SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Attorney General Merrick Garland speaks at a news conference, as (L-R) Lisa O. Monaco, deputy attorney general, Kristen Clarke, assistant attorney general for the civil rights division, and Vanita Gupta, associate attorney general, look on at the Department of Justice on June 25, 2021 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
News Outlets, Press Freedom Groups to DOJ: Don't Let GOP States Criminalize Abortion Coverage
"We ask that you publicly reiterate the press freedoms granted under the First Amendment, and remind states that they cannot infringe on those rights when news outlets write about abortion."
Aug 16, 2022
More than two dozen newsrooms and press freedom groups sent a letter to U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland on Tuesday, calling on the Justice Department to prevent journalists and their employers from being prosecuted for simply writing about abortion.
"Rather than risk the threat of jail time, fines or legal fees, some news organizations may not be able to publish stories about abortion and possibly even contraceptives."
At issue is a campaign, led by the National Right to Life Committee, to expand the GOP's devastating assault on reproductive freedom and other constitutional rights. In mid-June, anticipating that the U.S. Supreme Court's reactionary majority would soon overturn Roe v. Wade, the forced pregnancy group drafted and circulated model legislation to state lawmakers around the country.
If enacted, the legislation--already under consideration in the South Carolina Legislature, with more Republican-controlled states likely to follow in the near future--would prohibit "aiding and abetting" someone seeking an abortion, including by "hosting or maintaining a website... that encourages or facilitates efforts to obtain an illegal abortion."
As the letter--spearheaded by Mother Jones and Rewire News Group and signed by 24 other outlets and trade associations--makes clear, such a measure "could be loosely interpreted to criminalize news organizations and reporters for merely posting stories about abortion on their websites."
"There is precedent for state legislatures enacting nearly identical laws that trample on people's rights, and there is a history of well-funded organizations and individuals targeting news organizations through legal action that drains resources and can put newsrooms out of business," the letter states.
Mother Jones, for instance, "spent $2.5 million over two years fending off a lawsuit by a conservative billionaire who claimed he had been defamed in one of their 2012 stories," the letter continues. "The ordeal diverted tremendous time and money from normal day-to-day operations," and the magazine's finances "were compromised for years."
If "aiding and abetting" abortion bills are signed into law, "news organizations would be vulnerable in states where they maintain offices, and potentially in states where affected employees reside," says the letter. "Rather than risk the threat of jail time, fines or legal fees, some news organizations may not be able to publish stories about abortion and possibly even contraceptives."
In essence, "such laws would enable state governments to dictate which stories can be reported and published, at a time when an independent press is needed more than ever," the letter notes.
The newsrooms and press freedom groups implored Garland "to honor the protections of the U.S. Constitution and defend the news organizations that play a critical role in bringing attention to all the issues in our society."
"We ask that you publicly reiterate the press freedoms granted under the First Amendment, and remind states that they cannot infringe on those rights when news outlets write about abortion, whether they and their reporters work and live in states where abortion is legal or illegal," they wrote.
"If any state enacts such legislation," they added, "we ask that you intervene and use whatever authority is granted to the Department of Justice to halt the overall law from taking effect or provisions that may punish news organizations and reporters."
All 26 signatories are listed below:
Mother Jones
Rewire News Group
Scalawag Magazine
BuzzFeed News
HuffPost
The Marshall Project
The Intercept
The Nation
The American Prospect
The New Republic
The Center for Investigative Reporting
Capital B
Center for Public Integrity
CalMatters
Chalkbeat
Votebeat
Salon
Dame Magazine
Prism
PEN America
Center for Media at Risk
Institute for Nonprofit News
Radio Television Digital News Association
New York News Publishers Association
Media Matters for America
News Leaders Association
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Kenny Stancil
Kenny Stancil is senior researcher at the Revolving Door Project and a former staff writer for Common Dreams.
More than two dozen newsrooms and press freedom groups sent a letter to U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland on Tuesday, calling on the Justice Department to prevent journalists and their employers from being prosecuted for simply writing about abortion.
"Rather than risk the threat of jail time, fines or legal fees, some news organizations may not be able to publish stories about abortion and possibly even contraceptives."
At issue is a campaign, led by the National Right to Life Committee, to expand the GOP's devastating assault on reproductive freedom and other constitutional rights. In mid-June, anticipating that the U.S. Supreme Court's reactionary majority would soon overturn Roe v. Wade, the forced pregnancy group drafted and circulated model legislation to state lawmakers around the country.
If enacted, the legislation--already under consideration in the South Carolina Legislature, with more Republican-controlled states likely to follow in the near future--would prohibit "aiding and abetting" someone seeking an abortion, including by "hosting or maintaining a website... that encourages or facilitates efforts to obtain an illegal abortion."
As the letter--spearheaded by Mother Jones and Rewire News Group and signed by 24 other outlets and trade associations--makes clear, such a measure "could be loosely interpreted to criminalize news organizations and reporters for merely posting stories about abortion on their websites."
"There is precedent for state legislatures enacting nearly identical laws that trample on people's rights, and there is a history of well-funded organizations and individuals targeting news organizations through legal action that drains resources and can put newsrooms out of business," the letter states.
Mother Jones, for instance, "spent $2.5 million over two years fending off a lawsuit by a conservative billionaire who claimed he had been defamed in one of their 2012 stories," the letter continues. "The ordeal diverted tremendous time and money from normal day-to-day operations," and the magazine's finances "were compromised for years."
If "aiding and abetting" abortion bills are signed into law, "news organizations would be vulnerable in states where they maintain offices, and potentially in states where affected employees reside," says the letter. "Rather than risk the threat of jail time, fines or legal fees, some news organizations may not be able to publish stories about abortion and possibly even contraceptives."
In essence, "such laws would enable state governments to dictate which stories can be reported and published, at a time when an independent press is needed more than ever," the letter notes.
The newsrooms and press freedom groups implored Garland "to honor the protections of the U.S. Constitution and defend the news organizations that play a critical role in bringing attention to all the issues in our society."
"We ask that you publicly reiterate the press freedoms granted under the First Amendment, and remind states that they cannot infringe on those rights when news outlets write about abortion, whether they and their reporters work and live in states where abortion is legal or illegal," they wrote.
"If any state enacts such legislation," they added, "we ask that you intervene and use whatever authority is granted to the Department of Justice to halt the overall law from taking effect or provisions that may punish news organizations and reporters."
All 26 signatories are listed below:
Mother Jones
Rewire News Group
Scalawag Magazine
BuzzFeed News
HuffPost
The Marshall Project
The Intercept
The Nation
The American Prospect
The New Republic
The Center for Investigative Reporting
Capital B
Center for Public Integrity
CalMatters
Chalkbeat
Votebeat
Salon
Dame Magazine
Prism
PEN America
Center for Media at Risk
Institute for Nonprofit News
Radio Television Digital News Association
New York News Publishers Association
Media Matters for America
News Leaders Association
From Your Site Articles
Kenny Stancil
Kenny Stancil is senior researcher at the Revolving Door Project and a former staff writer for Common Dreams.
More than two dozen newsrooms and press freedom groups sent a letter to U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland on Tuesday, calling on the Justice Department to prevent journalists and their employers from being prosecuted for simply writing about abortion.
"Rather than risk the threat of jail time, fines or legal fees, some news organizations may not be able to publish stories about abortion and possibly even contraceptives."
At issue is a campaign, led by the National Right to Life Committee, to expand the GOP's devastating assault on reproductive freedom and other constitutional rights. In mid-June, anticipating that the U.S. Supreme Court's reactionary majority would soon overturn Roe v. Wade, the forced pregnancy group drafted and circulated model legislation to state lawmakers around the country.
If enacted, the legislation--already under consideration in the South Carolina Legislature, with more Republican-controlled states likely to follow in the near future--would prohibit "aiding and abetting" someone seeking an abortion, including by "hosting or maintaining a website... that encourages or facilitates efforts to obtain an illegal abortion."
As the letter--spearheaded by Mother Jones and Rewire News Group and signed by 24 other outlets and trade associations--makes clear, such a measure "could be loosely interpreted to criminalize news organizations and reporters for merely posting stories about abortion on their websites."
"There is precedent for state legislatures enacting nearly identical laws that trample on people's rights, and there is a history of well-funded organizations and individuals targeting news organizations through legal action that drains resources and can put newsrooms out of business," the letter states.
Mother Jones, for instance, "spent $2.5 million over two years fending off a lawsuit by a conservative billionaire who claimed he had been defamed in one of their 2012 stories," the letter continues. "The ordeal diverted tremendous time and money from normal day-to-day operations," and the magazine's finances "were compromised for years."
If "aiding and abetting" abortion bills are signed into law, "news organizations would be vulnerable in states where they maintain offices, and potentially in states where affected employees reside," says the letter. "Rather than risk the threat of jail time, fines or legal fees, some news organizations may not be able to publish stories about abortion and possibly even contraceptives."
In essence, "such laws would enable state governments to dictate which stories can be reported and published, at a time when an independent press is needed more than ever," the letter notes.
The newsrooms and press freedom groups implored Garland "to honor the protections of the U.S. Constitution and defend the news organizations that play a critical role in bringing attention to all the issues in our society."
"We ask that you publicly reiterate the press freedoms granted under the First Amendment, and remind states that they cannot infringe on those rights when news outlets write about abortion, whether they and their reporters work and live in states where abortion is legal or illegal," they wrote.
"If any state enacts such legislation," they added, "we ask that you intervene and use whatever authority is granted to the Department of Justice to halt the overall law from taking effect or provisions that may punish news organizations and reporters."
All 26 signatories are listed below:
Mother Jones
Rewire News Group
Scalawag Magazine
BuzzFeed News
HuffPost
The Marshall Project
The Intercept
The Nation
The American Prospect
The New Republic
The Center for Investigative Reporting
Capital B
Center for Public Integrity
CalMatters
Chalkbeat
Votebeat
Salon
Dame Magazine
Prism
PEN America
Center for Media at Risk
Institute for Nonprofit News
Radio Television Digital News Association
New York News Publishers Association
Media Matters for America
News Leaders Association
From Your Site Articles
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.