August, 06 2009, 09:18am EDT
Gaza/Israel: Hamas Rocket Attacks on Civilians Unlawful
Launches from Populated Areas Endanger Israelis and Palestinians
JERUSALEM
Hamas should repudiate unlawful rocket attacks against Israeli
population centers and hold those responsible for them to account,
Human Rights Watch said in a new report
released today. Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups have over
several years launched thousands of rockets at Israeli cities and
towns, including hundreds during Israel's three-week military offensive
in Gaza in December 2008 and January 2009. A UN fact-finding
investigation into serious violations of the laws of war by both sides
in the Gaza conflict, led by Judge Richard Goldstone, is due to report
back to the UN Human Rights Council in September.
The 31-page report, "Rockets from Gaza: Harm to Civilians from Palestinian Armed Groups' Rocket Attacks,"
documents attacks by Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups since
November 2008 that killed three Israeli civilians and seriously injured
dozens of others, damaged property and forced residents to leave their
homes. The rockets unlawfully struck populated areas up to 40
kilometers inside Israel, placing roughly 800,000 Israeli civilians at
risk. Rockets that fell short of their intended targets in Israel
killed two girls and wounded others in Gaza during this period.
Palestinian armed groups that launched rockets from densely populated
areas also unlawfully put Gaza civilians at risk of Israeli
counterstrikes.
"Hamas rocket attacks targeting Israeli civilians are unlawful and
unjustifiable, and amount to war crimes," said Iain Levine, program
director at Human Rights Watch. "As the governing authority in Gaza,
Hamas should publicly renounce rocket attacks on Israeli civilian
centers and punish those responsible, including members of its own
armed wing."
"Rockets from Gaza" focuses on events after November 4, 2008, when
Palestinian armed groups resumed rocket fire after an Israeli military
incursion into Gaza. Based on interviews with witnesses to rocket
attacks and launches, field investigations of strike sites in Israel
and Gaza, and media and other reports, the report details the cases of
Israeli and Palestinian civilians killed or wounded by rocket attacks
in December 2008 and January 2009. While Human Rights Watch found no
clear practice by Palestinian armed groups to deliberately use
civilians to shield rocket launches from counterattack, it found they
frequently violated the separate duty under the laws of war to take all
feasible precautions to avoid endangering civilians when they launched
rockets from densely populated areas.
"Hamas forces violated the laws of war both by firing rockets
deliberately or indiscriminately at Israeli cities and by launching
them from populated areas and endangering Gazan civilians," said Levine.
Hamas has significantly limited rocket attacks in recent months, but
has not renounced attacks that deliberately or indiscriminately target
civilians - serious violations of the laws of war - or brought to
justice those responsible for initiating such attacks, or for
endangering Palestinian civilians by launching rockets from densely
populated areas in Gaza. Hamas's armed wing claimed responsibility for
the three Israeli civilian deaths documented in the report. During the
Israeli offensive in December and January, the armed wings of Hamas and
Islamic Jihad claimed to have fired 820 rockets at Israel.
The locally made Qassam rockets and Soviet-designed Grad rockets
used by Hamas and other armed groups cannot be aimed with any
reliability. Under the laws of war, such weapons are indiscriminate
when used against targets in densely populated areas. The absence of
Israeli military forces in the areas struck by the rockets, as well as
statements from the leaders of the Palestinian armed groups, indicate
that the armed groups deliberately intended to strike Israeli civilians
and civilian structures. For example, Abu Obeida, a spokesman for
Hamas's Qassam Brigades, said in a video released on January 5, 2009
that "continuing the incursion will only make us increase our rocket
range [...]. We will double the number of Israelis under fire."
Under the laws of war, individuals who willfully authorize or carry
out deliberate or indiscriminate attacks against civilians are
committing war crimes.
An Israeli early warning siren system, which gives civilians roughly
10 to 45 seconds to find cover in prepared shelters, depending on their
distance from the launch site in Gaza, has undoubtedly limited the
number of civilian casualties in Israel. However, the repeated attacks
have, over months and even years, taken a psychological toll on the
population in areas close to Gaza. The laws of war prohibit attacks the
primary purpose of which is to spread terror among the civilian
population. Because of the rocket attacks, thousands of people have
moved away from frequently targeted areas such as Sderot municipality.
Palestinian armed groups have argued that the rocket attacks are
appropriate reprisals for Israeli military operations and the ongoing
economic blockade of Gaza, and are a lawful response to Israel's
control over Gaza. Human Rights Watch has also documented numerous laws
of war violations by Israeli forces in Gaza, but violations by one
party to a conflict never justify violations by the other. Attacks
targeting civilians are never permitted under the laws of war, which
require armed forces to target only military objectives, and to take
all feasible precautions to spare civilians from harm, regardless of
the reasons for resorting to armed conflict.
Similarly, although Israeli military operations caused far greater
total harm to civilian lives - killing several hundred civilians with
air strikes, artillery, tank shelling, and other attacks - and property
than operations by Palestinian armed groups, violations of the laws of
war are not determined by the number of civilian casualties, but by
whether each side is refraining from conducting deliberate or
indiscriminate attacks against civilians and is taking all feasible
precautions to minimize civilian loss.
"Human Rights Watch is committed to documenting the worst violations
of the laws of war committed by all sides in armed conflicts throughout
the world," Levine said. "We published this report because civilians
must never be the object of attack, regardless of the relative strength
of the attacker."
Using unsophisticated weapons does not justify failure to respect
the laws of war, just as an adversary's use of sophisticated weapons
does not provide a pass to its opponents to ignore those laws, Human
Rights Watch said. Such disparities exist in many wars, and if they
provided a justification for ignoring the laws of war the civilian toll
in armed conflicts would rise dramatically. The loss of civilian life
from armed conflict can be minimized only if each party recognizes its
legal obligations to abide by the laws of war, regardless of the
weaponry at its disposal.
"Rockets from Gaza" is the fifth in a series of reports Human Rights Watch has issued on the Israeli offensive launched on December 27, 2008. Two reports are forthcoming.
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
UN Chief Warns of Israel's Syria Invasion and Land Seizures
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres stressed the "urgent need" for Israel to "de-escalate violence on all fronts."
Dec 12, 2024
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres said Thursday that he is "deeply concerned" by Israel's "recent and extensive violations of Syria's sovereignty and territorial integrity," including a ground invasion and airstrikes carried out by the Israel Defense Forces in the war-torn Mideastern nation.
Guterres "is particularly concerned over the hundreds of Israeli airstrikes on several locations in Syria" and has stressed the "urgent need to de-escalate violence on all fronts throughout the country," said U.N. spokesperson Stephane Dujarric.
Israel claims its invasion and bombardment of Syria—which come as the United States and Turkey have also violated Syrian sovereignty with air and ground attacks—are meant to create a security buffer along the countries' shared border in the wake of last week's fall of former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and amid the IDF's ongoing assault on Gaza, which has killed or wounded more than 162,000 Palestinians and is the subject of an International Court of Justice genocide case.
While Israel argues that its invasion of Syria does not violate a 1974 armistice agreement between the two countries because the Assad dynasty no longer rules the neighboring nation, Dujarric said Guterres maintains that Israel must uphold its obligations under the deal, "including by ending all unauthorized presence in the area of separation and refraining from any action that would undermine the cease-fire and stability in Golan."
Israel conquered the western two-thirds of the Golan Heights in 1967 and has illegally occupied it ever since, annexing the seized lands in 1981.
Other countries including France, Russia, and Saudi Arabia have criticized Israel's invasion, while the United States defended the move.
"The Syrian army abandoned its positions in the area... which potentially creates a vacuum that could have been filled by terrorist organizations," U.S. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said at a press briefing earlier this week. "Israel has said that these actions are temporary to defend its borders. These are not permanent actions... We support all sides upholding the 1974 disengagement agreement."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Sanders Says 'Political Movement,' Not Murder, Is the Path to Medicare for All
"Killing people is not the way we're going to reform our healthcare system," he said. "The way we're going to reform our healthcare system is having people come together."
Dec 12, 2024
Addressing the assassination of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson and conversations it has sparked about the country's for-profit system, longtime Medicare for All advocate Sen. Bernie Sanders on Wednesday condemned the murder and stressed that getting to universal coverage will require a movement challenging corporate money in politics.
"Look, when we talk about the healthcare crisis, in my view, and I think the view of a majority of Americans, the current system is broken, it is dysfunctional, it is cruel, and it is wildly inefficient—far too expensive," said Sanders (I-Vt.), whose position is backed up by various polls.
"The reason we have not joined virtually every other major country on Earth in guaranteeing healthcare to all people as a human right is the political power and financial power of the insurance industry and drug companies," he told Jacobin. "It will take a political revolution in this country to get Congress to say, 'You know what, we're here to represent ordinary people, to provide quality care to ordinary people as a human right,' and not to worry about the profits of insurance and drug companies."
Asked about Thompson's alleged killer—26-year-old Luigi Mangione, whose reported manifesto railed against the nation's expensive healthcare system and low life expectancy—Sanders said: "You don't kill people. It's abhorrent. I condemn it wholeheartedly. It was a terrible act. But what it did show online is that many, many people are furious at the health insurance companies who make huge profits denying them and their families the healthcare that they desperately need."
"What you're seeing, the outpouring of anger at the insurance companies, is a reflection of how people feel about the current healthcare system."
"What you're seeing, the outpouring of anger at the insurance companies, is a reflection of how people feel about the current healthcare system," he continued, noting the tens of thousands of Americans who die each year because they can't get to a doctor.
"Killing people is not the way we're going to reform our healthcare system," Sanders added. "The way we're going to reform our healthcare system is having people come together and understanding that it is the right of every American to be able to walk into a doctor's office when they need to and not have to take out their wallet."
"The way we're going to bring about the kind of fundamental changes we need in healthcare is, in fact, by a political movement which understands the government has got to represent all of us, not just the 1%," the senator told Jacobin.
The 83-year-old Vermonter, who was just reelected to what he says is likely his last six-year term, is an Independent but caucuses with Democrats and sought their presidential nomination in 2016 and 2020. He has urged the Democratic Party to recognize why some working-class voters have abandoned it since Republicans won the White House and both chambers of Congress last month. A refusal to take on insurance and drug companies and overhaul the healthcare system, he argues, is one reason.
Sanders—one of the few members of Congress who regularly talks about Medicare for All—isn't alone in suggesting that unsympathetic responses to Thompson's murder can be explained by a privatized healthcare system that fails so many people.
In addition to highlighting Sanders' interview on social media, Congressman Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) pointed out to Business Insider on Wednesday that "you've got thousands of people that are sharing their stories of frustration" in the wake of Thompson's death.
Khanna—a co-sponsor of the Medicare for All Act, led in the House of Representatives by Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.)—made the case that you can recognize those stories without accepting the assassination.
"You condemn the murder of an insurance executive who was a father of two kids," he said. "At the same time, you say there's obviously an outpouring behavior of people whose claims are being denied, and we need to reform the system."
Two other Medicare for All advocates, Reps. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), also made clear to Business Insider that they oppose Thompson's murder but understand some of the responses to it.
"Of course, we don't want to see the chaos that vigilantism presents," said Ocasio-Cortez. "We also don't want to see the extreme suffering that millions of Americans confront when your life changes overnight from a horrific diagnosis, and people are led to just some of the worst, not just health events, but the worst financial events of their and their family's lives."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)—a co-sponsor of Sanders' Medicare for All Act—similarly toldHuffPost in a Tuesday interview, "The visceral response from people across this country who feel cheated, ripped off, and threatened by the vile practices of their insurance companies should be a warning to everyone in the healthcare system."
"Violence is never the answer, but people can be pushed only so far," she continued. "This is a warning that if you push people hard enough, they lose faith in the ability of their government to make change, lose faith in the ability of the people who are providing the healthcare to make change, and start to take matters into their own hands in ways that will ultimately be a threat to everyone."
After facing some criticism for those comments, Warren added Wednesday: "Violence is never the answer. Period... I should have been much clearer that there is never a justification for murder."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Reports Target Israeli Army for 'Unprecedented Massacre' of Gaza Journalists
"In Gaza, the scale of the tragedy is incomprehensible," wrote Thibaut Bruttin, director general of Reporters Without Borders.
Dec 12, 2024
Reports released this week from two organizations that advocate for journalists underscore just how deadly Gaza has become for media workers.
Reporters Without Borders' (RSF) 2024 roundup, which was published Thursday, found that at least 54 journalists were killed on the job or in connection with their work this year, and 18 of them were killed by Israeli armed forces (16 in Palestine, and two in Lebanon).
The organization has also filed four complaints with the International Criminal Court "for war crimes committed by the Israeli army against journalists," according to the roundup, which includes stats from January 1 through December 1.
"In Gaza, the scale of the tragedy is incomprehensible," wrote Thibaut Bruttin, director general of RSF, in the introduction to the report. Since October 2023, 145 journalists have been killed in Gaza, "including at least 35 who were very likely targeted or killed while working."
Bruttin added that "many of these reporters were clearly identifiable as journalists and protected by this status, yet they were shot or killed in Israeli strikes that blatantly disregarded international law. This was compounded by a deliberate media blackout and a block on foreign journalists entering the strip."
When counting the number of journalists killed by the Israeli army since October 2023 in both Gaza and Lebanon, the tally comes to 155—"an unprecedented massacre," according to the roundup.
Multiple journalists were also killed in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Mexico, Sudan, Myanmar, Colombia, and Ukraine, according to the report, and hundreds more were detained and are now behind bars in countries including Israel, China, and Russia.
Meanwhile, in a statement released Thursday, the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) announced that at least 139 Palestinian journalists and media workers have been killed since the war in Gaza began in 2023, and in a statement released Wednesday, IFJ announced that 104 journalists had perished worldwide this year (which includes deaths from January 1 through December 10). IFJ's number for all of 2024 appears to be higher than RSF because RSF is only counting deaths that occurred "on the job or in connection with their work."
IFJ lists out each of the slain journalists in its 139 count, which includes the journalist Hamza Al-Dahdouh, the son of Al Jazeera's Gaza bureau chief, Wael Al-Dahdouh, who was killed with journalist Mustafa Thuraya when Israeli forces targeted their car while they were in northern Rafah in January 2024.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular