May, 21 2009, 01:54pm EDT
Fact Sheet: Vice President Cheney Debunked
Today, former Vice President Cheney continues his pro-torture
public relations tour with a speech at the American Enterprise
Institute. His listeners can expect to hear more arguments for the use
of torture and abuse. What they won't hear from Vice President Cheney
is that national security experts overwhelmingly disagree with his
assessment about the value of resorting to abusive policies. Those
with experience conducting interrogations, leading forces in the
military, and doing the work of keeping America safe overwhelming
reject the use of torture.
NEW YORK
Today, former Vice President Cheney continues his pro-torture
public relations tour with a speech at the American Enterprise
Institute. His listeners can expect to hear more arguments for the use
of torture and abuse. What they won't hear from Vice President Cheney
is that national security experts overwhelmingly disagree with his
assessment about the value of resorting to abusive policies. Those
with experience conducting interrogations, leading forces in the
military, and doing the work of keeping America safe overwhelming
reject the use of torture.
Vice President Cheney says torture prevented attacks following 9/11.
Repeatedly, Vice President Cheney has said that information gained by
torturing detainees has been crucial in helping the government "defeat
or disrupt all further attempts to strike the homeland" (ABC News, Dec. 16, 2008). He says without torture, "we would have been attacked again" (Politico.com, Feb. 4, 2009).
Cheney even goes so far as to say that removing the ability to use
torture is making the nation less safe. He said Obama is making choices
that "raise the risk to the American people of another attack." (CNN, March 15 2009.)
- Vice President Cheney Debunked: FBI Director Robert Mueller says that isn't the case. When Vanity Fair asked if torture prevented additional attacks, Mueller said "I don't believe that has been the case." (Vanity Fair, Dec. 16, 2008).
- Vice President Cheney Debunked: Interrogator says the use of torture has led to American deaths in Iraq. Military
interrogator Matthew Alexander says that it is torture that is
recruiting for the enemy: "I learned in Iraq that the No. 1 reason
foreign fighters flocked there to fight were the abuses carried out at
Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo. Our policy of torture was directly and
swiftly recruiting fighters for al-Qaeda in Iraq... It's no exaggeration
to say that at least half of our losses and casualties in that country
have come at the hands of foreigners who joined the fray because of our
program of detainee abuse." He goes on to quantify the costs of
torture: "The number of U.S. soldiers who have died because of our
torture policy will never be definitively known, but it is fair to say
that it is close to the number of lives lost on Sept. 11, 2001. How
anyone can say that torture keeps Americans safe is beyond me -- unless
you don't count American soldiers as Americans." (Washington Post, Nov. 30, 2008) - Vice President Cheney Debunked: "This war
will be won or lost not on the battlefield but in the minds of
potential supporters who have not yet thrown in their lot with the
enemy. If we forfeit our values by signaling that they are negotiable
in situations of grave or imminent danger, we drive those undecideds
into the arms of the enemy. This way lies defeat, and we are well down
the road to it. (Charles Krulak and Joseph Hoar, Washington Post Op-Ed, May 17, 2009)
Vice President Cheney says that crucial information has been revealed through torture. "Well,
I would say that the key to what we did was to collect intelligence
against the enemy. That's what the terrorist surveillance program was
all about, that's what the enhanced interrogation program was all
about."(CNN, March 15 2009)
- Vice President Cheney Debunked: Experienced interrogators says torture doesn't "work".
Fifteen former interrogators from both the CIA and FBI stated in a
statement that "the use of torture and other inhumane and abusive
treatment results in false and misleading information, loss of critical
intelligence, and has caused serious damage to the reputation and
standing of the United States." ("Top Interrogators Declare Torture
Ineffective in Intelligence Gathering," June 24, 2008) - Vice President Cheney Debunked: Even Jesse Venture knows that the information revealed through torture cannot be relied upon.
As Jesse Ventura, former Governor of Minnesota, puts it, "You give me a
water board, Dick Cheney and one hour, and I'll have him confess to the
Sharon Tate murders." Jesse Ventura has in fact been water boarded in
preparation for his service in Vietnam. He says, from personal
experience, that it constitutes torture. (CNN, May 12, 2009) - Vice President Cheney Debunked: Abu Zabaydah said he gave up false information simply to stop being tortured. In
his Combatant Status Review Tribunal, the tribunal president asked him:
"So I understand that during this treatment, you said things to make
them stop and then those statements were actually untrue, is that
correct?" Abu Zubaydah replied: "Yes." (Combatant Status-Review Tribunal" at Guantanamo, March 27, 2007)
Vice PresidentCheney claims that a "wartime situation" justifies torture.
Cheney says that after 9/11, methods of law enforcement were no longer
applicable. After 9/11, he said it was a "wartime situation." Such a
situation, according to Cheney, justifies using all your "intelligence
resources, your military resources, your financial resources,
everything you can in order to shut down that terrorist threat against
you." According to Cheney, the wartime situation justifies the use of
torture. (CNN, March 15, 2009)
- Vice President Cheney Debunked: General David Petraeus rejects torture. In
a letter to his troops in Iraq, General Petraeus clearly states that
torture is not only illegal, but also not useful and not necessary:
"Some may argue that we would be more effective if we sanctioned
torture or other expedient methods to obtain information from the
enemy. They would be wrong. Beyond the basic fact that such actions are
illegal, history shows that they also are frequently neither useful nor
necessary. Certainly extreme physical action can makes someone "talk;"
however, what the individual says may be of questionable value. In
fact, our experience in applying the interrogation standards laid out
in the Army Field Manuel (2-22.3) on Human Intelligence Collector
Operations that was published last year shows that the techniques in
the manual work effectively and humanely in eliciting information from
detainees." (Letter to the Troops, May 10, 2007).
Former Vice President Cheney's daughter, Liz Cheney, justifies torture in the context of a ticking time bomb situation. She
says "We are talking about a situation when there are imminent threats
against the united states so if you to me, this guys has got
information that is going to save your kid's life and my kids' lives,
that is going to keep this country safe, but we gotta water board him
to get it, I got no problem with that." (MSNBC, May 12, 2009)
- Liz Cheney Debunked Ticking time bomb situations are fictional, according to a former CIA officer. A
retired senior CIA officer said in an interview with David Rose that
"Nobody in intelligence believes in the ticking bomb. It's just a way
of framing the debate for public consumption. That is not an
intelligence reality." In his article, Rose reported that the officer
said that inside the CIA, "there was hardly any argument about the
value of coercive methods" (Vanity Fair, Dec. 16, 2008)
Human Rights First is a non-profit, nonpartisan international human rights organization based in New York and Washington D.C. Human Rights First believes that building respect for human rights and the rule of law will help ensure the dignity to which every individual is entitled and will stem tyranny, extremism, intolerance, and violence.
LATEST NEWS
Amid Spying Fight, House Passes Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," said one advocate.
Apr 17, 2024
While applauding the U.S. House of Representatives' bipartisan passage of a bill to ensure that "law enforcement and intelligence agencies can't do an end-run around the Constitution by buying information from data brokers" on Wednesday, privacy advocates highlighted that Congress is trying to extend and expand a long-abused government spying program.
The House voted 219-199 for Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act (FANFSA), which won support from 96 Democrats and 123 Republicans, including the lead sponsor, Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio). Named for the constitutional amendment that protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, H.R. 4639 would close what campaigners call the data broker loophole.
"The privacy violations that flow from law enforcement entities circumventing the Fourth Amendment undermine civil liberties, free expression, and our ability to control what happens to our data," said Free Press Action policy counsel Jenna Ruddock. "These impacts affect everyone who uses digital platforms that extract our personal information any time we open a browser or visit social media and other websites—even when we go to events like demonstrations and other places with our phones revealing our locations."
"We're grateful that the House passed these vital and popular protections," she added. "The bill would prevent flagrant abuses of our privacy by government authorities in league with unscrupulous third-party data brokers. Making this legislation into law with Senate passage too would be a decisive and long-overdue action against government misuse of this clandestine business sector that traffics in our personal data for profit."
Wednesday's vote followed the House sending the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act to the Senate. H.R. 7888 would reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows for warrantless spying on noncitizens abroad but also sweeps up Americans' data.
The House notably included an amendment forcing a wide range of individuals and businesses to cooperate with government spying operations but rejected an amendment that would have added a warrant requirement to the bill, which the Senate could vote on as soon as Thursday.
Noting those decisions on the FISA reauthorization legislation, Ruddock stressed that "today's vote is a victory but follows a recent loss and ongoing threat as that Section 702 bill moves to the Senate this week too."
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," she argued. "That means passing FANFSA and reforming Section 702 authority—and prioritizing everyone's First and Fourth Amendment rights."
Jeramie Scott, senior counsel and director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center's Project on Surveillance Oversight, also praised the House's FANFSA passage on Wednesday.
"The passage of the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale underscores the extent to which reining in abusive warrantless surveillance is a bipartisan issue," Scott said. "We urge the Senate to take up this measure and close the data broker loophole."
Kia Hamadanchy, senior policy counsel at ACLU, similarly said Wednesday that "the bipartisan passage of this bill is a flashing warning sign to the government that if it wants our data, it must get a warrant."
Hamadanchy added that "we hope this vote puts a fire under the Senate to protect their constituents and rein in the government's warrantless surveillance of Americans, once and for all."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a critic of the pending 702 bill and FANFSA's lead sponsor in the upper chamber, called the the House's Wednesday vote "a huge win for privacy" and said that "now it's time for the Senate to follow suit."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Cables Show Biden Pressuring Nations to Oppose Palestine's UN Membership
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," said one former Lebanese diplomat.
Apr 17, 2024
As the United Nations Security Council prepares to vote Thursday on Palestine's bid to become a full U.N. member, the Biden administration—which claims to support Palestinian statehood—is lobbying UNSC nations in an effort to wrangle enough "no" votes so that the United States can avoid resorting to a veto.
Leaked cables obtained by The Intercept show U.S. pressure on Security Council members including Malta—which currently presides over the body—and Ecuador.
While claiming that President Joe Biden backs "Palestinian aspirations for statehood," one of the cables asserts that "it remains the U.S. view that the most expeditious path toward a political horizon for the Palestinian people is in the context of a normalization agreement between Israel and its neighbors."
"We therefore urge you not to support any potential Security Council resolution recommending the admission of 'Palestine' as a U.N. member state, should such a resolution be presented to the Security Council for a decision in the coming days and weeks," the document advises.
The U.S. argument essentially is that the U.N. should not create an independent Palestinian state by fiat—even though that's precisely how the world body voted in 1947 to establish the modern state of Israel.
The renewed push for Palestine's U.N. membership comes as Israel wages a genocidal war on the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian Authority, which hasn't controlled Gaza for nearly two decades, rejected the Biden administration's requests to hold off on seeking full membership.
"We wanted the U.S. to provide a substantive alternative to U.N. recognition. They didn't," one unnamed Palestinian official toldAxios on Wednesday. "We believe full membership in the U.N. for Palestine is way overdue. We have waited more than 12 years since our initial request."
As The Intercept's Ken Klippenstein and Daniel Boguslaw noted:
Since 2011, the U.N. Security Council has rejected the Palestinian Authority's request for full member status. On April 2, the Palestinian Observer Mission to the U.N. requested that the council once again take up consideration of its membership application. According to the first State Department cable, U.N. meetings since the beginning of April suggest that Algeria, China, Guyana, Mozambique, Russia, Slovenia, Sierra Leone, and Malta support granting Palestine full membership to the U.N. It also says that France, Japan, and Korea are undecided, while the United Kingdom will likely abstain from a vote.
Along with the United States, China, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom are permanent members of the UNSC, so they also have veto power.
Ahead of Thursday's planned vote, Spain has been doing its own lobbying in Europe to build greater support for Palestinian statehood. At a joint Tuesday press conference with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, Slovenian Prime Minister Robert Golob said the question is "when, not if, but when is the best moment to recognize Palestine."
Belgium—which is seeking economic sanctions against Israel in response to its genocidal war on Gaza—is expected to join Spain's push for Palestinian statehood after the country's European Union presidency expires in June.
Currently, 139 of the U.N.'s 193 member states recognize Palestine as an independent state.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—who has also claimed to support a so-called "two-state solution"—has alternately boasted about thwarting Palestinian statehood.
Critics pointed to the leaked cables as more proof of U.S. duplicity and double standards on the Israel-Palestine issue.
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," Massoud Maalouf, a former Lebanese ambassador to Canada, Chile, and Poland, said on social media.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Database Exposes 'Illicit Network Undermining Democracy Around the World'
Yanis Varoufakis hailed the effort as "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
Apr 17, 2024
"Coups. Assassinations. Riots. Detentions. Disinformation. We know the tactics that have been deployed to undermine our democracies. But who is behind them?"
Progressive International (PI) asks and answers this and other questions with an extensive new database published Wednesday that connects the dots in what the leftist group calls the "Reactionary International"—a loose global network of right-wing leaders and organizations working to subvert democratic institutions.
PI calls it an "illicit network undermining democracy around the world."
"Today is a mask-off moment for the Reactionary International and the parties, politicians, judges, journalists, foundations, think tanks, tech platforms, NGOs, activists, financiers, and entrepreneurs that comprise it," PI said.
"After a year of preparation, we finally open the doors to our new research consortium, exposing the global network of reactionary forces that corrode our democracies, destroy our planet, and drive us closer to world war," the group added.
"The twin insurrections at the U.S. Capitol in 2021 and BrasÃlia's Three Powers Plaza in 2023 left no doubt about the international coordination of reactionary forces," PI argued. "Yet far too little is known about the entities of this network, their sources of financing, and their institutional allies operating inside our political systems."
Ultimately, PI aims to "support democratic systems to become more resilient to their insidious tactics."
From leaders like Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and former U.S. President Donald Trump—the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee—to evangelical Christian groups influencing laws in African countries criminalizing LGBTQ+ people and tech companies empowering ubiquitous state surveillance, Reactionary International is a who's-who of the world's right-wing forces.
A cursory search of the database's contents shows users can:
- Learn about Israel's NSO, Rayzone, and Team Jorge, and how a team of Tel Aviv tech entrepreneurs fuel unrest in Latin America;
- Meet the Grey Wolves, Turkey's roving death squad with links to President Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan and the ethno-nationalists in his governing coalition; and
- Explore the global network of the Falun Gong, its Trump-connected media outlet The Epoch Times, and its traveling dance troupe known as Shen Yun.
Yanis Varoufakis, a PI member and secretary-general of the left-wing Democracy in Europe Movement 2025, called the database "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
PI invites the public to contribute to the database.
"Together, we will not only name, shame, and expose the forces of the far right—but also dismantle their network of complicity," the group said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular