Parents and caregivers with the Economic Security Project gather to advocate for the expanded child tax credit before the White House Conference on Hunger, Nutrition, and Health in Washington, D.C. on September 20, 2022. (Photo: Larry French/Getty Images for SKDK)
Food Insufficiency Up 25% Since Manchin, GOP Killed Child Tax Credit Boost
"A permanent expansion would be a game-changer for reducing child poverty for good," said one study co-author.
A Boston-based research team on Friday reiterated the negative effects of ending the expanded child tax credit by releasing a study that shows a huge jump in U.S. households not having enough food.
"Even brief periods of deprivation during childhood can have lasting impacts."
The expanded child tax credit (CTC) in the American Rescue Plan gave over 35 million U.S. families up to $300 a month per child until it expired last December, and congressional Republicans and right-wing Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) opposed continuing it.
Published in the journal JAMA Network Open, the new study focuses on food insufficiency, "a marker for economic strain... defined by household lack of enough food to eat in the last seven days."
Researchers at Boston Medical Center (BMC) and Boston University School of Public Health (BUSPH) found that ending the monthly payments "was associated with a 25% increase in household food insufficiency by early July 2022 compared with the period just before CTC expiration."
Lead author Allison Bovell-Ammon said in a statement that "this significant increase in food insufficiency among families with children is particularly concerning for child health equity, as child health, development, and educational outcomes are strongly linked to their family's ability to afford enough food."
"Even brief periods of deprivation during childhood can have lasting impacts on a child," added Bovell-Ammon, director of policy and communications for Children's HealthWatch at BMC.
The study states that "low-income, single-adult, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic households experienced greater increases than the overall sample, suggesting implications of deepening inequities linked to the policy expiration. Without further congressional action to extend the expanded CTC and reinstate monthly payments, reductions in food insufficiency, poverty, and inequity following the advance CTC payment introduction in 2021 may continue to erode."
Bovell-Ammon noted that "Black, Latino, Indigenous, and immigrant families in the U.S. consistently experience food insecurity--a broader measure that assesses quantity, quality, and variety of food--at higher rates than white families as a result of current and historical marginalization and systemic racism."
Study co-author Stephanie Ettinger de Cuba, a research associate professor at BUSPH and executive director of Children's HealthWatch, highlighted that some immigrant families struggled to access the CTC program.
"These barriers were due in part to specific eligibility exclusions, but they also occurred even when immigrant families were eligible," she said. "Following the expiration of the payments at the end of 2021, the gains in racial equity were eroded, potentially further exacerbating racial and health inequities and increasing distrust."
As various studies and data sets have made clear that the CTC payments lifted millions of children out of poverty and cutting them off harmed families, some progressives in Congress and policy experts have called for not only reinstating the program but making it permanent.
"The six short months of these child tax credit advanced payments clearly made a big difference for American families, a permanent expansion would be a game-changer for reducing child poverty for good," said study co-author Paul Shafer, an assistant professor at BUSPH.
"There is more to do to make sure that very low-income families actually get the monthly payments, prompting efforts like GetCTC.org," he added, "but a permanent expansion allows resources and awareness to build around the policy in a way that short-term fixes don't."
The study comes just weeks before the midterm elections, which will determine which party controls the U.S. House and Senate.
"For now, the choice for Democratic candidates couldn't be clearer: Campaign on renewing the expanded child tax credit," Jim Pugh of the Universal Income Project and ShareProgress recently wrote for In These Times. "It will help their chances at the polls in November and bring the country closer to reviving the most impactful anti-poverty program in a generation."
Leading up to Election Day, Senate Budget Committee Chair Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)--who caucuses with the Democrats--has urged party members on the campaign trail to emphasize how all of their economic policies will serve working-class people, unlike plans by Republicans, who want to cut Medicare and Social Security.
The two-time Democratic presidential primary candidate has also repeatedly called for reviving the CTC program. In a tweet this week, Sanders said that "at a time when child poverty is spiking, we need to focus on supporting low-income families by extending the expanded child tax credit."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
A Boston-based research team on Friday reiterated the negative effects of ending the expanded child tax credit by releasing a study that shows a huge jump in U.S. households not having enough food.
"Even brief periods of deprivation during childhood can have lasting impacts."
The expanded child tax credit (CTC) in the American Rescue Plan gave over 35 million U.S. families up to $300 a month per child until it expired last December, and congressional Republicans and right-wing Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) opposed continuing it.
Published in the journal JAMA Network Open, the new study focuses on food insufficiency, "a marker for economic strain... defined by household lack of enough food to eat in the last seven days."
Researchers at Boston Medical Center (BMC) and Boston University School of Public Health (BUSPH) found that ending the monthly payments "was associated with a 25% increase in household food insufficiency by early July 2022 compared with the period just before CTC expiration."
Lead author Allison Bovell-Ammon said in a statement that "this significant increase in food insufficiency among families with children is particularly concerning for child health equity, as child health, development, and educational outcomes are strongly linked to their family's ability to afford enough food."
"Even brief periods of deprivation during childhood can have lasting impacts on a child," added Bovell-Ammon, director of policy and communications for Children's HealthWatch at BMC.
The study states that "low-income, single-adult, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic households experienced greater increases than the overall sample, suggesting implications of deepening inequities linked to the policy expiration. Without further congressional action to extend the expanded CTC and reinstate monthly payments, reductions in food insufficiency, poverty, and inequity following the advance CTC payment introduction in 2021 may continue to erode."
Bovell-Ammon noted that "Black, Latino, Indigenous, and immigrant families in the U.S. consistently experience food insecurity--a broader measure that assesses quantity, quality, and variety of food--at higher rates than white families as a result of current and historical marginalization and systemic racism."
Study co-author Stephanie Ettinger de Cuba, a research associate professor at BUSPH and executive director of Children's HealthWatch, highlighted that some immigrant families struggled to access the CTC program.
"These barriers were due in part to specific eligibility exclusions, but they also occurred even when immigrant families were eligible," she said. "Following the expiration of the payments at the end of 2021, the gains in racial equity were eroded, potentially further exacerbating racial and health inequities and increasing distrust."
As various studies and data sets have made clear that the CTC payments lifted millions of children out of poverty and cutting them off harmed families, some progressives in Congress and policy experts have called for not only reinstating the program but making it permanent.
"The six short months of these child tax credit advanced payments clearly made a big difference for American families, a permanent expansion would be a game-changer for reducing child poverty for good," said study co-author Paul Shafer, an assistant professor at BUSPH.
"There is more to do to make sure that very low-income families actually get the monthly payments, prompting efforts like GetCTC.org," he added, "but a permanent expansion allows resources and awareness to build around the policy in a way that short-term fixes don't."
The study comes just weeks before the midterm elections, which will determine which party controls the U.S. House and Senate.
"For now, the choice for Democratic candidates couldn't be clearer: Campaign on renewing the expanded child tax credit," Jim Pugh of the Universal Income Project and ShareProgress recently wrote for In These Times. "It will help their chances at the polls in November and bring the country closer to reviving the most impactful anti-poverty program in a generation."
Leading up to Election Day, Senate Budget Committee Chair Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)--who caucuses with the Democrats--has urged party members on the campaign trail to emphasize how all of their economic policies will serve working-class people, unlike plans by Republicans, who want to cut Medicare and Social Security.
The two-time Democratic presidential primary candidate has also repeatedly called for reviving the CTC program. In a tweet this week, Sanders said that "at a time when child poverty is spiking, we need to focus on supporting low-income families by extending the expanded child tax credit."
A Boston-based research team on Friday reiterated the negative effects of ending the expanded child tax credit by releasing a study that shows a huge jump in U.S. households not having enough food.
"Even brief periods of deprivation during childhood can have lasting impacts."
The expanded child tax credit (CTC) in the American Rescue Plan gave over 35 million U.S. families up to $300 a month per child until it expired last December, and congressional Republicans and right-wing Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) opposed continuing it.
Published in the journal JAMA Network Open, the new study focuses on food insufficiency, "a marker for economic strain... defined by household lack of enough food to eat in the last seven days."
Researchers at Boston Medical Center (BMC) and Boston University School of Public Health (BUSPH) found that ending the monthly payments "was associated with a 25% increase in household food insufficiency by early July 2022 compared with the period just before CTC expiration."
Lead author Allison Bovell-Ammon said in a statement that "this significant increase in food insufficiency among families with children is particularly concerning for child health equity, as child health, development, and educational outcomes are strongly linked to their family's ability to afford enough food."
"Even brief periods of deprivation during childhood can have lasting impacts on a child," added Bovell-Ammon, director of policy and communications for Children's HealthWatch at BMC.
The study states that "low-income, single-adult, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic households experienced greater increases than the overall sample, suggesting implications of deepening inequities linked to the policy expiration. Without further congressional action to extend the expanded CTC and reinstate monthly payments, reductions in food insufficiency, poverty, and inequity following the advance CTC payment introduction in 2021 may continue to erode."
Bovell-Ammon noted that "Black, Latino, Indigenous, and immigrant families in the U.S. consistently experience food insecurity--a broader measure that assesses quantity, quality, and variety of food--at higher rates than white families as a result of current and historical marginalization and systemic racism."
Study co-author Stephanie Ettinger de Cuba, a research associate professor at BUSPH and executive director of Children's HealthWatch, highlighted that some immigrant families struggled to access the CTC program.
"These barriers were due in part to specific eligibility exclusions, but they also occurred even when immigrant families were eligible," she said. "Following the expiration of the payments at the end of 2021, the gains in racial equity were eroded, potentially further exacerbating racial and health inequities and increasing distrust."
As various studies and data sets have made clear that the CTC payments lifted millions of children out of poverty and cutting them off harmed families, some progressives in Congress and policy experts have called for not only reinstating the program but making it permanent.
"The six short months of these child tax credit advanced payments clearly made a big difference for American families, a permanent expansion would be a game-changer for reducing child poverty for good," said study co-author Paul Shafer, an assistant professor at BUSPH.
"There is more to do to make sure that very low-income families actually get the monthly payments, prompting efforts like GetCTC.org," he added, "but a permanent expansion allows resources and awareness to build around the policy in a way that short-term fixes don't."
The study comes just weeks before the midterm elections, which will determine which party controls the U.S. House and Senate.
"For now, the choice for Democratic candidates couldn't be clearer: Campaign on renewing the expanded child tax credit," Jim Pugh of the Universal Income Project and ShareProgress recently wrote for In These Times. "It will help their chances at the polls in November and bring the country closer to reviving the most impactful anti-poverty program in a generation."
Leading up to Election Day, Senate Budget Committee Chair Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)--who caucuses with the Democrats--has urged party members on the campaign trail to emphasize how all of their economic policies will serve working-class people, unlike plans by Republicans, who want to cut Medicare and Social Security.
The two-time Democratic presidential primary candidate has also repeatedly called for reviving the CTC program. In a tweet this week, Sanders said that "at a time when child poverty is spiking, we need to focus on supporting low-income families by extending the expanded child tax credit."