March, 02 2009, 12:55pm EDT
New Report From the Oakland Institute Issues a Challenge to Western-led Plans for a Genetically Engineered Revolution in Africa
African Farmers & Environmentalists Speak Out Against a New Green Revolution in Africa
WASHINGTON
A new report from the Oakland Institute, Voices from Africa: African
Farmers & Environmentalists Speak Out Against a New Green
Revolution in Africa, issues a direct challenge to Western-led plans
for a genetically engineered revolution in African agriculture,
particularly the recent misguided philanthropic efforts of the Gates
Foundation's Alliance for a New Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA), and
presents African resistance and solutions rooted in first-hand
knowledge of what Africans need.
The report finds a lack of accountability, transparency, and
stakeholder involvement in philanthropic efforts such as AGRA. "Despite
the Gates Foundation's rhetoric of inclusion and the claim that their
investment in agricultural development benefits the growing majority of
the world's poor who rely on agriculture, a leaked Gates Foundation
confidential report on their Agricultural Development Strategy for
2008-2011 actually emphasizes moving people out of the agricultural
sector," said Anuradha Mittal, Executive Director of the Oakland
Institute and the editor of the report. "Their intention is to reduce
dependency on agriculture, but their strategy report does not specify
where or how this new 'land mobile' population is to be reemployed,"
she continued.
AGRA claims to be an "African-led Green Revolution," and
features Kofi Annan at the helm as its chairman; however, African civil
society has rejected the idea that one man can speak on behalf of over
50 countries and 680 million people. It is also not apparent from the
foundation's Agricultural Development Strategy report whether--or
how--the Gates Foundation consulted with African farmers before
launching their multi-million dollar development strategy for the
continent. Some of the foundation's external advisors have long
partnered with biotech companies: for example, Ruth Oniang'o is
featured on Monsanto's website claiming that there is an urgent need
for food biotechnology in Africa, and Gates Foundation potential
grantee Calestous Juma has urged the G8 to put biotechnology on the
agenda for for Africa and discard the application of the precautionary
principle because it interferes with the development of new
technologies.
"Africa does not need dumping of food aid by rich countries
that destroys local efforts to produce. Not the imposition of
industrial-style agriculture based on chemicals and 'high-yielding'
seeds, with the paradoxical outcome of greater production of a few food
crops accompanied by even worse hunger and environmental degradation,"
said Diamantino Nhampossa, a contributor to the report and Executive
Coordinator of the Uniao Nacional de Camponeses (National Peasants
Union) in Mozambique and member of the Via Campesina's International
Coordinating Committee for the Africa Region.
The battle over genetic engineering is being fought across the
world, between those who champion farmers' rights to seeds, livelihood,
and land, and those who seek to privatize these. While promotional
campaigns for technological solutions to hunger regularly feature a
handful of African spokespeople who drown out the genuine voices of
farmers, researchers, and civil society groups, there is widespread
opposition to genetic engineering and plans for a New Green Revolution
for Africa. Voices From Africa is based on the essays and statements of
leading African farmers, environmentalists, and civil society groups,
and brings to light the real African perspectives on technological
solutions to hunger and poverty on the continent--and the solutions
that the people on the ground believe would bring true development.
The increase in hunger resulting from 2008's steep increase in
food prices has been used to make a case for increasing agricultural
production through technical solutions such as genetically engineered
crops. This "poor washing"--the spurious claim that technology will
address the needs of the hungry--and "green washing"--the claim that
this technology will help address the threat of climate change--conveys
a false sense of need. Voices from Africa clarifies how solutions to
hunger and environmental degradation require a paradigm shift that
values local and traditional knowledge and biodiversity, opens policy
space for developing countries to craft their own solutions, and allows
for agriculture and trade policies that protect local and regional
markets for small farmers, pastorlists, and fisherfolk. "The way to
fight poverty in Africa is to embrace the proposal of food sovereignty
that comes from the movement of peasants, indigenous peoples, migrants,
women, and rural communities," said Mr. Nhampossa. "Food sovereignty
puts those who produce, distribute, and consume food at the heart of
food systems and policies, rather than the demands of markets and
corporations."
Other voices featured in the report include: Mariam Mayet,
African Center of Biodiversity, South Africa; Nnimo Bassey,
Environmental Rights Action, Nigeria; David Fig, BioWatch, South
Africa; Mukoma Wa Ngugi, BBC Focus on Africa Magazine; Makhathe
Moahloli, Katleho Moho Association (KMA), Lesotho; Zachary Makanya,
Participatory Ecological Land Use Management Association (PELUM),
Kenya; and Gertrude Kenyangi Kabusimbi, Support for Women in
Agriculture and Environment (SWAGEN), Uganda.
Voices from Africa:African Farmers & Environmentalists
Speak Out Against a New Green Revolution in Africa is a publication of
the Oakland Institute (www.oaklandinstitute.org), a think tank for
research, analysis, and action whose mission is to increase public
participation and promote fair debate on critical social, economic, and
environmental issues in both national and international forums.
The Oakland Institute is a policy think tank whose mission is to increase public participation and promote fair debate on critical social, economic and environmental issues in both national and international forums.
LATEST NEWS
'Should Be a Global Wake-Up Call': Coral Reefs Suffer Fourth Mass Bleaching Event
"The announcement of the fourth global bleaching event is an urgent call to do two things: reduce greenhouse gas emissions and work together to prioritize resilient coral reefs for conservation."
Apr 16, 2024
Scientists said Monday that the world's coral reefs are facing a fourth global bleaching event as the fossil fuel-driven climate emergency pushes ocean temperatures to record highs, imperiling the critical underwater ecosystems that sustain thousands of species.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the International Coral Reef Initiative (ICRI)—which NOAA co-chairs—said they documented coral bleaching in the northern and southern hemispheres of every major ocean basin on Earth between February 2023 and April of this year. It could be the worst global bleaching event on record.
"Since early 2023, mass bleaching of coral reefs has been confirmed throughout the tropics including Florida in the U.S.; the Caribbean; Brazil; the eastern Tropical Pacific (including Mexico, El Salvador, Costa Rica, Panama, and Colombia); Australia's Great Barrier Reef; large areas of the South Pacific (including Fiji, Vanuatu, Tuvalu, Kiribati, the Samoas, and French Polynesia); the Red Sea (including the Gulf of Aqaba); the Persian Gulf; and the Gulf of Aden," the organizations said in a statement.
"NOAA has received confirmation of widespread bleaching across other parts of the Indian Ocean basin as well, including in Tanzania, Kenya, Mauritius, the Seychelles, Tromelin, Mayotte, and off the western coast of Indonesia," they added.
"More than half the reefs on the planet have basically experienced bleaching-level heat stress in the last year."
Derek Manzello, coordinator of NOAA's Coral Reef Watch, said that "as the world's oceans continue to warm, coral bleaching is becoming more frequent."
Excessively warm water causes corals to expel algae from their tissues, causing the organisms to turn white. While they can recover, such bleaching is evidence that corals are under significant stress and at risk of death.
The latest global bleaching event is the second in the last 10 years and "should be a global wake-up call," Manzello toldThe Washington Post.
"More than half the reefs on the planet have basically experienced bleaching-level heat stress in the last year," said Manzello.
NOAA and ICRI's statement comes as scientists around the world are voicing growing alarm over high ocean temperatures. Research released last month showed that global ocean surface temperatures had broken records every day of the year up to that point, underscoring the need to aggressively rein in fossil fuel production and use.
"Temperatures are off the charts," Emily Darling, director of coral reefs at the Wildlife Conservation Society, said Monday. "While many corals are suffering from extreme heat stress and bleaching, some locations and species show different types of natural resilience. Finding and conserving these priority coral reefs are critical to any global strategy to safeguard the planet's oceans and blue economies."
"The announcement of the fourth global bleaching event is an urgent call to do two things: reduce greenhouse gas emissions and work together to prioritize resilient coral reefs for conservation," Darling added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Green Group Slams EPA Failure to Curb 'Dangerous Levels of Air Pollution'
"Air pollution standards must protect endangered plants and wildlife, but the agency failed to follow the law, or the science, to fully address this toxic air pollution's harms to the environment," said one attorney.
Apr 15, 2024
The Center for Biological Diversity on Monday lamented what it called the Biden administration's failure to improve "outdated" limits on nitrogen and soot air pollution.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed keeping existing secondary national ambient air quality standards for sulfur and nitrogen oxides after estimating that new benchmarks previously put forth would result in reduced pollution from sources including coal-fired power plants.
However, Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) staff attorney Ryan Maher argued that "the EPA failed to seize this important opportunity to better protect plants and animals from these toxic pollutants."
"Since the EPA's last review of these pollution standards, the science showing the ecological harm from soot, sulfur, and nitrogen air pollution has become more certain."
"Since the EPA's last review of these pollution standards, the science showing the ecological harm from soot, sulfur, and nitrogen air pollution has become more certain," Maher added. "Rather than aligning its standards with this new research, the EPA has chosen to perpetuate dangerous levels of air pollution."
The Clean Air Act requires the EPA to set primary, or health-based, and secondary, or welfare-based, "national ambient air quality standards" for pollutants including sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter—better known as soot. However, the EPA has failed to update the secondary standards for nitrogen and sulfur air pollution for more than half a century. Key portions of the EPA's secondary soot standards also haven't been updated in decades.
According to the CBD:
The agency published today's proposal under an agreement that resulted from a 2022 lawsuit brought by the Center for Biological Diversity and the Center for Environmental Health. That agreement requires the agency to finalize its decision on the air quality standards no later than December 10, 2024.
The agency will hold a virtual public hearing on the proposed rule on May 8.
Critics have also called out the EPA for not completing a mandatory Endangered Species Act consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Services about how pollution levels allowed under the proposed standards could harm endangered plants and animals.
"Air pollution standards must protect endangered plants and wildlife, but the agency failed to follow the law, or the science, to fully address this toxic air pollution's harms to the environment," Maher noted.
Separately, green groups including Earthjustice, Sierra Club, California Communities Against Toxins, and Southwestern Environmental Law Center on Monday welcomed the EPA's decision to deny an industry petition to delist energy turbines as a major source of air pollution.
"Today's decision upholds critical environmental protections that are essential for safeguarding public health, particularly in communities that have historically borne the brunt of industrial pollution," Earthjustice director of federal clean air practice James Pew said in a statement.
"Keeping pollution control requirements in place is not just a matter of regulatory compliance; it's a fundamental environmental justice issue," Pew added. "EPA did the right thing by rejecting industry's attempt to dodge these requirements and get a free pass to pollute."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Sunrise Protesters Arrested at VP's House Demanding Biden Declare a Climate Emergency
"We deserve an administration who will fight for us, but instead of declaring a climate emergency, we are seeing Biden and Harris expand oil and gas production to record levels."
Apr 15, 2024
Six young activists were arrested outside Vice President Kamala Harris' Los Angeles home on Monday while calling on the White House to declare a climate emergency, according to the youth-led Sunrise Movement.
Harris and President Joe Biden–Democrats who are seeking reelection in November—campaigned as climate champions in the 2020 cycle but have had a mixed record on the topic since entering office.
"My generation is spending our teenage years organizing for climate action because people like Kamala Harris have failed us," said Adah Crandall, one of the activists arrested after blockading the street outside her California residence overnight.
"We're ready to do whatever it takes to win a climate emergency declaration—we will camp out overnight, we will get arrested, we will mobilize our peers by the thousands to win the world we deserve," the 18-year-old continued. "The Biden administration are cowards for not standing with young people."
"The Biden administration are cowards for not standing with young people."
The White House has been praised for climate provisions in the Inflation Reduction Act as well was a recent pause on liquefied natural gas exports. However, the president has also faced criticism for continuing fossil fuel lease sales, backing the Mountain Valley Pipeline and Willow oil project, and skipping last year's United Nations summit.
Just last week, the Biden administration approved a license for a pipeline company to build the nation's largest offshore oil terminal off of Texas' Gulf Coast—despite surging fossil fuel pollution that is pushing up global temperatures.
Sunrise last week condemned the approval as "very disappointing" and also joined with Campus Climate Network and Fridays for Future USA to announce Earth Day demonstrations intended to pressure Biden to declare a climate emergency.
Biden
claimed last year that "practically speaking," he had already declared a national climate emergency; however, as campaigners and experts have stressed, actually doing so would unlock various federal powers to tackle the fossil fuel-driving crisis.
"Our communities in California breathe toxic air from fossil fuels and face fires that destroy our homes," noted 18-year-old Ariela Lara, who was arrested at Harris' home.
"I'm on the frontlines raising my voice for my Black and Latine families and friends," Lara added, "because I know that we deserve to have affordable housing and healthcare, we deserve an administration who will fight for us, but instead of declaring a climate emergency, we are seeing Biden and Harris expand oil and gas production to record levels."
The action targeting Harris came after a February protest at Biden's campaign headquarters in Delaware that also led to arrests.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular