Climate activists demonstrate in support of a climate liability lawsuit brought by the island of Bonaire against the Netherlands.
'We Have to Act': Bonaire Residents File Climate Suit Against Netherlands
"There are plans in place to protect the European Netherlands against sea-level rise and other consequences of the climate crisis, but for Bonaire this is not yet the case," one plaintiff said.
Eight residents of the Caribbean island of Bonaire sued the government of the Netherlands Thursday for not doing enough to protect the Dutch municipality from the climate emergency.
In the lawsuit, filed alongside Greenpeace Netherlands, the islanders demand that the Netherlands work with Bonaire to make a plan to protect it from the impacts of the climate crisis and that it do its "fair share" to limit global temperature rise to 1.5°C by reaching net-zero by 2040 instead of 2050.
"The time for talking is over, we have to act," plaintiff Kjelld Kroon, a 28-year-old program creator, said in a statement. "I don't want to have to wait any longer, and that's why I'm taking action today."
As a low-lying Caribbean island, Bonaire is especially vulnerable to the climate crisis. A study commissioned by Greenpeace found that sea-level rise could cause permanent flooding on parts of the island by 2050 and submerge one-fifth of it by 2100. Rising temperatures would also devastate the coral reefs that the island relies on for tourism, fishing, and protection from storms; damage infrastructure and cultural heritage; and harm public health through more frequent heatwaves and vector-born diseases.
"Climate change is happening right now on Bonaire. It's getting increasingly hot and the rain showers are more frequent and more extreme. These downpours are causing flooding, inundating many houses. Including my mother's house," Kroon said.
Despite these risks, the plaintiffs say that the Netherlands has violated their human rights by not doing enough to protect Bonaire from the impact of rising temperatures caused primarily by the burning of fossil fuels. The Netherlands has maintained a presence on Bonaire for nearly 400 years, and the island became a special municipality in 2010.
"It shouldn't matter whether you live on Bonaire, on Ameland, or in Valkenburg. It's the Dutch government's duty to protect all of us from the consequences of the climate crisis."
"The Caribbean Netherlands has been forgotten for too long," plaintiff Danique Martis, a 25-year-old social worker, said in a statement. "There are plans in place to protect the European Netherlands against sea-level rise and other consequences of the climate crisis, but for Bonaire this is not yet the case. It saddens me to see how, despite knowing their responsibility, the Dutch government has chosen to push our right to safety aside. For this reason, we are going to the court, so they have no choice but to act."
The plaintiffs sent a pre-trial letter to the Dutch government in May of 2023 to give it a chance to resolve their concerns without a trial, The Guardian reported.
However, the Netherlands responded that its net-zero timeline was sufficient. Plaintiffs also were not satisfied with meetings concerning adaptations.
"It shouldn't matter whether you live on Bonaire, on Ameland, or in Valkenburg. It's the Dutch government's duty to protect all of us from the consequences of the climate crisis," Andy Palmen, executive director of Greenpeace Netherland, said in a statement.
The lawsuit was delivered to the district court in the Hague Thursday as part of a protest march from the prime minister's office, according to Greenpeace. At the same time, plaintiffs held a press conference in the capital of Bonaire.
"The government has a duty to reduce global warming as much as possible, and right now it's failing to do so," Palmen said. "We demand more protective measures for Bonaire, and we want the Dutch government to speed up the reduction of carbon emissions from the whole of the Netherlands. This is in the interest of all of us."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Eight residents of the Caribbean island of Bonaire sued the government of the Netherlands Thursday for not doing enough to protect the Dutch municipality from the climate emergency.
In the lawsuit, filed alongside Greenpeace Netherlands, the islanders demand that the Netherlands work with Bonaire to make a plan to protect it from the impacts of the climate crisis and that it do its "fair share" to limit global temperature rise to 1.5°C by reaching net-zero by 2040 instead of 2050.
"The time for talking is over, we have to act," plaintiff Kjelld Kroon, a 28-year-old program creator, said in a statement. "I don't want to have to wait any longer, and that's why I'm taking action today."
As a low-lying Caribbean island, Bonaire is especially vulnerable to the climate crisis. A study commissioned by Greenpeace found that sea-level rise could cause permanent flooding on parts of the island by 2050 and submerge one-fifth of it by 2100. Rising temperatures would also devastate the coral reefs that the island relies on for tourism, fishing, and protection from storms; damage infrastructure and cultural heritage; and harm public health through more frequent heatwaves and vector-born diseases.
"Climate change is happening right now on Bonaire. It's getting increasingly hot and the rain showers are more frequent and more extreme. These downpours are causing flooding, inundating many houses. Including my mother's house," Kroon said.
Despite these risks, the plaintiffs say that the Netherlands has violated their human rights by not doing enough to protect Bonaire from the impact of rising temperatures caused primarily by the burning of fossil fuels. The Netherlands has maintained a presence on Bonaire for nearly 400 years, and the island became a special municipality in 2010.
"It shouldn't matter whether you live on Bonaire, on Ameland, or in Valkenburg. It's the Dutch government's duty to protect all of us from the consequences of the climate crisis."
"The Caribbean Netherlands has been forgotten for too long," plaintiff Danique Martis, a 25-year-old social worker, said in a statement. "There are plans in place to protect the European Netherlands against sea-level rise and other consequences of the climate crisis, but for Bonaire this is not yet the case. It saddens me to see how, despite knowing their responsibility, the Dutch government has chosen to push our right to safety aside. For this reason, we are going to the court, so they have no choice but to act."
The plaintiffs sent a pre-trial letter to the Dutch government in May of 2023 to give it a chance to resolve their concerns without a trial, The Guardian reported.
However, the Netherlands responded that its net-zero timeline was sufficient. Plaintiffs also were not satisfied with meetings concerning adaptations.
"It shouldn't matter whether you live on Bonaire, on Ameland, or in Valkenburg. It's the Dutch government's duty to protect all of us from the consequences of the climate crisis," Andy Palmen, executive director of Greenpeace Netherland, said in a statement.
The lawsuit was delivered to the district court in the Hague Thursday as part of a protest march from the prime minister's office, according to Greenpeace. At the same time, plaintiffs held a press conference in the capital of Bonaire.
"The government has a duty to reduce global warming as much as possible, and right now it's failing to do so," Palmen said. "We demand more protective measures for Bonaire, and we want the Dutch government to speed up the reduction of carbon emissions from the whole of the Netherlands. This is in the interest of all of us."
- Greta Thunberg Joins 630+ Young People in Landmark Climate Lawsuit Against Sweden ›
- Dutch Court Hears Case Accusing Government of Complicity in Israeli War Crimes ›
- Portuguese Youth File 'Unprecedented' Climate Lawsuit Against 33 European Countries ›
- 'Historic': Belgium Court Says Inadequate Climate Policy a Human Rights Violation ›
- Opinion | Portuguese Climate Activists on Trial Represent the True Spirit of April 25 | Common Dreams ›
Eight residents of the Caribbean island of Bonaire sued the government of the Netherlands Thursday for not doing enough to protect the Dutch municipality from the climate emergency.
In the lawsuit, filed alongside Greenpeace Netherlands, the islanders demand that the Netherlands work with Bonaire to make a plan to protect it from the impacts of the climate crisis and that it do its "fair share" to limit global temperature rise to 1.5°C by reaching net-zero by 2040 instead of 2050.
"The time for talking is over, we have to act," plaintiff Kjelld Kroon, a 28-year-old program creator, said in a statement. "I don't want to have to wait any longer, and that's why I'm taking action today."
As a low-lying Caribbean island, Bonaire is especially vulnerable to the climate crisis. A study commissioned by Greenpeace found that sea-level rise could cause permanent flooding on parts of the island by 2050 and submerge one-fifth of it by 2100. Rising temperatures would also devastate the coral reefs that the island relies on for tourism, fishing, and protection from storms; damage infrastructure and cultural heritage; and harm public health through more frequent heatwaves and vector-born diseases.
"Climate change is happening right now on Bonaire. It's getting increasingly hot and the rain showers are more frequent and more extreme. These downpours are causing flooding, inundating many houses. Including my mother's house," Kroon said.
Despite these risks, the plaintiffs say that the Netherlands has violated their human rights by not doing enough to protect Bonaire from the impact of rising temperatures caused primarily by the burning of fossil fuels. The Netherlands has maintained a presence on Bonaire for nearly 400 years, and the island became a special municipality in 2010.
"It shouldn't matter whether you live on Bonaire, on Ameland, or in Valkenburg. It's the Dutch government's duty to protect all of us from the consequences of the climate crisis."
"The Caribbean Netherlands has been forgotten for too long," plaintiff Danique Martis, a 25-year-old social worker, said in a statement. "There are plans in place to protect the European Netherlands against sea-level rise and other consequences of the climate crisis, but for Bonaire this is not yet the case. It saddens me to see how, despite knowing their responsibility, the Dutch government has chosen to push our right to safety aside. For this reason, we are going to the court, so they have no choice but to act."
The plaintiffs sent a pre-trial letter to the Dutch government in May of 2023 to give it a chance to resolve their concerns without a trial, The Guardian reported.
However, the Netherlands responded that its net-zero timeline was sufficient. Plaintiffs also were not satisfied with meetings concerning adaptations.
"It shouldn't matter whether you live on Bonaire, on Ameland, or in Valkenburg. It's the Dutch government's duty to protect all of us from the consequences of the climate crisis," Andy Palmen, executive director of Greenpeace Netherland, said in a statement.
The lawsuit was delivered to the district court in the Hague Thursday as part of a protest march from the prime minister's office, according to Greenpeace. At the same time, plaintiffs held a press conference in the capital of Bonaire.
"The government has a duty to reduce global warming as much as possible, and right now it's failing to do so," Palmen said. "We demand more protective measures for Bonaire, and we want the Dutch government to speed up the reduction of carbon emissions from the whole of the Netherlands. This is in the interest of all of us."
- Greta Thunberg Joins 630+ Young People in Landmark Climate Lawsuit Against Sweden ›
- Dutch Court Hears Case Accusing Government of Complicity in Israeli War Crimes ›
- Portuguese Youth File 'Unprecedented' Climate Lawsuit Against 33 European Countries ›
- 'Historic': Belgium Court Says Inadequate Climate Policy a Human Rights Violation ›
- Opinion | Portuguese Climate Activists on Trial Represent the True Spirit of April 25 | Common Dreams ›