

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Miyoko Sakashita, Center for Biological Diversity, (415)
436-9682 x 308
Eric Glitzenstein, Wildlife Advocacy Project, (202) 588-5206
Pat Rose or Katie Tripp, Save the Manatee Club, (407)
539-0990
Elizabeth Fleming, Defenders of Wildlife, (727) 823-3888
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
announced today that new critical habitat protections may be warranted for the Florida manatee. The
notice, published in today's Federal Register, is in response to a
petition to revise the manatee's critical habitat filed by the Center for
Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife, Save the Manatee Club, and the
Wildlife Advocacy Project. According to the petition, manatees need new
protected habitat because a vast body of science has developed about what areas
are essential to the survival of manatees since the critical habitat was
originally designated in 1976.
Patti Thompson, a leading manatee biologist who co-authored
the petition for the Wildlife Advocacy Project, said she is "pleased that
the Service is moving forward with this long overdue strengthening of the
manatee's habitat designation. Our petition is designed not only to update the
geographic areas using the latest available scientific information, but also to
address the absence in the current designation of required 'constituent
elements' that must be protected, such as warm water, travel corridors, and
food sources. Although these omissions were understandable when manatee
critical habitat was first designated more than 30 years ago, it is vitally
important that the designation now be based on the best science
available."
"Habitat protection is the key to ensuring the recovery
of Florida's
endangered manatees," said Miyoko Sakashita, oceans program director at
the Center for Biological Diversity. "Today's announcement is an
important step toward reducing threats to manatees and preserving Florida's natural
heritage."
The Florida
manatee was one of the first species listed under the Endangered Species Act
and among the first to have critical habitat designated for protection.
These protections have helped slow the decline of manatees and promoted their
conservation, but manatees still face a host of threats, and new habitat
protections are urgently needed.
"Save the Manatee Club looks forward to working
closely with the Fish and Wildlife Service to undertake this essential and long
overdue effort to identify and protect habitat critical to the manatee's
long term survival," said Pat Rose, executive director of Save the
Manatee Club.
Critical habitat designation is meant to identify the areas
that are essential for the manatee's conservation and recovery.
"Updating the critical habitat designation will ensure that the best
available science is used to protect manatee habitat," said Elizabeth
Fleming, Florida
representative of Defenders of Wildlife.
Manatee habitat is threatened by a variety of factors, such
as coastal development; propeller scarring and seagrass damage; dams and other
water control structures; and pollution and marine debris, including derelict
fishing gear. According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, more than seven
times the sustainable level of Florida's
manatees are killed each year by human activities, including vessel collisions.
Today's announcement means that the Fish and Wildlife
Service will conduct a full review of scientific information to determine
whether additional critical habitat protections are needed. Critical habitat
designation is an important layer of protection that means that any federal
activity conducted in the area must undergo environmental review to ensure that
it does not harm or destroy the manatee's habitat. A rule proposing new
critical habitat is due by December 19, 2009, a year from the date the petition
was filed.
The Fish and Wildlife Service is soliciting information and
accepting comments on manatee critical habitat for 30 days.
###
The Center for Biological Diversity is a national,
nonprofit conservation organization with more than 225,000 members and online
activists dedicated to the protection of endangered species and wild places.
For more information, visit www.biologicaldiversity.org.
Defenders of Wildlife is dedicated to
the protection of all native animals and plants in their natural communities. With more than 1 million
members and activists, Defenders of Wildlife is a leading advocate for
innovative solutions to safeguard our wildlife heritage for generations to
come. For more information, visit www.defenders.org
Save the Manatee Club was established
in 1981 to protect manatees and their aquatic habitat for future generations
and today, it is the world's leading manatee conservation
organization. The Club is a membership-based, national nonprofit
organization that promotes public awareness and education; sponsors local and
international scientific research and rescue, rehabilitation, and release
efforts; and advocates for the conservation of manatees and their essential
habitat based on the best available scientific data. For more information,
please visit www.savethemanatee.org
The Wildlife Advocacy
Project is a non-profit advocacy organization that seeks to
complement and supplement the efforts of grassroots wildlife protection
activists to win long-lasting conservation benefits for animals and the
planet. It pursues its mission through publication education and
science-based advocacy, and urges recognition and respect for the innate wild
nature of all wildlife, whether in the wild or held in captivity. For more
information, visit www.wildlifeadvocacy.org.
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey said "bare due diligence" would have exposed ICE officers' falsehoods.
Video footage obtained by The New York Times has exposed lies told by two federal immigration enforcement agents about the circumstances leading up to a non-fatal shooting in Minneapolis that occurred on January 14.
According to a Monday report from the Times, the video directly contradicts claims made by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials that they were attacked by assailants armed with a shovel and a broom for around three minutes before the agents opened fire and wounded one of the attackers.
"Instead, the confrontation depicted in the video lasts about 12 seconds and shows two men struggling with the agent," reported the Times. "It shows no sustained attack with a shovel."
Federal prosecutors had initially pursued assault charges against Venezuelan national Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis, who was shot in the leg by the ICE officers during the January confrontation, and fellow Venezuelan national Alfredo Aljorna.
However, the government abruptly dropped charges against the two men in February, and ICE Acting Director Todd Lyons acknowledged that two federal officers appear “to have made untruthful statements” about the incident.
The Times noted that the government had access to the video of the shooting hours after it took place.
However, one source told the paper that prosecutors didn't watch the video until three weeks after they filed charges against Sosa-Celis and Aljorna, and instead relied on "the ICE agent’s statement and an FBI agent’s affidavit describing the footage."
This revelation prompted a rebuke from Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, who told the Times that "bare due diligence would have shown that the agents were lying."
Trump administration officials have come under fire in recent weeks for lying about shootings involving federal immigration officials, such as when former US Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem falsely claimed that slain Minneapolis intensive care nurse Alex Pretti was aiming “to inflict maximum damage on individuals and to kill law enforcement."
In reality, video footage showed Pretti never drew his handgun during his confrontation with federal immigration officers, while also clearly showing that officers disarmed him before they opened fire.
Noem also falsely claimed that slain ICE observer Renee Good had attempted "an act of domestic terrorism" by trying to run over a federal immigration officer with her car, even though footage clearly showed Good turning her vehicle away from the officer in an attempt to get away from the scene.
"This is an express public incitement for war crimes and crimes against humanity—and, I would say, for genocide," said a spokesperson for Iran's Foreign Ministry.
Iranian officials on Monday warned US President Donald Trump that his name will be "etched in history as a supreme war criminal" if he follows through with his threat to wage total war on Iran's civilian infrastructure, including bridges and power plants.
Kazem Gharibabadi, Iran's deputy foreign minister, wrote on social media following Trump's Easter-morning outburst that "threats to attack power plants and bridges (civilian infrastructure) constitute war crimes under Article 8(2)(b) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions of 1977 (Article 52)."
"The president of the United States, in his capacity as the highest-ranking official of his country, has openly threatened to commit war crimes—an act that entails his individual criminal responsibility before the International Criminal Court and any competent national court," Gharibabadi added, vowing that Iran "will deliver a decisive, immediate, and regret-inducing response" to any attack.
Esmail Baghaei, a spokesperson for Iran's Foreign Ministry, said Trump's threats are "an indication of a criminal mindset."
"This is an express public incitement for war crimes and crimes against humanity—and, I would say, for genocide," Baghaei said in an interview on Sunday. "Threatening to attack a country's critical infrastructure, energy sector, it would mean that you want to put at risk the whole population."
Absolute bombshell. Iran's Spokesperson Esmail Baghaei accuses the Trump administration of a criminal mindset and public incitement for genocide. Threatening a nation's critical infrastructure puts the entire population at risk. The White House has completely abandoned morality. pic.twitter.com/HcBZGZho5p
— Furkan Gözükara (@FurkanGozukara) April 5, 2026
The US and Israel have already done significant damage to Iran's civilian infrastructure. The country's deputy health minister said Monday that more than 360 healthcare, education, and research centers have been hit by US-Israeli strikes, and dozens of medics have been killed since the bombing began on February 28.
But Trump on Sunday threatened an indiscriminate assault, telling Fox News that if the Iranians "don't make a deal and fast," he is "considering blowing everything up and taking the oil."
"You're going to see bridges and power plants dropping all over their country," the president said, setting a new deadline of 8 pm ET for the complete reopening of the Strait of Hormuz.
Trump's remarks came after he published a deranged post on his Truth Social platform demanding that Iran "open the Fuckin' Strait, you crazy bastards, or you'll be living in Hell."
Analysts and lawmakers in the US echoed Iranian officials' warnings that Trump's threatened attacks would constitute war crimes.
"Trump's advisers are telling him to hit civilian sites because it will cause unrest and potentially topple the regime. But just think about the insanity of this plan: kill tens of thousands of civilians in order to cause a national panic," US Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) wrote. "Bombing to induce political panic IS A WAR CRIME."
Dylan Williams, vice president for government affairs at the Center for International Policy, said that "any lawmaker who votes for supplemental funding for the war on Iran or against war powers resolutions to end it will be fully complicit in the war crimes threatened here, as well as those already committed by this unhinged and unfit Commander in Chief."
The US president's renewed threats came amid reports of a diplomatic effort, mediated in part by Pakistan, to enact a 45-day ceasefire to provide space for a lasting resolution to the war.
Axios reported that the talks are seen as "the only chance to prevent a dramatic escalation in the war that will include massive strikes on Iranian civilian infrastructure and a retaliation against energy and water facilities in the Gulf states."
“She was so long in there," said the child's father. "I just think that if they would have moved faster, nothing like that would have happened.”
President Donald Trump's Department of Health and Human Services and its office in charge of providing care for unaccompanied immigrant children have been named in a civil lawsuit alleging that a three-year-old was sexually abused after immigration officials separated her from her mother at the US border, while her father waited for months to be reunited with the child.
The girl crossed the border with her mother last September but was separated from her mother after the woman was charged with making false statements, according to The Associated Press. She was sent to the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), which operates under HHS and places children in foster or shelter settings.
When Trump took office for his second term in January 2025, the average time a child was under ORR's care was 37 days, but as of February children were remaining in shelter or foster settings for an average of 200 days.
The process through which ORR releases children to the care of their parents or sponsors has grown more arduous under the Trump administration, and in the case of the three-year-old, she waited for five months in foster care while the government repeatedly told her father it couldn't make an appointment for him to be fingerprinted.
Court documents state that during that time, the girl reported being sexually abused by an older child who was living in the same foster setting in Harlingen, Texas. She told a caregiver that she had been abused multiple times and had suffered bleeding as a result.
ORR only told her father that there had been an "accident" in foster care. Officials did not tell him the result of a forensic exam and interview of his child, but the older child accused of the abuse was removed from the foster setting.
“I asked them, ‘What happened? I want to know. I’m her father. I want to know what’s going on,’ and they just told me that they couldn’t give me more information, that it was under investigation,” said the father, who is a legal permanent US resident and spoke to the AP anonymously to protect his daughter's identity. “She was so long in there... I just think that if they would have moved faster, nothing like that would have happened.”
The Trump administration has claimed its new restrictions for sponsors and family members seeking custody of their children who are in ORR's care have prevented traffickers from illegally bringing children into the US and have kept unaccompanied minors safe.
Family members like the three-year-old's father are required to submit to income verification, home inspections, and DNA testing.
The new procedures were immediately followed by a drastic jump in child detention times, according to the AP.
Legal advocates have filed lawsuits challenging the new restrictions on the grounds that they can cause prolonged detention for children. Lauren Fisher Flores, the legal director of the American Bar Association’s ProBar project and the attorney representing the girl's family, told the AP that the organization has worked on eight habeas corpus petitions on behalf of children who have been detained for an average of 255 days.
In the girl's case, the government finally allowed the father to be fingerprinted after attorneys sent a letter to ORR, but still did not provide a timeline for his daughter's release. His lawyers then filed a habeas petition, prompting the government to release the child to her father.
During the legal challenge, the father learned the details of what ORR had called an "accident" that happened in the foster setting.
“To have your child abused while in the government’s care, to not understand what has happened or how to protect them, to not even be told about the abuse, it is unimaginable,” Fisher Flores told the AP. “Children deserve safety and they belong with their parents.”