Russian President Vladimir Putin speaks on the phone on February 12, 2022. (Photo: Alexei Nikolsky/Russian Presidential Press and Information Office/TASS)
International Court of Justice Orders Russia to Halt Attack on Ukraine
"Russia must comply immediately," said Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. "Ignoring the order will isolate Russia even further."
The International Court of Justice on Wednesday ordered the Russian government to immediately halt its invasion of Ukraine, a legally binding decision that Moscow is likely to ignore as it continues bombarding its neighbor.
"The Russian Federation must, pending the final decision in the case, suspend the military operations that it commenced on 24 February 2022 in the territory of Ukraine," reads the preliminary ruling handed down by the United Nations' top court.
Just days after Russia launched its full-scale attack, the Ukrainian government petitioned the ICJ to take legal action against Moscow, which Kyiv accused of unlawfully justifying its invasion by alleging genocide against ethnic Russians in the Donbas.
In an emergency filing at The Hague, Ukraine said that "contrary to what the Russian Federation claims, no acts of genocide, as defined by Article III of the Genocide Convention, have been committed in the Luhansk and Donetsk oblasts of Ukraine."
Russia boycotted a hearing on Ukraine's filing last week, a signal that Moscow has no intention of complying with the court's decision.
In its 22-page ruling, the ICJ concluded that "at the present stage of the proceedings, it suffices to observe that the court is not in possession of evidence substantiating the allegation of the Russian Federation that genocide has been committed on Ukrainian territory."
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy called the ICJ's decision "a complete victory," noting that "the order is binding under international law."
"Russia must comply immediately," Zelenskyy wrote on Twitter. "Ignoring the order will isolate Russia even further."
\u201cUkraine gained a complete victory in its case against Russia at the International Court of Justice. The ICJ ordered to immediately stop the invasion. The order is binding under international law. Russia must comply immediately. Ignoring the order will isolate Russia even further\u201d— \u0412\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0434\u0438\u043c\u0438\u0440 \u0417\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0441\u044c\u043a\u0438\u0439 (@\u0412\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0434\u0438\u043c\u0438\u0440 \u0417\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0441\u044c\u043a\u0438\u0439) 1647445312
The Washington Post reported Wednesday that despite the binding nature of the ICJ's ruling, the court "does not appear to have a viable path to enforce the decision."
"Sanctions could only be imposed by the U.N. Security Council, of which Russia is a permanent member and where it has a veto power," the Post noted. "The court's mission is to settle disputes between sovereign nations, and it cannot charge presidents or military leaders with war crimes, for example."
Ahead of the hearing on Ukraine's emergency filing, Alain Pellet--a French attorney who had previously represented Russia at the ICJ--resigned from Moscow's legal team, declaring in an open letter that "it has become impossible to represent in forums dedicated to the application of the law a country that so cynically despises it."
"There is no justification," Pellet wrote, "for the use of war to impose a political regime change in Kyiv or a territorial dismemberment of Ukraine."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The International Court of Justice on Wednesday ordered the Russian government to immediately halt its invasion of Ukraine, a legally binding decision that Moscow is likely to ignore as it continues bombarding its neighbor.
"The Russian Federation must, pending the final decision in the case, suspend the military operations that it commenced on 24 February 2022 in the territory of Ukraine," reads the preliminary ruling handed down by the United Nations' top court.
Just days after Russia launched its full-scale attack, the Ukrainian government petitioned the ICJ to take legal action against Moscow, which Kyiv accused of unlawfully justifying its invasion by alleging genocide against ethnic Russians in the Donbas.
In an emergency filing at The Hague, Ukraine said that "contrary to what the Russian Federation claims, no acts of genocide, as defined by Article III of the Genocide Convention, have been committed in the Luhansk and Donetsk oblasts of Ukraine."
Russia boycotted a hearing on Ukraine's filing last week, a signal that Moscow has no intention of complying with the court's decision.
In its 22-page ruling, the ICJ concluded that "at the present stage of the proceedings, it suffices to observe that the court is not in possession of evidence substantiating the allegation of the Russian Federation that genocide has been committed on Ukrainian territory."
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy called the ICJ's decision "a complete victory," noting that "the order is binding under international law."
"Russia must comply immediately," Zelenskyy wrote on Twitter. "Ignoring the order will isolate Russia even further."
\u201cUkraine gained a complete victory in its case against Russia at the International Court of Justice. The ICJ ordered to immediately stop the invasion. The order is binding under international law. Russia must comply immediately. Ignoring the order will isolate Russia even further\u201d— \u0412\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0434\u0438\u043c\u0438\u0440 \u0417\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0441\u044c\u043a\u0438\u0439 (@\u0412\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0434\u0438\u043c\u0438\u0440 \u0417\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0441\u044c\u043a\u0438\u0439) 1647445312
The Washington Post reported Wednesday that despite the binding nature of the ICJ's ruling, the court "does not appear to have a viable path to enforce the decision."
"Sanctions could only be imposed by the U.N. Security Council, of which Russia is a permanent member and where it has a veto power," the Post noted. "The court's mission is to settle disputes between sovereign nations, and it cannot charge presidents or military leaders with war crimes, for example."
Ahead of the hearing on Ukraine's emergency filing, Alain Pellet--a French attorney who had previously represented Russia at the ICJ--resigned from Moscow's legal team, declaring in an open letter that "it has become impossible to represent in forums dedicated to the application of the law a country that so cynically despises it."
"There is no justification," Pellet wrote, "for the use of war to impose a political regime change in Kyiv or a territorial dismemberment of Ukraine."
The International Court of Justice on Wednesday ordered the Russian government to immediately halt its invasion of Ukraine, a legally binding decision that Moscow is likely to ignore as it continues bombarding its neighbor.
"The Russian Federation must, pending the final decision in the case, suspend the military operations that it commenced on 24 February 2022 in the territory of Ukraine," reads the preliminary ruling handed down by the United Nations' top court.
Just days after Russia launched its full-scale attack, the Ukrainian government petitioned the ICJ to take legal action against Moscow, which Kyiv accused of unlawfully justifying its invasion by alleging genocide against ethnic Russians in the Donbas.
In an emergency filing at The Hague, Ukraine said that "contrary to what the Russian Federation claims, no acts of genocide, as defined by Article III of the Genocide Convention, have been committed in the Luhansk and Donetsk oblasts of Ukraine."
Russia boycotted a hearing on Ukraine's filing last week, a signal that Moscow has no intention of complying with the court's decision.
In its 22-page ruling, the ICJ concluded that "at the present stage of the proceedings, it suffices to observe that the court is not in possession of evidence substantiating the allegation of the Russian Federation that genocide has been committed on Ukrainian territory."
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy called the ICJ's decision "a complete victory," noting that "the order is binding under international law."
"Russia must comply immediately," Zelenskyy wrote on Twitter. "Ignoring the order will isolate Russia even further."
\u201cUkraine gained a complete victory in its case against Russia at the International Court of Justice. The ICJ ordered to immediately stop the invasion. The order is binding under international law. Russia must comply immediately. Ignoring the order will isolate Russia even further\u201d— \u0412\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0434\u0438\u043c\u0438\u0440 \u0417\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0441\u044c\u043a\u0438\u0439 (@\u0412\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0434\u0438\u043c\u0438\u0440 \u0417\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0441\u044c\u043a\u0438\u0439) 1647445312
The Washington Post reported Wednesday that despite the binding nature of the ICJ's ruling, the court "does not appear to have a viable path to enforce the decision."
"Sanctions could only be imposed by the U.N. Security Council, of which Russia is a permanent member and where it has a veto power," the Post noted. "The court's mission is to settle disputes between sovereign nations, and it cannot charge presidents or military leaders with war crimes, for example."
Ahead of the hearing on Ukraine's emergency filing, Alain Pellet--a French attorney who had previously represented Russia at the ICJ--resigned from Moscow's legal team, declaring in an open letter that "it has become impossible to represent in forums dedicated to the application of the law a country that so cynically despises it."
"There is no justification," Pellet wrote, "for the use of war to impose a political regime change in Kyiv or a territorial dismemberment of Ukraine."