August, 17 2009, 12:37pm EDT

Iraq: Stop Killings for Homosexual Conduct
No Protection by Authorities from Widening Murder Campaign
BEIRUT
Iraqi militias are carrying out a spreading campaign of torture and
murder against men suspected of homosexual conduct, or of not being
"manly" enough, and Iraq authorities have done nothing to stop the
killing, Human Rights Watch said in a report released today. Human
Rights Watch called on Iraq's government to act urgently to rein in
militia abuses, punish the perpetrators, and stop a new resurgence of
violence that threatens all Iraqis' safety.
The 67-page report, "'They Want Us Exterminated': Murder, Torture, Sexual Orientation and Gender in Iraq,"
documents a wide-reaching campaign of extrajudicial executions,
kidnappings, and torture of gay men that began in early 2009. The
killings began in the vast Baghdad neighborhood of Sadr City, a
stronghold of Moqtada al-Sadr's Mahdi Army militia, and spread to many
cities across Iraq. Mahdi Army spokesmen have promoted fears about the
"third sex" and the "feminization" of Iraq men, and suggested that
militia action was the remedy. Some people told Human Rights Watch that
Iraqi security forces have colluded and joined in the killing.
"Iraq's leaders are supposed to defend all Iraqis, not abandon them
to armed agents of hate," said Scott Long, director of the Lesbian,
Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Rights Program at Human Rights Watch.
"Turning a blind eye to torture and murder threatens the rights and
life of every Iraqi."
Silence and stigma surrounding sexuality and gender in Iraq make
placing a precise figure on the number killed almost impossible, but
indications are that hundreds of men may have died.
One man told Human Rights Watch that militiamen kidnapped and killed
his partner of 10 years in April: "It was late one night, and they came
to take my partner at his parents' home. Four armed men barged into the
house, masked and wearing black. They asked for him by name; they
insulted him and took him in front of his parents. ... He was found in
the neighborhood the day after. They had thrown his corpse in the
garbage. His genitals were cut off and a piece of his throat was ripped
out."
The killers invade homes and pick people up in the street, witnesses
and survivors said, interrogating them before murdering them to extract
names of other potential victims. They practice grotesque tortures,
including gluing men's anuses shut as punishment. Human Rights Watch
spoke to doctors who said that hospitals and morgues have received
dozens of mutilated bodies, living and dead.
"Murder and torture are no way to enforce morality," said Rasha
Moumneh, Middle East and North Africa researcher at Human Rights Watch.
"These killings point to the continuing and lethal failure of Iraq's
post-occupation authorities to establish the rule of law and protect
their citizens."
Consensual homosexual conduct between adults is not a criminal
offense under Iraqi law. Although many militias in Iraq claim to be
enforcers of Islamic law, the Human Rights Watch report also shows how
the killings - committed without evidence or trial, on the basis of
prejudice and whim - violate standards in Sharia law for legality,
proof, and privacy.
International human rights law forbids all forms of torture and
inhuman treatment and guarantees the right to life, including the right
to effective state protection. In its 1994 decision in the landmark
case of Toonen v. Australia, the United Nations Human Rights
Committee held that the protections against unequal treatment in the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) extend to
sexual orientation as a protected status.
The report also documents how fears that Iraqi men's masculinity is
under threat propel the killings as much as prejudices about sexuality.
Many men told Human Rights Watch that their parents or brothers have
threatened them with honor killings because their "unmanly" behavior
threatens the reputation of the family or tribe. In a provision left
over from the Saddam Hussein era, Iraqi law allows mitigated penalties
for crimes committed "with honorable motives." This exception
encourages gender-based violence.
Many Iraqis who fear being attacked have sought safety in
surrounding countries, but those countries are no safe haven, the
report says. Consensual homosexual conduct is criminalized in most of
these countries, and prejudice based on sexual orientation and gender
identity fosters violence and discrimination in all of them. Human
Rights Watch urges the United Nations High Commission for Refugees
(UNHCR), as well as governments that accept Iraqi refugees, to offer
rapid resettlement to these endangered people.
Accounts from the report (all names are aliases, to protect the speakers)
"[The killers'] measuring rod to judge people is who they have sex
with. It is not by their conscience, it is not by their conduct or
their values, it is who they have sex with. The cheapest thing in Iraq
is a human being, a human life. It is cheaper than an animal, than a
pair of used-up batteries you buy on the street. Especially people like
us. ... I can't believe I'm here talking to you because it's all just
been repressed, repressed, repressed. For years it's been like that -
if I walk down the street, I would feel everyone pointing at me. I feel
as if I'm dying all the time. And now this, in the last month - I don't
understand what we did to deserve this. They want us exterminated. All
the violence and all this hatred: the people who are suffering from it
don't deserve it."
- Hamid, in Iraq, April 24, 2009
"We've been hearing about this, about gay men being killed, for more
than a month. It's like background noise now, every day. The stories
started spreading in February about this campaign against gay people by
the Mahdi Army: everyone was talking about it, I was hearing about it
from my straight friends. In a coffee shop in Karada, on the streets in
Harithiya [Baghdad neighborhoods], they were talking about it. I didn't
worry at first. My friends and I, we look extremely masculine, there is
nothing visibly "feminine" about us. None of us ever, ever believed
this would happen to us. But then at the end of March we heard on the
street that 30 men had been killed already."
- Idris, in Iraq, April 24, 2009
"They did many things to us, the Mahdi Army. ... They kidnapped [my
partner] for six days. He will not talk about what they did to him.
There were bruises on his side as if he was dragged on the street. They
did things to him he can't describe, even to me. They wrote in the dust
on the windshield of his car: 'Death to the people of Lot and to
collaborators.' They sent us veiled threats in text messages: 'You are
on the list.' They sent him a piece of paper in an envelope, to his
home: there were three bullets wrapped in plastic, of different size.
The note said, 'Which one do you want in your heart?' ... I want to be
a regular person, lead a normal life, walk around the city, drink
coffee on the street. But because of who I am, I can't. There is no way
out."
- Mohammad, in Iraq, April 21, 2009
"At 10 a.m., [Ministry of Interior officers] cuffed my hands behind
my back. Then they tied a rope around my legs, and they hung me upside
down from a hook in the ceiling, from morning till sunset. I passed
out. I was stripped down to my underwear while I hung upside down. They
cut me down that night, but they gave me no water or food. Next day,
they told me to put my clothes back on and they took me to the
investigating officer. He said, 'You like that? We're going to do that
to you more and more, until you confess.' Confess to what? I asked. 'To
the work you do, to the organization you belong to, and that you are a tanta'
[queen]. For days, there were severe beatings, and constant humiliation
and insults. ... It was the same form of abuse every day. They beat me
all over my body; when they had me hanging upside down, they used me
like a punching bag. ... They used electric prods all over my body.
Then they raped me. Over three days. The first day, 15 of them raped
me; the second day, six; the third day, four. There was a bag on my
head every time."
- Nuri, on April 15 and 27, 2009
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
From Soaring Energy Prices to Climate Threat to AI Bubble, Experts Warn Against Data Center Buildout
“Tech giants are cutting backroom deals with utilities and government officials to build massive data centers at breakneck speed, while passing the costs onto working families," said the author of a new Public Citizen report.
Dec 04, 2025
As the construction of artificial intelligence data centers expands across the nation largely unregulated, experts warn that the unrestrained buildup of these facilities is causing electricity costs to skyrocket, accelerating the climate crisis, and putting the economy at risk.
A new report out Thursday from the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen highlights the "unchecked expansion" of these data centers, often with little oversight, input from communities, or even financial responsibility on the part of the Big Tech firms profiting.
“We’re watching Big Tech overlords write their own rules in real time,” said Deanna Noël, Public Citizen's climate campaigns director and one of the report's authors. “Tech giants are cutting backroom deals with utilities and government officials to build massive data centers at breakneck speed, while passing the costs onto working families through higher electricity bills, polluted air and water, and false claims about job creation."
A forecast published earlier this week by Bloomberg New Energy Finance projected that the power demand for AI facilities will hit 106 gigawatts by 2035—a 36% jump from what it predicted back in April.
That dramatic increase, it said, can be attributed not just to the more rapid buildup of AI facilities, but also to the size of the ones being constructed: "Of the nearly 150 new data center projects BNEF added to its tracker in the last year, nearly a quarter exceed 500 megawatts," it found.
This faster-than-expected expansion has come with massive consequences for the people living near the power-sucking behemoths. Public Citizen's report found:
Residents’ electricity costs in some data center-dense areas have surged over 250% in just five years. At PJM—the world’s largest power market—capacity auction prices spiked 800% in 2024, in part due to data center growth. That same year, consumers across seven PJM states paid $4.3 billion more in electricity costs to cover data centers’ new transmission infrastructure.
On Wednesday, CNBC reported on findings from a watchdog report that PJM's 65 million consumers will pay a total of $16.6 billion to secure future power supplies needed to meet demand from AI data centers from now until 2027, approximately $255 per person on average.
In some of the states with the most data centers, residential electricity prices have spiked considerably over the past year. In September, they were up 20% in Illinois, 12% in Ohio, and 9% in Virginia, according to data from the federal Energy Information Administration.
The massive surge in electricity usage is also fueling the climate crisis. As of March 2025, 56% of the electricity used to power data centers came from fossil fuels, a share that is likely to increase now that the Trump administration has pushed to expand the extraction of coal and other planet-heating energy sources in order to power them.
"At the very moment we must rapidly phase out fossil fuels," Noël said, "the Trump administration is doing the opposite—fast-tracking data center development powered by coal, oil, and gas."
Tech companies like Amazon, Meta, and Google that benefit from these projects rarely have to bear the full economic cost, instead passing some of it onto taxpayers, often without public debate due to nondisclosure agreements that keep the details of proposals under wraps until deals are finalized.
"In the race to attract large data centers, states are forfeiting hundreds of millions of dollars in tax revenue," a June CNBC investigation found. The report determined that 42 states provide full or partial sales tax exemptions to data centers or have no sales tax at all. Thirty-seven of those states have legislation specifically granting sales tax exemptions for data centers.
While these exemptions are often granted following promises of economic growth and job creation, as the Public Citizen report argues: "They rarely deliver on these promises. Data centers create few permanent, high-paying jobs, and generous tax breaks deprive communities of critical revenue needed to fund schools, infrastructure, and other public services."
Data centers have increasingly faced pushback from local communities. On Wednesday night in Howell, Michigan, over 150 people assembled at a town hall in opposition to a proposed $1 billion "hyperscale" data center project backed by Meta, following days of protest.
“Already we have started to see many regions (across the country) realizing that the huge spike in electricity demand from data centers is straining the grid, and this is only going to get worse as the growth of data centers increases based on the projected and planned investments,” said one of the panelists, Ben Green, an assistant professor of information and public policy at the University of Michigan.
Economic analysts, meanwhile, remain skeptical about whether the rapid buildup of AI infrastructure will be sustainable in the long term, given the extraordinary energy demand.
In November, Morgan Stanley projected AI-related data center spending will total $2.9 trillion cumulatively from 2025 to 2028, with roughly half requiring external financing.
Abe Silverman, general counsel for the public utility board in New Jersey, pointed out to CNBC the unease communities are feeling about "paying money today for a data center tomorrow."
“We’re in a bit of a bubble,” he warned. “There is no question that data center developers are coming out of the woodwork, putting in massive numbers of new requests. It’s impossible to say exactly how many of them are speculative versus real.”
Cathy Kunkel, a consultant at the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, said, "It does tend to be consumers—residential, commercial, and other industrial ratepayers—that end up paying for overbuilt electrical infrastructure."
The health of the entire US economy, it turns out, may be hitched to this "bubble." As the Wall Street Journal reported in late November, "business investment in AI might have accounted for as much as half of the growth in gross domestic product, adjusted for inflation, in the first six months of the year."
OpenAI founder Sam Altman raised eyebrows last month when he suggested that if the bubble bursts, his company is too big to fail, and would likely receive a large taxpayer-funded federal bailout: "When something gets sufficiently huge... the federal government is kind of the insurer of last resort as we've seen in various financial crises," Altman said. "So I guess given the magnitude of what I expect AI economic impact to look like, sort of I do think the government ends up as like the insurer of last resort."
A looming financial bubble related to AI's rapid growth, alongside the various other concerns related to the data center buildout, is why Public Citizen says policymakers must understand the gravity the situation and be willing to push back against an industry that has built an army of lobbyists to press its interests on Capitol Hill.
"Policymakers at all levels of government must act with urgency to rein in Big Tech’s unchecked expansion," Noël said. "By demanding transparency and accountability, enforcing strong community protections, and requiring clean and cheap renewable energy, policymakers can shield consumers from soaring electricity costs, reduce emissions to protect public health, and align this buildout with the clean energy transition.
"Without urgent intervention," she said, "Big Tech will continue getting a free ride while more neighborhoods are turned into sacrifice zones for Silicon Valley’s tech tycoons—fueled by the fossil fuel industry.”
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Where Is Yuanxin?' 6-Year-Old Missing in DHS Custody After ICE Separated Him From Father at Check-In
"Six-year-old Yuanxin had just enrolled in the first grade at an elementary school in Astoria," said Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani. "Now he's in custody, alone. ICE won't say where. This cruelty serves no one."
Dec 04, 2025
New York City Public Advocate Jumaane Williams on Thursday said the Trump administration continues to tell the "cruel lie" that it does not separate children from their families in immigration enforcement, as he joined other city officials and advocates in demanding the Department of Homeland Security immediately release a six-year-old boy who was taken from his father during an immigration check-in in Manhattan more than a week ago.
"Six-year-old asylum-seeker Yuanxin has been separated from his father, held at an undisclosed location," said Williams.
As The City reported Tuesday, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers arrested Yuanxin's father, Fei, when they arrived at 26 Federal Plaza—the ICE headquarters and immigration court that's become notorious for federal agents' violent treatment of immigrants and advocates under President Donald Trump—on November 26.
Fei, who sought asylum when he and his son crossed the US border in April, was sent to Orange County Jail in New York, while his son, a public school student in Queens, was separated from him. ICE agents did not tell Fei where they were taking Yuanxin.
Tricia McLaughlin, a spokesperson for DHS, said in a statement this week that while agents were attempting to take Fei north to Orange County, he "was acting so disruptive and aggressive that he endangered the child’s well-being." She accused him of attempting to "escape and abandon his son."
While acknowledging that the two had been separated, McLaughlin said, "ICE does not separate families.”
A judge "administratively closed" the family's asylum case in September, The City reported, which "would have been seen as a positive step and indicated that DHS wasn’t actively seeking the person’s deportation" under previous administrations.
They were also released on a yearlong parole after having been previously detained, and were required to visit 26 Federal Plaza for check-ins with ICE.
According to the Deportation Data Project, at least 151 children under the age of 18 have been arrested and detained by ICE since January.
Diana Moreno, an immigrant rights advocate who is running for the state Assembly in District 36, spoke to CBS News on Tuesday about Yuanxin's detention.
"To see their classmates disappear overnight is something that no parent wants to explain to their kid why this is happening," said Moreno.
The New York Immigration Coalition also demanded that the father and son "be reunited with each other immediately," while Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani condemned the Trump administration's "cruelty."
"Six-year-old Yuanxin had just enrolled in the first grade at an elementary school in Astoria," said Mamdani. "Now he's in custody, alone. ICE won't say where. This cruelty serves no one. It must end."
Chuck Park, a candidate for US Congress in New York's 6th District, also in Queens, said Yuanxin "looks like my son did at that age."
"Big glasses. Sweet smile," said Park. "Now alone, scared at an unknown ICE detention center. Taken from his dad at a routine check-in. This is what we're fighting against. This kid is who we're fighting for."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Medicare for All Sees Key Polling Shift as Americans Fume Over Surging Private Insurance Premiums
"Everybody recognizes that our current healthcare system is broken," said Sen. Bernie Sanders. "That’s why over 60% of the American people support Medicare for All."
Dec 04, 2025
With Affordable Care Act premiums surging and lawmakers on both sides of the political aisle scrambling to cobble together a last-minute fix, recent polling data shows that a strong majority of the American public supports a transformative proposal that few members of Congress are vocally advocating.
Data for Progress released survey results late last month showing that 65% of likely US voters—including 78% of Democrats, 71% of Independents, and 49% of Republicans—either strongly or somewhat support "creating a national health insurance program, sometimes called 'Medicare for All,' that would cover all Americans and replace most private health insurance plans."
Overall support for such a system dropped just two percentage points when survey respondents were informed that Medicare for All would replace insurance premiums with higher taxes, abolish most private insurance, and eliminate copays and deductibles. In an analysis posted last week, The Lever's David Sirota observed that those results are a shift from earlier polling showing a sharp decline in support for Medicare for All once respondents were told the proposal would wipe out private insurance.
"That might have been the end of Medicare for All for another generation—except now the ACA is epically and undeniably failing to guarantee 'affordable' healthcare," Sirota wrote. "As private health insurers are now jacking up premiums for tens of millions of Americans, a new poll shows a huge majority of Americans now want Medicare for All—even if it entails eliminating private insurers and raising taxes."
The Data for Progress survey came as Republican and Democratic lawmakers continued floating temporary, Band-Aid solutions to avert catastrophic premium increases stemming in large part from the looming expiration of enhanced ACA tax credits, which lapse at the end of the year.
A new poll released Thursday by KFF found that "six in ten adults (61%) who buy their health coverage on the ACA marketplace say it is very or somewhat difficult to afford their deductibles and out-of-pocket costs for medical care."
"When asked what they would do if the amount they pay for health insurance each month doubled, one in three enrollees (32%) say they are very likely to shop for a lower-premium plan (with higher deductibles and out-of-pocket costs), and one in four (25%) say they would be very likely to go uninsured," KFF noted.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) on Thursday pitched a three-year extension of the ACA subsidies ahead of a planned vote next week—a proposal that Republicans are certain to oppose.
On the Republican side, Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.)—who is linked to the largest Medicare fraud case in US history—is convening a group of Republican lawmakers to craft a likely dead-on-arrival ACA alternative that would implement some proposals floated by President Donald Trump, including new savings accounts that critics say would further enrich banks and insurance giants.
Scott warned in a statement to Axios earlier this week that "the more Republicans refuse to engage on this issue, the more we allow radical Democrats to lead our country on a slow creep towards the Socialist single-payer healthcare system they've always wanted."
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), meanwhile, is reportedly planning to finalize a healthcare bill early next week, though no details were immediately available.
There's also a bipartisan framework led by Reps. Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ) and Jen Kiggans (R-Va.), which calls for a one-year extension of the enhanced ACA tax credits "with targeted modifications," including intensified means-testing that would phase out the subsidies for those with incomes between 600% and 1,000% of the federal poverty level.
The Medicare for All Act, led by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in the Senate and Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.) in the House, would have no such means-testing, guaranteeing comprehensive coverage to all for free at the point of service.
"Everybody recognizes that our current healthcare system is broken. That’s why over 60% of the American people support Medicare for All," Sanders said at a rally with nurses in the nation's capital on Wednesday. "The day will come when working-class Americans will be able to go to the doctor, dentist, or a nursing home without having to worry about the cost. We’re going to win this fight."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


