Dec 16, 2022
Twitter CEO Elon Musk, a self-proclaimed free speech absolutist, suspended a number of journalists from the social media platform on Thursday in what the ACLU condemned as "an attack on free expression" that should be reversed.
Musk justified his decision by claiming those suspended--including Drew Harwell of The Washington Post, Micah Lee of The Intercept, Ryan Mac of The New York Times, and Matt Binder of Mashable--shared real-time details about his location, an accusation stemming from the journalists' reporting on a Twitter account that tracked the movements of the billionaire's private jet.
That account and the person behind it, a college student, have been suspended and Musk says he intends to take legal action, even though the flight information was based on publicly available data.
"Criticizing me all day long is totally fine," Musk tweeted late Thursday, "but doxxing my real-time location and endangering my family is not."
Following the suspensions of journalists, which were carried out without notice or immediate explanation, the Postreported that "none of the tweets from suspended reporters" that it reviewed "revealed the location of Musk or his family."
Musk later insisted that even so much as sharing a link to the flight-tracking account in the course of reporting amounts to a violation of Twitter's newly amended policy against sharing a person's "live location information."
As Musk faced backlash from press freedom and civil liberties groups over the decision, he posted a poll on Twitter asking users when he should unsuspend the journalists' accounts. When a plurality of respondents said the accounts should be restored "now," Musk tweeted: "Sorry, too many options. Will redo poll."
Jameel Jaffer, executive director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, toldNPR that "Musk suspending journalists' accounts is petty and vindictive and absolutely disgraceful--and especially so because Musk has styled himself, however absurdly, as a champion of free speech."
\u201cWhat message does this send to *other* reporters--the ones who haven't (yet) been purged? Is it tenable for reporters to stay here now that Musk has made clear that they're here at his pleasure, and that he'll eject them if they cross his arbitrary lines?\u201d— Jameel Jaffer (@Jameel Jaffer) 1671157691
The Committee to Protect Journalists, a watchdog group that defends press freedom worldwide, said in a statement that it is "concerned about news reports that journalists who have covered recent developments involving Twitter and its owner, Elon Musk, have had their accounts on the platform suspended."
"If confirmed as retaliation for their work, this would be a serious violation of journalists' right to report the news without fear of reprisal," the group added.
Musk's move also drew attention and criticism from lawmakers.
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), who has faced death threats and other forms of harassment, tweeted that she understands "feeling unsafe, but descending into abuse of power [and] erratically banning journalists only increases the intensity around you."
"You're a public figure. An extremely controversial and powerful one," Ocasio-Cortez wrote. "Take a beat and lay off the proto-fascism. Maybe try putting down your phone."
Edward Snowden, who exposed mass surveillance by the powerful U.S. National Security Agency and is now living in Russia under threat of imprisonment in his home country, weighed in on the suspensions Friday morning, writing that he is "significantly more sympathetic to Elon Musk's concern about crazy people showing up at the door than the average person because, well, look at my life, but c'mon, man."
"You're a public figure in a position of power in a world where even normal people are constantly tracked," Snowden added.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Twitter CEO Elon Musk, a self-proclaimed free speech absolutist, suspended a number of journalists from the social media platform on Thursday in what the ACLU condemned as "an attack on free expression" that should be reversed.
Musk justified his decision by claiming those suspended--including Drew Harwell of The Washington Post, Micah Lee of The Intercept, Ryan Mac of The New York Times, and Matt Binder of Mashable--shared real-time details about his location, an accusation stemming from the journalists' reporting on a Twitter account that tracked the movements of the billionaire's private jet.
That account and the person behind it, a college student, have been suspended and Musk says he intends to take legal action, even though the flight information was based on publicly available data.
"Criticizing me all day long is totally fine," Musk tweeted late Thursday, "but doxxing my real-time location and endangering my family is not."
Following the suspensions of journalists, which were carried out without notice or immediate explanation, the Postreported that "none of the tweets from suspended reporters" that it reviewed "revealed the location of Musk or his family."
Musk later insisted that even so much as sharing a link to the flight-tracking account in the course of reporting amounts to a violation of Twitter's newly amended policy against sharing a person's "live location information."
As Musk faced backlash from press freedom and civil liberties groups over the decision, he posted a poll on Twitter asking users when he should unsuspend the journalists' accounts. When a plurality of respondents said the accounts should be restored "now," Musk tweeted: "Sorry, too many options. Will redo poll."
Jameel Jaffer, executive director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, toldNPR that "Musk suspending journalists' accounts is petty and vindictive and absolutely disgraceful--and especially so because Musk has styled himself, however absurdly, as a champion of free speech."
\u201cWhat message does this send to *other* reporters--the ones who haven't (yet) been purged? Is it tenable for reporters to stay here now that Musk has made clear that they're here at his pleasure, and that he'll eject them if they cross his arbitrary lines?\u201d— Jameel Jaffer (@Jameel Jaffer) 1671157691
The Committee to Protect Journalists, a watchdog group that defends press freedom worldwide, said in a statement that it is "concerned about news reports that journalists who have covered recent developments involving Twitter and its owner, Elon Musk, have had their accounts on the platform suspended."
"If confirmed as retaliation for their work, this would be a serious violation of journalists' right to report the news without fear of reprisal," the group added.
Musk's move also drew attention and criticism from lawmakers.
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), who has faced death threats and other forms of harassment, tweeted that she understands "feeling unsafe, but descending into abuse of power [and] erratically banning journalists only increases the intensity around you."
"You're a public figure. An extremely controversial and powerful one," Ocasio-Cortez wrote. "Take a beat and lay off the proto-fascism. Maybe try putting down your phone."
Edward Snowden, who exposed mass surveillance by the powerful U.S. National Security Agency and is now living in Russia under threat of imprisonment in his home country, weighed in on the suspensions Friday morning, writing that he is "significantly more sympathetic to Elon Musk's concern about crazy people showing up at the door than the average person because, well, look at my life, but c'mon, man."
"You're a public figure in a position of power in a world where even normal people are constantly tracked," Snowden added.
Twitter CEO Elon Musk, a self-proclaimed free speech absolutist, suspended a number of journalists from the social media platform on Thursday in what the ACLU condemned as "an attack on free expression" that should be reversed.
Musk justified his decision by claiming those suspended--including Drew Harwell of The Washington Post, Micah Lee of The Intercept, Ryan Mac of The New York Times, and Matt Binder of Mashable--shared real-time details about his location, an accusation stemming from the journalists' reporting on a Twitter account that tracked the movements of the billionaire's private jet.
That account and the person behind it, a college student, have been suspended and Musk says he intends to take legal action, even though the flight information was based on publicly available data.
"Criticizing me all day long is totally fine," Musk tweeted late Thursday, "but doxxing my real-time location and endangering my family is not."
Following the suspensions of journalists, which were carried out without notice or immediate explanation, the Postreported that "none of the tweets from suspended reporters" that it reviewed "revealed the location of Musk or his family."
Musk later insisted that even so much as sharing a link to the flight-tracking account in the course of reporting amounts to a violation of Twitter's newly amended policy against sharing a person's "live location information."
As Musk faced backlash from press freedom and civil liberties groups over the decision, he posted a poll on Twitter asking users when he should unsuspend the journalists' accounts. When a plurality of respondents said the accounts should be restored "now," Musk tweeted: "Sorry, too many options. Will redo poll."
Jameel Jaffer, executive director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, toldNPR that "Musk suspending journalists' accounts is petty and vindictive and absolutely disgraceful--and especially so because Musk has styled himself, however absurdly, as a champion of free speech."
\u201cWhat message does this send to *other* reporters--the ones who haven't (yet) been purged? Is it tenable for reporters to stay here now that Musk has made clear that they're here at his pleasure, and that he'll eject them if they cross his arbitrary lines?\u201d— Jameel Jaffer (@Jameel Jaffer) 1671157691
The Committee to Protect Journalists, a watchdog group that defends press freedom worldwide, said in a statement that it is "concerned about news reports that journalists who have covered recent developments involving Twitter and its owner, Elon Musk, have had their accounts on the platform suspended."
"If confirmed as retaliation for their work, this would be a serious violation of journalists' right to report the news without fear of reprisal," the group added.
Musk's move also drew attention and criticism from lawmakers.
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), who has faced death threats and other forms of harassment, tweeted that she understands "feeling unsafe, but descending into abuse of power [and] erratically banning journalists only increases the intensity around you."
"You're a public figure. An extremely controversial and powerful one," Ocasio-Cortez wrote. "Take a beat and lay off the proto-fascism. Maybe try putting down your phone."
Edward Snowden, who exposed mass surveillance by the powerful U.S. National Security Agency and is now living in Russia under threat of imprisonment in his home country, weighed in on the suspensions Friday morning, writing that he is "significantly more sympathetic to Elon Musk's concern about crazy people showing up at the door than the average person because, well, look at my life, but c'mon, man."
"You're a public figure in a position of power in a world where even normal people are constantly tracked," Snowden added.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.