August, 17 2009, 12:37pm EDT
Iraq: Stop Killings for Homosexual Conduct
No Protection by Authorities from Widening Murder Campaign
BEIRUT
Iraqi militias are carrying out a spreading campaign of torture and
murder against men suspected of homosexual conduct, or of not being
"manly" enough, and Iraq authorities have done nothing to stop the
killing, Human Rights Watch said in a report released today. Human
Rights Watch called on Iraq's government to act urgently to rein in
militia abuses, punish the perpetrators, and stop a new resurgence of
violence that threatens all Iraqis' safety.
The 67-page report, "'They Want Us Exterminated': Murder, Torture, Sexual Orientation and Gender in Iraq,"
documents a wide-reaching campaign of extrajudicial executions,
kidnappings, and torture of gay men that began in early 2009. The
killings began in the vast Baghdad neighborhood of Sadr City, a
stronghold of Moqtada al-Sadr's Mahdi Army militia, and spread to many
cities across Iraq. Mahdi Army spokesmen have promoted fears about the
"third sex" and the "feminization" of Iraq men, and suggested that
militia action was the remedy. Some people told Human Rights Watch that
Iraqi security forces have colluded and joined in the killing.
"Iraq's leaders are supposed to defend all Iraqis, not abandon them
to armed agents of hate," said Scott Long, director of the Lesbian,
Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Rights Program at Human Rights Watch.
"Turning a blind eye to torture and murder threatens the rights and
life of every Iraqi."
Silence and stigma surrounding sexuality and gender in Iraq make
placing a precise figure on the number killed almost impossible, but
indications are that hundreds of men may have died.
One man told Human Rights Watch that militiamen kidnapped and killed
his partner of 10 years in April: "It was late one night, and they came
to take my partner at his parents' home. Four armed men barged into the
house, masked and wearing black. They asked for him by name; they
insulted him and took him in front of his parents. ... He was found in
the neighborhood the day after. They had thrown his corpse in the
garbage. His genitals were cut off and a piece of his throat was ripped
out."
The killers invade homes and pick people up in the street, witnesses
and survivors said, interrogating them before murdering them to extract
names of other potential victims. They practice grotesque tortures,
including gluing men's anuses shut as punishment. Human Rights Watch
spoke to doctors who said that hospitals and morgues have received
dozens of mutilated bodies, living and dead.
"Murder and torture are no way to enforce morality," said Rasha
Moumneh, Middle East and North Africa researcher at Human Rights Watch.
"These killings point to the continuing and lethal failure of Iraq's
post-occupation authorities to establish the rule of law and protect
their citizens."
Consensual homosexual conduct between adults is not a criminal
offense under Iraqi law. Although many militias in Iraq claim to be
enforcers of Islamic law, the Human Rights Watch report also shows how
the killings - committed without evidence or trial, on the basis of
prejudice and whim - violate standards in Sharia law for legality,
proof, and privacy.
International human rights law forbids all forms of torture and
inhuman treatment and guarantees the right to life, including the right
to effective state protection. In its 1994 decision in the landmark
case of Toonen v. Australia, the United Nations Human Rights
Committee held that the protections against unequal treatment in the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) extend to
sexual orientation as a protected status.
The report also documents how fears that Iraqi men's masculinity is
under threat propel the killings as much as prejudices about sexuality.
Many men told Human Rights Watch that their parents or brothers have
threatened them with honor killings because their "unmanly" behavior
threatens the reputation of the family or tribe. In a provision left
over from the Saddam Hussein era, Iraqi law allows mitigated penalties
for crimes committed "with honorable motives." This exception
encourages gender-based violence.
Many Iraqis who fear being attacked have sought safety in
surrounding countries, but those countries are no safe haven, the
report says. Consensual homosexual conduct is criminalized in most of
these countries, and prejudice based on sexual orientation and gender
identity fosters violence and discrimination in all of them. Human
Rights Watch urges the United Nations High Commission for Refugees
(UNHCR), as well as governments that accept Iraqi refugees, to offer
rapid resettlement to these endangered people.
Accounts from the report (all names are aliases, to protect the speakers)
"[The killers'] measuring rod to judge people is who they have sex
with. It is not by their conscience, it is not by their conduct or
their values, it is who they have sex with. The cheapest thing in Iraq
is a human being, a human life. It is cheaper than an animal, than a
pair of used-up batteries you buy on the street. Especially people like
us. ... I can't believe I'm here talking to you because it's all just
been repressed, repressed, repressed. For years it's been like that -
if I walk down the street, I would feel everyone pointing at me. I feel
as if I'm dying all the time. And now this, in the last month - I don't
understand what we did to deserve this. They want us exterminated. All
the violence and all this hatred: the people who are suffering from it
don't deserve it."
- Hamid, in Iraq, April 24, 2009
"We've been hearing about this, about gay men being killed, for more
than a month. It's like background noise now, every day. The stories
started spreading in February about this campaign against gay people by
the Mahdi Army: everyone was talking about it, I was hearing about it
from my straight friends. In a coffee shop in Karada, on the streets in
Harithiya [Baghdad neighborhoods], they were talking about it. I didn't
worry at first. My friends and I, we look extremely masculine, there is
nothing visibly "feminine" about us. None of us ever, ever believed
this would happen to us. But then at the end of March we heard on the
street that 30 men had been killed already."
- Idris, in Iraq, April 24, 2009
"They did many things to us, the Mahdi Army. ... They kidnapped [my
partner] for six days. He will not talk about what they did to him.
There were bruises on his side as if he was dragged on the street. They
did things to him he can't describe, even to me. They wrote in the dust
on the windshield of his car: 'Death to the people of Lot and to
collaborators.' They sent us veiled threats in text messages: 'You are
on the list.' They sent him a piece of paper in an envelope, to his
home: there were three bullets wrapped in plastic, of different size.
The note said, 'Which one do you want in your heart?' ... I want to be
a regular person, lead a normal life, walk around the city, drink
coffee on the street. But because of who I am, I can't. There is no way
out."
- Mohammad, in Iraq, April 21, 2009
"At 10 a.m., [Ministry of Interior officers] cuffed my hands behind
my back. Then they tied a rope around my legs, and they hung me upside
down from a hook in the ceiling, from morning till sunset. I passed
out. I was stripped down to my underwear while I hung upside down. They
cut me down that night, but they gave me no water or food. Next day,
they told me to put my clothes back on and they took me to the
investigating officer. He said, 'You like that? We're going to do that
to you more and more, until you confess.' Confess to what? I asked. 'To
the work you do, to the organization you belong to, and that you are a tanta'
[queen]. For days, there were severe beatings, and constant humiliation
and insults. ... It was the same form of abuse every day. They beat me
all over my body; when they had me hanging upside down, they used me
like a punching bag. ... They used electric prods all over my body.
Then they raped me. Over three days. The first day, 15 of them raped
me; the second day, six; the third day, four. There was a bag on my
head every time."
- Nuri, on April 15 and 27, 2009
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
'This Is Genocide,' Amnesty International Says of Israel's Death Machine in Gaza
"Our damning findings must serve as a wake-up call to the international community," said Agnès Callamard, the group's secretary-general. "It must stop now."
Dec 05, 2024
The leading human rights group Amnesty International said late Wednesday what United Nations experts, national leaders, and historians have been arguing for months: that Israel's massive assault on Gaza amounts to the crime of genocide against the Palestinian population.
Amnesty, which had sharply criticized Israel's U.S.-backed war but until Thursday stopped short of labeling it genocide, details its findings and conclusion in a sprawling new report titled "You Feel Like You Are Subhuman": Israel's Genocide Against Palestinians in Gaza.
The 296-page document features interviews with survivors and witnesses of Israel's large-scale campaign of bombing, displacement, arbitrary detention, and destruction of Gaza's agricultural land and civilian infrastructure, interviews supplemented by an analysis of satellite imagery, video footage, and other visual evidence.
Israeli authorities, the group said, did not respond substantively with any of its inquiries between October 2023—when the assault on Gaza began in the wake of the deadly Hamas-led attack on Israel—and October 2024. The report does, however, include quotes from Israeli officials and soldiers, including one who declared that "there is no innocence in Gaza."
"Through its research findings and legal analysis," the report states, "Amnesty International has found sufficient basis to conclude that Israel committed, during the nine-month period under review, prohibited acts under Articles II (a), (b), and (c) of the Genocide Convention, namely killing, causing serious bodily or mental harm and deliberately inflicting on Palestinians in Gaza conditions of life calculated to bring about their physical destruction in whole or in part."
Amnesty said it also "found sufficient basis to conclude that these acts were committed with the specific intent to destroy Palestinians in Gaza, as such, who form a substantial part of the Palestinian population."
Agnès Callamard, Amnesty's secretary-general, said in a statement that her organization's report "demonstrates that Israel has carried out acts prohibited under the Genocide Convention, with the specific intent to destroy Palestinians in Gaza."
"Month after month, Israel has treated Palestinians in Gaza as a subhuman group unworthy of human rights and dignity, demonstrating its intent to physically destroy them," said Callamard. "Our damning findings must serve as a wake-up call to the international community: this is genocide. It must stop now."
Amnesty published its findings more than a year into an Israeli assault that has killed more than 44,500 people in Gaza, displaced almost all of the enclave's population, and left many at dire risk of starvation and disease. Nearly 70% of the deaths verified by the U.N. have been women and children.
"Governments must stop pretending they are powerless to end this genocide, which was enabled by decades of impunity for Israel's violations of international law."
The human rights group's report comes less than a month after a special U.N. committee said that the Israeli military's actions in the Gaza Strip—including the obstruction of humanitarian aid and targeted attacks on civilians—bear "the characteristics of genocide."
Amnesty echoes that assessment, pointing to Israel's mass destruction of cultural and religious sites in Gaza, detention and torture, use of dehumanizing language against Palestinians, and—in the case of many soldiers—the open celebration of Palestinian suffering.
"Amnesty International considers that the pattern of conduct which characterized Israel's military operations, coupled with the statements of Israeli officials and soldiers made in a context of apartheid, an unlawful blockade, and an unlawful military occupation, provide sufficient evidence of Israel's intent to destroy Palestinians in Gaza, as such," the report states.
Callamard called on nations continuing to provide military support for Israel's assault, including the United States, to cease arms transfers immediately, as they are "violating their obligation to prevent genocide and are at risk of becoming complicit in genocide."
"The international community's seismic, shameful failure for over a year to press Israel to end its atrocities in Gaza, by first delaying calls for a cease-fire and then continuing arms transfers, is and will remain a stain on our collective conscience," said Agnès Callamard.
"Governments must stop pretending they are powerless to end this genocide, which was enabled by decades of impunity for Israel's violations of international law," she added. "States need to move beyond mere expressions of regret or dismay and take strong and sustained international action, however uncomfortable a finding of genocide may be for some of Israel's allies."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'What a Racket': CBO Finds Extending Trump Tax Cuts Would Shrink US Economy
"The looting has begun," said one Democrat. "Far from unleashing record-breaking growth, the next Trump tax scam will make hardworking families worse off, shrink our economy, and blow a $4.6 trillion hole in the deficit."
Dec 05, 2024
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projected Wednesday that extending provisions of the 2017 Trump-GOP tax law that are set to expire at the end of next year would shrink the U.S. economy over the long run, a finding that came as Republicans planned to move ahead with another round of regressive tax cuts within the first 100 days of the new Congress.
In its new analysis, the CBO found that allowing provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act to expire as scheduled in 2025 would have a positive long-term effect on Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth compared to permanently extending the provisions.
"Expiration increases the long-term growth of potential GDP by about 6 basis points," the CBO said.
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, said in response to the CBO's findings that "the looting has begun."
"Far from unleashing record-breaking growth, the next Trump tax scam will make hardworking families worse off, shrink our economy, and blow a $4.6 trillion hole in the deficit," said Whitehouse. "What a racket, to push for trillions in tax cuts so billionaires keep paying lower rates than nurses and plumbers, and then cite deficit concerns to rob families needing things like home heating or childcare."
"Looting the treasury for megadonors is a rotten trick," the senator added, "and no amount of budgetary smoke and mirrors will hide it."
The CBO report was published as congressional Republicans continued to map out their legislative agenda before taking control of both chambers in January. The Associated Pressreported earlier this week that "in preparation for Trump's return, Republicans in Congress have been meeting privately for months and with the president-elect to go over proposals to extend and enhance those tax breaks, some of which would otherwise expire in 2025."
"It's always been about further enriching political and economic elites even at the cost of our economic future."
During the 2024 campaign, Trump pledged to sustain individual tax breaks enacted by the 2017 law—which disproportionately benefited the rich—and further reduce the statutory tax rate for U.S. corporations.
"The last time Republicans spent this much money for no apparent gain was the war in Iraq," Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, said Wednesday. "Trump's political donors want a return on their investment, and Republicans are going to give it to them, even at the cost of shrinking our economy and destroying jobs."
To offset the massive projected cost of extending the 2017 law and enacting new corporate tax cuts, Republicans are planning to pursue deep cuts to Medicaid, federal nutrition assistance, and other programs that help low-income Americans meet basic needs.
"President-elect Trump campaigned as a champion of the working class but his first act will be tanking the economy and throwing workers under the bus to line the pockets of his wealthy friends," said Lindsay Owens, executive director of the Groundwork Collaborative. "The Trump tax scam is back for its second act, and Americans should brace for impact."
David Kass, executive director of Americans for Tax Fairness, called the latest CBO analysis of the Republican Party's tax policies "even more damning than previous iterations."
"Using the country's credit card to give away trillions of dollars to the wealthiest Americans and big corporations would be disastrous for our economy and the average American," Kass said Wednesday. "The Trump Tax Scam bill has never been about economic growth or improving the lives of working and middle-class Americans. It's always been about further enriching political and economic elites even at the cost of our economic future."
"Moving forward," Kass added, "the incoming administration and congressional Republicans must answer why they plan to make hardworking Americans worse off, shrink our economy, and increase the deficit by $4.6 trillion."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Supreme Court Signals It Will Uphold 'State-Sanctioned Discrimination' in Transgender Care Case
"We the people means all the people," said the ACLU. "There is no 'transgender' exception to the U.S. Constitution."
Dec 04, 2024
Attorneys who argued against Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming healthcare at the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday expressed hope that the court's nine justices will take "the opportunity to affirm the essential freedom and equality of all people before the law," while reports indicated that the right-wing majority is inclined to uphold the ban.
"Every day this law inflicts further pain, injustice, and discrimination on families in Tennessee and prevents them from receiving the medical care they need," said Lucas Cameron-Vaughn, staff attorney at the ACLU of Tennessee, which represented three families and a physician. "We ask the Supreme Court to commit to upholding the promises of the U.S. Constitution for all people by putting an end to Tennessee's state-sanctioned discrimination against trans youth and their families."
The law, S.B. 1, which was passed in March 2023, bars medical providers from prescribing puberty-delaying medications, other hormonal treatment, and surgical procedures to transgender minors and youths with gender dysphoria.
The Supreme Court case, United States v. Skrmetti, applies only to the ban on puberty blockers and hormonal therapy for minors; a lower court found the plaintiffs did not have legal standing to challenge the surgery ban.
The ACLU, the ACLU of Tennessee, Lambda Legal, and a law firm were joined by the Biden administration in arguing that Tennessee allows doctors to prescribe puberty blockers and other hormonal treatments for youths with congenital defects, early puberty, diseases, or physical injuries.
As such, said the plaintiffs, Tennessee's ban for transgender and nonbinary youths violates the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment, which guarantees equal treatment under the law.
"My heart—and the heart of every transgender advocate fighting this fight—is heavy with the weight of what these laws mean for people's everyday lives."
The court's three liberal justices—Justices Sonya Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson—all indicated they believed Tennessee has tried to classify people according to sex or gender with the law.
"One of the articulated purposes of this law is essentially to encourage gender conformity and to discourage anything other than gender conformity," said Kagan. "Sounds to me like, 'We want boys to be boys and we want girls to be girls,' and that's an important purpose behind the law."
Matthew Rice, the lawyer representing Tennessee in the case, claimed the state simply wants to prevent "regret" among minors, and the court's six conservative justices signaled they were inclined to allow Tennessee to ban the treatments—which are endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics and other top medical associations.
Chief Justice John Roberts said the nine justices should not overrule the decision made by lawmakers representing Tennessee residents, considering there is debate over the issue, and pointed to changes some European countries have made to their gender-affirming care protocols for minors.
Representing the Biden administration, U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar acknowledged that there has been debate about gender-affirming care in the U.S. and abroad, but pointed out that countries including the U.K. and Sweden have not outright banned treatment.
"I think that's because of the recognition that this care can provide critical, sometimes lifesaving benefits for individuals with severe gender dysphoria," she said.
Following the arguments, plaintiff Brian Williams, who has a 16-year-old daughter in need of gender-affirming care, addressed supporters who had assembled outside the Supreme Court.
"Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming medical care is an active threat to the future my daughter deserves," said Williams. "It infringes not only on her freedom to be herself but on our family's love for her. We are not expecting everyone to understand everything about our family or the needs of transgender young people like our daughter. What we are asking for is for her freedom to be herself without fear. We are asking for her to be able to access the care she needs and enter adulthood knowing nothing is holding her back because of who she is."
Sotomayor said there is "very clear" evidence "that there are some children who actually need this treatment."
A 2022 study led by researchers at the University of Washington found that transgender and nonbinary youths aged 13-20 were 60% less likely to experience moderate or severe depression and 73% less likely to be suicidal after receiving gender-affirming care.
Prelogar asked the justices to "think about the real-world consequences of laws like S.B. 1," highlighting the case of a plaintiff identified as Ryan Roe.
Roe had such severe gender dysphoria that "he was throwing up before school every day," said Prelogar. "He thought about going mute because his voice caused him so much distress. And Ryan has told the courts that getting these medications after a careful consultation process with his doctors and his parents, has saved his life."
"But Tennessee has come in and categorically cut off access to Ryan's care," she added. "This law harms Ryan's health and the health of all other transgender adolescents for whom these medications are a necessity."
Tennessee is home to about 3,100 transgender teenagers, and about 110,000 transgender youths between the ages of 13-17 live in the 24 states where gender-affirming care is restricted.
More than 20 states have laws that could be impacted by the court's ruling in United States v. Skrmetti.
"My heart—and the heart of every transgender advocate fighting this fight—is heavy with the weight of what these laws mean for people's everyday lives," said Chase Strangio, co-director of the ACLU's LGBTQ & HIV Project. "But I also know that every out trans person has embraced the unknown in the name of living free from shame or the limits of other people's expectations."
"My heart aches for the parents who spent years watching their children in distress and eventually found relief in the medical care that Tennessee now overrides their judgment to ban," said Strangio. "Whatever happens today, tomorrow, and in the months and years to come, I trust that we will come together to fight for the realized promise of our Constitution's guarantee of equal protection for all."
A ruling in the case is expected in June.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular