

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

President of the American Federation of Teachers Randi Weingarten speaks during a rally in front of the Department of Education to protest budget cuts on March 13, 2025 in Washington, D.C.
"The White House is not above the law, and we will never stop fighting on behalf of our students and our public schools and the protections, services, and resources they need to thrive," said one union leader.
A federal judge on Thursday halted the Trump administration's efforts to shut down the U.S. Department of Education and ordered that some 1,300 employees who were let go in March be reinstated.
The department can't be shut down without assent from Congress, yet the "record abundantly reveals that defendants' true intention is to effectively dismantle the department without an authorizing statute," wrote U.S. District Judge Myong Joun.
On March 11, the Trump administration announced it was firing over 1,300 staff, effectively halving the agency when combined with other staff reductions, such as the administration's "Fork in the Road" email, according to court filings.
Then, on March 20, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order aiming to begin the process of closing the DOE "to the maximum extent appropriate and permitted by law," and turning over education to the states and local communities.
On Thursday, the court issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting the Trump administration from carrying out the reductions announced on March 11, and ordered the administration to reinstate those employees. It also bars the Trump administration from implementing the executive order and a related directive given out the following day.
By issuing a preliminary injunction, the court has ruled to keep the status quo in place while the underlying issue is disputed.
The plaintiffs in the suit, who include the Somerville Public School Committee, the Easthampton School District, the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), AFT Massachusetts, American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Council 93, American Association of University Professors (AAUP), and Service Employees International Union (SEIU), cheered the decision on Thursday.
Ilana Krepchin, chair of the Somerville School Committee, said the group is "deeply encouraged" by the court's decision.
AFT Massachusetts president Jessica Tang said that "the White House is not above the law, and we will never stop fighting on behalf of our students and our public schools and the protections, services, and resources they need to thrive."
"Today, the court rightly rejected one of the administration's very first illegal, and consequential, acts: abolishing the federal role in education," added AFT president Randi Weingarten.
In court, the educators, professors, school districts, and unions had argued that by getting rid of the staff required to meet Congress's requirements, the Trump administration was unlawfully abolishing the DOE and its "statutorily mandated" parts. The judge said that the plaintiffs are likely to succeed in demonstrating that the Trump administration is effectively undercutting the DOE ability to carry out its statutory duties.
"A department without enough employees to perform statutorily mandated functions is not a department at all. This court cannot be asked to cover its eyes while the department's employees are continuously fired and units are transferred out until the department becomes a shell of itself," the district court wrote.
The nonprofit legal group Democracy Forward is representing the plaintiffs in court.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A federal judge on Thursday halted the Trump administration's efforts to shut down the U.S. Department of Education and ordered that some 1,300 employees who were let go in March be reinstated.
The department can't be shut down without assent from Congress, yet the "record abundantly reveals that defendants' true intention is to effectively dismantle the department without an authorizing statute," wrote U.S. District Judge Myong Joun.
On March 11, the Trump administration announced it was firing over 1,300 staff, effectively halving the agency when combined with other staff reductions, such as the administration's "Fork in the Road" email, according to court filings.
Then, on March 20, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order aiming to begin the process of closing the DOE "to the maximum extent appropriate and permitted by law," and turning over education to the states and local communities.
On Thursday, the court issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting the Trump administration from carrying out the reductions announced on March 11, and ordered the administration to reinstate those employees. It also bars the Trump administration from implementing the executive order and a related directive given out the following day.
By issuing a preliminary injunction, the court has ruled to keep the status quo in place while the underlying issue is disputed.
The plaintiffs in the suit, who include the Somerville Public School Committee, the Easthampton School District, the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), AFT Massachusetts, American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Council 93, American Association of University Professors (AAUP), and Service Employees International Union (SEIU), cheered the decision on Thursday.
Ilana Krepchin, chair of the Somerville School Committee, said the group is "deeply encouraged" by the court's decision.
AFT Massachusetts president Jessica Tang said that "the White House is not above the law, and we will never stop fighting on behalf of our students and our public schools and the protections, services, and resources they need to thrive."
"Today, the court rightly rejected one of the administration's very first illegal, and consequential, acts: abolishing the federal role in education," added AFT president Randi Weingarten.
In court, the educators, professors, school districts, and unions had argued that by getting rid of the staff required to meet Congress's requirements, the Trump administration was unlawfully abolishing the DOE and its "statutorily mandated" parts. The judge said that the plaintiffs are likely to succeed in demonstrating that the Trump administration is effectively undercutting the DOE ability to carry out its statutory duties.
"A department without enough employees to perform statutorily mandated functions is not a department at all. This court cannot be asked to cover its eyes while the department's employees are continuously fired and units are transferred out until the department becomes a shell of itself," the district court wrote.
The nonprofit legal group Democracy Forward is representing the plaintiffs in court.
A federal judge on Thursday halted the Trump administration's efforts to shut down the U.S. Department of Education and ordered that some 1,300 employees who were let go in March be reinstated.
The department can't be shut down without assent from Congress, yet the "record abundantly reveals that defendants' true intention is to effectively dismantle the department without an authorizing statute," wrote U.S. District Judge Myong Joun.
On March 11, the Trump administration announced it was firing over 1,300 staff, effectively halving the agency when combined with other staff reductions, such as the administration's "Fork in the Road" email, according to court filings.
Then, on March 20, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order aiming to begin the process of closing the DOE "to the maximum extent appropriate and permitted by law," and turning over education to the states and local communities.
On Thursday, the court issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting the Trump administration from carrying out the reductions announced on March 11, and ordered the administration to reinstate those employees. It also bars the Trump administration from implementing the executive order and a related directive given out the following day.
By issuing a preliminary injunction, the court has ruled to keep the status quo in place while the underlying issue is disputed.
The plaintiffs in the suit, who include the Somerville Public School Committee, the Easthampton School District, the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), AFT Massachusetts, American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Council 93, American Association of University Professors (AAUP), and Service Employees International Union (SEIU), cheered the decision on Thursday.
Ilana Krepchin, chair of the Somerville School Committee, said the group is "deeply encouraged" by the court's decision.
AFT Massachusetts president Jessica Tang said that "the White House is not above the law, and we will never stop fighting on behalf of our students and our public schools and the protections, services, and resources they need to thrive."
"Today, the court rightly rejected one of the administration's very first illegal, and consequential, acts: abolishing the federal role in education," added AFT president Randi Weingarten.
In court, the educators, professors, school districts, and unions had argued that by getting rid of the staff required to meet Congress's requirements, the Trump administration was unlawfully abolishing the DOE and its "statutorily mandated" parts. The judge said that the plaintiffs are likely to succeed in demonstrating that the Trump administration is effectively undercutting the DOE ability to carry out its statutory duties.
"A department without enough employees to perform statutorily mandated functions is not a department at all. This court cannot be asked to cover its eyes while the department's employees are continuously fired and units are transferred out until the department becomes a shell of itself," the district court wrote.
The nonprofit legal group Democracy Forward is representing the plaintiffs in court.