

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

A water fountain is seen near a playground at the grounds of the former Naval Air Warfare Center Warminster in Bucks County, Pennsylvania on February 6, 2019.
The authors of a new study showing that tens of thousands of sites across the United States are believed to be contaminated by per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, often called "forever chemicals," warned that their findings likely vastly underestimate the prevalence of the chemicals, because they're used in so many products.
Scientists at Northeastern University in Boston led the study, which was published Wednesday in Environmental Science & Technology Letters and identified 57,412 sites where per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) contamination is presumed.
"While it sounds scary that there are over 57,000 presumptive contamination sites, this is almost certainly a large underestimation."
"Forever chemicals"--so named because they do not break down and instead remain in the environment and people's bodies for decades--are especially likely to pollute areas where firefighting foam is discharged, such as military bases and airports.
The researchers used Northeastern's contamination site tracker, developed by the university's PFAS Project Lab, to validate more than 500 sites where PFAS contamination was presumed to be.
They also developed a "presumptive contamination" model to determine other sites where forever chemical pollution was highly likely.
More than a quarter of the sites not included by the PFAS Project Lab's tracker were places that are not typically associated with PFAS, including restaurants, car washes, and textile cleaners. In addition to substances used at industrial sites, PFAS are often found in household items.
Of the 503 known contamination sites, reads the study, "176 (35%) were observed in the map, and another 187 (37%) were expected by the [presumptive contamination] model but were not mapped due to data limitations, bringing the total validation accuracy to 72%."
The researchers' model identified 49,145 industrial facilities, 4,255 wastewater treatment plants, 3,493 current or former military sites, and 519 major airports as places where contamination is likely. PFAS exposure has been linked to several cancers, thyroid disease, and other health problems.
"While it sounds scary that there are over 57,000 presumptive contamination sites, this is almost certainly a large underestimation," said study co-author Phil Brown, director of Northeastern University's Social Science Environmental Health Research Institute, in a statement. "The scope of PFAS contamination is immense, and communities impacted by this contamination deserve swift regulatory action that stops ongoing and future uses of PFAS while cleaning up already existing contamination."
The study follows recent reports showing that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is likely underestimating the amount of PFAS contamination in U.S. drinking water; that so-called "nontoxic" products for children contain the substances; and that shelves at dollar stores are packed with items containing PFAS.
"As PFAS are found to be harmful at lower and lower levels, it is critically important to identify sources of potential contamination and take steps to protect downstream communities who may be unwittingly exposed," said David Andrews, Ph.D., a senior scientist at the Environmental Working Group (EWG), in response to the study.
Monica Amarelo, the group's vice president of media relations, noted that "there are few federal limits on industrial discharges of these forever chemicals."
In September, EWG released an analysis showing that at least five facilities owned by major U.S. companies including 3M and Dow Chemical are exploiting a regulatory loophole to avoid reporting the amount of PFAS pollution their operations are causing.
Companies have been required since 2020 to report to the EPA the annual release of more than 100 pounds of PFAS, but former Republican President Donald Trump's administration put in place a loophole "allowing them not to report if PFAS amounts are negligible, defined as less than 1% of a total mixture."
"The exemption makes it possible for manufacturers to avoid [Toxics Release Inventory] reporting, often by diluting their waste mixtures so the concentration of any single PFAS remains below 1%," said EWG. "Facilities can therefore avoid reporting, even if they release one or a combination of PFAS in quantities significantly above the 100-pound threshold, so long as each forever chemical makes up less than 1% of the total mixture."
The loophole could be contributing to the government's underestimation of the amount of PFAS contamination in the environment.
"Federal regulations limiting discharges into the air and water are urgently needed to turn off the tap at the source," said Melanie Benesh, EWG's vice president of government affairs, on Wednesday. "The EPA should move swiftly to set regulations for the industries most likely to be dumping PFAS into the environment. State regulators should also act quickly to incorporate limits on the amount of PFAS that can be released into existing permits."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The authors of a new study showing that tens of thousands of sites across the United States are believed to be contaminated by per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, often called "forever chemicals," warned that their findings likely vastly underestimate the prevalence of the chemicals, because they're used in so many products.
Scientists at Northeastern University in Boston led the study, which was published Wednesday in Environmental Science & Technology Letters and identified 57,412 sites where per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) contamination is presumed.
"While it sounds scary that there are over 57,000 presumptive contamination sites, this is almost certainly a large underestimation."
"Forever chemicals"--so named because they do not break down and instead remain in the environment and people's bodies for decades--are especially likely to pollute areas where firefighting foam is discharged, such as military bases and airports.
The researchers used Northeastern's contamination site tracker, developed by the university's PFAS Project Lab, to validate more than 500 sites where PFAS contamination was presumed to be.
They also developed a "presumptive contamination" model to determine other sites where forever chemical pollution was highly likely.
More than a quarter of the sites not included by the PFAS Project Lab's tracker were places that are not typically associated with PFAS, including restaurants, car washes, and textile cleaners. In addition to substances used at industrial sites, PFAS are often found in household items.
Of the 503 known contamination sites, reads the study, "176 (35%) were observed in the map, and another 187 (37%) were expected by the [presumptive contamination] model but were not mapped due to data limitations, bringing the total validation accuracy to 72%."
The researchers' model identified 49,145 industrial facilities, 4,255 wastewater treatment plants, 3,493 current or former military sites, and 519 major airports as places where contamination is likely. PFAS exposure has been linked to several cancers, thyroid disease, and other health problems.
"While it sounds scary that there are over 57,000 presumptive contamination sites, this is almost certainly a large underestimation," said study co-author Phil Brown, director of Northeastern University's Social Science Environmental Health Research Institute, in a statement. "The scope of PFAS contamination is immense, and communities impacted by this contamination deserve swift regulatory action that stops ongoing and future uses of PFAS while cleaning up already existing contamination."
The study follows recent reports showing that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is likely underestimating the amount of PFAS contamination in U.S. drinking water; that so-called "nontoxic" products for children contain the substances; and that shelves at dollar stores are packed with items containing PFAS.
"As PFAS are found to be harmful at lower and lower levels, it is critically important to identify sources of potential contamination and take steps to protect downstream communities who may be unwittingly exposed," said David Andrews, Ph.D., a senior scientist at the Environmental Working Group (EWG), in response to the study.
Monica Amarelo, the group's vice president of media relations, noted that "there are few federal limits on industrial discharges of these forever chemicals."
In September, EWG released an analysis showing that at least five facilities owned by major U.S. companies including 3M and Dow Chemical are exploiting a regulatory loophole to avoid reporting the amount of PFAS pollution their operations are causing.
Companies have been required since 2020 to report to the EPA the annual release of more than 100 pounds of PFAS, but former Republican President Donald Trump's administration put in place a loophole "allowing them not to report if PFAS amounts are negligible, defined as less than 1% of a total mixture."
"The exemption makes it possible for manufacturers to avoid [Toxics Release Inventory] reporting, often by diluting their waste mixtures so the concentration of any single PFAS remains below 1%," said EWG. "Facilities can therefore avoid reporting, even if they release one or a combination of PFAS in quantities significantly above the 100-pound threshold, so long as each forever chemical makes up less than 1% of the total mixture."
The loophole could be contributing to the government's underestimation of the amount of PFAS contamination in the environment.
"Federal regulations limiting discharges into the air and water are urgently needed to turn off the tap at the source," said Melanie Benesh, EWG's vice president of government affairs, on Wednesday. "The EPA should move swiftly to set regulations for the industries most likely to be dumping PFAS into the environment. State regulators should also act quickly to incorporate limits on the amount of PFAS that can be released into existing permits."
The authors of a new study showing that tens of thousands of sites across the United States are believed to be contaminated by per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, often called "forever chemicals," warned that their findings likely vastly underestimate the prevalence of the chemicals, because they're used in so many products.
Scientists at Northeastern University in Boston led the study, which was published Wednesday in Environmental Science & Technology Letters and identified 57,412 sites where per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) contamination is presumed.
"While it sounds scary that there are over 57,000 presumptive contamination sites, this is almost certainly a large underestimation."
"Forever chemicals"--so named because they do not break down and instead remain in the environment and people's bodies for decades--are especially likely to pollute areas where firefighting foam is discharged, such as military bases and airports.
The researchers used Northeastern's contamination site tracker, developed by the university's PFAS Project Lab, to validate more than 500 sites where PFAS contamination was presumed to be.
They also developed a "presumptive contamination" model to determine other sites where forever chemical pollution was highly likely.
More than a quarter of the sites not included by the PFAS Project Lab's tracker were places that are not typically associated with PFAS, including restaurants, car washes, and textile cleaners. In addition to substances used at industrial sites, PFAS are often found in household items.
Of the 503 known contamination sites, reads the study, "176 (35%) were observed in the map, and another 187 (37%) were expected by the [presumptive contamination] model but were not mapped due to data limitations, bringing the total validation accuracy to 72%."
The researchers' model identified 49,145 industrial facilities, 4,255 wastewater treatment plants, 3,493 current or former military sites, and 519 major airports as places where contamination is likely. PFAS exposure has been linked to several cancers, thyroid disease, and other health problems.
"While it sounds scary that there are over 57,000 presumptive contamination sites, this is almost certainly a large underestimation," said study co-author Phil Brown, director of Northeastern University's Social Science Environmental Health Research Institute, in a statement. "The scope of PFAS contamination is immense, and communities impacted by this contamination deserve swift regulatory action that stops ongoing and future uses of PFAS while cleaning up already existing contamination."
The study follows recent reports showing that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is likely underestimating the amount of PFAS contamination in U.S. drinking water; that so-called "nontoxic" products for children contain the substances; and that shelves at dollar stores are packed with items containing PFAS.
"As PFAS are found to be harmful at lower and lower levels, it is critically important to identify sources of potential contamination and take steps to protect downstream communities who may be unwittingly exposed," said David Andrews, Ph.D., a senior scientist at the Environmental Working Group (EWG), in response to the study.
Monica Amarelo, the group's vice president of media relations, noted that "there are few federal limits on industrial discharges of these forever chemicals."
In September, EWG released an analysis showing that at least five facilities owned by major U.S. companies including 3M and Dow Chemical are exploiting a regulatory loophole to avoid reporting the amount of PFAS pollution their operations are causing.
Companies have been required since 2020 to report to the EPA the annual release of more than 100 pounds of PFAS, but former Republican President Donald Trump's administration put in place a loophole "allowing them not to report if PFAS amounts are negligible, defined as less than 1% of a total mixture."
"The exemption makes it possible for manufacturers to avoid [Toxics Release Inventory] reporting, often by diluting their waste mixtures so the concentration of any single PFAS remains below 1%," said EWG. "Facilities can therefore avoid reporting, even if they release one or a combination of PFAS in quantities significantly above the 100-pound threshold, so long as each forever chemical makes up less than 1% of the total mixture."
The loophole could be contributing to the government's underestimation of the amount of PFAS contamination in the environment.
"Federal regulations limiting discharges into the air and water are urgently needed to turn off the tap at the source," said Melanie Benesh, EWG's vice president of government affairs, on Wednesday. "The EPA should move swiftly to set regulations for the industries most likely to be dumping PFAS into the environment. State regulators should also act quickly to incorporate limits on the amount of PFAS that can be released into existing permits."