SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Michael Regan speaks at the White House on May 12, 2021 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Nicholas Kamm/AFP via Getty Images)
Anger as Biden EPA Backs 'Dangerous and Unnecessary' Oil Export Project on Texas Coast
"You cannot address current and historic environmental injustice if you are advancing new fossil fuel projects," said one campaigner.
Nov 09, 2022
Environmental and climate campaigners on Wednesday expressed outrage after the Biden administration backed the approval of a massive new fossil fuel project on the Texas coast that one opponent calls "dangerous and unnecessary."
"Y'all have a terrible spill record. You choose to run these pipes right up our ass. We are against this project."
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommended that the Maritime Administration approve the Sea Port Oil Terminal (SPOT), a crude oil infrastructure project proposed by Enterprise Products Operating LLC, SPOT Terminal Services LLC, and Enbridge Inc.
As currently planned, SPOT would consist of several pipelines--the longest of them 50 miles long--storage tanks, and a deepwater oil export platform 30 miles off the coast of Brazoria County.
"This is a signal President [Joe] Biden is moving us in the wrong direction on addressing environmental injustice and the climate crisis," Kelsey Crane, senior policy advocate at the green group Earthworks, said in a statement.
"You cannot address current and historic environmental injustice if you are advancing new fossil fuel projects that will continue to harm the communities who are forced to live alongside this pollution and have been suffering and dying under industry exploitation," Crane added.
Earthworks said SPOT would emit 300 million tons of greenhouse gases annually, "further harming the health of predominantly low-income communities and communities of color."
The group added that the project would "increase air pollutants that form ozone and smog in communities that have failed to meet EPA air quality standards for more than a decade and [are] home to some of the highest cancer clusters in the nation."
The advocacy group Food & Water Watch calls SPOT "dangerous and unnecessary," arguing that "we can't sacrifice the health of Texas' Gulf Coast environment and communities for a massive crude oil export terminal that will further fuel the climate crisis."
According to U.S. Coast Guard and Maritime Administration, the pipelines will pass through the Brazos River, 149 wetlands, and the town of Surfside Beach. EPA recommended approval for SPOT's license despite acknowledging that "more emphasis is needed to ensure that environmental justice and climate change considerations are included in the project for the protection of overburdened communities."
Residents of communities that would be affected by SPOT have pushed back against the project. In March 2021, the Surfside Beach Village Council voted unanimously to oppose the proposal as planned, and protests have been held against the proposal.
At an August virtual public hearing on the proposed project, Surfside Beach resident Donna Robinson asked, "What kind of plan is set in place for fishing and tourism losses in case it spills oil?"
"Y'all have a terrible spill record," she added. "You choose to run these pipes right up our ass. We are against this project."
Noting during the same hearing that there are more than 50 public water wells within a kilometer of the proposed pipeline route, Healthy Gulf staff scientist Naomi Yoder said that the U.S. Maritime Administration "has received 14,000 comments against this project" and that "an oil spill is just a matter of time" because "Enterprise has a horrible track record of spills."
Melanie Oldham, Freeport resident and founder of Citizens for Clean Air and Water in Brazoria, said that "in one breath the EPA says they approve of the project, and in the next breath they talk about the need to take a closer look at environmental justice communities, which is Brazoria County."
Oldham added that "the only way to ensure environmental justice and protection of these communities that have been overburdened by industry is to deny the license for SPOT and all new fossil fuel projects."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Environmental and climate campaigners on Wednesday expressed outrage after the Biden administration backed the approval of a massive new fossil fuel project on the Texas coast that one opponent calls "dangerous and unnecessary."
"Y'all have a terrible spill record. You choose to run these pipes right up our ass. We are against this project."
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommended that the Maritime Administration approve the Sea Port Oil Terminal (SPOT), a crude oil infrastructure project proposed by Enterprise Products Operating LLC, SPOT Terminal Services LLC, and Enbridge Inc.
As currently planned, SPOT would consist of several pipelines--the longest of them 50 miles long--storage tanks, and a deepwater oil export platform 30 miles off the coast of Brazoria County.
"This is a signal President [Joe] Biden is moving us in the wrong direction on addressing environmental injustice and the climate crisis," Kelsey Crane, senior policy advocate at the green group Earthworks, said in a statement.
"You cannot address current and historic environmental injustice if you are advancing new fossil fuel projects that will continue to harm the communities who are forced to live alongside this pollution and have been suffering and dying under industry exploitation," Crane added.
Earthworks said SPOT would emit 300 million tons of greenhouse gases annually, "further harming the health of predominantly low-income communities and communities of color."
The group added that the project would "increase air pollutants that form ozone and smog in communities that have failed to meet EPA air quality standards for more than a decade and [are] home to some of the highest cancer clusters in the nation."
The advocacy group Food & Water Watch calls SPOT "dangerous and unnecessary," arguing that "we can't sacrifice the health of Texas' Gulf Coast environment and communities for a massive crude oil export terminal that will further fuel the climate crisis."
According to U.S. Coast Guard and Maritime Administration, the pipelines will pass through the Brazos River, 149 wetlands, and the town of Surfside Beach. EPA recommended approval for SPOT's license despite acknowledging that "more emphasis is needed to ensure that environmental justice and climate change considerations are included in the project for the protection of overburdened communities."
Residents of communities that would be affected by SPOT have pushed back against the project. In March 2021, the Surfside Beach Village Council voted unanimously to oppose the proposal as planned, and protests have been held against the proposal.
At an August virtual public hearing on the proposed project, Surfside Beach resident Donna Robinson asked, "What kind of plan is set in place for fishing and tourism losses in case it spills oil?"
"Y'all have a terrible spill record," she added. "You choose to run these pipes right up our ass. We are against this project."
Noting during the same hearing that there are more than 50 public water wells within a kilometer of the proposed pipeline route, Healthy Gulf staff scientist Naomi Yoder said that the U.S. Maritime Administration "has received 14,000 comments against this project" and that "an oil spill is just a matter of time" because "Enterprise has a horrible track record of spills."
Melanie Oldham, Freeport resident and founder of Citizens for Clean Air and Water in Brazoria, said that "in one breath the EPA says they approve of the project, and in the next breath they talk about the need to take a closer look at environmental justice communities, which is Brazoria County."
Oldham added that "the only way to ensure environmental justice and protection of these communities that have been overburdened by industry is to deny the license for SPOT and all new fossil fuel projects."
Environmental and climate campaigners on Wednesday expressed outrage after the Biden administration backed the approval of a massive new fossil fuel project on the Texas coast that one opponent calls "dangerous and unnecessary."
"Y'all have a terrible spill record. You choose to run these pipes right up our ass. We are against this project."
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommended that the Maritime Administration approve the Sea Port Oil Terminal (SPOT), a crude oil infrastructure project proposed by Enterprise Products Operating LLC, SPOT Terminal Services LLC, and Enbridge Inc.
As currently planned, SPOT would consist of several pipelines--the longest of them 50 miles long--storage tanks, and a deepwater oil export platform 30 miles off the coast of Brazoria County.
"This is a signal President [Joe] Biden is moving us in the wrong direction on addressing environmental injustice and the climate crisis," Kelsey Crane, senior policy advocate at the green group Earthworks, said in a statement.
"You cannot address current and historic environmental injustice if you are advancing new fossil fuel projects that will continue to harm the communities who are forced to live alongside this pollution and have been suffering and dying under industry exploitation," Crane added.
Earthworks said SPOT would emit 300 million tons of greenhouse gases annually, "further harming the health of predominantly low-income communities and communities of color."
The group added that the project would "increase air pollutants that form ozone and smog in communities that have failed to meet EPA air quality standards for more than a decade and [are] home to some of the highest cancer clusters in the nation."
The advocacy group Food & Water Watch calls SPOT "dangerous and unnecessary," arguing that "we can't sacrifice the health of Texas' Gulf Coast environment and communities for a massive crude oil export terminal that will further fuel the climate crisis."
According to U.S. Coast Guard and Maritime Administration, the pipelines will pass through the Brazos River, 149 wetlands, and the town of Surfside Beach. EPA recommended approval for SPOT's license despite acknowledging that "more emphasis is needed to ensure that environmental justice and climate change considerations are included in the project for the protection of overburdened communities."
Residents of communities that would be affected by SPOT have pushed back against the project. In March 2021, the Surfside Beach Village Council voted unanimously to oppose the proposal as planned, and protests have been held against the proposal.
At an August virtual public hearing on the proposed project, Surfside Beach resident Donna Robinson asked, "What kind of plan is set in place for fishing and tourism losses in case it spills oil?"
"Y'all have a terrible spill record," she added. "You choose to run these pipes right up our ass. We are against this project."
Noting during the same hearing that there are more than 50 public water wells within a kilometer of the proposed pipeline route, Healthy Gulf staff scientist Naomi Yoder said that the U.S. Maritime Administration "has received 14,000 comments against this project" and that "an oil spill is just a matter of time" because "Enterprise has a horrible track record of spills."
Melanie Oldham, Freeport resident and founder of Citizens for Clean Air and Water in Brazoria, said that "in one breath the EPA says they approve of the project, and in the next breath they talk about the need to take a closer look at environmental justice communities, which is Brazoria County."
Oldham added that "the only way to ensure environmental justice and protection of these communities that have been overburdened by industry is to deny the license for SPOT and all new fossil fuel projects."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.