

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Dan Beeton, 202-239-1460
The
National Democratic Institute (NDI) and the International Republican
Institute (IRI), organizations that receive funding from the U.S. State
Department, are planning on sending delegations to observe the November
29 elections in Honduras, according to a statement issued by Republican
Senator Richard Lugar. The IRI is a group that has supported the ouster
of democratically elected presidents in Haiti and Venezuela in recent
years. Both groups are apparently planning to assist with observation of the elections,
despite the fact that the electoral process will be effectively
controlled by thousands of military troops and police officers - the
same forces who have committed innumerable human rights violations,
including killings, rapes, beatings and thousands of detentions, since
the June 28 coup d'etat.
"I am
surprised to see NDI joining the International Republican Institute in
its efforts to legitimize another coup," Center for Economic and Policy
Research Co-Director Mark Weisbrot said. "NDI has generally been less willing to support coups and anti-democratic regimes than has its Republican counterpart."
Weisbrot noted that NDI steered clear of IRI's involvement in the
ouster of democratically elected President Jean-Bertrand Aristide in
2004, which became the subject of controversy following a major 2006 investigative report in the New York Times. When IRI publicly applauded the 2002 coup d'etat against Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez in a press release, the NDI remained silent. The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) - the primary funder of both IRI and NDI - expressed its disagreement with IRI for voicing its support for an "unconstitutional" action.
NDI's plans to observe the elections have been surprising because
Democratic leaders in Congress, including Senator John Kerry and
Representative Howard Berman, have repeatedly expressed their opposition to the coup, and other congressional Democrats have urged President Obama not to recognize elections held under the coup regime.
Richard Trumka, President of the AFL-CIO, has written
that ongoing human rights abuses under the coup regime, including
continued repression of trade unionists, makes it impossible to hold
free and fair elections. Trumka called on the U.S. government to oppose
national elections in Honduras unless President Zelaya is reinstated,
in a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton this month.
An editorial in a leading Honduran newspaper, El Tiempo,
on Friday noted the electoral process will be controlled by the coup
regime: "12,000 troops, 14,000 police and 5,000 reservists are fully in
direct control of the polling," it notes, opining that free and fair
elections are impossible due to the current, ongoing human rights
abuses. "Until now, the atmosphere is totally contrary to a democratic
electoral process, and what prevails is a climate of political
oppression," the editorial states.
"The IRI has become notorious throughout Latin America for its
sometimes rogue actions that have threatened to seriously damage
U.S.-Latin American relations," Weisbrot said. "NDI would do well to
exercise caution in following IRI's lead on Honduras."
Weisbrot noted that in addition to its support for the coups in Haiti and Venezuela, IRI organized a conference
in Brazil in 2005 to promote political reforms that would undermine the
Workers' Party - the political party of President Lula da Silva.
When the creation of the NED, IRI, and NDI was first being publicly
discussed, in 1983, the Washington Post reported: "The CIA used to fund
covertly much of what the endowment plan envisions, such as the
publication of books and articles 'consistent' with democratic ideals.
But many of these were halted in 1967 following public disclosure of
the CIA's activities."
The Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) was established in 1999 to promote democratic debate on the most important economic and social issues that affect people's lives. In order for citizens to effectively exercise their voices in a democracy, they should be informed about the problems and choices that they face. CEPR is committed to presenting issues in an accurate and understandable manner, so that the public is better prepared to choose among the various policy options.
(202) 293-5380"Trump’s approach would lead to more medical bankruptcies, more unaffordable care, and more Americans dying unnecessarily in the richest nation on Earth."
President Donald Trump and his Republican allies have finally started talking about proposals to fix America's healthcare system, but Sen. Bernie Sanders so far has found their ideas to be severely lacking.
In an op-ed published by the Boston Globe on Thursday, Sanders (I-Vt.) denounced the GOP healthcare plans as "absurd" ideas that "would take our already broken healthcare system and make it even worse."
Sanders then ripped apart Trump's plan to simply send Americans a lump sum of money that they could use to negotiate their own healthcare package, which he said would be an "absolute disaster."
"At a time when more than 60 percent of our people live paycheck to paycheck, a $6,500 check is meaningless in the face of real medical costs," he argued. "How is someone who needs a $150,000 cancer treatment going to get the care they need with a $6,500 check? What is a pregnant woman supposed to do with a $6,500 check when the average cost of childbirth in America is over $20,000? How is someone who has a heart attack going to be able to afford a $50,000 hospital stay with just $6,500?"
All of this, Sanders continued, would simply cause more people in the US to go bankrupt from trying to afford their medical expenses, which is a situation that does not occur in any nation that has universal healthcare.
"Trump’s approach would lead to more medical bankruptcies, more unaffordable care, and more Americans dying unnecessarily in the richest nation on Earth," he said.
Sanders argued that the long-term solution for the US healthcare crisis is a single-payer Medicare for All system that he has been proposing for his entire political career.
However, he also acknowledged that this proposal currently lacks support in the US Congress, and he pitched some alternative ideas to serve as a bridge to truly universal healthcare, including extending the enhanced tax credits first passed in 2021 as part of the American Rescue Plan; repealing the nearly $1 trillion in cuts to Medicaid that were passed by Republicans earlier this year in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act; and expanding Medicare to cover dental, vision, and hearing care.
Sanders also challenged the president to support banning stock buybacks and dividends for health insurance companies, which he called a waste of resources that should be devoted to patients' care.
"The American people know that our healthcare system is broken," Sanders concluded. "With the country’s increased focus on health, Democrats must be strong in rallying the American people around a rational healthcare system that works for all, not just insurance and drug companies."
Sanders on Thursday made similar points in an op-ed published by Fox News in which he ripped the GOP for slashing Medicaid funding simply so Big Tech titans like Tesla CEO Elon Musk could have more money to "build millions of robots that will, by the way, decimate good-paying jobs throughout our country."
Earlier this week, the senator also sent a letter urging Democrats in Congress to support the policies outlined in his new opinion pieces.
"Normalizing the use of military troops for domestic law enforcement sets a dangerous precedent," said DC's attorney general. "This federal overreach is not normal or legal."
A federal judge ruled Thursday that President Donald Trump's deployment of more than 2,000 National Guard troops to police Washington, DC, is illegal and must come to an end.
Over objections from city officials, Trump ordered the troops to flood the nation's capital in August to deter what he claimed was an unstoppable crime wave, even though crime was falling precipitously and was at a 30-year low.
Federal District Judge Jia Cobb, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, wrote that the Trump administration “exceeded the bounds of their authority” and “acted contrary to law” by deploying the National Guard "for nonmilitary, crime-deterrence missions in the absence of a request from the city’s civil authorities."
She wrote that while Trump is the commander-in-chief of the armed forces, Trump's legal authority to deploy troops around the country is subject to limits by Congress, especially in DC, where it has the ultimate authority under the Constitution.
She wrote that the court "rejects defendants’ fly-by assertion of constitutional power, finding that such a broad reading of the president’s Article II authority would erase Congress’ role in governing the district and its National Guard."
Cobb also said that the Pentagon lacked statutory authority to deploy more than 1,000 out-of-state National Guard members to DC. She wrote that "the district’s exercise of sovereign powers within its jurisdiction is irreparably harmed by defendants’ actions in deploying the guards."
While finding the administration's actions illegal, Cobb said it will not be required to pull back troops immediately. She gave the administration until December 11 to file an appeal.
“There is generally no public interest in the perpetuation of unlawful agency action,” Cobb concluded. “There is a substantial public interest in having governmental agencies abide by the federal laws that govern their existence and operations.”
The ruling follows a lawsuit in early September from the office of DC Attorney General Brian Schwalb.
"The court has ruled that the National Guard deployment to DC is illegal and granted a preliminary injunction," Schwalb said after the ruling was handed down. "As we made clear from the start: The US military should not police American citizens on American soil. This is a victory for DC, home rule, and American democracy."
The ruling comes amid legal battles over Trump's moves to deploy the National Guard in other US cities. The US Supreme Court is expected to soon weigh in on his deployment in Chicago, even as some troops sent to Illinois are headed home.
"Normalizing the use of military troops for domestic law enforcement sets a dangerous precedent," Schwalb continued. "No president should be empowered to disregard states’ independence and deploy troops anywhere—with no check on their military power. This federal overreach is not normal or legal."
"Between the booths flooding and a fire breaking out in the Blue Zone, feels like maybe someone is trying to tell us something at COP30," said one journalist.
Delegates at the United Nations Climate Change Conference being held in Belém, Brazil were forced to evacuate after a fire broke out at the Hangar Convention and Exhibition Center on Thursday.
Brazilian government officials told BBC that the fire, which broke out early in the afternoon, is now under control.
BBC climate editor Justin Rowlatt, who was covering the conference, described seeing "huge columns of smoke rising up into the air through the hole that's been burnt in the top of the conference center," and said that there was "a huge panic, people have been running out of here."
#COP30 is on fire pic.twitter.com/VWAIhjVrqm
— Mike Szabo / @szabotage.bsky.social (@MikeSzaboCP) November 20, 2025
Imagens obtidas pelo @Metropoles mostram o momento exato do início do fogo na COP30.
Foi durante um evento da delegação africana. pic.twitter.com/5A6J3NAr3I
— Sam Pancher (@SamPancher) November 20, 2025
Officials do not yet know what caused the fire, but the Guardian reports that Brazilian Minister of Tourism Celso Sabino cast doubt on any suspicions that the blaze could have been set deliberately.
"You’d have to be a really awful person to set fire to a COP," he said.
Some climate activists argued that the fire at COP30 could be seen as an ill omen for the conference's outcome, especially given criticisms over the conference being packed to the brim with fossil fuel lobbyists.
US-based activist Jes Vesconte told the Guardian that the COP30 blaze was "a potent metaphor" for what's been happening at the conference.
"As capitalist fossil fuel companies, imperialist countries, and militarist powers block the talks here (or in abstentia in the case of the US)," Vesconte said, "they are putting profits over planet and people, profiteering off ecocide, genocide, and countless deaths, at the expense of all life on Earth, and pouring fuel on the fire of the burning planet."
Emily Pontecorvo, staff writer at Heatmap News, also picked up on the symbolism of the fire.
"A literal fire has erupted in the middle of the United Nations conference devoted to stopping the planet from burning," she wrote in a post on Bluesky.
Climate reporter Amy Westervelt noted that the fire wasn't the only disaster to befall COP30 this week.
"Between the booths flooding and a fire breaking out in the Blue Zone, feels like maybe someone is trying to tell us something at COP30," she observed.
A report released last week by the Kick Big Polluters Out (KBPO) coalition said it tallied the “largest ever attendance share” for fossil fuel lobbyists, dimming hopes of reaching a breakthrough agreement to curb emissions. In total, KBPO counted 1,602 fossil fuel lobbyists at the climate summit, representing roughly 1 out every 25 participants at this year's conference.