May, 21 2009, 01:54pm EDT
Fact Sheet: Vice President Cheney Debunked
Today, former Vice President Cheney continues his pro-torture
public relations tour with a speech at the American Enterprise
Institute. His listeners can expect to hear more arguments for the use
of torture and abuse. What they won't hear from Vice President Cheney
is that national security experts overwhelmingly disagree with his
assessment about the value of resorting to abusive policies. Those
with experience conducting interrogations, leading forces in the
military, and doing the work of keeping America safe overwhelming
reject the use of torture.
NEW YORK
Today, former Vice President Cheney continues his pro-torture
public relations tour with a speech at the American Enterprise
Institute. His listeners can expect to hear more arguments for the use
of torture and abuse. What they won't hear from Vice President Cheney
is that national security experts overwhelmingly disagree with his
assessment about the value of resorting to abusive policies. Those
with experience conducting interrogations, leading forces in the
military, and doing the work of keeping America safe overwhelming
reject the use of torture.
Vice President Cheney says torture prevented attacks following 9/11.
Repeatedly, Vice President Cheney has said that information gained by
torturing detainees has been crucial in helping the government "defeat
or disrupt all further attempts to strike the homeland" (ABC News, Dec. 16, 2008). He says without torture, "we would have been attacked again" (Politico.com, Feb. 4, 2009).
Cheney even goes so far as to say that removing the ability to use
torture is making the nation less safe. He said Obama is making choices
that "raise the risk to the American people of another attack." (CNN, March 15 2009.)
- Vice President Cheney Debunked: FBI Director Robert Mueller says that isn't the case. When Vanity Fair asked if torture prevented additional attacks, Mueller said "I don't believe that has been the case." (Vanity Fair, Dec. 16, 2008).
- Vice President Cheney Debunked: Interrogator says the use of torture has led to American deaths in Iraq. Military
interrogator Matthew Alexander says that it is torture that is
recruiting for the enemy: "I learned in Iraq that the No. 1 reason
foreign fighters flocked there to fight were the abuses carried out at
Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo. Our policy of torture was directly and
swiftly recruiting fighters for al-Qaeda in Iraq... It's no exaggeration
to say that at least half of our losses and casualties in that country
have come at the hands of foreigners who joined the fray because of our
program of detainee abuse." He goes on to quantify the costs of
torture: "The number of U.S. soldiers who have died because of our
torture policy will never be definitively known, but it is fair to say
that it is close to the number of lives lost on Sept. 11, 2001. How
anyone can say that torture keeps Americans safe is beyond me -- unless
you don't count American soldiers as Americans." (Washington Post, Nov. 30, 2008) - Vice President Cheney Debunked: "This war
will be won or lost not on the battlefield but in the minds of
potential supporters who have not yet thrown in their lot with the
enemy. If we forfeit our values by signaling that they are negotiable
in situations of grave or imminent danger, we drive those undecideds
into the arms of the enemy. This way lies defeat, and we are well down
the road to it. (Charles Krulak and Joseph Hoar, Washington Post Op-Ed, May 17, 2009)
Vice President Cheney says that crucial information has been revealed through torture. "Well,
I would say that the key to what we did was to collect intelligence
against the enemy. That's what the terrorist surveillance program was
all about, that's what the enhanced interrogation program was all
about."(CNN, March 15 2009)
- Vice President Cheney Debunked: Experienced interrogators says torture doesn't "work".
Fifteen former interrogators from both the CIA and FBI stated in a
statement that "the use of torture and other inhumane and abusive
treatment results in false and misleading information, loss of critical
intelligence, and has caused serious damage to the reputation and
standing of the United States." ("Top Interrogators Declare Torture
Ineffective in Intelligence Gathering," June 24, 2008) - Vice President Cheney Debunked: Even Jesse Venture knows that the information revealed through torture cannot be relied upon.
As Jesse Ventura, former Governor of Minnesota, puts it, "You give me a
water board, Dick Cheney and one hour, and I'll have him confess to the
Sharon Tate murders." Jesse Ventura has in fact been water boarded in
preparation for his service in Vietnam. He says, from personal
experience, that it constitutes torture. (CNN, May 12, 2009) - Vice President Cheney Debunked: Abu Zabaydah said he gave up false information simply to stop being tortured. In
his Combatant Status Review Tribunal, the tribunal president asked him:
"So I understand that during this treatment, you said things to make
them stop and then those statements were actually untrue, is that
correct?" Abu Zubaydah replied: "Yes." (Combatant Status-Review Tribunal" at Guantanamo, March 27, 2007)
Vice President Cheney claims that a "wartime situation" justifies torture.
Cheney says that after 9/11, methods of law enforcement were no longer
applicable. After 9/11, he said it was a "wartime situation." Such a
situation, according to Cheney, justifies using all your "intelligence
resources, your military resources, your financial resources,
everything you can in order to shut down that terrorist threat against
you." According to Cheney, the wartime situation justifies the use of
torture. (CNN, March 15, 2009)
- Vice President Cheney Debunked: General David Petraeus rejects torture. In
a letter to his troops in Iraq, General Petraeus clearly states that
torture is not only illegal, but also not useful and not necessary:
"Some may argue that we would be more effective if we sanctioned
torture or other expedient methods to obtain information from the
enemy. They would be wrong. Beyond the basic fact that such actions are
illegal, history shows that they also are frequently neither useful nor
necessary. Certainly extreme physical action can makes someone "talk;"
however, what the individual says may be of questionable value. In
fact, our experience in applying the interrogation standards laid out
in the Army Field Manuel (2-22.3) on Human Intelligence Collector
Operations that was published last year shows that the techniques in
the manual work effectively and humanely in eliciting information from
detainees." (Letter to the Troops, May 10, 2007).
Former Vice President Cheney's daughter, Liz Cheney, justifies torture in the context of a ticking time bomb situation. She
says "We are talking about a situation when there are imminent threats
against the united states so if you to me, this guys has got
information that is going to save your kid's life and my kids' lives,
that is going to keep this country safe, but we gotta water board him
to get it, I got no problem with that." (MSNBC, May 12, 2009)
- Liz Cheney Debunked Ticking time bomb situations are fictional, according to a former CIA officer. A
retired senior CIA officer said in an interview with David Rose that
"Nobody in intelligence believes in the ticking bomb. It's just a way
of framing the debate for public consumption. That is not an
intelligence reality." In his article, Rose reported that the officer
said that inside the CIA, "there was hardly any argument about the
value of coercive methods" (Vanity Fair, Dec. 16, 2008)
Human Rights First is a non-profit, nonpartisan international human rights organization based in New York and Washington D.C. Human Rights First believes that building respect for human rights and the rule of law will help ensure the dignity to which every individual is entitled and will stem tyranny, extremism, intolerance, and violence.
LATEST NEWS
Trump Pick to Replace Lina Khan Vowed to End 'War on Mergers'
"Andrew Ferguson is a corporate shill who opposes banning noncompetes, opposes banning junk fees, and opposes enforcing the Anti-Merger Act," said one antitrust attorney.
Dec 11, 2024
President-elect Donald Trump's pick to lead the Federal Trade Commission vowed in his job pitch to end current chair Lina Khan's "war on mergers," a signal to an eager corporate America that the incoming administration intends to be far more lax on antitrust enforcement.
Andrew Ferguson was initially nominated by President Joe Biden to serve as a Republican commissioner on the bipartisan FTC, and his elevation to chair of the commission will not require Senate confirmation.
In a one-page document obtained by Punchbowl, Ferguson—who previously worked as chief counsel to Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.)—pitched himself to Trump's team as the "pro-innovation choice" with "impeccable legal credentials" and "proven loyalty" to the president-elect.
Ferguson's top agenda priority, according to the document, is to "reverse Lina Khan's anti-business agenda" by rolling back "burdensome regulations," stopping her "war on mergers," halting the agency's "attempt to become an AI regulator," and ditching "novel and legally dubious consumer protection cases."
Trump announced Ferguson as the incoming administration's FTC chair as judges in Oregon and Washington state
blocked the proposed merger of Kroger and Albertsons, decisions that one antitrust advocate called a "fantastic culmination of the FTC's work to protect consumers and workers."
According to a recent
report by the American Economic Liberties Project, the Biden administration "brought to trial four times as many billion-dollar merger challenges as Trump-Pence or Obama-Biden enforcers did," thanks to "strong leaders at the FTC" and the Justice Department's Antitrust Division.
In a letter to Ferguson following Trump's announcement on Tuesday, FTC Commissioners Alvaro Bedoya and Rebecca Kelly Slaughter wrote that the document obtained and published by Punchbowl "raises questions" about his priorities at the agency mainly "because of what is not in it."
"Americans pay more for healthcare than anyone else in the developed world, yet they die younger," they wrote. "Medical bills bankrupt people. In fact, this is the main reason Americans go bankrupt. But the document does not mention the cost of healthcare or prescription medicine."
"If there was one takeaway from the election, it was that groceries are too expensive. So is gas," the commissioners continued. "Yet the document does not mention groceries, gas, or the cost of living. While you have said we're entering the 'most pro-worker administration in history,' the document does not mention labor, either. Americans are losing billions of dollars to fraud. Fraudsters are so brazen that they impersonate sitting FTC commissioners to steal money from retirees. The word 'fraud' does not appear in the document."
"The document does propose allowing more mergers, firing civil servants, and fighting something called 'the trans agenda,'" they added. "Is all of that more important than the cost of healthcare and groceries and gasoline? Or fighting fraud?"
As an FTC commissioner, Ferguson voted against rules banning anti-worker noncompete agreements and making it easier for consumers to cancel subscriptions. Ferguson was also the only FTC member to oppose an expansion of a rule to protect consumers from tech support scams that disproportionately impact older Americans.
"Andrew Ferguson is a corporate shill who opposes banning noncompetes, opposes banning junk fees, and opposes enforcing the Anti-Merger Act," said Basel Musharbash, principal attorney at Antimonopoly Counsel. "Appointing him to chair the FTC is an affront to the antitrust laws and a gift to the oligarchs and monopolies bleeding this country dry."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Once Again, Tom Cotton Blocks Bill to Shield Journalists From Betraying Sources
Responding to the GOP senator's latest thwarting of the PRESS Act, Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden vowed to "keep trying to get this bill across the finish line" before Republicans take control of the Senate next month.
Dec 10, 2024
Republican U.S. Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas on Tuesday again blocked the passage of House-approved bipartisan legislation meant to shield journalists and telecommunications companies from being compelled to disclose sources and other information to federal authorities.
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) brought the Protect Reporters from Exploitative State Spying (PRESS) Act—which would prohibit the federal government from forcing journalists and telecom companies to disclose certain information, with exceptions for terroristic or violent threats—for a unanimous consent vote.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) argued Tuesday that passing the PRESS Act is "more important now than ever before when we've heard some in the previous administration talk about going after the press in one way or another," a reference to Republican President-elect Donald Trump's threats to jail journalists who refuse to reveal the sources of leaks. Trump, who has referred to the press as the "enemy of the people," repeatedly urged Senate Republicans to "kill this bill."
Cotton, who blocked a vote on the legislation in December 2022, again objected to the bill, a move that thwarted its speedy passage. The Republican called the legislation a "threat to national security" and "the biggest giveaway to the liberal press in American history."
The advocacy group Defending Rights and Dissent lamented that "Congress has abdicated their responsibility to take substantive steps to protect the constitutional right to a free press."
However, Seth Stern, director of advocacy at the Freedom of the Press Foundation, noted ways in which Senate Democrats can still pass the PRESS Act before Republicans gain control of the upper chamber next month:
Senate Democrats had all year to move this bipartisan bill and now time is running out. Leader Schumer needs to get the PRESS Act into law—whether by attaching it to a year-end legislative package or bringing it to the floor on its own—even if it means shortening lawmakers' holiday break. Hopefully, today was a preview of more meaningful action to come.
Responding to Tuesday's setback, Wyden vowed, "I'm not taking my foot off the gas."
"I'll keep trying to get this bill across the finish line to write much-needed protections for journalists and their sources into black letter law," he added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Judges Block Kroger-Albertsons Merger in 'Win for Farmers, Workers, and Consumers'
"We applaud the FTC for securing one of the most significant victories in modern antitrust enforcement," said one advocate.
Dec 10, 2024
Antitrust advocates on Tuesday welcomed a pair of court rulings against the proposed merger of grocery giants Kroger and Albertsons, which was challenged by Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan and multiple state attorneys general.
"The FTC, along with our state partners, scored a major victory for the American people, successfully blocking Kroger's acquisition of Albertsons," said Henry Liu, director of the commission's Bureau of Competition, in a statement. "This historic win protects millions of Americans across the country from higher prices for essential groceries—from milk, to bread, to eggs—ultimately allowing consumers to keep more money in their pockets."
"This victory has a direct, tangible impact on the lives of millions of Americans who shop at Kroger or Albertsons-owned grocery stores for their everyday needs, whether that's a Fry's in Arizona, a Vons in Southern California, or a Jewel-Osco in Illinois," he added. "This is also a victory for thousands of hardworking union employees, protecting their hard-earned paychecks by ensuring Kroger and Albertsons continue to compete for workers through higher wages, better benefits, and improved working conditions."
While Liu was celebrating the preliminary injunction from Oregon-based U.S. District Court Judge Adrienne Nelson, later Tuesday, King County Superior Court Judge Marshall Ferguson released a ruling that blocked the merger in Washington state.
"We're standing up to mega-monopolies to keep prices down," said Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson. "We went to court to block this illegal merger to protect Washingtonians' struggling with high grocery prices and the workers whose jobs were at stake. This is an important victory for affordability, worker protections, and the rule of law."
Advocacy groups applauding the decisions also pointed to the high cost of groceries and the anticipated impact of Kroger buying Albertsons—a $24.6 billion deal first announced in October 2022.
"American families are the big winner today, thanks to the Federal Trade Commission. The only people who stood to gain from the potential merger between Albertsons and Kroger were their wealthy executives and investors," asserted Liz Zelnick of Accountable.US. "The rest of us are letting out a huge sigh of relief knowing today's victory is good news for competitive prices and consumer access."
Describing the federal decision as "a victory for commonsense antitrust enforcement that puts people ahead of corporations," Food & Water Watch senior food policy analyst Rebecca Wolf also pointed out that "persistently high food prices are hitting Americans hard, and a Kroger-Albertsons mega-merger would have only made it worse."
"Already, a handful of huge corporations' stranglehold on our food system means that consumers are paying too much for too little choice in supermarkets, workers are earning too little, and farmers and ranchers cannot get fair prices for their crops and livestock," she noted. "Today's decision and strengthened FTC merger guidelines help change the calculus."
Like Wolf, Farm Action president and co-founder Angela Huffman similarly highlighted that "while industry consolidation increases prices for consumers and harms workers, grocery mergers also have a devastating impact on farmers and ranchers."
"When grocery stores consolidate, farmers have even fewer options for where to sell their products, and the chances of them receiving a fair price for their goods are diminished further," Huffman explained. "Today's ruling is a win for farmers, workers, and consumers alike."
Some advocates specifically praised Khan—a progressive FTC chair whom President-elect Donald Trumpplans to replace with Andrew Ferguson, a current commissioner who previously worked as chief counsel to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and as Republican counsel on the Senate Judiciary Committee.
"Today's decision is a major win for shoppers and grocery workers. Families have been paying the price of unchecked corporate power in the food and grocery sector, and further consolidation would only worsen this crisis," declared Groundwork Collaborative executive director Lindsay Owens in a statement.
"FTC Chair Lina Khan's approach is the blueprint to deliver lower prices, higher wages, and an economy that works for everyone," Owens argued. "The rebirth of antitrust enforcement has protected consumers against the worst of corporate power in our economy and it would be wise to continue this approach."
Laurel Kilgour, research manager at the American Economic Liberties Project, called the federal ruling "a resounding victory for workers, consumers, independent retailers, and local communities nationwide—and a powerful validation of Chair Khan and the FTC's rigorous enforcement of the law."
"The FTC presented a strong case that Kroger and Albertsons fiercely compete head-to-head on price, quality, and service. The ruling is a capstone on the FTC's work over the past four years and includes favorable citations to the FTC's recent victories against the Tapestry-Capri, IQVIA-Propel, and Illumina-Grail mergers," Kilgour continued.
"The court also cites long-standing Supreme Court law which recognizes that Congress was also concerned with the impacts of mergers on smaller competitors," she added. "We applaud the FTC for securing one of the most significant victories in modern antitrust enforcement and for successfully protecting the public interest from harmful consolidation."
Despite the celebrations, the legal battle isn't necessarily over.
The Associated Pressreported that "the case may now move to the FTC, although Kroger and Albertsons have asked a different federal judge to block the in-house proceedings," and Colorado is also trying to halt the merger in state court.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular