which is explicitly banned in organic production. "We
couldn't understand why the USDA was allowing this to happen," Kastel
said.
Congress passed the Organic Foods Production
Act, as part of the 1990
farm bill, charging the USDA with defending the interests of ethical
industry
participants and protecting organic consumers against fraud.
Cornucopia researchers were shocked when they
started investigating the
DHA/ARA oils, manufactured by Martek Biosciences Corporation, Columbia,
MD,
and found they were implicated by parents and healthcare professionals
in
severe and chronic health problems in infants around the country.
"Organics should be the last bastion of pure,
natural and
unadulterated food for consumers," said Charlotte Vallaeys, lead author
of
Cornucopia's report, Replacing
Mother --
Imitating Human Breast Milk in the Laboratory: www.cornucopia.org
Through a separate FOIA request to the FDA,
Cornucopia learned that
there was an apparent correlation between the use of Martek's
nutritional oils
and severe gastrointestinal problems sometimes resulting in
highly-invasive
testing procedures and hospitalizations.
"Based on FDA adverse reaction reports, we
discovered that many
parents, physicians and healthcare practitioners found that chronic
problems
with infants, often resulting in 'failure to thrive,' acute
dehydration (caused by dangerous diarrhea/vomiting) and severe emotional
stress
on the babies and their families, were often immediately resolved when
switching to formula without DHA/ARA supplementation," stated Vallaeys.
After learning about the health problems,
Cornucopia immediately
stepped up its legal efforts at the USDA to remove Martek's oils not
only
from organic infant formula, but also from organic baby food and organic
milk
manufactured by the nation's leading brand, Horizon, owned by the dairy
giant
Dean Foods.
"It's concerning enough that these Martek oils
are being
widely introduced in the marketplace, in both organic and conventional
products, but there is no authoritative research that suggests they
actually
benefit children's development, as is claimed by the industry," said
Marsha Walker, RN, IBCLC, Executive Director of the National Alliance
for
Breastfeeding Advocacy.
Infant formula manufacturers like Enfamil (Mead
Johnson) promote their
products as being "our closest formula to breast milk," and
research indicates such advertisements might have discouraged some women
from
breastfeeding, which is universally recognized as being superior to
formula in
numerous ways, including for the health and development of babies.
"This seems to be a crass marketing gimmick,
using our children as
guinea pigs to enhance the bottom line at the major pharmaceutical
companies
that manufacture infant formula," lamented Kastel. "The fact
that this material is being illegally added to certified organic formula
is
highly repugnant and left mothers, who could not breastfeed for whatever
reason, with few alternatives in the marketplace."
Over the past few years, infant formula
manufacturers have raised their
prices after adding Martek oils to their products. With the exception
of
some prescription formulas, available with approval from pediatricians,
only
one over-the-counter formula is available without synthetic DHA/ARA, Baby's Only, an organic product
manufactured by Nature's One in Columbus,
Ohio.
"After today's official announcement by the
USDA, all other
organic formula manufacturers will need to remove Martek's oils from
their products," Cornucopia's Vallaeys stated.
In the meantime, The Cornucopia Institute also
has filed petitions with
the FDA requesting that their Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS)
designation
for the Martek oils be revoked.
"When Martek's additives were originally
granted GRAS
status, it was with extreme reservations on the part of the FDA review
panel
because of adverse reactions to these oils" said Valleys.
"When we reviewed FOIA documents, we were astonished to find that none
of the
infant formula manufacturers had complied with the FDA's request to
monitor adverse reactions and perform post-market surveillance of these
materials."
Like baking soda or any other synthetic
ingredient that manufacturers
would like to use in organic products, Martek and the infant formula
manufacturers who would like to use synthetic DHA/ARA oils will now be
allowed
to petition the National Organic Standards Board for a safety review.
Cornucopia projects an aggressive lobbying fight with public interest
groups
and powerful manufacturers once again squaring off.
"We have to say we are continuing to be
impressed by the ethical
turnaround at the USDA, in their oversight of the organic industry,
since the
new administration took control in Washington and Secretary Vilsack
promised
members of the organic community that he would appoint leadership who
'shares our values," Kastel affirmed.
According to The Cornucopia Institute, widely
recognized as one of the
industry's most aggressive independent watchdogs, organic consumers have
every
reason to feel more confident every day in the integrity of the USDA
organic
label.
The Cornucopia Institute, a Wisconsin-based nonprofit farm policy research group, is dedicated to the fight for economic justice for the family-scale farming community. Their Organic Integrity Project acts as a corporate and governmental watchdog assuring that no compromises to the credibility of organic farming methods and the food it produces are made in the pursuit of profit.
LATEST NEWS
Sanders Backs Push for Billionaire Tax in California as Newsom Raises Money to Fight It
"Yes: We need a wealth tax on billionaires," said US Sen. Bernie Sanders.
Dec 31, 2025
US Sen. Bernie Sanders on Tuesday endorsed an effort in California to impose a one-time tax on the wealth of the state's billionaires, a grassroots campaign that has drawn opposition from Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom and powerful investors.
Sanders (I-Vt.) said the proposed ballot initiative, which is currently in the signature-gathering phase, "is a model that should be emulated throughout the country." The senator said he plans to introduce a proposal for a national wealth tax in the near future.
"In my view, in a democratic society, we cannot continue to tolerate a rigged economy in which 60% of our people live paycheck to paycheck—struggling to pay for housing, food, and healthcare while the top 1% now owns more wealth than the bottom 93%," Sanders said in a statement posted to social media. "We must not continue a trend in which, over the past 50 years, $79 trillion in wealth in our country has been redistributed from the bottom 90% to the top 1%."
Yes: We need a wealth tax on billionaires. pic.twitter.com/2OUwSos5De
— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) December 30, 2025
If placed on the November 2026 ballot and approved by voters, the California Billionaire Tax Act would levy a single 5% tax on the wealth of the roughly 200 billionaires who reside in the state. Those subject to the tax would have the option of paying the amount owed all at once or over a period of five years.
Organizers say the measure would generate $100 billion in revenue, which the state could use to avert a looming healthcare crisis fueled by the unprecedented Medicaid cuts that US President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans enacted over the summer.
“California is facing massive federal healthcare cuts—$20 to $30 billion a year for the next five years," said Suzanne Jimenez, chief of staff of Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers West, a top supporter of the proposed ballot initiative.
"The billionaire tax would raise dollar-for-dollar emergency funding of $100 billion through a one-time 5% tax on the worldwide net worth of California’s billionaires," Jimenez added. "Any reductions in state income tax would be negligible in comparison to the billions that will be raised by the billionaire tax. And billionaires would still be taxed at lower rates than were in effect under President Reagan."
"We need a tax system that demands that the billionaire class finally pays their fair share of taxes."
Last week, California Attorney General Rob Bonta formally issued the title and summary of the proposed initiative as prominent billionaires—including Peter Thiel and Larry Page—threatened to leave the state over the measure, which would apply retroactively to those living in California as of January 1, 2026. Thiel is facing a potential $1.2 billion tax, while Page would have to pay roughly $12 billion.
The New York Times reported last week that Newsom, "who has been close with people like Mr. Page, is raising money for a committee to oppose the measure."
"The committee received a $100,000 donation from the venture capitalist Ron Conway in November, according to state campaign finance records," the Times added.
Other lawmakers from the state are supporting the measure, including US Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who represents Silicon Valley.
Sanders, in his Tuesday statement, applauded Khanna, saying he is "absolutely right to support this effort."
"From a moral, economic, and political perspective, our nation will not thrive when so few own so much while so many have so little," said Sanders. "We need a tax system that demands that the billionaire class finally pays their fair share of taxes."
Keep ReadingShow Less
In Blow to 'Fetal Personhood' Push, Alabamian Serving 18 Years After Stillbirth Gets New Trial
"I'm hopeful that my new trial will end with me being freed, because I simply lost my pregnancy at home because of an infection," said Brooke Shoemaker, who has already spent five years in prison.
Dec 30, 2025
While Brooke Shoemaker and a rights group representing her in court are celebrating this week after an Alabama judge threw out her conviction and ordered a new trial, her case is also drawing attention to the dangers of "fetal personhood" policies.
"Laws and judicial decisions that grant fetuses—and in some cases embryos and fertilized eggs—the same legal rights and status given to born people, such as the right to life, is 'fetal personhood,'" explains the website of the group, Pregnancy Justice. "When fetuses have rights, this fundamentally changes the legal rights and status of all pregnant people, opening the door to criminalization, surveillance, and obstetric violence."
Since the US Supreme Court's Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization ruling ended the federal right to abortion in 2022, far-right activists and politicians have ramped up their fight for fetal personhood policies. Pregnancy Justice found that in the two years after the decision, the number of people who faced criminal charges related to their pregnancies hit its highest level in US history.
Shoemaker's case began even earlier, in 2017, when she experienced a stillbirth at home about 24-26 weeks into her pregnancy. Paramedics brought her to a hospital, where she disclosed using methamphetamine while pregnant. Although a medical examiner could not determine whether the drug use caused the stillbirth—and, according to Pregnancy Justice, "her placenta showed clear signs of infection"—a jury found her guilty of chemical endangerment of a minor. She's served five years of her 18-year sentence.
"After becoming Ms. Shoemaker's counsel in 2024, Pregnancy Justice filed a petition alongside Andrew Stanley of the Samford Law Office requesting a hearing based on new evidence about the infection that led to the demise of Ms. Shoemaker's pregnancy, leading the judge to agree with Pregnancy Justice's medical witness and to vacate the conviction," the rights group said in a Monday statement.
Lee County Circuit Judge Jeffrey Tickal wrote in his December 22 order that "should the facts had been known, and brought before the jury, the results probably would have been different."
Shoemaker said Monday that "after years of fighting, I'm thankful that I'm finally being heard, and I pray that my next Christmas will be spent at home with my children and parents... I'm hopeful that my new trial will end with me being freed, because I simply lost my pregnancy at home because of an infection. I loved and wanted my baby, and I never deserved this."
Although Tickal's decision came three days before Christmas, the 45-year-old mother of four remained behind bars for the holiday last week, as the state appeals.
"While we are thrilled with the judge's decision, we are outraged that Ms. Shoemaker is still behind bars when she should have been home for Christmas," said former Pregnancy Justice senior staff attorney Emma Roth. "She was convicted based on feelings, not facts. Pregnancy Justice will continue to fight on appeal and prove that pregnancies end tragically for reasons far beyond a mother's control. Women like Ms. Shoemaker should be allowed to grieve their loss without fearing arrest."
AL.com reported Tuesday that "Alabama is unique in that it is one of only three states, along with Oklahoma and South Carolina, where the state Supreme Court allows the application of criminal laws meant to punish child abuse or child endangerment to be applied in the context of pregnancy."
However, similar cases aren't restricted to those states. Pregnancy Justice found that in the two years following Dobbs, "prosecutors initiated cases in 16 states: Alabama, California, Florida, Idaho, Kentucky, Mississippi, Nebraska, New Mexico, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. While prosecutions were brought in all of these states, to date, the majority of the reported cases occurred in Alabama (192) and Oklahoma (112)."
This is fantastic news!!I wrote in my book how the medical examiner ruled the cause of the stillbirth "undetermined," but the coroner (who lacks medical training) instead listed cause of stillbirth as mom's meth usage on the fetal death certificate.
[image or embed]
— Jill Wieber Lens (@jillwieberlens.bsky.social) December 30, 2025 at 12:25 PM
"Prosecutors used a variety of criminal statutes to charge the defendants in these cases, often bringing more than one charge against an individual defendant," the group's report continues. "In total, the 412 defendants faced 441 charges for conduct related to pregnancy, pregnancy loss, or birth. The majority of charges (398/441) asserted some form of child abuse, neglect, or endangerment."
"As has been the case for decades, nearly all the cases alleged that the pregnant person used a substance during pregnancy," the report adds. "In 268 cases, substance use was the only allegation made against the pregnant person. In the midst of a wide-ranging crisis in maternal healthcare and despite maternal healthcare deserts across the country, prosecutors or police argued that pregnant people's failure to obtain prenatal care was evidence of a crime. This was the case in 29 of 412 cases."
When the publication was released last year, Pregnancy Justice president Lourdes A. Rivera said in a statement that "the Dobbs decision emboldened prosecutors to develop ever more aggressive strategies to prosecute pregnancy, leading to the most pregnancy-related criminal cases on record."
"This is directly tied to the radical legal doctrine of 'fetal personhood,' which grants full legal rights to an embryo or fetus, turning them into victims of crimes perpetrated by pregnant women," Rivera argued. "To turn the tide on criminalization, we need to separate healthcare from the criminal legal system and to change policy and practices to ensure that pregnant people can safely access the healthcare they need, without fear of criminalization. This report demonstrates that, in post-Dobbs America, being pregnant places people at increased risk, not only of dire health outcomes, but of arrest."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'A Wake-Up Call': Scientists Find 2025 Among Hottest Years on Record
"2025 was full of stark reminders of the urgent need to cut climate pollution, invest in clean energy, and tackle the climate crisis now."
Dec 30, 2025
Climate change driven by human burning of fossil fuels helped make 2025 one of the hottest years ever recorded, a scientific report published Monday affirmed, prompting renewed calls for urgent action to combat the worsening planetary emergency.
Researchers at World Weather Attribution (WWA) found that "although 2025 was slightly cooler than 2024 globally, it was still far hotter than almost any other year on record," with only two other recent years recording a higher average worldwide temperature.
For the first time, the three-year running average will end the year above the 1.5°C warming goal, relative to preindustrial levels, established a decade ago under the landmark Paris climate agreement.
"Global temperatures remained very high and significant harm from human-induced climate change is very real," the report continues. "It is not a future threat, but a present-day reality."
"Across the 22 extreme events we analyzed in depth, heatwaves, floods, storms, droughts, and wildfires claimed lives, destroyed communities, and wiped out crops," the researchers wrote. "Together, these events paint a stark picture of the escalating risks we face in a warming world."
The WWA researchers' findings tracked with the findings of United Nations experts and others that 2025 would be the third-hottest year on record.
According to the WWA study:
This year highlighted again, in stark terms, how unfairly the consequences of human-induced climate change are distributed, consistently hitting those who are already marginalized within their societies the hardest. But the inequity goes deeper: The scientific evidence base itself is uneven. Many of our studies in 2025 focused on heavy rainfall events in the Global South, and time and again we found that gaps in observational data and the reliance on climate models developed primarily for the Global North prevented us from drawing confident conclusions. This unequal foundation in climate science mirrors the broader injustices of the climate crisis.
The events of 2025 make it clear that while we urgently need to transition away from fossil fuels, we also must invest in adaptation measures. Many deaths and other impacts could be prevented with timely action. But events like Hurricane Melissa highlight the limits of preparedness and adaptation: When an intense storm strikes small islands such as Jamaica and other Caribbean nations, even relatively high levels of preparedness cannot prevent extreme losses and damage. This underscores that adaptation alone is not enough; rapid emission reductions remain essential to avoid the worst impacts of climate change.
“If we don’t stop burning fossil fuels very, very, quickly, very soon, it will be very hard to keep that goal” of 1.5°C, WWA co-founder Friederike Otto—who is also an Imperial College London climate scientist—told the Associated Press. “The science is increasingly clear.”
The WWA study's publication comes a month after this year's United Nations Climate Change Conference—or COP30—ended in Brazil with little meaningful progress toward a transition from fossil fuels.
Responding to the new study, Climate Action Campaign director Margie Alt said in a statement that "2025 was full of stark reminders of the urgent need to cut climate pollution, invest in clean energy, and tackle the climate crisis now."
"Today’s report is a wake-up call," Alt continued. "Unfortunately, [US President Donald] Trump and Republicans controlling Congress spent the past year making climate denial official US policy and undermining progress to stave off the worst of the climate crisis. Their reckless polluters-first agenda rolled back critical climate protections and attacked and undermined the very agencies responsible for helping Americans prepare for and recover from increasingly dangerous disasters."
"Across the country, people are standing up and demanding their leaders do better to protect our families from climate change and extreme weather," Alt added. "It's time those in power started listening.”
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


