February, 24 2009, 10:00am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Brandon Hersh (202) 471-3205,bhersh@mediamatters.org
Will's Climate Change Column Sparks Outrage in Environmental Community
After Post refuses to address numerous global warming falsehoods, leading environmental organizations join Media Matters in calling for correction
WASHINGTON
After Post refuses to address numerous global warming
falsehoods, leading environmental organizations join Media Matters in
calling for correction
Today, Media
Matters for America President Eric Burns joined Sierra Club
Executive Director Carl Pope, League of Conservation Voters President Gene
Karpinski, and Friends of the Earth President Brent Blackwelder in issuing a
letter to Washington Post ombudsman
Andy Alexander asking him to address several blatant falsehoods in George
Will's February 15 column about global warming.
Yesterday, Media Matters sent
an action
email, asking readers to contact the Post,
which prompted thousands of activists to send correction requests.
"George Will's factually
challenged attempt to deny the link between human activity and climate change
is a stain on a publication respected for its commitment to accuracy,"
said Burns upon the release of the letter. "Will's
column and the Post's refusal to address its falsehoods have
drawn ire from thousands of Media Matters readers
and sparked outrage from esteemed leaders and members of the environmental
community. Hopefully, these actions will encourage the Post to finally correct the record."
The letter, a copy of which is included below, rebuts several falsehoods
in Will's column. As Media Matters recently
noted, Alexander
reportedly responded to one of these claims with further distortions of the
facts.
Andy Alexander
Ombudsman
The Washington
Post
1150 15th St. NW
Washington, DC 20071
Dear Mr. Alexander:
We are writing today to express urgent concern over your refusal to
correct George Will's February 15 column, "Dark Green
Doomsayers." Will used his nationally syndicated column to make several
clear distortions about global warming.
First, Will misused data on global sea ice levels from the Arctic
Climate Research Center (ACRC),
wrongly suggesting that ACRC data undermine the overwhelming scientific
consensus surrounding "man-made global warming." In fact, the ACRC
says the opposite is true -- the sea ice data Will cited actually support the
scientific consensus that humans are causing global warming.
Second, Will claimed that "according to the U.N. World
Meteorological Organization, there has been no recorded global warming for more
than a decade." Will cited no source and provided no quote for this claim.
In fact, last year, the WMO stated that the "long-term upward trend of
global warming, mostly driven by greenhouse gas emissions, is continuing."
And just last month, WMO secretary general Michel Jarraud reportedly said:
"The major trend is unmistakably one of warming."
Third, Will rehashed the discredited myth that in the 1970s, there was
broad scientific consensus that the Earth faced an imminent global cooling
threat.
Will's column has sparked widespread criticism. Yet, the only
response from the Post seems to
be to defend Will with further misinformation. When Brad Johnson from the
Center for American Progress Action Fund contacted you to correct Will's
distortions, you reportedly refused to acknowledge that they exist.
Global warming is one of the most urgent issues facing our country and
the entire world. In dealing with an issue of such magnitude, the Post has a duty to provide the truth to
its readers.
George Will is entitled to his own opinions, but he is not entitled to
his own facts. We respectfully ask that you immediately make your readers aware
of the glaring misinformation in Will's column.
Thank you.
Carl Pope
Executive Director, The Sierra Club
Gene Karpinski
President, League of Conservation
Voters
Brent Blackwelder
President, Friends of the Earth
Eric Burns
President, Media Matters For America
To view
a PDF of the letter, please visit:
https://mediamatters.org/static/pdf/wapo-letter-20090224.pdf
Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3) progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media.
LATEST NEWS
Progressives Say Israel-Hamas Pause 'Not Enough' to End Bloodshed
"The Israeli government's collective punishment and unfolding genocide of Palestinians in Gaza cannot just be put on 'pause'; it must be stopped," said Jewish Voice for Peace.
Nov 22, 2023
Israel and Hamas have agreed to a deal under which dozens of Israeli hostages will be freed in exchange for a brief pause in fighting and the release of 150 Palestinian women and children held in Israel's prisons.
The pause, set to take effect within the next 24 hours, is expected to last at least four days to allow for the release of 50 hostages held by Hamas. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office said the pause will be extended by a day for every additional 10 hostages released.
Hamas is believed to have around 240 hostages. According to the Israeli human rights group HaMoked, thousands of Palestinians are currently detained in Israel without charge or trial.
If it holds, the Qatar-mediated hostage deal will mark a temporary reprieve in what has been a catastrophic six-week war. Israel's response to the October 7 Hamas-led attack—which killed roughly 1,200 people—has decimated large swaths of the Gaza Strip, wrecking schools, homes, hospitals, and other civilian infrastructure and killing more than 14,000 people, drawing accusations of genocide.
Israel's siege of the Palestinian enclave has left virtually the entire population on the brink of starvation and forced many of the territory's overwhelmed hospitals to shut down due to a lack of fuel and other critical supplies, depriving many patients—including premature babies—of necessary treatment.
"There is no military solution. We need a political solution—and we cannot get there until we have a full and lasting ceasefire."
Progressive U.S. lawmakers who have been calling for a cease-fire for weeks welcomed the newly announced hostage deal but said it's not sufficient, particularly if the Israeli government resumes its devastating bombing campaign once the four-day pause is over—as Netanyahu has said he intends to do.
"A temporary pause in the violence is not enough," Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) said in a statement. "We must move with urgency to save as many lives as possible and achieve a permanent cease-fire agreement. Over 14,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza since this violence began, including thousands of children, and 1.7 million Palestinians have been displaced from their homes."
“Further displacement of Palestinians and forced annexation of their land will only perpetuate this conflict," Tlaib added. "Expanding the illegal occupation will never lead to a just and lasting peace. We must address the root causes of this conflict."
Rep. Cori Bush (D-Mo.), the lead sponsor of a cease-fire resolution in the U.S. House, said the pause announcement "further proves the effectiveness of de-escalation and diplomacy—not military force—as a means of saving lives and affirms why we must keep up our push for a permanent cease-fire."
"When this agreement expires, the bombing will continue, thousands more will die, and millions of people will continue to be displaced," said Bush. "We must continue to vigorously push for a permanent cease-fire that ends this violence, protects and saves lives, and ensures the safe return of all hostages, including those who are being arbitrarily detained."
The advocacy group Jewish Voice for Peace echoed Bush and Tlaib, saying that "the Israeli government's collective punishment and unfolding genocide of Palestinians in Gaza cannot just be put on 'pause'; it must be stopped."
"Once we have reached a permanent cease-fire, we cannot return to the status quo," the group continued. "We must address the root causes of injustice. A future of peace and safety for everyone, grounded in justice, freedom and equality for all, is still the only option. There is no military solution. We need a political solution—and we cannot get there until we have a full and lasting cease-fire."
Congressional support for a cease-fire has grown steadily in recent weeks as survey results indicate overwhelming support from the U.S. public. Forty-three members of Congress are now calling for a cease-fire, according to a tally by The Intercept's Prem Thakker.
The Biden administration, though, has repeatedly dismissed the prospects of a lasting cease-fire, claiming it would only benefit Hamas. Citing an unnamed senior official, Politicoreported Tuesday that "there was no sense" inside the administration "that the pause would turn into a lengthier cease-fire."
"And there was some concern in the administration about an unintended consequence of the pause: that it would allow journalists broader access to Gaza and the opportunity to further illuminate the devastation there and turn public opinion on Israel," the outlet added.
As news of the Israel-Hamas deal emerged late Tuesday, The Associated Pressreported that "residents in Gaza City said the fighting there had intensified overnight into Wednesday, with gunfire, heavy artillery, and airstrikes in central neighborhoods."
Omar Shakir, Israel and Palestine director at Human Rights Watch, said in response to the Israel-Hamas deal that "cease-fire or not, unlawful attacks should cease."
Shakir also called for the immediate release of all hostages and an end to the Israeli siege that "has put the lives of 2.2 million people at risk."
"Human beings are not bargaining chips," he said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most US Voters Want Stricter Supreme Court Ethics Code
"Americans can see through the court's failed attempt at a code of conduct," said one group. "It's time for Congress to take action and pass actual ethics reform."
Nov 21, 2023
Nearly three-quarters of U.S. voters want federal lawmakers to pass a stricter ethics policy for the nation's Supreme Court, according to polling results released Tuesday by the progressive advocacy group Demand Justice.
The poll was conducted by YouGov after the Supreme Court announced last week that it had formally adopted a new code of conduct following months of outrage over reporting on relationships between right-wing justices and billionaires. YouGov explained to those surveyed that justices have been criticized for failing to disclose taking gifts and travel from political donors.
YouGov also told voters that supporters of a stricter ethics code say the newly adopted policy "has no way to actually enforce the rules" and believe "Congress should continue to investigate corruption allegations," while opponents of congressional action believe members of the court should be "allowed to determine their own rules without interference" and trusted to enforce them.
Across party lines, 74% of voters agreed that Congress should approve a stricter ethics code and continue to probe "the ties between justices and political megadonors," including 90% of Democrats, 70% of Independents, and 57% of Republicans.
In response to the findings, End Citizens United said that "Americans can see through the court's failed attempt at a code of conduct. It's time for Congress to take action and pass actual ethics reform."
As Common Dreamsreported when the new code was announced last week, critics have condemned it as a "toothless PR stunt" intended to curb media coverage of potential corruption and "halt momentum for transparency and real reform."
Amid a wave of reporting about Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito's connections to billionaire megadonors and Leonard Leo—who leads the Federalist Society, a primary force in pushing U.S. courts to the right—Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee passed the Supreme Court Ethics, Recusal, and Transparency (SCERT) Act in July.
However, the bill is unlikely to win approval from the full Senate or GOP-controlled House of Representatives. Still, the Senate panel—chaired by Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.)—is expected to continue its probe, possibly with subpoenas targeting Leo and Thomas benefactor Harlan Crow.
Demand Justice was among over a dozen groups that last week called on the committee to issue subpoenas, arguing that "we must learn the full scope of these hidden efforts to improperly influence the Supreme Court and the extent of Justices Thomas' and Alito's ethical wrongdoings."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Baltimore Becomes Latest US City to Officially Endorse Medicare for All
"Every Baltimore resident deserves healthcare whenever they need it," said one local pastor who backed the resolution. "It's time to join every other developed nation in making healthcare a guaranteed human right."
Nov 21, 2023
Baltimore on Monday became the latest of over 100 U.S. municipalities to officially endorse a national healthcare program, commonly called Medicare for All.
The passage of a Medicare for All resolution—introduced by Democratic Baltimore City Councilmembers Kristerfer Burnett and Odette Ramos—puts Maryland's largest city in a growing group of municipalities including Philadelphia, San Francisco, Seattle, Los Angeles, Atlanta, Denver, Austin, and Washington, D.C. that have endorsed federally funded universal healthcare programs.
"I want to thank the advocates who have been pushing these resolutions across the country to try and show that there are municipalities that understand that our constituents, in order to fully thrive, need access to healthcare," Burnett said Monday.
"No one should be forced to make the desperate choice between paying for insulin or groceries."
Local Rev. Alvin C. Hathaway Sr., pastor of the Union Baptist Church, told the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen that "every Baltimore resident deserves healthcare whenever they need it."
"No one should be forced to make the desperate choice between paying for insulin or groceries," Hathaway added. "It's time to join every other developed nation in making healthcare a guaranteed human right."
According to U.S. Census Bureau figures cited by Public Citizen, more than 1 in 5 Baltimore residents live in poverty, with 6.7% of residents under age 65 uninsured.
The Baltimore City Health Department published a report in 2020 that said, in part:
It is impossible to discuss the health and well-being of Baltimore City's residents without applying the lens of health equity and systemic disparities. While the overall mortality rate in Baltimore City has declined over the past decade, the city still has a mortality rate nearly 30% higher than the rest of the state, and ranks last on key health outcomes compared to other jurisdictions in Maryland.
This reality is compounded by a series of complicated systemic social, political, economic, and environmental obstacles. With more than 1 in 3 of Baltimore's children below the federal poverty line and more than 30% of Baltimore households earning less than $25,000 per year, income, poverty, and race have an enormous impact on health outcomes.
Jean Ross, president of National Nurses United, said that "every day, we nurses see the human cost of our patients delaying care or going without care, simply because they can't afford it, and that's why we need Medicare for All."
"We're grateful to the city of Baltimore for joining more than 100 other cities around the country in passing a resolution in support of Medicare for All," Ross added. "The grassroots movement to guarantee healthcare to all in the United States is growing every day."
Earlier this year, U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) joined Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.) in reintroducing Medicare for All legislation.
"The American people understand, as I do, that healthcare is a human right, not a privilege," Sanders said at the time. "As we speak, there are millions of people who would like to go to a doctor but cannot afford to do so. That is an outrage."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular