

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Support ships were seen near efforts to recover oil and cap the Deepwater Horizon spill site on July 3, 2010 in the Gulf of Mexico. (Photo: Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
A federal judge late Thursday blocked the Biden administration's massive oil and gas lease sale in the Gulf of Mexico, a significant win for environmentalists as they work to prevent the Interior Department from handing public lands and waters over to the fossil fuel industry.
In his 68-page decision (pdf), Judge Rudolph Contreras of the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. wrote that the Biden administration violated federal law by not adequately accounting for the emissions impact of the sale, which would have been the biggest offshore oil and gas lease sell-off in the country's history.
"This is a huge victory for our climate, endangered whales, and Gulf communities."
Climate groups characterized the sale--held just days after the COP26 summit in Glasgow--as the equivalent of "lighting the fuse of a massive carbon bomb."
"The Department of the Interior acted arbitrarily and capriciously in excluding foreign consumption from their greenhouse gas emissions calculation," Contreras, an Obama appointee, found.
The Biden Interior Department, which now must conduct a fresh environmental review, had relied on an analysis completed under the Trump administration, which was teeming with allies of the fossil fuel industry.
Brettny Hardy, senior attorney for Earthjustice--a group that sued the Biden administration over the lease sale--applauded the judge's decision Thursday and said that "we simply cannot continue to make investments in the fossil fuel industry to the peril of our communities and increasingly warming planet."
"Interior should use its next five-year leasing plan to protect our coastal communities and public waters and offer no new offshore leases," Hardy added. "We can no longer afford to do anything less."
On the campaign trail, President Joe Biden pledged to ban new oil and gas leasing on federal lands and waters, a promise that climate advocates cautiously applauded while demanding more ambitious action. One of the first executive orders Biden signed as president directed the Interior Department to pause all new oil and natural gas leasing on public lands and offshore waters.
Yet, over the past 12 months, the Biden administration has approved drilling permits at a faster rate than its oil-friendly predecessor. According to new federal data, the Biden administration signed off on more than 3,550 permits for oil and gas drilling on public lands in its first year in power.
Around a quarter of all U.S. greenhouse gas emissions--which Biden has promised to slash--come from fossil fuel extraction on public lands.
Administration officials insist they've been hamstrung by a Trump-appointed federal judge who, in a June ruling, blocked Biden's temporary pause on new drilling leases. But climate groups argue the judge's order did not require the administration to move ahead with the huge lease sale in the Gulf of Mexico--a conclusion echoed by the Biden Justice Department.
Related Content

Following Contreras' ruling on Thursday, Kristen Monsell of the Center for Biological Diversity said she is "thrilled the court saw through the Biden administration's horribly reckless decision to hold the largest oil lease sale in U.S. history without carefully studying the risks."
"This is a huge victory for our climate, endangered whales, and Gulf communities," said Monsell. "New oil leases are fundamentally incompatible with addressing the climate emergency, and they'll cause more oil spills and harm to wildlife and people in the Gulf."
"For the sake of our climate and frontline communities," she added, "the Biden administration must end new leasing and phase out existing drilling. Anything less would be a gross failure of climate leadership."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A federal judge late Thursday blocked the Biden administration's massive oil and gas lease sale in the Gulf of Mexico, a significant win for environmentalists as they work to prevent the Interior Department from handing public lands and waters over to the fossil fuel industry.
In his 68-page decision (pdf), Judge Rudolph Contreras of the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. wrote that the Biden administration violated federal law by not adequately accounting for the emissions impact of the sale, which would have been the biggest offshore oil and gas lease sell-off in the country's history.
"This is a huge victory for our climate, endangered whales, and Gulf communities."
Climate groups characterized the sale--held just days after the COP26 summit in Glasgow--as the equivalent of "lighting the fuse of a massive carbon bomb."
"The Department of the Interior acted arbitrarily and capriciously in excluding foreign consumption from their greenhouse gas emissions calculation," Contreras, an Obama appointee, found.
The Biden Interior Department, which now must conduct a fresh environmental review, had relied on an analysis completed under the Trump administration, which was teeming with allies of the fossil fuel industry.
Brettny Hardy, senior attorney for Earthjustice--a group that sued the Biden administration over the lease sale--applauded the judge's decision Thursday and said that "we simply cannot continue to make investments in the fossil fuel industry to the peril of our communities and increasingly warming planet."
"Interior should use its next five-year leasing plan to protect our coastal communities and public waters and offer no new offshore leases," Hardy added. "We can no longer afford to do anything less."
On the campaign trail, President Joe Biden pledged to ban new oil and gas leasing on federal lands and waters, a promise that climate advocates cautiously applauded while demanding more ambitious action. One of the first executive orders Biden signed as president directed the Interior Department to pause all new oil and natural gas leasing on public lands and offshore waters.
Yet, over the past 12 months, the Biden administration has approved drilling permits at a faster rate than its oil-friendly predecessor. According to new federal data, the Biden administration signed off on more than 3,550 permits for oil and gas drilling on public lands in its first year in power.
Around a quarter of all U.S. greenhouse gas emissions--which Biden has promised to slash--come from fossil fuel extraction on public lands.
Administration officials insist they've been hamstrung by a Trump-appointed federal judge who, in a June ruling, blocked Biden's temporary pause on new drilling leases. But climate groups argue the judge's order did not require the administration to move ahead with the huge lease sale in the Gulf of Mexico--a conclusion echoed by the Biden Justice Department.
Related Content

Following Contreras' ruling on Thursday, Kristen Monsell of the Center for Biological Diversity said she is "thrilled the court saw through the Biden administration's horribly reckless decision to hold the largest oil lease sale in U.S. history without carefully studying the risks."
"This is a huge victory for our climate, endangered whales, and Gulf communities," said Monsell. "New oil leases are fundamentally incompatible with addressing the climate emergency, and they'll cause more oil spills and harm to wildlife and people in the Gulf."
"For the sake of our climate and frontline communities," she added, "the Biden administration must end new leasing and phase out existing drilling. Anything less would be a gross failure of climate leadership."
A federal judge late Thursday blocked the Biden administration's massive oil and gas lease sale in the Gulf of Mexico, a significant win for environmentalists as they work to prevent the Interior Department from handing public lands and waters over to the fossil fuel industry.
In his 68-page decision (pdf), Judge Rudolph Contreras of the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. wrote that the Biden administration violated federal law by not adequately accounting for the emissions impact of the sale, which would have been the biggest offshore oil and gas lease sell-off in the country's history.
"This is a huge victory for our climate, endangered whales, and Gulf communities."
Climate groups characterized the sale--held just days after the COP26 summit in Glasgow--as the equivalent of "lighting the fuse of a massive carbon bomb."
"The Department of the Interior acted arbitrarily and capriciously in excluding foreign consumption from their greenhouse gas emissions calculation," Contreras, an Obama appointee, found.
The Biden Interior Department, which now must conduct a fresh environmental review, had relied on an analysis completed under the Trump administration, which was teeming with allies of the fossil fuel industry.
Brettny Hardy, senior attorney for Earthjustice--a group that sued the Biden administration over the lease sale--applauded the judge's decision Thursday and said that "we simply cannot continue to make investments in the fossil fuel industry to the peril of our communities and increasingly warming planet."
"Interior should use its next five-year leasing plan to protect our coastal communities and public waters and offer no new offshore leases," Hardy added. "We can no longer afford to do anything less."
On the campaign trail, President Joe Biden pledged to ban new oil and gas leasing on federal lands and waters, a promise that climate advocates cautiously applauded while demanding more ambitious action. One of the first executive orders Biden signed as president directed the Interior Department to pause all new oil and natural gas leasing on public lands and offshore waters.
Yet, over the past 12 months, the Biden administration has approved drilling permits at a faster rate than its oil-friendly predecessor. According to new federal data, the Biden administration signed off on more than 3,550 permits for oil and gas drilling on public lands in its first year in power.
Around a quarter of all U.S. greenhouse gas emissions--which Biden has promised to slash--come from fossil fuel extraction on public lands.
Administration officials insist they've been hamstrung by a Trump-appointed federal judge who, in a June ruling, blocked Biden's temporary pause on new drilling leases. But climate groups argue the judge's order did not require the administration to move ahead with the huge lease sale in the Gulf of Mexico--a conclusion echoed by the Biden Justice Department.
Related Content

Following Contreras' ruling on Thursday, Kristen Monsell of the Center for Biological Diversity said she is "thrilled the court saw through the Biden administration's horribly reckless decision to hold the largest oil lease sale in U.S. history without carefully studying the risks."
"This is a huge victory for our climate, endangered whales, and Gulf communities," said Monsell. "New oil leases are fundamentally incompatible with addressing the climate emergency, and they'll cause more oil spills and harm to wildlife and people in the Gulf."
"For the sake of our climate and frontline communities," she added, "the Biden administration must end new leasing and phase out existing drilling. Anything less would be a gross failure of climate leadership."