For Immediate Release
U.S. Treasury Responds to CEPR's Cost Estimate for IMF Funding; CEPR Responds
$108 Billion for IMF Will Cost Much More than Budgeted
WASHINGTON - According to the Office of the Majority Leader in the House of
Representatives, on Thursday the U.S. Treasury Department, which seeks
to persuade the U.S. Congress to approve a $108 billion line of credit
for the International Monetary Fund (IMF), released talking points on
the subject entitled "Talking Points on IMF Funding Request."
Treasury's second talking point had the following under "Myth":
of course, will have to pay interest on the borrowed funds made
available to the IMF. And while proponents of the funding contend that
we will also receive interest returns from the IMF, we must analyze
whether the interest will exceed the finance charges on the money the
U.S. has borrowed. According to a report from the Center for Economic
and Policy research the U.S. will likely borrow at a higher interest
rate than IMF would pay the American taxpayer in return, resulting in a
net cost to taxpayers."
Followed by this "Fact":
interest earned and the change in value of the assets we receive when
the United States makes IMF contributions has historically exceeded the
cost of borrowing the money. During the period FY2000 - FY2008, the
cumulative net interest income effect (of US participation in the
General and Special Drawing Rights (SDR) Departments) and change in the
value of our assets was $2.79 billion."
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
The media landscape is changing fast
Our news team is changing too as we work hard to bring you the news that matters most.
Change is coming. And we've got it covered.
This is very misleading. Treasury does not tell us why the U.S. assets
increased in value, but it is because the dollar declined in value
against other currencies during this period. When the dollar falls
against the IMF's currency (the Special Drawing Rights or SDR's), the
value of US assets at the fund increases.
Is Treasury saying that the dollar is going to decline again in the
coming years? If so, it should make this claim explicit.
Bottom line: the cost of the $108 billion that Treasury wants for the
IMF is far greater than the $5 billion figure that was scored by the
Congressional Budget Office. It is widely believed that the CBO figure
was agreed to as part of a political bargaining process, with the
Administration pushing for a zero cost, and the CBO wanting something
considerably higher. The CBO has not published anywhere the methodology
that it used to come up with an estimate of $5 billion. Our own
estimate, published here, was between $16.6 and $26.3 billion; this was a conservative estimate that assumed that there was no risk of default.
We want a more open and sharing world.
That's why our content is free. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported.
All of our original content is published under Creative Commons—allowing (and encouraging) our articles to be republished freely anywhere. In addition to the traffic and reach our content generates on our site, the multiplying impact of our work is huge and growing as our articles flourish across the Internet and are republished by other large and small online and print outlets around the world.
Several times a year we run brief campaigns to ask our readers to pitch in—and thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Our 2019 Mid-Year Campaign is underway. Can you help? We can't do it without you.
The Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) was established in 1999 to promote democratic debate on the most important economic and social issues that affect people's lives. In order for citizens to effectively exercise their voices in a democracy, they should be informed about the problems and choices that they face. CEPR is committed to presenting issues in an accurate and understandable manner, so that the public is better prepared to choose among the various policy options.