NATO troops take part in an Estonian-led exercise about 60 miles from the Russian border on May 27, 2021. (Photo: Raigo Pajula/AFP via Getty Images)
As Putin Asserts Russia's Right to Defend Against NATO, US Urged to Avoid 'New Cold War'
While the Biden administration vows to "stand up for Ukraine," one expert implored U.S. leaders to "recognize our own provocations and aggressions" and to "make an effort to understand Russia."
As Russian President Vladimir Putin responded Wednesday to NATO provocations along his nation's western frontier by warning that his country reserves the right to defend itself, peace advocates stressed the need for U.S. self-awareness and restraint in order to avoid a "new Cold War."
"We can see Russia as a partner rather than an adversary in Eastern Europe."
Following U.S. vows to "stand up for Ukraine"--including by sending combat troops and sanctioning Moscow--in the event of Russian aggression, Putin said during a press conference with Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis that "Russia has a peaceful foreign policy, but has the right to defend its security," according to Agence France-Presse.
The remarks were Putin's first in public since he and U.S. President Joe Biden met during a two-hour virtual summit on Tuesday. U.S. leaders are alarmed by Russia's concentration of troops within striking distance of eastern Ukraine, where pro-Moscow separatists have been fighting government forces since 2014.
Putin is seeking a guarantee that NATO will not expand further eastward, as it has done nine times since 1999. He called NATO enlargement a "very sensitive" issue for his country and "one of the key questions in preserving Russia's security," while citing the Biden administration's "open door" policy of potential membership for Ukraine and Georgia--both of which border Russia and were former Soviet republics--as cause for alarm.
"We cannot but be concerned about the prospect of Ukraine's possible admission to NATO," Putin said, "because this will undoubtedly be followed by the deployment of appropriate military contingents, bases, and weapons that threaten us."
Russian troops invaded Georgia--home to pro-Moscow separatist enclaves--in 2008, and Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula, which Russia subsequently annexed with the support of a majority of the local population, in 2014. Crimea was previously part of Russia from 1783 to 1954.
Biden followed Putin's remarks by saying that "the idea that the United States is going to unilaterally use force to confront Russia invading Ukraine is not... in the cards right now," according to Defense One.
Appearing on Democracy Now! Wednesday, Katrina vanden Heuvel, editorial director and publisher of The Nation, said that "this escalation is not new."
"We have a one-sided narrative in this country, which is a problem because we haven't followed the growing mass of NATO troops on... Russia's border," she explained. "The escalation is neither in the United States' national interest nor security interest at a time when politics, [a] political solution, [a] diplomatic solution, is the only way forward."
"History matters," vanden Heuvel asserted. "In 1990, Gorbachev presided over the reunification of Germany and [then-U.S. Secretary of State] James Baker promised... NATO would not expand one inch eastward. That promise, which is documented in the National Security Archive, in [former Secretary of State] Condi Rice's book, in other materials, was violated. I think that is the original sin of what we witnessed today."
NATO--formed in 1949 as a mutual defense pact against the Soviet Union--has long been condemned as a provocative anachronism in the post-Cold War era, with many critics arguing that the trans-Atlantic alliance should be dissolved.
Instead, NATO has steadily expanded eastward and currently counts 10 former Soviet or Warsaw Pact nations as members. NATO's eastern boundary is now less than 100 miles from St. Petersburg, Russia's second-largest city.
Writing for Responsible Statecraft Tuesday, Worcester State University professor Joseph Preston Baratta urged U.S. leaders to "recognize our own provocations and aggressions" and to "make an effort to understand Russia."
"We can see Russia as a partner rather than an adversary in Eastern Europe," he said. "We can ask for a 'generous act' on the part of European leaders, like bringing Russia back into the Group of Eight, rather than continuing to hurt her people by sanctions."
When Democracy Now! host Amy Goodman mentioned the House of Representatives' approval Tuesday of a $778 billion U.S. military budget--more than the next 10 countries combined--vanden Heuvel called the development "such a tragedy."
"We have seen a revival of this national security strategy where we have made Russia and China the grave enemies," she said. "They are not going to be friends but mutual interests demand a working partnership."
Vanden Heuvel stressed that the U.S. "must wake up and understand... that we need to sort out a relationship with Russia."
She said that means recognizing that policies and actions like Biden's Summit for Democracy--which is taking place this week and has angered Beijing and Moscow--are provocations that have "a kind of Cold War feel."
"But the one-sided coverage, and it is not even commentary, in the U.S. media about U.S.-Russia, is I think debilitating and dangerous for our security and thinking," vanden Heuvel added.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
As Russian President Vladimir Putin responded Wednesday to NATO provocations along his nation's western frontier by warning that his country reserves the right to defend itself, peace advocates stressed the need for U.S. self-awareness and restraint in order to avoid a "new Cold War."
"We can see Russia as a partner rather than an adversary in Eastern Europe."
Following U.S. vows to "stand up for Ukraine"--including by sending combat troops and sanctioning Moscow--in the event of Russian aggression, Putin said during a press conference with Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis that "Russia has a peaceful foreign policy, but has the right to defend its security," according to Agence France-Presse.
The remarks were Putin's first in public since he and U.S. President Joe Biden met during a two-hour virtual summit on Tuesday. U.S. leaders are alarmed by Russia's concentration of troops within striking distance of eastern Ukraine, where pro-Moscow separatists have been fighting government forces since 2014.
Putin is seeking a guarantee that NATO will not expand further eastward, as it has done nine times since 1999. He called NATO enlargement a "very sensitive" issue for his country and "one of the key questions in preserving Russia's security," while citing the Biden administration's "open door" policy of potential membership for Ukraine and Georgia--both of which border Russia and were former Soviet republics--as cause for alarm.
"We cannot but be concerned about the prospect of Ukraine's possible admission to NATO," Putin said, "because this will undoubtedly be followed by the deployment of appropriate military contingents, bases, and weapons that threaten us."
Russian troops invaded Georgia--home to pro-Moscow separatist enclaves--in 2008, and Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula, which Russia subsequently annexed with the support of a majority of the local population, in 2014. Crimea was previously part of Russia from 1783 to 1954.
Biden followed Putin's remarks by saying that "the idea that the United States is going to unilaterally use force to confront Russia invading Ukraine is not... in the cards right now," according to Defense One.
Appearing on Democracy Now! Wednesday, Katrina vanden Heuvel, editorial director and publisher of The Nation, said that "this escalation is not new."
"We have a one-sided narrative in this country, which is a problem because we haven't followed the growing mass of NATO troops on... Russia's border," she explained. "The escalation is neither in the United States' national interest nor security interest at a time when politics, [a] political solution, [a] diplomatic solution, is the only way forward."
"History matters," vanden Heuvel asserted. "In 1990, Gorbachev presided over the reunification of Germany and [then-U.S. Secretary of State] James Baker promised... NATO would not expand one inch eastward. That promise, which is documented in the National Security Archive, in [former Secretary of State] Condi Rice's book, in other materials, was violated. I think that is the original sin of what we witnessed today."
NATO--formed in 1949 as a mutual defense pact against the Soviet Union--has long been condemned as a provocative anachronism in the post-Cold War era, with many critics arguing that the trans-Atlantic alliance should be dissolved.
Instead, NATO has steadily expanded eastward and currently counts 10 former Soviet or Warsaw Pact nations as members. NATO's eastern boundary is now less than 100 miles from St. Petersburg, Russia's second-largest city.
Writing for Responsible Statecraft Tuesday, Worcester State University professor Joseph Preston Baratta urged U.S. leaders to "recognize our own provocations and aggressions" and to "make an effort to understand Russia."
"We can see Russia as a partner rather than an adversary in Eastern Europe," he said. "We can ask for a 'generous act' on the part of European leaders, like bringing Russia back into the Group of Eight, rather than continuing to hurt her people by sanctions."
When Democracy Now! host Amy Goodman mentioned the House of Representatives' approval Tuesday of a $778 billion U.S. military budget--more than the next 10 countries combined--vanden Heuvel called the development "such a tragedy."
"We have seen a revival of this national security strategy where we have made Russia and China the grave enemies," she said. "They are not going to be friends but mutual interests demand a working partnership."
Vanden Heuvel stressed that the U.S. "must wake up and understand... that we need to sort out a relationship with Russia."
She said that means recognizing that policies and actions like Biden's Summit for Democracy--which is taking place this week and has angered Beijing and Moscow--are provocations that have "a kind of Cold War feel."
"But the one-sided coverage, and it is not even commentary, in the U.S. media about U.S.-Russia, is I think debilitating and dangerous for our security and thinking," vanden Heuvel added.
As Russian President Vladimir Putin responded Wednesday to NATO provocations along his nation's western frontier by warning that his country reserves the right to defend itself, peace advocates stressed the need for U.S. self-awareness and restraint in order to avoid a "new Cold War."
"We can see Russia as a partner rather than an adversary in Eastern Europe."
Following U.S. vows to "stand up for Ukraine"--including by sending combat troops and sanctioning Moscow--in the event of Russian aggression, Putin said during a press conference with Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis that "Russia has a peaceful foreign policy, but has the right to defend its security," according to Agence France-Presse.
The remarks were Putin's first in public since he and U.S. President Joe Biden met during a two-hour virtual summit on Tuesday. U.S. leaders are alarmed by Russia's concentration of troops within striking distance of eastern Ukraine, where pro-Moscow separatists have been fighting government forces since 2014.
Putin is seeking a guarantee that NATO will not expand further eastward, as it has done nine times since 1999. He called NATO enlargement a "very sensitive" issue for his country and "one of the key questions in preserving Russia's security," while citing the Biden administration's "open door" policy of potential membership for Ukraine and Georgia--both of which border Russia and were former Soviet republics--as cause for alarm.
"We cannot but be concerned about the prospect of Ukraine's possible admission to NATO," Putin said, "because this will undoubtedly be followed by the deployment of appropriate military contingents, bases, and weapons that threaten us."
Russian troops invaded Georgia--home to pro-Moscow separatist enclaves--in 2008, and Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula, which Russia subsequently annexed with the support of a majority of the local population, in 2014. Crimea was previously part of Russia from 1783 to 1954.
Biden followed Putin's remarks by saying that "the idea that the United States is going to unilaterally use force to confront Russia invading Ukraine is not... in the cards right now," according to Defense One.
Appearing on Democracy Now! Wednesday, Katrina vanden Heuvel, editorial director and publisher of The Nation, said that "this escalation is not new."
"We have a one-sided narrative in this country, which is a problem because we haven't followed the growing mass of NATO troops on... Russia's border," she explained. "The escalation is neither in the United States' national interest nor security interest at a time when politics, [a] political solution, [a] diplomatic solution, is the only way forward."
"History matters," vanden Heuvel asserted. "In 1990, Gorbachev presided over the reunification of Germany and [then-U.S. Secretary of State] James Baker promised... NATO would not expand one inch eastward. That promise, which is documented in the National Security Archive, in [former Secretary of State] Condi Rice's book, in other materials, was violated. I think that is the original sin of what we witnessed today."
NATO--formed in 1949 as a mutual defense pact against the Soviet Union--has long been condemned as a provocative anachronism in the post-Cold War era, with many critics arguing that the trans-Atlantic alliance should be dissolved.
Instead, NATO has steadily expanded eastward and currently counts 10 former Soviet or Warsaw Pact nations as members. NATO's eastern boundary is now less than 100 miles from St. Petersburg, Russia's second-largest city.
Writing for Responsible Statecraft Tuesday, Worcester State University professor Joseph Preston Baratta urged U.S. leaders to "recognize our own provocations and aggressions" and to "make an effort to understand Russia."
"We can see Russia as a partner rather than an adversary in Eastern Europe," he said. "We can ask for a 'generous act' on the part of European leaders, like bringing Russia back into the Group of Eight, rather than continuing to hurt her people by sanctions."
When Democracy Now! host Amy Goodman mentioned the House of Representatives' approval Tuesday of a $778 billion U.S. military budget--more than the next 10 countries combined--vanden Heuvel called the development "such a tragedy."
"We have seen a revival of this national security strategy where we have made Russia and China the grave enemies," she said. "They are not going to be friends but mutual interests demand a working partnership."
Vanden Heuvel stressed that the U.S. "must wake up and understand... that we need to sort out a relationship with Russia."
She said that means recognizing that policies and actions like Biden's Summit for Democracy--which is taking place this week and has angered Beijing and Moscow--are provocations that have "a kind of Cold War feel."
"But the one-sided coverage, and it is not even commentary, in the U.S. media about U.S.-Russia, is I think debilitating and dangerous for our security and thinking," vanden Heuvel added.